* UCI WorldTour


Author Topic: Archive (as in, trash bin)  (Read 21987 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fus87

  • Veteran
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 510
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #40 on: January 09, 2012, 08:49:51 AM »
Speaking of Voecklers: Is there any point trying to sign non-WorldTour riders? After all, ProConti riders like Voeckler, Rujano or Pozzato will only have the opportunity of riding a WT event if their team is invited, making them somewhat less valuable (unless of course they perform good enough to off-set that).
It could of course make signing these riders a gamble: Do you believe in Pozzato's Paris-Roubaix abilities enough to sign him, even if he won't get you many points (or none at all) elsewhere?
Opinions on that?

I object to the flat bottom salary for keepers - I want to keep neo-pro Agostini for 19500 a year. ;)
Or rather, I object to the high level of the bottom: 100 CQ points times 500 is only 50k. Unless of course you're talking about WT points...

I see the logic behind using the WorldTour rankings, after all that's what the score in this league is calculated after. Looking at CQ only could even lead people to keep riders that score a lot in Continental races, but only little in the WorldTour (an example would be Viviani: 532 CQ points overall in 2011, but only 98 of them from WT races).
Pro: The spread in salary between top riders will be bigger.
Contra: Many riders, especially younger ones, didn't score WT points at all. And with the top riders, the WT ranking makes the problem of a rider underperforming (or being injured) and not scoring many points even bigger.
But overall, I'm not opposed to this. Using the WorldTour ranking will also make me look at these rankings for the first time in years - which just shows how irrelevant they have become.

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 13815
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #41 on: January 09, 2012, 09:33:28 AM »
Speaking of Voecklers: Is there any point trying to sign non-WorldTour riders? After all, ProConti riders like Voeckler, Rujano or Pozzato will only have the opportunity of riding a WT event if their team is invited, making them somewhat less valuable (unless of course they perform good enough to off-set that).
It could of course make signing these riders a gamble: Do you believe in Pozzato's Paris-Roubaix abilities enough to sign him, even if he won't get you many points (or none at all) elsewhere?
Opinions on that?

That's a good analysis, and for me also the reason why including them is fun, while obviously their market price won't reflect their real value. Also, you can sign a 2-year deal and hope that the guy signs with a WorldTour team next year!

I object to the flat bottom salary for keepers - I want to keep neo-pro Agostini for 19500 a year. ;)
Or rather, I object to the high level of the bottom: 100 CQ points times 500 is only 50k. Unless of course you're talking about WT points...

Yep, those were WT points. Still too low? 50 points and €100k then?

Pro: The spread in salary between top riders will be bigger.
Contra: Many riders, especially younger ones, didn't score WT points at all.

Thus the bottom limit...

But overall, I'm not opposed to this. Using the WorldTour ranking will also make me look at these rankings for the first time in years - which just shows how irrelevant they have become.

Precisely. Nobody really cares about the WorldTour ranking, and we'll use it as the scoring (as there is no other choice methinks). Thus, using it for keepers is the first step towards people actually noticing it.
Skype: stefek-burczymucha
Leagues I run: Advanced NBA, Cycling, All-Europe Football

Offline pimmen

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 288
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Ajax:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #42 on: January 09, 2012, 10:34:01 AM »
I would rather not use the WT rankings. They are skewed as hell  :o

You simply would run into too many riders that would have salaries that make no sense at all I think...But I'll leave that to you guys.

For our own soring method it's another case, and here it would ofcourse make sense to use the WT points.

About keeping riders: I would say lets put in a maximum (not an obligation) of 5 riders. I chose Vacansoleil for a reason afterall  :thumbsup:

Offline Flu

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 305
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #43 on: January 09, 2012, 10:52:32 AM »
I rarely ever look at any ranking at all, so I'm mostly leaving this discussion to those who know what they're taking about. :)

However, since the gist of the matter seems to be that no ranking perfectly translates to wage, how about something like this:
We figure out a base formula which generally gets it "close enough." Once everyone sent in their keepers, the list - with wages - gets published on the forum. Then we all get 24 or 48 hours to object/discuss certain specific cases which seem off a bit, after which we can leave it to Garfield's discretion to make some adjustments.

