* NBA Front Office

Blank 
Denver Nuggets Minnesota Timberwolves Oklahoma City Thunder Portland Trailblazers Utah Jazz :: Boston Celtics Brooklyn Nets New York Knicks Philadelphia 76ers Toronto Raptors 
Golden State Warriors Los Angeles Clippers Los Angeles Lakers Phoenix Suns Sacramento Kings :: Chicago Bulls Cleveland Cavaliers Detroit Pistons Indiana Pacers Milwaukee Bucks 
Dallas Mavericks Houston Rockets Memphis Grizzlies New Orleans Pelicans San Antonio Spurs :: Atlanta Hawks Charlotte Hornets2 Miami Heat Orlando Magic Washington Wizards 
Blank

Author Topic: Two teams per person?  (Read 976 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 9108
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • :Euskaltel:
    • View Profile
Two teams per person?
« on: May 02, 2012, 08:12:22 AM »
Because of this league's complexity, it's very well possible that we don't find 30 dedicated people with decent CBA knowledge and the right attitude. (The latter includes forgiveness towards fixing mathematical blunders on the go, as well as genuine interest in learning how contracts can be constructed under the Gilbert Arenas rule.)

More importantly, we really need all participants to be responsible for their franchise's future in the long term, especially in case of teams under the salary cap. Let me explain based on an example: whoever gets the Bobcats or the Hornets must embrace the rebuilding process by investing in young players, wisely using his draft picks for a year or two, and then slowly improving in season 2 or 3 (OKC too were the worst team in this league once, y'know). The worst thing that could happen to our game is some win-oriented kid with little respect for how the NBA really functions, who starts off by overpaying a couple of aging losers and then quits after a month, while complaining about Kemba's struggles in the +/- category.

Going further, since the league will focus strongly on contract construction and such, it's very possible that managing teams like the Lakers or the Bulls - with their rotations fixed and their salaries just under the hard cap - will be less exciting (and surely less time-consuming).

All this leads me to a conclusion that maybe it makes sense to have two teams assigned to every GM: one in each conference. Preferably, one would contend and the other in the middle of a painful rebuilding, so that you can enjoy the ins & outs of both processes. Practical changes would include the yearly fee rising to $4, and of course transfer ban between your two franchises.

Thoughts?

Offline Ayden

Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2012, 09:15:39 AM »
I like it
Check out www.sportcodex.com

The future of sports social networking!

Offline DeanO22

  • MVP
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2302
  • Bonus inPoints: 36
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :PHX:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :MichiganState:
    • :ACM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2012, 10:41:30 AM »
I am ok with it too.  How would we decide on the 2 teams?  I am fine with a team given to me instead of choosing both.

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 9108
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • :Euskaltel:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2012, 10:52:51 AM »
How would we decide on the 2 teams?

That's kinda secondary :)
  • Let's see if people like the idea.
  • Let's see if I have more than 15 applications. In that case I'll have the luxury of preparing the Collective Bargaining Agreement Knowledge Test of Doom, CBAKToD (TM), to directly eliminate people who don't know absolutely anything and don't care enough to look it up.
  • Let's discuss together who gets what. Shouldn't be difficult. First all the die-hards get their home team. Then you look at the other conference and name a couple of teams that you like (either like per se, or like the challenge of their salary situation). Then we try to make everybody as happy as possible :)

Offline CRS245

  • *Senior Staff
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 30412
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a beer
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2012, 11:02:02 AM »
Outsider's view - I like that idea Garfield.

Offline NickF

  • MVP
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3969
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :ATL:
    • :CAR:
    • :CHA:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :UNC:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2012, 01:26:44 PM »
i like this idea... we will have to have a good trade committee to make sure nobody takes advantage of having 2 teams.

Offline RenoDelft

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 1482
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NYY:
    • :SFO:
    • :SA:
    • :MON-NHL:
    • :UCLA:
    • :OL:
    • :AG2R:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2012, 05:29:22 AM »
I will follow the other managers.
Concern could indeed be trades between those teams having the same manager.....

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 9108
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • :Euskaltel:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2012, 05:32:36 AM »
Don't worry guys, like I wrote above: trades between your two franchises are forbidden. Trading with only 28 other teams should be realistic enough! :)

Offline IndianaBuc

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 1709
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NYY:
    • :TAM:
    • :OKC:
    • :Blank:
    • :Nebraska:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2012, 09:37:37 PM »
Sounds good to me,I like the idea of diehard team and challange team.

Offline Orange Country

  • MVP
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 14012
  • Bonus inPoints: 1281
    • :ATL:
    • :TEN:
    • :MEM:
    • :NAS:
    • :Tennessee:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2012, 10:57:09 PM »
I don't see any issue with each GM taking 2 teams.

