### Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 3222 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### CRS245

• *Senior Staff
• MVP
• Join Date: Jan 2009
• Posts: 30315
• Bonus inPoints: 27
• Fantasy Sport:
##### Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

## Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

$f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots$

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  $x=S_t$ and $E=S_t-S_0$  then if the "output" is the Option Price ($f(x)=C(s_t)$), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}$

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that $S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2$  and $\Delta=0.8554$ , so the approximate value of the call is:

$C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2$
$C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma$

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  $\Gamma=0.02$

$36.504+50\Gamma=37.504$

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}$

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

### References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

### Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about inPoints and the Invitationals.

### Quick Profile

Did you miss your activation email?

### Chat Room

• OUDAN: Oh I do Brent
Today at 02:35:17 AM
• Scalious: Yes, I know.
Today at 02:36:25 AM
• Scalious: I've been doing most of my moves to clear enough cap to confortably re-sign him w/o hurting my bottom line
Today at 02:39:03 AM
• Scalious: Cobb trade was the first one I actually took on more future cap
Today at 02:39:42 AM
• OUDAN: Ok bud no worries at all as u said u weren't really serious so no harm done
Today at 02:41:58 AM
• Scalious: Huh? Oh I'm past that..now i'm trying to figure out If its smart to re-sign him now..or hold and hope he falls off his NO 1 perch
Today at 02:43:40 AM
• Brent: I'd trade you Myers, but I would need quite a bit of talent to come to the Phillies.
Today at 02:44:54 AM
• OUDAN: Because of his contract is be open to discussing a deal for him Brent
Today at 02:45:56 AM
• OUDAN: Maybe send me a list of interests?
Today at 02:46:04 AM
• Brent: The early times during a rebuild look pretty ugly.  This Philly team needs talent.
Today at 02:46:17 AM
• Brent: Or you could send me Stanton and you can cut some cap. lol
Today at 02:47:06 AM
• OUDAN: Makes sense
Today at 02:47:11 AM
• OUDAN: Lol send me a list of interests and we shall see if we are close
Today at 02:47:33 AM
• Scalious: Yeah..most teams already poached what little valued MLB talent that team came with
Today at 02:47:37 AM
• OUDAN: Abreu would be the guy id move to save  but would once again take a lot
Today at 02:48:31 AM
• Scalious: You just gotta draft real strong this fall with all those picks
Today at 02:49:00 AM
• Brent: Yep.  I got a lot of picks to build around, but like you said I need to hit on some really good.
Today at 02:49:22 AM
• OUDAN: Not sure about Nyers wrist
Today at 02:52:29 AM
• OUDAN: I'd have to research that for sure
Today at 02:52:35 AM
• Brent: Padres manager Bud Black said that Wil Myers has experienced "marked improvement" with his left wrist after he visited specialist Dr. Lorenzo Pacelli on Tuesday. It's good to hear, although Myers has yet to resume swinging a bat and there's currently no timetable for him to do so. The outfielder hasn't played in two weeks because of tendinitis in his left wrist. May 26 - 8:19 PM
Today at 02:54:15 AM
• 9inches: Thanks, MT, for response.
Today at 08:09:36 AM
• Kube20: Morning boys
Today at 09:27:08 AM
• Corey: morning Kube and everyone else as well
Today at 10:08:11 AM
• Brent: Morning guys.
Today at 10:09:22 AM
• Rob: Moaning
Today at 10:20:49 AM
• jnorris: morning guys
Today at 10:22:16 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: morning fellas
Today at 10:24:08 AM
• Brent: Morning, thanks for that super quick reply.
Today at 10:24:50 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: let's make some deals today boys
Today at 10:24:55 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: no worries bud, I try to get back ASAP
Today at 10:25:12 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: I didn't even see when you sent it
Today at 10:25:25 AM
• Brent: I'm usually good, but if I am on mobile, I don't reply that quick.  It's too much of a pain to do much of anything on mobile.
Today at 10:26:05 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: I just know in that format, I have him higher than guys like Sano and Buxton (call me crazy)
Today at 10:26:09 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: still looking to acquire some arms in MB
Today at 10:28:43 AM
• 9inches: I'll be on most of the morning if anyone wants to look at any ideas.
Today at 10:29:27 AM
• 9inches: MB of course.
Today at 10:29:34 AM
• Brent: It's too bad you don't want Shark, Tanaka or King Felix.
Today at 10:30:38 AM
• OUDAN: Morning boys
Today at 10:31:27 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: I'd want them Brent, it's just too bad they don't better fit my anticipated window of competitiveness
Today at 10:32:22 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: hey Sooner
Today at 10:32:36 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: I'm around Tony, would love to land an arm or two (I see you have a few you are shopping)
Today at 10:32:57 AM
• OUDAN: I'm not even jumping in to these talks lol. I can't deal in MB
Today at 10:34:33 AM
• 9inches: I still need your cap, Vols. Outside of OF or nameable specs, most of the assets have already been dealt.
Today at 10:38:13 AM
Today at 10:38:31 AM
• 9inches: im still keeping you (and a couple others with cap) in my talks with other teams.
Today at 10:39:13 AM
• VolsRaysBucs: I've got cap space a' plenty!
Today at 10:39:41 AM
• OUDAN: BooYah! is panda 4.5 til 2017 9?
Today at 10:39:45 AM
• 9inches:
Today at 10:39:53 AM
• 9inches: through 17.
Today at 10:40:24 AM
• OUDAN: Nice deal
Today at 10:40:37 AM