* NBA Front Office

Blank 
Denver Nuggets Minnesota Timberwolves Oklahoma City Thunder Portland Trailblazers Utah Jazz :: Boston Celtics Brooklyn Nets New York Knicks PHI-NBA Toronto Raptors 
Golden State Warriors Los Angeles Clippers Los Angeles Lakers Phoenix Suns Sacramento Kings :: Chicago Bulls Cleveland Cavaliers Detroit Pistons Indiana Pacers Milwaukee Bucks 
Dallas Mavericks Houston Rockets Memphis Grizzlies New Orleans Pelicans San Antonio Spurs :: Atlanta Hawks Charlotte Hornets2 Miami Heat Orlando Magic Washington Wizards 
Blank

Author Topic: Two teams per person?  (Read 1290 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 10328
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 4
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • View Profile
Two teams per person?
« on: May 02, 2012, 08:12:22 AM »
Because of this league's complexity, it's very well possible that we don't find 30 dedicated people with decent CBA knowledge and the right attitude. (The latter includes forgiveness towards fixing mathematical blunders on the go, as well as genuine interest in learning how contracts can be constructed under the Gilbert Arenas rule.)

More importantly, we really need all participants to be responsible for their franchise's future in the long term, especially in case of teams under the salary cap. Let me explain based on an example: whoever gets the Bobcats or the Hornets must embrace the rebuilding process by investing in young players, wisely using his draft picks for a year or two, and then slowly improving in season 2 or 3 (OKC too were the worst team in this league once, y'know). The worst thing that could happen to our game is some win-oriented kid with little respect for how the NBA really functions, who starts off by overpaying a couple of aging losers and then quits after a month, while complaining about Kemba's struggles in the +/- category.

Going further, since the league will focus strongly on contract construction and such, it's very possible that managing teams like the Lakers or the Bulls - with their rotations fixed and their salaries just under the hard cap - will be less exciting (and surely less time-consuming).

All this leads me to a conclusion that maybe it makes sense to have two teams assigned to every GM: one in each conference. Preferably, one would contend and the other in the middle of a painful rebuilding, so that you can enjoy the ins & outs of both processes. Practical changes would include the yearly fee rising to $4, and of course transfer ban between your two franchises.

Thoughts?

Offline Ayden

  • All-Star
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 986
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :PIT:
    • :TAM:
    • :NOR:
    • :ANA:
    • :Oregon:
    • :Portugal:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2012, 09:15:39 AM »
I like it
Check out www.sportcodex.com

The future of sports social networking!

Offline DeanO22

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2368
  • Bonus inPoints: 36
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :PHX:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :MichiganState:
    • :ACM:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2012, 10:41:30 AM »
I am ok with it too.  How would we decide on the 2 teams?  I am fine with a team given to me instead of choosing both.

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 10328
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 4
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2012, 10:52:51 AM »
How would we decide on the 2 teams?

That's kinda secondary :)
  • Let's see if people like the idea.
  • Let's see if I have more than 15 applications. In that case I'll have the luxury of preparing the Collective Bargaining Agreement Knowledge Test of Doom, CBAKToD (TM), to directly eliminate people who don't know absolutely anything and don't care enough to look it up.
  • Let's discuss together who gets what. Shouldn't be difficult. First all the die-hards get their home team. Then you look at the other conference and name a couple of teams that you like (either like per se, or like the challenge of their salary situation). Then we try to make everybody as happy as possible :)

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 30419
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
  • Fantasy Prestige 57
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a beer
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2012, 11:02:02 AM »
Outsider's view - I like that idea Garfield.
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline NickF

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3988
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :ATL:
    • :CAR:
    • :CHA:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :UNC:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2012, 01:26:44 PM »
i like this idea... we will have to have a good trade committee to make sure nobody takes advantage of having 2 teams.

Offline RenoDelft

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 1482
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :NYY:
    • :SFO:
    • :SA:
    • :MON-NHL:
    • :UCLA:
    • :OL:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2012, 05:29:22 AM »
I will follow the other managers.
Concern could indeed be trades between those teams having the same manager.....

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 10328
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 4
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2012, 05:32:36 AM »
Don't worry guys, like I wrote above: trades between your two franchises are forbidden. Trading with only 28 other teams should be realistic enough! :)

Offline IndianaBuc

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 1849
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :NYY:
    • :TAM:
    • :OKC:
    • :Blank:
    • :Nebraska:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2012, 09:37:37 PM »
Sounds good to me,I like the idea of diehard team and challange team.

Offline Orange Country

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 14128
  • Bonus inPoints: 1281
  • Fantasy Prestige -5
    • :ATL:
    • :TEN:
    • :MEM:
    • :NAS:
    • :Tennessee:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2012, 10:57:09 PM »
I don't see any issue with each GM taking 2 teams.

