* NBA Front Office

Blank 
Denver Nuggets Minnesota Timberwolves Oklahoma City Thunder Portland Trailblazers Utah Jazz :: Boston Celtics Brooklyn Nets New York Knicks Philadelphia 76ers Toronto Raptors 
Golden State Warriors Los Angeles Clippers Los Angeles Lakers Phoenix Suns Sacramento Kings :: Chicago Bulls Cleveland Cavaliers Detroit Pistons Indiana Pacers Milwaukee Bucks 
Dallas Mavericks Houston Rockets Memphis Grizzlies New Orleans Pelicans San Antonio Spurs :: Atlanta Hawks Charlotte Hornets2 Miami Heat Orlando Magic Washington Wizards 
Blank

Author Topic: Two teams per person?  (Read 1244 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 9669
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 2
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • :Euskaltel:
    • View Profile
Two teams per person?
« on: May 02, 2012, 08:12:22 AM »
Because of this league's complexity, it's very well possible that we don't find 30 dedicated people with decent CBA knowledge and the right attitude. (The latter includes forgiveness towards fixing mathematical blunders on the go, as well as genuine interest in learning how contracts can be constructed under the Gilbert Arenas rule.)

More importantly, we really need all participants to be responsible for their franchise's future in the long term, especially in case of teams under the salary cap. Let me explain based on an example: whoever gets the Bobcats or the Hornets must embrace the rebuilding process by investing in young players, wisely using his draft picks for a year or two, and then slowly improving in season 2 or 3 (OKC too were the worst team in this league once, y'know). The worst thing that could happen to our game is some win-oriented kid with little respect for how the NBA really functions, who starts off by overpaying a couple of aging losers and then quits after a month, while complaining about Kemba's struggles in the +/- category.

Going further, since the league will focus strongly on contract construction and such, it's very possible that managing teams like the Lakers or the Bulls - with their rotations fixed and their salaries just under the hard cap - will be less exciting (and surely less time-consuming).

All this leads me to a conclusion that maybe it makes sense to have two teams assigned to every GM: one in each conference. Preferably, one would contend and the other in the middle of a painful rebuilding, so that you can enjoy the ins & outs of both processes. Practical changes would include the yearly fee rising to $4, and of course transfer ban between your two franchises.

Thoughts?

Offline Ayden

  • All-Star
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 986
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :PIT:
    • :TAM:
    • :NOR:
    • :ANA:
    • :Oregon:
    • :Portugal:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2012, 09:15:39 AM »
I like it
Check out www.sportcodex.com

The future of sports social networking!

Offline DeanO22

  • MVP
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2338
  • Bonus inPoints: 36
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :PHX:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :MichiganState:
    • :ACM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2012, 10:41:30 AM »
I am ok with it too.  How would we decide on the 2 teams?  I am fine with a team given to me instead of choosing both.

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 9669
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 2
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • :Euskaltel:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2012, 10:52:51 AM »
How would we decide on the 2 teams?

That's kinda secondary :)
  • Let's see if people like the idea.
  • Let's see if I have more than 15 applications. In that case I'll have the luxury of preparing the Collective Bargaining Agreement Knowledge Test of Doom, CBAKToD (TM), to directly eliminate people who don't know absolutely anything and don't care enough to look it up.
  • Let's discuss together who gets what. Shouldn't be difficult. First all the die-hards get their home team. Then you look at the other conference and name a couple of teams that you like (either like per se, or like the challenge of their salary situation). Then we try to make everybody as happy as possible :)

Offline Colby

  • MVP
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 30418
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
  • Fantasy Prestige 57
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a beer
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2012, 11:02:02 AM »
Outsider's view - I like that idea Garfield.

Offline NickF

  • MVP
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3985
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :ATL:
    • :CAR:
    • :CHA:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :UNC:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2012, 01:26:44 PM »
i like this idea... we will have to have a good trade committee to make sure nobody takes advantage of having 2 teams.

Offline RenoDelft

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 1482
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :NYY:
    • :SFO:
    • :SA:
    • :MON-NHL:
    • :UCLA:
    • :OL:
    • :AG2R:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2012, 05:29:22 AM »
I will follow the other managers.
Concern could indeed be trades between those teams having the same manager.....

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 9669
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 2
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • :Euskaltel:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2012, 05:32:36 AM »
Don't worry guys, like I wrote above: trades between your two franchises are forbidden. Trading with only 28 other teams should be realistic enough! :)

Offline IndianaBuc

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 1743
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :NYY:
    • :TAM:
    • :OKC:
    • :Blank:
    • :Nebraska:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2012, 09:37:37 PM »
Sounds good to me,I like the idea of diehard team and challange team.

Offline Orange Country

  • MVP
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 14012
  • Bonus inPoints: 1281
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :ATL:
    • :TEN:
    • :MEM:
    • :NAS:
    • :Tennessee:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Two teams per person?
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2012, 10:57:09 PM »
I don't see any issue with each GM taking 2 teams.

