### Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 3919 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### CRS245

• *Senior Staff
• MVP
• Join Date: Jan 2009
• Posts: 30392
• Bonus inPoints: 27
• Fantasy Sport:
##### Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

## Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

$f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots$

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  $x=S_t$ and $E=S_t-S_0$  then if the "output" is the Option Price ($f(x)=C(s_t)$), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}$

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that $S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2$  and $\Delta=0.8554$ , so the approximate value of the call is:

$C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2$
$C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma$

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  $\Gamma=0.02$

$36.504+50\Gamma=37.504$

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}$

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

### References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

### Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about inPoints and the Invitationals.

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
Last name of MLB all-time HR leader:
Who won the 2015 mens NCAA basketball championship (school name only):

### Quick Profile

Did you miss your activation email?

### Chat Room

• chrisetc21: He has no control
April 30, 2016, 02:33:52 AM
• Jonathan: Send him to minors, at least it won't cost them games.
April 30, 2016, 03:07:05 AM
• Jonathan: Connor Cook to da Raiders.
April 30, 2016, 02:21:55 PM
• Mariner: Toronto Maple Leafs win draft lottery
April 30, 2016, 09:50:08 PM
• Jonathan: Albies to AAA, Swanson to AA. Could be seeing there guys sooner than later.
April 30, 2016, 11:58:55 PM
• Jonathan: Someone besides the Oilers are allowed to pick 1st?
May 01, 2016, 12:04:49 AM
• favo_zomg: The Oilers are picking 4th! I call collusion! lol
May 01, 2016, 07:45:48 AM
• CRS245: Oh Oilers
May 01, 2016, 06:47:47 PM
• Mariner: Oilers could be trading down
May 02, 2016, 06:30:41 PM
• chrisetc21: Houston Oilers #1
May 02, 2016, 07:18:39 PM
• Jonathan: Devin Mesoraco......... disappointing fantasy owners since 2011
May 02, 2016, 07:54:13 PM
Yesterday at 10:26:33 AM
• Jonathan: He is out for the year, already?
Yesterday at 01:20:17 PM
• Jonathan: Oklahoma. Bad career choice.
Yesterday at 01:23:01 PM
• Jonathan: He is trying to cry his way out, just like Murray did. He knows his career is coming to a close, should be happy he even has a contract.
Yesterday at 01:40:03 PM
• Jonathan: 5th year option on the #2 pick in 2013 declined, ouch
Yesterday at 03:04:39 PM
• Jonathan: chris, send velasquez this way
Yesterday at 04:15:58 PM
Yesterday at 04:19:22 PM
• Jonathan: I'll send you Giles lol
Yesterday at 04:19:43 PM
• Jonathan: seriously, I am the cubs..... you know I got youth on my side.
Yesterday at 04:20:08 PM
• chrisetc21: ha, Luhnow I'm not
Yesterday at 04:20:15 PM
• chrisetc21: well, i'm taking offers, i'd like to get it wrapped up in a day or two
Yesterday at 04:23:58 PM
• Jonathan: Any interest in Brees?
Yesterday at 04:27:41 PM
• Jonathan: I'll post my block.
Yesterday at 04:36:34 PM
• chrisetc21: nah, my team is too bqd
Yesterday at 04:40:02 PM
• Jonathan: Luckily I got there mid season, and was able to grab some young guys and trade for Carr.
Yesterday at 04:52:28 PM
• chrisetc21: I wish I'd got in when they did that new league draft, missing that set the team back a ton
Yesterday at 08:09:02 PM
• Jonathan: And most teams are loaded with cap. Gonna be overpaying for scrubs.
Yesterday at 08:23:36 PM
• chrisetc21: yeah, i didn't notice that when I started messing with my team
Yesterday at 08:25:25 PM
• chrisetc21: everyone has a ton of cap, going to difficult to manuever for talent
Yesterday at 08:25:54 PM
• chrisetc21: should make it more interesting though
Yesterday at 08:26:10 PM
• Jonathan: Watt gonna get paid...... way too much
Yesterday at 08:26:48 PM
• chrisetc21: hopefully someone blows their cap on him,
Yesterday at 08:28:10 PM
• Jonathan: TGF looking like it will survive the purge.
Yesterday at 08:42:50 PM
• chrisetc21: Good, my 12 year rebuild is almost done there
Yesterday at 09:43:13 PM
• fantasyboi: anyone selling early in ML?
Yesterday at 11:09:34 PM
• pandoval172: i've been selling all along
Today at 12:34:07 AM
Today at 12:37:31 AM
• fantasyboi: sent PM
Today at 01:34:48 AM
• fantasyboi: keremeos replied
Today at 01:34:58 AM
• pandoval172: back boi
Today at 01:46:35 AM
• fantasyboi: back
Today at 01:49:31 AM
• BHows: Anyone else having trouble getting on Fantrax?
Today at 11:59:12 AM
• Tarheels55: I'm on
Today at 12:00:30 PM
• BHows: Rebooted, now it's up. Weird!
Today at 12:12:02 PM