### Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 3054 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### CRS245

• *Senior Staff
• MVP
• Join Date: Jan 2009
• Posts: 30263
• Bonus inPoints: 27

• Fantasy Sport:
##### Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

## Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

$f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots$

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  $x=S_t$ and $E=S_t-S_0$  then if the "output" is the Option Price ($f(x)=C(s_t)$), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}$

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that $S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2$  and $\Delta=0.8554$ , so the approximate value of the call is:

$C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2$
$C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma$

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  $\Gamma=0.02$

$36.504+50\Gamma=37.504$

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}$

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

### References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

### Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about inPoints and the Invitationals.

### Quick Profile

Did you miss your activation email?

### Chat Room

• Corey: 175 is my guess Pat
Today at 01:11:28 AM
• patjossom: This is going to be crazy finding guys. Lol
Today at 01:11:31 AM
• patjossom: Awesome!
Today at 01:11:46 AM
• Corey: control F will be very important lol
Today at 01:13:31 AM
• Scalious: How many pages we thinking. O/U 6?
Today at 01:14:18 AM
• Corey: 6 is was guess
Today at 01:14:48 AM
• Corey: This is how I love FA to be
Today at 01:15:03 AM
• Eric: evening
Today at 01:15:15 AM
• Tony: we need a new hockey league
Today at 01:16:13 AM
• patjossom: Yeah love me some capitalism!
Today at 01:16:14 AM
• Eric: yes we do tony
Today at 01:17:31 AM
• Eric: I'm bringing back throwback
Today at 01:17:54 AM
• Tony: sweet
Today at 01:18:32 AM
• Eric: we need another tho.
Today at 01:18:54 AM
• Eric: Alot of them are the same
Today at 01:19:13 AM
• Tony: You should do a 15 team league with team goalies.  I think it would work great
Today at 01:19:26 AM
• Eric: Hmmm not bad idea. pts league?
Today at 01:20:22 AM
• Eric: I'm headed to bed but pm or fb me the udea
Today at 01:21:06 AM
• Tony: depends on the theme.  NHL, make your own team name  or whatever
Today at 01:22:26 AM
• Tony: later, dont for get to pick up some razers on the way home.
Today at 01:23:04 AM
• Eric: I'll ponder it! I'm out larer
Today at 01:23:21 AM
• Eric: LOL
Today at 01:23:44 AM
• Eric: I love my beard
Today at 01:23:57 AM
• Tony:
Today at 01:27:49 AM
• sandman: Holy BooYah! this is awesome
Today at 01:30:56 AM
• Tony: Im sleepy all of a sudden.
Today at 01:31:54 AM
• atombomb3776: Can someone explain how fitzy is placing his bids in BTL?
Today at 01:34:01 AM
• atombomb3776: Check Nelly Cruz for example
Today at 01:34:30 AM
• Alex87878: fitzy is wild
Today at 01:35:08 AM
• Corey: He bid 8m
Today at 01:35:33 AM
• atombomb3776: he is bidding wrong
Today at 01:35:45 AM
• Corey: he is postimg his contract with the bid instead of after the bid
Today at 01:35:57 AM
• atombomb3776: yeah 8M for 2 years 4M per year
Today at 01:36:12 AM
• patjossom: He made some help on Rusney.
Today at 01:36:26 AM
• patjossom: I think he's confused
Today at 01:36:38 AM
• Corey: So 8m is his bid, anything over 8m beats it
Today at 01:36:50 AM
• atombomb3776: ahh nevermjnd. Brain fart my bad
Today at 01:37:37 AM
• atombomb3776: sorry its just about bedtime for me lol
Today at 01:38:03 AM
• Corey: Didn't I even post the contract thread in the FA board
Today at 01:38:28 AM
• patjossom: Yep
Today at 01:39:10 AM
• atombomb3776: Sorry wasnt paying attention. half a sleep
Today at 01:49:40 AM
• Corey: your fine atom. wasnt referencing you lol
Today at 01:52:36 AM
• atombomb3776: ok cool. this free agency is insane
Today at 01:57:27 AM
• Corey: I love it
Today at 01:59:41 AM
• Corey: OMG someone help me. Having this conversation is like pounding my head into a brick wall
Today at 02:17:06 AM
Today at 02:17:15 AM
• JMAC: he doesnt want to.comprehend it ,.thats all, let.it.go. LOL
Today at 02:18:44 AM
• Alex87878: I got yo back Corey
Today at 02:23:55 AM
• Corey: well boys im out. if you see any duplicates pm me. do not post in the thread
Today at 02:26:02 AM
• patjossom: Later
Today at 02:32:25 AM