### Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 3954 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### CRS245

• *Senior Staff
• MVP
• Join Date: Jan 2009
• Posts: 30392
• Bonus inPoints: 27
• Fantasy Sport:
##### Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

## Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

$f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots$

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  $x=S_t$ and $E=S_t-S_0$  then if the "output" is the Option Price ($f(x)=C(s_t)$), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}$

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that $S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2$  and $\Delta=0.8554$ , so the approximate value of the call is:

$C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2$
$C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma$

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  $\Gamma=0.02$

$36.504+50\Gamma=37.504$

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}$

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

### References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

### Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about inPoints and the Invitationals.

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
Last name of MLB all-time HR leader:
New England Patriots QB last name:

### Quick Profile

Did you miss your activation email?

### Chat Room

• ajm5551: hey all!
May 18, 2016, 06:17:47 PM
• cjbeckel: Hey Jason, I see you are looking to move Grienke in ML.  If you are willing to take care of his salary I have the MiLB talent to send your way
May 18, 2016, 09:26:37 PM
• cjbeckel: Does anyone want to deal in Mendoza Line?!
May 19, 2016, 10:14:50 PM
• Scalious: Just sent you a quick return PM
May 19, 2016, 10:15:34 PM
• cjbeckel: I replied back Scalious
May 19, 2016, 10:42:10 PM
• Jonathan: lol cant post it, cant post anything ha
May 20, 2016, 02:18:25 AM
• Jonathan: scal, go to leagues, modify and where it says transactions.... make sure it is set to default. Maybe when you added jp you changed that, but I dont remember it being like that before. Could just be a bug?
May 20, 2016, 02:21:21 AM
• Jonathan: Could someone else confirm that we can not start new post in transactions, could just be me too. Maybe that was scals way to prevent me from posting too much
May 20, 2016, 02:22:50 AM
• Jonathan: I posted it one board up, so a Mod can move it to correct board. Thanks.
May 20, 2016, 02:26:23 AM
• Jonathan: You can reply to other threads, so that did not affect any current bids. fyi
May 20, 2016, 02:31:37 AM
• Jonathan: cant create new
May 20, 2016, 02:31:52 AM
May 20, 2016, 02:32:48 AM
• Jonathan: You have to do same thing for trading block boards. Cant do anything there, not even update block.
May 20, 2016, 02:26:42 PM
• Jonathan: I know its tough to tell as a mod, because you can still do all that.
May 20, 2016, 02:27:42 PM
• Jonathan: You can just make that reply only, as that is all that is needed by non-mods.
May 20, 2016, 02:29:42 PM
• Scalious: transaction board fine I think..every else
May 20, 2016, 04:00:53 PM
• Scalious: later...
May 20, 2016, 04:01:04 PM
• Jonathan: thanks
May 20, 2016, 11:18:35 PM
• Jonathan: How many eyes did Fulmer open today?
May 21, 2016, 07:19:46 PM
• themarksman13: Not mine...he's got that kind of stuff
May 22, 2016, 01:57:43 AM
• chrisetc21: his era is still over 5
May 22, 2016, 02:08:42 AM
• chrisetc21:
May 22, 2016, 02:08:51 AM
• Jonathan: Yeah, and so isn't Jon Gray's Way over that, actually.
May 22, 2016, 02:18:14 AM
• Jonathan: Everyone likes to talk about Gray though.
May 22, 2016, 02:21:49 AM
• Jonathan: Feel bad for Shoemaker. Pitches gem, then Smith blows it.
May 22, 2016, 02:29:31 AM
• Jonathan:
May 22, 2016, 09:00:18 AM
• Jonathan:
May 22, 2016, 10:00:12 AM
• janesvilleaces: hows and heels pm
May 22, 2016, 11:02:35 AM
• janesvilleaces: watson pm
May 22, 2016, 11:21:50 AM
• Jonathan: Russell 2-23 with 13k this week
May 22, 2016, 11:45:14 PM
• cjbeckel: Does anyone want to deal in Mendoza Line?!
Yesterday at 06:43:46 PM
• cjbeckel: I'm still looking to pick up big league Starting Pitchers and nobody in my organization is off limits!
Yesterday at 06:44:39 PM
• Jonathan: I still got Cain
Yesterday at 08:59:56 PM
• cjbeckel: Lol..we already completed that deal
Yesterday at 09:59:23 PM
• cjbeckel: Do you have any others in mind?
Yesterday at 09:59:39 PM
• Jonathan: You cleaned me out, at least with the guys I wanted to move.
Yesterday at 10:11:40 PM
• Jonathan: You might wanna tell someone to get you Cain though, he has had 3 straight QS, he on fire lol
Yesterday at 10:13:45 PM
• Jonathan: Although, pitching at Coors is another story.
Yesterday at 10:15:42 PM
• Jonathan: BooYah! , and who said Commerica is bad for Righties. 6 HR's all by righties
Yesterday at 10:19:28 PM
• Jonathan: Castellanos should of had 2, got lucky his first one went 400' and hit the wall.
Yesterday at 10:21:50 PM
• cjbeckel: True, that Matt Cain trade has been sitting out there for over a week
Yesterday at 10:54:31 PM
• Scalious: I need to do a good ole fashion Spec spam...
Yesterday at 10:58:29 PM
• Scalious: I've got like 90 Open farm slots
Yesterday at 10:59:14 PM
• Scalious: LOL.. Its been sitting out because I thought it was processed already
Yesterday at 11:00:35 PM
• Scalious: It was posted on the 15th and JP said it was fantraxed on the 19th
Yesterday at 11:02:00 PM
• cjbeckel: Thanks Scalious
Yesterday at 11:24:11 PM
• Jonathan: A few drafts and you will be full.
Yesterday at 11:51:36 PM
• Jonathan: I got pick 21st and on available for higher pick.
Yesterday at 11:52:30 PM
• Jonathan: Looks like Gallo is back, lets see if he improves at all.
Today at 12:09:12 AM
• ldsjayhawk: Rick - PMd a quick question
Today at 01:04:01 AM