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
New England Patriots QB last name:
Who won the 2015 mens NCAA basketball championship (school name only):

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • janesvilleaces: and a fumble.... can't win playing like this. Will root for ATL in superbowl
    Yesterday at 04:51:51 PM
  • indiansnation: Holly crap billy is alive
    Yesterday at 05:00:05 PM
  • indiansnation: Didnt think atlanta had a chance
    Yesterday at 05:01:03 PM
  • janesvilleaces: gb is moving the ball..just killing themselves and the defense looks like they have never seen a football field before
    Yesterday at 05:02:16 PM
  • Jonathan: ATL would of been 10 loss without Ryan.
    Yesterday at 05:02:16 PM
  • Jonathan: That is why he makes 23M per year
    Yesterday at 05:03:30 PM
  • indiansnation: Wow gb looks lost
    Yesterday at 05:09:22 PM
  • Jonathan: Troy Aikman hasn't said "doing your job" yet, clearly tipped off to gambling odds. Phil Simms won't let us down later with "We talked About"
    Yesterday at 05:23:54 PM
  • cheesesteak: I have a man-crush. His name is Julio Jones.
    Yesterday at 05:37:52 PM
  • janesvilleaces: queer
    Yesterday at 05:39:48 PM
  • janesvilleaces: congrats to the falcons. Clearly better team
    Yesterday at 05:58:14 PM
  • indiansnation: Congrats atlanta and way to go greenbay u choked big time
    Yesterday at 06:00:20 PM
  • janesvilleaces: indians.. huch and go root for your browns
    Yesterday at 06:03:20 PM
  • janesvilleaces: i guess we could say green bay is pulling a buckeye...
    Yesterday at 06:04:00 PM
  • indiansnation: Janes sorry but greenbay looks like crap
    Yesterday at 06:06:03 PM
  • janesvilleaces: agreed
    Yesterday at 06:06:28 PM
  • janesvilleaces: delay of game on the kickoff...geez
    Yesterday at 06:14:19 PM
  • BHows: WTH- Mets holding up the WCBII draft?
    Yesterday at 06:28:36 PM
  • kidd5jersey: GB sucks lol
    Yesterday at 06:33:00 PM
  • Jonathan: Football pundits are going to get whiplash jumping off Aaron Rodgers bandwagon and onto Matt Ryan Express.
    Yesterday at 06:39:41 PM
  • janesvilleaces: who is your team kidd
    Yesterday at 06:40:28 PM
  • janesvilleaces: he was on all day
    Yesterday at 06:40:44 PM
  • janesvilleaces: your up bhows
    Yesterday at 06:43:49 PM
  • Mets Donations Accepted: Sorry bhows life called had to take a break for a couple hours
    Yesterday at 07:13:14 PM
  • janesvilleaces: no excuse
    Yesterday at 07:13:32 PM
  • Mets Donations Accepted: Yeah I know janes....draft definitely comes before my kids lol
    Yesterday at 07:14:38 PM
  • Jonathan: Joe Buck drops the "fog" travel excuse to help explain Packers spineless performance.
    Yesterday at 07:22:43 PM
  • Daddy: Wow man I just saw this...
    Yesterday at 07:44:29 PM
  • Daddy: "The Kansas City Royals regretfully announce the passing of Yordano Ventura, who perished in a car accident last night in the Dominican Republic," the Kansas City Royals said in a statement, adding that no further details were available regarding the accident that claimed Ventura's life."
    Yesterday at 07:44:42 PM
  • Daddy: RIP and prayers to his family.
    Yesterday at 07:47:23 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy i guess where he was at they dont have very good roads sign there. He was going and someone just git him from side and it killed him instently
    Yesterday at 08:09:01 PM
  • Jonathan: Phil Simms drops "They talked about with us" at 9 minute mark of first quarter!
    Yesterday at 08:58:11 PM
  • janesvilleaces: so Brady fumbles clearly but they dont overturn it.... a bs defenseless reciever call... pittsburgh stands no chance..the fix is in
    Yesterday at 09:33:30 PM
  • janesvilleaces: nobody wants to see pittsburgh atlanta super bowl
    Yesterday at 09:33:52 PM
  • Eric: Nobody wants to see NE
    Yesterday at 09:35:21 PM
  • janesvilleaces: apparently the nfl does
    Yesterday at 09:36:50 PM
  • Eric: Cause the NFL love Brady, even tho it doesnt seem like it they do. The NFL took a huge step back IMO this year
    Yesterday at 09:37:26 PM
  • Eric: Clowney should have NEVER got fined for taking Brady down
    Yesterday at 09:37:42 PM
  • janesvilleaces: they should put flags on the receivers and qb cause if thye get touched its a flag
    Yesterday at 09:39:14 PM
  • janesvilleaces: receivers can push off all day though and its cool
    Yesterday at 09:39:31 PM
  • Eric: NFL really has become the No Fun League
    Yesterday at 09:43:59 PM
  • Eric: this year has just put a sour taste in my mouth
    Yesterday at 09:44:25 PM
  • Jonathan: Funny it ends up being the 2 that are likely to decide the MVP in regular season.
    Yesterday at 10:12:03 PM
  • BHows: Go Falcons!
    Yesterday at 10:46:18 PM
  • CRS245: ugh
    Yesterday at 10:46:52 PM
  • janesvilleaces: yet another year i won't be watching the superbowl
    Yesterday at 10:47:48 PM
  • BHows: Sorry Colby, Cincy fan here!
    Yesterday at 10:49:49 PM
  • indiansnation: I so hate patriots. I hope atlanta crushes them
    Yesterday at 11:12:27 PM
  • chrisetc21: should be a good game
    Today at 12:49:55 AM
  • nottathedaddy: Baltimore is up in WBCII
    Today at 12:55:18 AM