### Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 3031 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### CRS245

• *Senior Staff
• MVP
• Join Date: Jan 2009
• Posts: 30251
• Bonus inPoints: 27

• Fantasy Sport:
##### Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

## Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

$f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots$

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  $x=S_t$ and $E=S_t-S_0$  then if the "output" is the Option Price ($f(x)=C(s_t)$), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}$

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that $S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2$  and $\Delta=0.8554$ , so the approximate value of the call is:

$C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2$
$C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma$

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  $\Gamma=0.02$

$36.504+50\Gamma=37.504$

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}$

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

### References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

### Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about inPoints and the Invitationals.

### Quick Profile

Did you miss your activation email?

### Chat Room

• Orange Country: I bet saying to your comment abut u got a lot to do
Today at 01:40:29 AM
• Lindner: Ha, yeah. I'll probably get completely caught up tomorrow.  Tomorrow is a baseball day for me.  We're drafting live for our hometown league, too, tomorrow night.
Today at 01:42:44 AM
• Jpsprague10: What's up Nick, finals squared away?
Today at 01:57:05 AM
• Lindner: Yessir! Thankfully.
Today at 01:57:39 AM
• Lindner: What have you been up to, buddy.
Today at 01:58:36 AM
• Lindner: ?*
Today at 01:58:39 AM
• Jpsprague10: Right on, graduated or more to go? Me, i'm on about a month straight of 14 hour work days /7 days a week. Being an owner/Executive chef was a bad idea lol.
Today at 02:02:28 AM
• Lindner: One more semester for me yet before graduation.  Ouch! Sounds like fun.
Today at 02:05:27 AM
• Lindner: I've heard the food industry can be pretty fun..
Today at 02:05:52 AM
• Lindner: I'm going to hit the hay.  I got through a bunch of non-tenders tonight.  I'll wrap the rest up tomorrow after work. Night guys.
Today at 02:11:21 AM
• Jpsprague10: This time of year is insane! It will slow down soon after the new year begin and I can hire a new everyday chef and get rid of that part of the title. Good luck with that last semester!
Today at 02:13:44 AM
• Jpsprague10: Yeah, it will take some work to catch up, get sime rest
Today at 02:15:53 AM
• Lindner: That makes sense.  Thanks, man.  Best of luck to you as well in that venture.
Today at 02:16:46 AM
• Lindner: I'm pretty tired, so I don't want to do anything that requires too much thinking.  I don't want to make any errors.  I'll get the trades and non-tenders with multiple claims tomorrow during the day.
Today at 02:17:58 AM
Today at 10:04:04 AM
• utmbrad: slow Monday it seems
Today at 10:29:34 AM
• Corey: morning boys
Today at 10:32:50 AM
• Corey: BTN will be up by 1030
Today at 10:33:04 AM
Today at 10:34:44 AM
• OUDAN: Morning boys
Today at 10:40:46 AM
Today at 10:41:42 AM
• Corey: Sunday night traveling is the worst
Today at 10:43:42 AM
Today at 10:46:33 AM
• OUDAN: Yes it is
Today at 10:54:36 AM
• utmbrad: abother trade question for you guys 20team dynasty h2h cats
Today at 11:03:03 AM
• utmbrad: Sonny Gray and Starling Marte for Mat Latos Henderson Alvarez and Garrett Jones
Today at 11:03:48 AM
• utmbrad: I think I know what the answer is going to be on it but just curious others opinions
Today at 11:04:28 AM
• Corey: Gray side
Today at 11:05:55 AM
• Corey: is the one I like more
Today at 11:06:29 AM
Today at 11:06:59 AM
• OUDAN: Yup
Today at 11:07:13 AM
• OUDAN: No not close for me
Today at 11:07:20 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: I agree w/ Corey on that deal Brad
Today at 11:07:28 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: and OU
Today at 11:07:36 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: by a wiiiiiiiiide margin
Today at 11:07:55 AM
• utmbrad: that is what I thought as well. felt it was another insulting offer by a particular owner (not on this site)
Today at 11:08:52 AM
• utmbrad: so I countered him with an insulting offer and he snapped. so  i was just looking for an unbiased opinion
Today at 11:09:35 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: tell him to throw in mackey sasser or wally backman and its a done deal (it may confuse him) lol
Today at 11:09:56 AM
• OUDAN: lol
Today at 11:10:02 AM
• Corey: Not close imo
Today at 11:10:18 AM
• OUDAN: Mt god made some huge moves this weekend
Today at 11:10:52 AM
• OUDAN: my*
Today at 11:10:56 AM
• utmbrad: anyways according to him everyone here is looking at the trade wrong
Today at 11:11:09 AM
• utmbrad: Latos and Gray are a push
Today at 11:11:26 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: what league OU
Today at 11:11:37 AM
• utmbrad: and Alvarez and LH power bat Jones in NYY are worth Marte
Today at 11:11:56 AM
• OUDAN: BLB Vols
Today at 11:12:14 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: is anyone else having trouble searching players on fantrax lately?
Today at 11:19:16 AM