Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 3164 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online CRS245

  • *Senior Staff
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 30266
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :Blank:

    • 0_: :EPL13INVITEE: :NFL13INVITEE: :EPL12INVITEE: :NHL12INVITEE: :NFL12INVITEE: :NBA12INVITEE: :MLB12INVITEE: :NFL11FINALIST: :NHL11INVITEE: :NBA11INVITEE: :MLB11INVITEE: :MLB10INVITEE: :MLB09CHAMP:
    • View Profile
    • ProFSL
  • Fantasy Sport: :MLB:
Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  x=S_t and E=S_t-S_0  then if the "output" is the Option Price (f(x)=C(s_t)), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2  and \Delta=0.8554 , so the approximate value of the call is:

C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2
C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  \Gamma=0.02

 36.504+50\Gamma=37.504

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

 

Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

ProFSL Fantasy Sports

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jdwalter21: you have gattis and santana
    Yesterday at 09:49:40 PM
  • OUDAN: Forgot Santana had C still lol
    Yesterday at 09:50:25 PM
  • OUDAN: I'd move Gattis possibly then but I would have to have a bad back I'm light on bats as is
    Yesterday at 09:51:02 PM
  • Jdwalter21: i have Logan Morrison or Mark Canha - Mckenry is my only catcher. I thought he would get a few more starts over Hundley than he has gotten
    Yesterday at 09:52:47 PM
  • Jdwalter21: i have plenty of RP if u need anything
    Yesterday at 09:53:24 PM
  • OUDAN: You have some RPs I like but I have a ton myself
    Yesterday at 09:56:18 PM
  • OUDAN: Don't really see a match as I do think Gattis bad right now I refuse to believe he is this bad lol
    Yesterday at 09:57:30 PM
  • Jdwalter21: lol, yea McCutcheon is hitting .185 right now
    Yesterday at 09:59:25 PM
  • OUDAN: Wow lol
    Yesterday at 09:59:43 PM
  • OUDAN: Prince hitting like .400 but 1 HR lol something don't make sense
    Yesterday at 10:00:01 PM
  • OUDAN: I do need a CF but I doubt Hamilton is moving l
    Yesterday at 10:00:49 PM
  • Scalious: Good sign...
    Yesterday at 10:01:08 PM
  • OUDAN: True just shocking
    Yesterday at 10:01:20 PM
  • Scalious: Lotta power hitters don't hit for power in April...
    Yesterday at 10:01:32 PM
  • OUDAN: Yup
    Yesterday at 10:01:53 PM
  • OUDAN: JD what other league?
    Yesterday at 10:04:58 PM
  • OUDAN: Scal won't trade me the guys I want lol
    Yesterday at 10:05:32 PM
  • Scalious: Which league?
    Yesterday at 10:06:31 PM
  • OUDAN: MB lol
    Yesterday at 10:06:51 PM
  • OUDAN: BTL not sure we haven't tried there
    Yesterday at 10:07:03 PM
  • Scalious: I don't have any flexibilty in BTL. I was playing with a lineup with a hole it for awhile
    Yesterday at 10:07:43 PM
  • OUDAN: Ahhhh I'm after some bat depth there and maybe SP or RP upgrades
    Yesterday at 10:08:48 PM
  • OUDAN: But it's guys like Baez and Olsen I wanna move
    Yesterday at 10:09:12 PM
  • Scalious: Yeah.. I need bats too.
    Yesterday at 10:09:22 PM
  • OUDAN: Gotcha well guess it's just me wanting in MB and can't have lol
    Yesterday at 10:10:56 PM
  • Scalious: What.. Soler and Desclafani? Yeah no..i'm trying to win next year. Not 2020..
    Yesterday at 10:12:35 PM
  • OUDAN: Lol I forget who all it was but yeah them
    Yesterday at 10:14:27 PM
  • OUDAN: They are the guys helping you now but not the guys for just this year lol
    Yesterday at 10:15:08 PM
  • OUDAN: BooYah! small market
    Yesterday at 10:15:11 PM
  • jblum: so fun watching portland lose
    Today at 01:35:18 AM
  • Brent: What's up guys?
    Today at 03:52:13 AM
  • Brent: I am home now.
    Today at 03:52:16 AM
  • Jonathan: 3 1/2 days until NFL draft!
    Today at 10:19:22 AM
  • indiansnation: Brent pm
    Today at 12:36:32 PM
  • indiansnation: bhows pm
    Today at 12:40:23 PM
  • indiansnation: ryanjames pm
    Today at 12:43:18 PM
  • BHows: Go for it Indians
    Today at 01:02:43 PM
  • indiansnation: its done
    Today at 01:18:16 PM
  • Daddy: Adam Wainwright out for season
    Today at 01:22:39 PM
  • Daddy: Good news for Tyler Lyons, bad news for almost everyone else
    Today at 01:23:24 PM
  • OUDAN: Or Marco Gonzalez I hope lol
    Today at 01:23:48 PM
  • Daddy: lol
    Today at 01:24:13 PM
  • Daddy: it will be Lyons
    Today at 01:24:25 PM
  • OUDAN: He will be the first option your prolly right
    Today at 01:24:51 PM
  • OUDAN: Makes Lee and waino out on my NE team lol I suck
    Today at 01:25:17 PM
  • soonerorlitigator: Marco Gonzalez has been on DL due to shoulder tightness
    Today at 01:26:55 PM
  • soonerorlitigator: Otherwise he would be the guy up
    Today at 01:27:12 PM
  • OUDAN: Guess I missed that
    Today at 01:27:45 PM
  • OUDAN: I feel like DW this year
    Today at 01:27:50 PM
  • Brent: Morning guys
    Today at 01:58:38 PM

Forum Search