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
Last name of MLB all-time HR leader:
New England Patriots QB last name:

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • atgibson120: KC pick is in Jonathan
    June 21, 2017, 08:00:07 PM
  • trefilov22: Fantasy Hockey Sim League -www.pofhl.com
    June 21, 2017, 08:14:41 PM
  • Jonathan: Vegas got a kings ransom from Tampa and Isles.
    June 21, 2017, 10:15:47 PM
  • Jonathan: Minny and Winnipeg might be given a lot to prevent players taken too.
    June 21, 2017, 11:04:19 PM
  • indiansnation: crap fluery g pitts taken by las vegas
    June 21, 2017, 11:18:32 PM
  • Gr8O: Wow mcdavid just won MVP over Crosby
    June 21, 2017, 11:26:17 PM
  • indiansnation: wow thats crap
    June 21, 2017, 11:28:54 PM
  • Jonathan: Pitt had to give a future 2nd to make sure they took him. Vegas nets picks #13 and 15 this year plus a few future 2nds.
    June 21, 2017, 11:30:13 PM
  • Jonathan: Specs in Theodore, Tuch and gusev.
    June 21, 2017, 11:31:28 PM
  • indiansnation: just watching all of it know
    June 21, 2017, 11:32:40 PM
  • Gr8O: i could have even seen the goalie winning but guess mcdavid won because he is the only one over 100 points and lead in assists with 70
    June 21, 2017, 11:32:41 PM
  • indiansnation: just got home
    June 21, 2017, 11:32:54 PM
  • indiansnation: mcdavid can kiss my @@@
    June 21, 2017, 11:34:43 PM
  • Jonathan: Only Chicago has less cap space than Vegas now. They hooked Pitt up IMO. Saved that cap. Overall a decent team, but very uninspiring offense, I am sure that is the focus with 3 of top 15 picks + tuch
    June 21, 2017, 11:35:26 PM
  • indiansnation: slap in face to my boy crosby
    June 21, 2017, 11:36:09 PM
  • indiansnation: vegas is probably not done tradeing yet
    June 21, 2017, 11:37:14 PM
  • Jonathan: McDavid is only 3rd player to ever win Art Ross with part of the season as a teenager.  4th youngest to win MVP. He has had a legendary start to career and only 20.
    June 21, 2017, 11:44:37 PM
  • Jonathan: Crosby took home the Conn Smythe.... that is McDavid's next goal lol
    June 21, 2017, 11:48:28 PM
  • Jonathan: Crosby will get a shot at becoming first to win that award 3 years in a row and tie Roy for most all time. Former Pen Mario also won it back to back
    June 21, 2017, 11:51:41 PM
  • indiansnation: flluery is all excited about being drafted im happy for him. they already said heis there starting goalie
    June 22, 2017, 12:03:48 AM
  • Jonathan: Solid with G's and D. Pitt will be fine with Murray.
    June 22, 2017, 12:06:58 AM
  • snugerud: I am a pens fan and will say McDavid barring injury will surpass crosby
    June 22, 2017, 11:42:08 AM
  • snugerud: he is bigger, faster and i think with time will have the same play making ability
    June 22, 2017, 11:42:43 AM
  • GypsieDeathBringer: What does surpass mean
    June 22, 2017, 12:01:36 PM
  • GypsieDeathBringer: He probably won't win more stanley cups.  Probably won't score more points because the league is calling less and less penalties.  Won't win as many gold medals because the NHL doesn't participate.
    June 22, 2017, 12:02:15 PM
  • GypsieDeathBringer: His relative corsi will be higher though.  He'll have that going for him.
    June 22, 2017, 12:04:57 PM
  • snugerud: i mean that in a completely non scientific sense.  With the changes the NHL has gone through its difficult to compare any player from one decade to the next
    June 22, 2017, 03:54:18 PM
  • snugerud: so ya , i mean that in the way that crosby could have , but can never surpass gretzky.  I wonder if we will ever see a 200 point season again
    June 22, 2017, 03:56:40 PM
  • GypsieDeathBringer: I'm sure we will when the NHL gets sued beyond belief for not doing enough for concussions and they have to go to 4 on 4, or start calling penalties again.
    June 22, 2017, 05:12:30 PM
  • Daddy: TRUST THE PROCESS
    June 22, 2017, 08:46:59 PM
  • chrisetc21: Trust the losing
    June 22, 2017, 11:39:59 PM
  • indiansnation: Looking to move Philips in Busch league willing to add draft pick 3rd to move him
    June 22, 2017, 11:54:12 PM
  • Jonathan: Wow Chicago traded Panarin
    Yesterday at 01:46:05 PM
  • Anthony: I'm stunned
    Yesterday at 01:50:27 PM
  • hockeygoon33: Shocked he was even up as an option.
    Yesterday at 02:50:22 PM
  • dazfoster: Panarin and Hjalmarrson for lesser players and hardly saved any cap space.
    Yesterday at 02:56:36 PM
  • cho34: Stunned why chicago why
    Yesterday at 03:42:36 PM
  • Jonathan: Should of traded him to Carolina, we like Hawks lol
    Yesterday at 03:54:00 PM
  • Jonathan: Arizona making moves too
    Yesterday at 03:59:58 PM
  • Drew: Jonathan is it possible for you to send me your next 2 possible picks in TGF then I'll send you my proxy list as you pick right before me?
    Yesterday at 04:05:39 PM
  • Drew: Just trying to think of a fair way to send you my proxy
    Yesterday at 04:06:25 PM
  • Drew: I'm just going to send it and trust you haha
    Yesterday at 04:11:28 PM
  • Jonathan: I really have no idea who I am picking that far ahead. You can send it to someone not in the league and let me know who to PM when your up.
    Yesterday at 04:12:07 PM
  • Jonathan: btw your OTC, I already picked.
    Yesterday at 04:12:58 PM
  • Drew: Don't you pick in 1 pick?
    Yesterday at 04:13:36 PM
  • Jonathan: no, texans and chargers both picked today and my Jets
    Yesterday at 04:14:05 PM
  • Drew: Oh I see I only got that Chargers were OTC
    Yesterday at 04:14:38 PM
  • Drew: I'll pick now
    Yesterday at 04:14:41 PM
  • Jonathan: I'm hoping Marshall gets a shot in DC this year, I drafted him last year. Finally decided to stop punting TE.
    Yesterday at 04:18:01 PM
  • Jonathan: Blues get Schenn
    Yesterday at 10:40:17 PM