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
New England Patriots QB last name:
Who won the 2015 mens NCAA basketball championship (school name only):

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • blkhwkfn: Skinner is 45 in dog years
    October 14, 2017, 08:26:57 PM
  • blkhwkfn: yeah it is a huge blow for the Dodgers on paper, but this is the playoffs. Anything can happen
    October 14, 2017, 08:28:12 PM
  • Jonathan: Skinner with a goal. Guy is money.
    October 14, 2017, 08:45:59 PM
  • blkhwkfn: Ha Don Cherry didnt like McCollum calling out McDavid. I agree
    October 14, 2017, 09:11:23 PM
  • blkhwkfn: New game played in Edmonton, Where's Cam Talbot?
    October 15, 2017, 01:08:04 AM
  • blkhwkfn: Yeah there will be an early coaching change in edmonton
    October 15, 2017, 01:22:27 AM
  • kidd5jersey: Armchair- Cubs looking to move Freddie Freeman and Julio Teheran
    October 15, 2017, 12:31:56 PM
  • blkhwkfn: Rodgers! broken collar bone ouch
    October 15, 2017, 04:14:13 PM
  • blkhwkfn: big trade on the way. Montreal/Vegas. James Neal?
    October 15, 2017, 04:18:58 PM
  • janesvilleaces: Rebel nhl has a few teams available
    October 15, 2017, 05:55:11 PM
  • indiansnation: Janes pm
    October 15, 2017, 09:08:58 PM
  • janesvilleaces: Blues, Carolina,sharks and lightening.email hockey freak as he is commish
    October 16, 2017, 08:04:47 AM
  • Eric: Hey fellas
    October 16, 2017, 01:47:44 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey
    October 16, 2017, 03:01:54 PM
  • blkhwkfn: just one game blah
    October 16, 2017, 07:32:06 PM
  • Gilly: Where did old Colby go?
    October 17, 2017, 10:34:09 AM
  • indiansnation: Dont know
    October 17, 2017, 12:25:01 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: He's got to be around somewhere
    October 17, 2017, 03:15:25 PM
  • Thecliff: Colby, Colby where are you?
    October 17, 2017, 05:16:03 PM
  • Flash: Colby has assembled a ProFSL staff to attend to your needs.
    October 17, 2017, 05:30:14 PM
  • Flash: The Staff includes ejh1528, Anthony, Drew, Billy, and myself.  We communicate with Colby when there is a major issue.
    October 17, 2017, 05:31:40 PM
  • Flash: As many of you have surmised, Colby has moved to a background role, but still has the interests of the ProFSL community in the forefront.
    October 17, 2017, 05:33:23 PM
  • Flash: Use the Help Desk or PM one of the Staff members I listed when you have an issue that needs attention.
    October 17, 2017, 05:34:48 PM
  • Tubbs: Is Free Market Kings coming back?
    October 17, 2017, 08:32:33 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Considering who's asking, I think it is more of interest in Colby, not that there's a problem.
    October 17, 2017, 09:18:37 PM
  • Flash: My remarks were for process.  It’s no secret Colby is not around ProFSL these days.  His appearances on the Board are infrequent, and have been for the past few years.
    October 17, 2017, 11:50:20 PM
  • Gilly: Theres no issue Flash, I was merely just curious were he went.  Great staff you have for the site
    October 18, 2017, 11:07:30 AM
  • indiansnation: Hey gilly
    October 18, 2017, 01:03:24 PM
  • Flash: @Tubbs Don’t envision the return of the Free Market Kings
    October 18, 2017, 02:22:17 PM
  • chrisetc21: Hey Tubbs, New York available in TT :o
    October 19, 2017, 07:48:58 PM
  • indiansnation: Hockey freek i take that team
    October 19, 2017, 09:05:15 PM
  • hockeyfreak47: Done your all setup  :judge:
    October 19, 2017, 09:34:09 PM
  • Tubbs: Thanks, but I must pass.
    October 19, 2017, 09:58:53 PM
  • Tony: :EDM2:
    October 19, 2017, 10:01:42 PM
  • Tony: :EDM3:
    October 19, 2017, 10:02:01 PM
  • Jonathan: Cubs are all but done. Is it dodgers turn to finally win it? Only 30 years, but they have spent a lot for awhile now.
    October 19, 2017, 11:14:42 PM
  • blkhwkfn: 3 NLCS and a World Serries Championship.......not bad lots to be happy about in Cubs Nation
    Yesterday at 12:32:31 AM
  • blkhwkfn: Really dont understand what Ottawa is doing with Logan Brown. If you arent going to play him send him to Jrs
    Yesterday at 12:53:22 AM
  • Jonathan: Canes aren't using Necas either. We got TVR back tonight though.
    Yesterday at 01:03:28 AM
  • blkhwkfn: Silly to keep young developing players in the organ loft
    Yesterday at 01:09:13 AM
  • blkhwkfn: haha had a red player notice on fantrax, checked it out and it was a year old from last season
    Yesterday at 05:47:15 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: You can set your preferences for how long those flags stay red
    Yesterday at 06:35:34 PM
  • blkhwkfn: I know, he didnt have a flag 2 days ago. He had a 3 point game but they didnt update the news part lol
    Yesterday at 08:42:19 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Lol.  Every one in a while I find an active minor league player in baseball on the wrong team.
    Today at 02:30:33 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: It gives Fantrax character.  Ha
    Today at 02:30:48 PM
  • Jonathan: slow motion
    Today at 05:10:43 PM
  • Jonathan: :EDM: trying to hang with :PHO:
    Today at 05:16:52 PM
  • blkhwkfn: gotten some offensive action with the Coyotes and McDavid isnt awake quite yet
    Today at 07:18:09 PM
  • blkhwkfn: I am retiring from multasking Hockey business, babaysitting and watching hockey LMAO
    Today at 07:21:26 PM
  • Jonathan: Watching 2 huge guys in G with Darling/Bishop tonight. The best matchup is Slavin vs. Seguin though.
    Today at 09:12:12 PM