(agree about maximum, no obligation for keepers, by the way)

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 13815
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #44 on: January 09, 2012, 11:00:14 AM »
We figure out a base formula which generally gets it "close enough." Once everyone sent in their keepers, the list - with wages - gets published on the forum. Then we all get 24 or 48 hours to object/discuss certain specific cases which seem off a bit, after which we can leave it to Garfield's discretion to make some adjustments.

That sounds cute, but might be a bit problematic in case of guys you keep not because you like them, but because in fact you like their salary. The question is: should the latter even take place?

Anyway, we're a bunch of brothers here, so I have no doubt we'll figure it out one way or another :toast:

Re number of keepers: min 3, max 5 seems to be the prevailing opinion. I might end up fixing it at 3 for simplicity, in which case you just win your 4th and 5th guy in an auction a week later, thus again no biggie. Keep sending them in!
Skype: stefek-burczymucha
Leagues I run: Advanced NBA, Cycling, All-Europe Football

Offline Fus87

  • Veteran
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 510
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #45 on: January 09, 2012, 03:39:40 PM »
That's a good analysis, and for me also the reason why including them is fun, while obviously their market price won't reflect their real value. Also, you can sign a 2-year deal and hope that the guy signs with a WorldTour team next year!

Or that his team becomes WorldTour...
...and signs a certain Namibian after his surprise top-10 finish at the Olympics...

That sounds cute, but might be a bit problematic in case of guys you keep not because you like them, but because in fact you like their salary. The question is: should the latter even take place?

What if you're deciding to keep a yet unproven rider (therefore with a low salary), hoping that he'll break through this year? If he doesn't, you wasted a spot (and probably a lot of money) - if he does, your gamble pays off. I can see it could be a tiny bit fishy, but not so much as to forbid it.


pimmen raises a very valid point: Using the WT rankings, keeping Hesjedal or Dan Martin would be more expensive than keeping Andy Schleck... :rool:
Should whoever picks Garmin be punished for having another guy deliver big time each year?

But it also has to be said that any system will always have its problems, and weird results. We're only trying to find some way to determine the keepers' salaries, not inventing the wheel. And it's only for the first year, after that riders will be traded and auctioned (if they're free agents), right?

My suggestion would be to give Garfield dictatorial powers to decide on one system (of those proposed here) that's then used to determine the salaries for riders we choose to keep.
I think a bottom salary of 100k for riders with less than 50 WT points is OK. You have 88 and 89 riders with >50 points in the 2010 and 2011 rankings, which is roughly 5 per team (in an ideal world, where every team was equally good). That way, the smaller teams don't have to keep some riders for a salary that isn't justified.
And while using the WT points would give a winning machine like Cavendish a salary of only 99k, that also mirrors that he, as a sprinter, doesn't score that many WT points.

Of course, as pimmen said, that also shows that the WT points scale is "skewed as hell" - so maybe it shouldn't be used for point scoring either? Using the CQ ranking (taking into account only WT races) could be a better way: In the Tour de France, the top-20 in GC get WT points; but the top-50 get CQ points (with the rest also getting 20 points for finishing). And CQ also takes into account the various jerseys, and awards points for wearing the leader's jersey.
For his very good Tour, Jelle Vanendert got 34 WT points (17% points of the points for 1st place). In the CQ ranking, Vanendert got 237 CQ points (that's 39,5% points of the points for 1st place). Thomas Voeckler scored 122 WT points in the Tour (61% of the points for 1st place), but 592 CQ points (98,7% of the points for 1st place). More importantly, in the WT ranking, 110 points (90,1%) came from his 4th GC place. In the CQ ranking, only 320 points (54%) come from his overall GC position, while 200 points (33,8%) come from his 10 days in the yellow jersey - this isn't reflected in the WT ranking at all. But I don't remember Voeckler's Tour as one where he finished close to the podium, but as one where he defended his maillot jaune against all odds for 10 days. And that's how it should be reflected in the scoring system we use.
A similar point can be made about Vanendert, and it's even more obvious in the case of Samuel Sαnchez: 134 WT points, 90 of which come from his 6th place in GC; but 557 CQ points, where 180 come from the stages to Luz-Ardiden, Plateau de Beille and Alpe d'Huez, and 80 from his winning the mountain jersey (which again isn't taken into account at all in the WT ranking).

