Rule Discussion - Prospect Game Number

[BeanTown]

Would that have allowed me to keep Kabanov? I had to let him go from my minors as his contract was done, but he hasn't played an NHL game yet. Just curious

[Drew]

Would that have allowed me to keep Kabanov? I had to let him go from my minors as his contract was done, but he hasn't played an NHL game yet. Just curious

No since he was a * player there was nothing you could do to keep him as waivers were closed and no experienced minor leaguers were allowed up.

[favo_zomg]

I would have to say not eligible because he is over the now 10 game threshold.

but when I signed him, he was not over the ten games... I think if tony gets his, than everyone should. No offense to you, but everyone signed their players at the time they did with no prior knowledge of this fix coming up.

[BeanTown]

No since he was a * player there was nothing you could do to keep him as waivers were closed and no experienced minor leaguers were allowed up.

K cool 

[Drew]

but when I signed him, he was not over the ten games... I think if tony gets his, than everyone should. No offense to you, but everyone signed their players at the time they did with no prior knowledge of this fix coming up.

Yes I understand that as I did as well. So do you mean that all prospects should have 1 year added to their contracts? Not just players under 10 games played?

[favo_zomg]

Yes I understand that as I did as well. So do you mean that all prospects should have 1 year added to their contracts? Not just players under 10 games played?

Yes... We all signed them under those original conditions, and I feel that those conditions should still be upheld. I feel that the new 10 game rule should only apply to prospects currently without a contract and all prospects drafted this year and all the years after. Or, if you give any prospect a one year extension, give it to all of the prospects that did not receive a 3 year extension AND any prospect signed to a 3 year extension that has yet to play 10 games. But that would be a lot of backtracking.

[Drew]

Yes... We all signed them under those original conditions, and I feel that those conditions should still be upheld. I feel that the new 10 game rule should only apply to prospects currently without a contract and all prospects drafted this year and all the years after. Or, if you give any prospect a one year extension, give it to all of the prospects that did not receive a 3 year extension AND any prospect signed to a 3 year extension that has yet to play 10 games. But that would be a lot of backtracking.

I think the easiest would be to give 1 year to every prospect contract signed or none at all, we will probably have to take a league vote on this because such players like RNH, Landeskog, Henrique, etc. would all get 1 more year which I would be opposed to.

[favo_zomg]

I think the easiest would be to give 1 year to every prospect contract signed or none at all, we will probably have to take a league vote on this because such players like RNH, Landeskog, Henrique, etc. would all get 1 more year which I would be opposed to.

I would be opposed to that as well... As I said, I think it would be better to just not give it to any prospects on any contract... Just make it viable to any prospect not signed as of yet.

[BeanTown]

I would be opposed to that as well... As I said, I think it would be better to just not give it to any prospects on any contract... Just make it viable to any prospect not signed as of yet.

  I think his is the best way..... If they aren't yet signed then ok, but already signed keep it the way it is IMO

[cho34]

I would be opposed to that as well... As I said, I think it would be better to just not give it to any prospects on any contract... Just make it viable to any prospect not signed as of yet.