FanDuel Promo Code $100 Money Back

Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 4302 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CRS245

  • *Senior Staff
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 30411
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
    • Buy me a beer
Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  x=S_t and E=S_t-S_0  then if the "output" is the Option Price (f(x)=C(s_t)), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2  and \Delta=0.8554 , so the approximate value of the call is:

C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2
C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  \Gamma=0.02

 36.504+50\Gamma=37.504

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
Last name of MLB all-time HR leader:
Who won the 2015 mens NCAA basketball championship (school name only):

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Yeah, you can mess up a title team, and at the time moving to STL was a good business deal. I believe the Rams won a Super Bowl there correct???
    Yesterday at 02:50:52 PM
  • Daddy: :doh:
    Yesterday at 02:51:13 PM
  • halo99: Yeah Super Bowl 34...sorry subject for me I'm from stl
    Yesterday at 02:53:40 PM
  • halo99: This guy takes it to the extreme
    Yesterday at 02:54:01 PM
  • halo99: He didn't even try to negotiate to keep the team here after getting all the benefits of the first move
    Yesterday at 02:54:51 PM
  • halo99: But hey it's a business more power to him but he's not worried ab winning
    Yesterday at 02:55:31 PM
  • halo99: See the fisher signing
    Yesterday at 02:55:44 PM
  • halo99: One of those things where u would have to live here the last few years and fully witness to understand I think
    Yesterday at 02:59:37 PM
  • halo99: At any rate go Pats lol
    Yesterday at 02:59:54 PM
  • Daddy: Now I understand the criticism.
    Yesterday at 03:14:30 PM
  • Daddy: No offense, but who the hell wouldn't take LA over STL.
    Yesterday at 03:15:36 PM
  • Daddy: There are franchises in the NFL who have been in one city for decades and generations that have never won a SB
    Yesterday at 03:16:52 PM
  • Daddy: STL managed to run 2 franchises out of the city, what does that tell you? I know what it says to me.
    Yesterday at 03:18:12 PM
  • Daddy: I've taken BooYah! s on better structures than the Edward Jones Dome.
    Yesterday at 03:19:50 PM
  • Daddy: Actually me stomach is bubbling a bit right now just thinking about it.
    Yesterday at 03:20:46 PM
  • halo99: He only left saint louis because he could double the franchise value by moving to la
    Yesterday at 03:22:01 PM
  • halo99: Stl had a stadium on the table similar to what minny did for the vikings
    Yesterday at 03:22:38 PM
  • halo99: Kronkee wouldn't even talk to the city about staying...wasn't a possibility
    Yesterday at 03:23:10 PM
  • halo99: St. Louis did screw up in letting the big red leave no doubt about that
    Yesterday at 03:23:41 PM
  • halo99: NFL bylaws said u can't leave a city just to make money
    Yesterday at 03:24:18 PM
  • halo99: Completely ignored
    Yesterday at 03:24:36 PM
  • halo99: LA can have them
    Yesterday at 03:25:08 PM
  • halo99: Honestly shouldn't have left there in the first place
    Yesterday at 03:33:55 PM
  • Jonathan: I'm hoping canes stay here.  Small markets don't keep teams long.  Quebec can have Vegas lol
    Yesterday at 03:34:57 PM
  • halo99: Yeah I hope so too. It sucks losing a team even one that's been bad for a long time like the Rams and hurricanes
    Yesterday at 03:36:37 PM
  • halo99: They're about to turn it around
    Yesterday at 03:37:12 PM
  • halo99: Unlike the fnhl canes
    Yesterday at 03:37:31 PM
  • Jonathan: We got us 1 title,  only pro team to ever win in this state.
    Yesterday at 03:38:44 PM
  • halo99: Yep that's the way I look at it for the rams
    Yesterday at 03:39:38 PM
  • Jonathan: Missed playoffs since.  Funny b/c last time they won teams like Sabres and Oilers were good.  They' re all coming around again,  few years away.
    Yesterday at 03:41:17 PM
  • halo99: yeah it shouldn't take that long to rebuild...any fan base will lose interest
    Yesterday at 03:43:42 PM
  • halo99: Look at the Hawks they couldn't draw flies prior to toews and kane
    Yesterday at 03:44:11 PM
  • halo99: Tough to justify spending money on season tickets to watch a bad product year after year
    Yesterday at 03:45:05 PM
  • Jonathan: I like less ppl at games,  that reduces the cost for the rest of us.
    Yesterday at 03:48:51 PM
  • Jonathan: But that will go away with winning.
    Yesterday at 03:49:25 PM
  • Anthony: Hawks inability to sell tickets was due to greedy ownership and high ticket prices really
    Yesterday at 03:52:01 PM
  • dazfoster: Chicago was due to Dollar Bill Wirtz, big plus is his son Rocky took over in 2007 and revoked most of Bill's policies and will spend the money while Bill wouldn't spend a cent.
    Yesterday at 04:49:13 PM
  • Jonathan: Jeff Fisher earned his contract extension in New England, Rams defense held Danny Woodhead to 0 rushing yards, catches and TD's.
    Yesterday at 05:40:55 PM
  • Jonathan: Jeff Fisher is place holder, coaching spam, he's supposedly got deal through 2018, Rams Inglewood stadium is set to open in 2019
    Yesterday at 05:43:51 PM
  • Jonathan: 49ers / Bears game is fertilizer vs. manure yet I find myself mesmerized by snow
    Yesterday at 06:29:02 PM
  • Drew: Couple openings in Backyard, PM me if interested
    Yesterday at 06:39:26 PM
  • Drew: Spots filled! Thanks guys
    Yesterday at 11:33:50 PM
  • irbwilleo: ncaa tourney time folks,I am working on the fantrax issue
    Today at 10:41:09 AM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Thanks for the peace and quiet in FNHL gents. It's a nice change. :toast:
    Today at 02:36:21 PM
  • Daddy: I'm working on that
    Today at 02:42:41 PM
  • Daddy: I've just run short on tradable assets :rofl:
    Today at 02:43:15 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: PM Snug
    Today at 05:23:39 PM
  • Daddy: Full league, but still looking for good owners. FNHL [link]
    Today at 05:42:38 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: :iatp:
    Today at 05:45:38 PM
  • Eric: If you need a GM, lmk!
    Today at 07:00:29 PM