0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I don't like it, people have enough cap already. I would be more in favour of something like if you sign a player in free agency that plays on your team in real life then you get a discount of say 10%. Makes teams stick to their own players and keeps the feel of real life teams still in it.
I don't like it, people have enough cap already. ...
How is the discount only valid for 1 season....?
Do you tag new FP's each season then...?
And why over 27 years old? Seems a little off.... That means the likes of Crosby & Stamkos couldn't be FP's ... And I'm pretty sure both more than qualify for the tag of a team's "Franchise Player"
...Let's see... Maybe I'll choose my Franchise Player as either:Mark Streit, Pascal Dupuis, Kyle Quincy, or Vernon Fiddler.Wow, that's a stunning crop of "Franchise" players to choose from!
And as Drew said, you could sign some 28 year old player, and assign the FP tag to get a discount on him. Seems odd.
...this might also limit major trades involving top end talent moving teams. Not suggesting GM's trade Stamkos' and Crosby's every month, but it would certainly put a damper on some trades if there were 2 good players on every team that could not be traded.
Maybe a "Franchise" tag on a younger player or even prospect, would make more sense, and give him a greatly reduced contract.
So if you had a 1st-10th overall draft pick as an up and comer, you wouldn't have to pay 2.5-3m in salary to him if you assigned the FP tag. Maybe just 1m or something like that.But he wouldn't be able to be traded for his entire 3 year ELC (or longer).
I like the Franchise tag idea. Also, in the 3 years this league has been running, I have managed to diversify my roster by trading Maple Leaf players. The less the better for me.
i'm proposing that Franchise NHL incorporate a new rule to give this league a little identity, unique to this league & related to the name "Franchise". This is the discussion thread to generate awareness, discussion + to vet the rule.