Author Topic: Scoring Categories  (Read 17965 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #30 on: September 14, 2009, 02:47:59 PM »
BTW, there was a reason why roto was used this year.  H2H in Fantrax requires that no division have two more teams than any other division.  The NL Central and AL West throw this balance off.  They are not sure if this will be fixed for next year, so we may have to stick with roto yet again or find another provider.  I still think Fantrax is the best out there for this league.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #31 on: September 14, 2009, 11:56:32 PM »
BTW, there was a reason why roto was used this year.  H2H in Fantrax requires that no division have two more teams than any other division.  The NL Central and AL West throw this balance off.  They are not sure if this will be fixed for next year, so we may have to stick with roto yet again or find another provider.  I still think Fantrax is the best out there for this league.

That would be a shame if they can't fix it, but you would think it's a simple thing somewhere in their code that sets the maximum difference... just increase it.  Obviously it must me more complicated than that.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #32 on: September 19, 2009, 02:06:38 PM »
BTW, Fantrax emailed me that they overhauled their H2H setup for football and all other sports.  The only question remaining is the divisional setup.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #33 on: October 15, 2009, 09:47:31 PM »
We should have a minimum and maximum setting for plate appearances and innings pitched.   I'll make the request to Fantrax for 2010.  I would like to see the following categories...

BATTING: RC, AVG, OBP, SLUG
FIELDING: RF, FLD%
PITCHING: K/BB, FIP, NS2, QS

I personally would like to finalize these before bidding on FA's, especially things like whether or not we'll include NS2 (does a RP's role matter or not?).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #34 on: October 16, 2009, 09:05:39 AM »
I personally would like to finalize these before bidding on FA's, especially things like whether or not we'll include NS2 (does a RP's role matter or not?).

The intention of this game was to measure individual players' success independent of their teammates.  With that said, QS and NS2 cannot be considered.  I am thinking of two more metrics though...

Win Shares - Ranges from 0 to 1 over 9 innings
Runs Allowed - Opposite of Runs Created for pitchers
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #35 on: October 16, 2009, 10:46:54 AM »
BTW, we could do H2H next year, but it will be without divisions.  I can manually set the playoffs per the division leaders and wildcard teams of each league.  Bringing H2H into the game will make it more interesting.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

lp815

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #36 on: October 16, 2009, 03:10:04 PM »
BTW, we could do H2H next year, but it will be without divisions.  I can manually set the playoffs per the division leaders and wildcard teams of each league.  Bringing H2H into the game will make it more interesting.

I don't know if I would put a vote of confidence in H2H, unless it did have divisions.  I've got a couple reasons, but they are mostly just personal preferences, so I won't state them unless I can think of a good way to make them solid points.  But I do know that I would really like to keep divisions, and if H2H requires a loss of divisions, it will take some convincing for me to support it.  I won't say no outright, but taking away divisions would really detract from the feel of an MLB league, in my opinion.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #37 on: October 16, 2009, 03:13:10 PM »
Logging into Fantax and seeing my Pirates at the bottom of the NL Central made it feel more real. :toast:  H2H would lose the visual aspect of seeing the divisions, but the division winners would be selected by looking for each division's top team in the overall standings.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

lp815

  • Guest
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #38 on: October 16, 2009, 03:16:24 PM »
Well, if we were to use H2H without divisions, I would like to see a weekly schedule that puts emphasis on divisional play.  For instance, in the Angels case, more matchups against real life divisional opponents (A's, Rangers, Mariners).  And maybe on the forum we can have weekly updates, with divisions branched out.  Thoughts?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Scoring Categories
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2009, 03:25:44 PM »
Well, if we were to use H2H without divisions, I would like to see a weekly schedule that puts emphasis on divisional play.  For instance, in the Angels case, more matchups against real life divisional opponents (A's, Rangers, Mariners).  And maybe on the forum we can have weekly updates, with divisions branched out.  Thoughts?