I realise I'm opening a can of worms here, but this is called the brainstorming topic for a reason.
How big was Cavendish's success at the Tour? 112 WT points compared to the winner's 200 (I'm aware Evans also got points from stages), or 565 CQ points compared to 600?
To me, it's the latter. The WT points scale puts a ridiculous high weight on GC results, which - as many riders have lamented - sometimes results in boring races. There's no need for us to aggravate that by using a stupid ranking, and not honouring stage wins (whether it's a mass sprint, an epic breakaway or a lucky finisseur), jerseys etc.
Therefore, I propose that instead of using the WT points for the keepers' salaries, we use the CQ ranking for scoring - and, by extension, for the keepers' salaries, but with a twist: Only WT results count, but with their CQ points.

Slaughter me now.

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 13815
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #46 on: January 09, 2012, 04:00:01 PM »
Therefore, I propose that instead of using the WT points for the keepers' salaries, we use the CQ ranking for scoring - and, by extension, for the keepers' salaries, but with a twist: Only WT results count, but with their CQ points.

Sounds great to me. It's only slightly less transparent (we need to extract the WT race from the overall score), but has a zillion advantages, which you have just listed brilliantly! :toast:

I will now update the rules and assign the salaries to our first keepers.

Btw warm welcome to Ag2r, our 10th team!
Skype: stefek-burczymucha
Leagues I run: Advanced NBA, Cycling, All-Europe Football

Offline Garfield

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 13815
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :PHX:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :ARS:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #47 on: January 09, 2012, 05:07:27 PM »
I will now update the rules and assign the salaries to our first keepers.

Done and done!
Skype: stefek-burczymucha
Leagues I run: Advanced NBA, Cycling, All-Europe Football

Offline Flu

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 305
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #48 on: January 09, 2012, 05:11:33 PM »
Slaughter me now.

On the contrary. I think it's a great idea.
It makes the game a lot more interesting, and puts a bit less emphasis on the top dogs. Suddenly a whole lot of riders become much more useful to have in your team - riders who may only score a few, or none, WT points in a season won't just be making up the numbers now, but will actually contribute. That gives us a few more tactical options.

 :winner:

Offline pimmen

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 288
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Ajax:
    • View Profile
Re: Brainstorming
« Reply #49 on: January 09, 2012, 05:16:35 PM »
The only thing from the rules which is not entirely clear to me is this:

"Example: If a team bids €4M for Cadel Evans, then that declares that the entire value of his contract is €3M, and they can still choose between 1 year €3M, 2 years €1.5M per, or 3 years €1M per."

In this case do you pay the €1m that is missing from the contract value as a signing fee? And Is there any reason not to choose 3 years at €1m per year over 1 year for €3m per year except maybe a possible retirement?