I could construct a spreadsheet to transform the overall H2H standings into a divisional layout with GB listed.  It's too much work to calculate the divisional W-L record.  A custom schedule can easily be made to put more emphasis on divisional play.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Both you and @TheGoat. I hope yall enjoyed your trip. Got to take in the lights and sounds. Cuz im due and im coming to collect. See you in September.
    Yesterday at 08:50:11 PM
  • Braves155: Will be around for talks tonight
    Yesterday at 08:50:16 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill see you in September but I will look forward to still being around late December
    Yesterday at 08:51:51 PM
  • Braves155: Just settling in now, about to cook some dinner
    Yesterday at 08:52:05 PM
  • Daddy: @Braves tries harder than anyone. Never afraid to take risks, never afraid to negotiate. Probably too easy going IMO. Talk about effort.. you talking @Braves155
    Yesterday at 08:52:22 PM
  • Daddy: Any league i run you have a seat at the table if you want one.
    Yesterday at 08:53:09 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: braves and i have made some good trades in past
    Yesterday at 08:53:51 PM
  • Braves155: Daddy - Countless teams have inquired about Pacheco. I like the idea of building around him and the eventual 1.1 pick
    Yesterday at 08:54:33 PM
  • Braves155: My D is coming together as well with some nice young pieces
    Yesterday at 08:55:01 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: lmaooo i think i did ask abt him too braves
    Yesterday at 08:55:13 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i totally understand u wanting to build w him
    Yesterday at 08:55:32 PM
  • Daddy: Do YOUR thing @Braves, im a huge fan. It took Brian 12 years to become competitive. But man does Brian try hard.
    Yesterday at 08:55:57 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I was one of them that inquired as well before I moved my 3 first
    Yesterday at 08:56:55 PM
  • Daddy: Effort > Talent
    Yesterday at 08:57:07 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: some reason i am able to turn things in 1-2 yrs
    Yesterday at 08:58:28 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i guess its my dilligence and patience
    Yesterday at 08:58:43 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah I just sold my first year when taking over as I didnt have the roster. After my first season I ended up with 3 of the top 8 picks. Lots of luck and trades to be where I am going into year 3
    Yesterday at 09:00:06 PM
  • Braves155: IN NFL LIVE a player with any type role on a team can contribute & add value. After the 1st week of FA look at the FA wire...there will only be scraps
    Yesterday at 09:09:26 PM
  • Braves155: I also think this is a top-heavy, but deep Draft.
    Yesterday at 09:10:21 PM
  • Daddy: Big NFL LIVE trade. Who is sleeping? While you slept Brian has gone out and made a power move.
    Yesterday at 09:51:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nice move to recpoup
    Yesterday at 10:18:36 PM
  • Rhino7: @Daddy, thanks for what you said lol. It was the ultimate challenge to beat JWalkerjr88 last season, I wanted my path to go through him so it makes my title run that much better! I just wanted to get to the SB and figured at that point anything can happen and lucky for me, my boys had enough left to take out BAB. Live is the most challenging league I’m in and most fun, so thanks for what you all do to make it that way.
    Yesterday at 10:28:58 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Rhino that was a pretty close final too i think
    Yesterday at 10:41:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: eitrher than or i had somekey players not perfoem well at all regardless great win by u
    Yesterday at 10:43:31 PM
  • Rhino7: Appreciate it, your team is solid. I expect to see you make another run
    Yesterday at 10:46:37 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You did well Rhino. I appreciate the battle. The loss didnt sting more because i was undefeated, i know fully that being undefeated in the reg season doesnt mean anything in the playoffs. When rhino and i played this past season, the better team won.
    Yesterday at 10:58:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This next year im coming full force. So far my pattern is win a chip every other year. Lets keep the streak going!!
    Yesterday at 10:58:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: im coming back too
    Yesterday at 11:02:00 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: lets see if my team performs like last yr
    Yesterday at 11:02:10 PM
  • Daddy: Well.. if im undefeated heading into the NFC Title game & I lose. I may beat up my neighbor. I dont like that guy anyway.
    Yesterday at 11:07:13 PM
  • Daddy: I hate losing. Especially when its the biggest moments. I hate my teams i root for to lose. I really hate for the teams i built myself to lose.
    Yesterday at 11:08:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I dont like losing ever. But a loss is a loss. Im pissed either way
    Yesterday at 11:09:47 PM
  • Braves155: Are you also a perfectionist in your everyday life?
    Yesterday at 11:10:05 PM
  • Daddy: Im not a perfectionist in my dynasty life. I make all kinds of bad trades and make all kinds of mistakes.
    Yesterday at 11:10:51 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If i traded all my picks to a division rival in a rebuild and he beat me in the title game with Desmond ridder or lose undefeated. Its all a loss at the end of the day
    Yesterday at 11:11:08 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody is right all the time. Its the beauty of sports.
    Yesterday at 11:11:13 PM
  • Daddy: Beat me with Desmond Ridder and i trade for Desmond Ridder.
    Yesterday at 11:11:54 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You playing chess not checkers lol
    Yesterday at 11:13:04 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Rhino beat me with goff and then traded goff
    Yesterday at 11:13:44 PM
  • Daddy: It helps to know sports but ive signed guys ive never heard of like SP Dallas Kuechel. Nobody knew who he was. I saw he earned a spot. I took a chance. A couple years later the dude wins the Cy Young.
    Yesterday at 11:14:05 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: 3 out of the 4 starting QBs in the title games have been traded this offseason
    Yesterday at 11:14:21 PM
  • Daddy: I think i had him on a prospect deal.
    Yesterday at 11:14:22 PM
  • Daddy: It helps just to fill up your roster and sign good contracts. If you dont know crap but keep a full roster and manage finances, you will kick ass.
    Yesterday at 11:15:26 PM
  • Daddy: I wasnt a genius signing Kuechel. I was just filling an empty spot. I got rewarded with the best pitcher in baseball for a few seasons.
    Yesterday at 11:16:59 PM
  • Braves155: I love it when one of your Dynasty teams you've been rebuilding starts showing up and being competitive early in the season. Especially in baseball
    Yesterday at 11:19:42 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I'm decent at building, but I need to get better st winning.  I did win an offsite 32-team football league, it only took me 1.5 season to rebuild and win.
    Yesterday at 11:25:50 PM
  • Daddy: Thats what you should be doing @Brent. LIVE sharpens those skills so you can go elsewhere and dominate unsuspecting leagues.
    Today at 12:01:29 AM
  • Daddy: I use the same screen name on every site. So the sites I'm visiting/competing, know who is putting foots to them.
    Today at 12:02:47 AM
  • Daddy: And they know where they can find me. Along with the growing list of LIVE GMs who would put more foots to them.
    Today at 12:03:48 AM
  • Daddy: If "Daddy" appears on your site. He wears a size 13 and you know it.
    Today at 12:04:44 AM