For the rest, thumbs up  :thumbsup:
I like the changes that have been made a lot


 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • gventura: :LAD: OTC
    March 20, 2020, 11:03:54 PM
  • Colby: Is South Korean baseball going live in a week?
    March 23, 2020, 02:06:21 PM
  • Colby: See March 28 games slated for KBO: [link]
    March 23, 2020, 02:06:32 PM
  • Colby: NHL Sim posted at The Open
    March 24, 2020, 03:34:06 PM
  • Colby: The Open is scoring here: [link]
    March 24, 2020, 03:38:14 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: :iatp:
    March 24, 2020, 06:50:21 PM
  • gventura: :TOR: OTC
    March 25, 2020, 11:21:51 PM
  • Colby: Congrats to OPEN rookie jackdaniels for being the only one to go 3 for 3 in our NHL Sim event
    March 26, 2020, 02:36:53 PM
  • Colby: New event for tomorrow :NHL: [link]
    March 26, 2020, 02:42:19 PM
  • Colby: Also, even if you're late this month to THE OPEN, get big time bonus points here: [link]
    March 26, 2020, 02:42:40 PM
  • Burkes Boys: :thumbsup::thumbsup:
    March 26, 2020, 04:11:02 PM
  • gventura: :PIT: OTC
    March 27, 2020, 03:04:31 PM
  • DMarch47: :PIT: has chosen....
    March 28, 2020, 04:00:53 PM
  • Colby: The OPEN has 1 day left of scoring with an NHL sim tomorrow
    March 30, 2020, 07:18:10 PM
  • Colby: Anyone can win $100 for this month. Tomorrow is the last day. There is 900 points available for most people... 300 in the NHL SIM event and 600 in the sponsored event.
    March 30, 2020, 07:19:33 PM
  • Colby: [link]
    March 30, 2020, 07:19:38 PM
  • gventura: :BOS: OTC
    March 31, 2020, 08:22:21 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Stay safe people
    April 03, 2020, 05:21:44 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Anyone else finding COVID-life tough?!
    April 08, 2020, 02:03:50 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: It's like running a marathon. You head keeps telling you to quit but you just have to push on.
    April 08, 2020, 02:04:51 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Can't wait for some hockey!!! :taco::taco:
    April 08, 2020, 02:05:23 PM
  • dickiedunn: :iatp: I am certainly itching to watch the end of the regular NHL season.
    April 10, 2020, 02:11:19 PM
  • indiansnation: feeling a little better. gotta stay home 14 days for my imune system to get better. hadscare of my life thought i hade virus but had pneumonia. same system as virus.
    April 11, 2020, 07:08:37 PM
  • indiansnation: scared because they werent sure if i had corona or not got tested and came back negative
    April 11, 2020, 07:10:39 PM
  • Burkes Boys: Glad to hear you're doing better Indians. Pneumonia is pretty bad but you sound like beating it. :thumbsup:
    April 12, 2020, 11:35:36 AM
  • Mordecai: Right about now I would pay to watch street hockey
    April 16, 2020, 11:38:27 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: LOL
    April 17, 2020, 02:55:47 PM
  • christof.furness: Looking for 4 owner for a new 16 team Dynasty Auction H2H cats 8x8 small buy but all money goes into the pot for prizes...exciting concept with really good owners...with 2 draft a season...on Fantrax if interested email me at christof.furness@hotmail.co.uj
    April 26, 2020, 09:10:00 AM
  • christof.furness: *[link]
    April 26, 2020, 09:10:36 AM
  • christof.furness: And I can send out a constitution
    April 26, 2020, 09:10:59 AM
  • indiansnation: Looks like baseball comeing back july
    April 29, 2020, 11:11:52 PM
  • Fitzy1962: Brian, what's going on with NFLC?
    April 30, 2020, 12:18:00 AM
  • indiansnation: Fitzy1362 pm
    April 30, 2020, 05:45:40 PM
  • indiansnation: Rumors flying around nba might not cone back this yr
    April 30, 2020, 05:46:55 PM
  • indiansnation: Owners dont want to play with out fans
    April 30, 2020, 05:48:21 PM
  • indiansnation: Lose to much money
    April 30, 2020, 05:48:33 PM
  • Daddy: Covid 19 has stalled the sports world.
    May 01, 2020, 03:11:39 AM
  • Thecliff: NASCAR to resume this month and Matt Kenseth has come out of retirement...
    May 02, 2020, 06:12:01 PM
  • Colby: UFC fights, KBO... thinking we have something to work with here
    May 06, 2020, 06:54:31 PM
  • indiansnation: So baseball is comeing back.
    May 11, 2020, 07:32:58 PM
  • indiansnation: Beggining of july. 82 games played u play your own division and u play that same division in national league
    May 11, 2020, 07:34:18 PM
  • gventura: LA just announced 3 more months, CA Gov says no sports this summer. Even if the MLBPA come to angreement with the Owners, still not convinced a July start is gonna happen. AZ cases are spiking the last couple days so the AZ/FL plan probably wont work either
    May 12, 2020, 06:13:22 PM
  • Thecliff: :judge: NASCAR TCRL Race 5 preview [link] is posted. The race will run Sunday at Darlington  :toth:
    May 15, 2020, 02:19:54 PM
  • Thecliff: :judge: NASCAR TCRL Race 5 highlights [link] is posted. Enjoy  :toth:
    May 20, 2020, 09:52:20 AM
  • Thecliff: :judge: NASCAR TCRL Race 6 preview [link] at Darlington.
    May 20, 2020, 09:53:50 AM
  • indiansnation: Looks like college football returning in fall
    May 22, 2020, 04:15:55 PM
  • indiansnation: Will have nfl type practice for 4 weeks
    May 22, 2020, 04:16:49 PM
  • Thecliff: :judge: NASCAR TCRL Race 6 highlights [link] is posted. Enjoy  :toth:
    May 23, 2020, 10:32:14 AM
  • Thecliff: :judge: NASCAR TCRL Race 7 preview [link]
    Yesterday at 09:49:28 PM
  • Milton: NRL restarts this weekend in Australia--no crowds. AFL starts 2 weeks later--again no crowds
    Today at 03:38:41 PM