Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 3088 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CRS245

  • *Senior Staff
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 30242
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :Blank:

    • 0_: :EPL13INVITEE: :NFL13INVITEE: :EPL12INVITEE: :NHL12INVITEE: :NFL12INVITEE: :NBA12INVITEE: :MLB12INVITEE: :NFL11FINALIST: :NHL11INVITEE: :NBA11INVITEE: :MLB11INVITEE: :MLB10INVITEE: :MLB09CHAMP:
    • View Profile
    • ProFSL
  • Fantasy Sport: :MLB:
Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  x=S_t and E=S_t-S_0  then if the "output" is the Option Price (f(x)=C(s_t)), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2  and \Delta=0.8554 , so the approximate value of the call is:

C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2
C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  \Gamma=0.02

 36.504+50\Gamma=37.504

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

 

Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

ProFSL Fantasy Sports

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Corey: If anyone has any ideas of different things to add to the ProFSL Trophy room let me know.
    Today at 06:52:26 PM
  • Corey: Members will have a trophy room where Trophys are awarded in there profile to show leagues they have won
    Today at 06:52:51 PM
  • Orange Country: you get my other text
    Today at 06:53:43 PM
  • Corey: Flying to florida at 8am tomorrow, picking up a vehicle and riding back. Got to bring 2 friends with me because I can't drive lol
    Today at 06:54:55 PM
  • Orange Country: Lol nice
    Today at 06:55:53 PM
  • Orange Country: there another MB team open
    Today at 06:56:14 PM
  • Corey: Myabe, have 3 people looking at it
    Today at 06:57:09 PM
  • Orange Country: cool, did you see where BJ changed his name to Melvin
    Today at 06:58:29 PM
  • Corey: If it makes him have better contact I like it
    Today at 06:59:57 PM
  • redbeard82: can't make it worse?
    Today at 07:01:30 PM
  • Orange Country: you really think it will? he still sucks a ton
    Today at 07:02:20 PM
  • Orange Country: I read BP essay on braves and it made a shocking statement
    Today at 07:02:48 PM
  • Orange Country: it said cox and scherlotz need to step away
    Today at 07:03:17 PM
  • Orange Country: I can't say I disagree
    Today at 07:03:30 PM
  • Orange Country: Jesus moncada is up to 135 in BTL
    Today at 07:16:08 PM
  • Scalious: I know! You should be happy you actually Moncada at 65 in MB
    Today at 07:17:17 PM
  • Orange Country: no.doubt
    Today at 07:25:19 PM
  • Orange Country: I'm lucky he signed this late in FA
    Today at 07:28:48 PM
  • redbeard82: yeah. 65 is a bargain from what i've seen
    Today at 07:32:59 PM
  • redbeard82: we had somebody blow 100% of FAAB in cornerstone. went for 90 in BLB and at 105 in 108
    Today at 07:33:24 PM
  • Baseballnut83: somebody signed him for 15m in bush i think
    Today at 07:34:00 PM
  • Baseballnut83: or 30m
    Today at 07:34:09 PM
  • Baseballnut83: reid mail
    Today at 07:34:17 PM
  • redbeard82: glad he signed before the prospectus maximus draft though seeing as i have the #2 pick
    Today at 07:34:40 PM
  • Baseballnut83: crazy money for a minor league guy.
    Today at 07:38:50 PM
  • Baseballnut83: hes starting AA right?
    Today at 07:39:06 PM
  • redbeard82: have they said?
    Today at 07:43:48 PM
  • redbeard82: i'm guessing high a
    Today at 07:43:54 PM
  • Baseballnut83: i heard rumblings high a then it was AA i thought. either way. 135m for a high A guy is insane
    Today at 07:45:26 PM
  • redbeard82: where was 135?
    Today at 07:48:37 PM
  • Baseballnut83: give me minute maybe im off i thought 108
    Today at 07:55:32 PM
  • Baseballnut83: no in BTL sorry
    Today at 07:55:58 PM
  • Baseballnut83: he is 105 in 108
    Today at 07:56:45 PM
  • redbeard82: ah. yeah. either way it's a tough amount of money to commit to a guy
    Today at 08:06:55 PM
  • Baseballnut83: agreed. they are halfway to what i paid for stanton in btl which was crazy money. i paid 220 for 5yrs
    Today at 08:11:41 PM
  • redbeard82: wow. that's a hefty contract too.
    Today at 08:13:00 PM
  • redbeard82: but at least you'tr getting a stud.
    Today at 08:13:17 PM
  • Baseballnut83: yup. moncada has proven zip in bigs...
    Today at 08:14:58 PM
  • Scalious: Kang hasn't proven anything and you gave him 90m
    Today at 08:21:06 PM
  • Baseballnut83: kang is going to be in bigs right away and yes i overpaid. they are paying 135 for a high A minor leaguer
    Today at 08:24:49 PM
  • Baseballnut83: thats my point. break down the 135 by 5 years and that is 17m a season for a minor leaguer
    Today at 08:26:13 PM
  • redbeard82: that's 27 a year
    Today at 08:27:17 PM
  • Scalious: Your missing context. The team paying him 135 is re-building and has a ton of cap.
    Today at 08:27:35 PM
  • redbeard82: but in general the unknowns tend to get overpaid cause everybody hasn't seen the warts yet
    Today at 08:27:57 PM
  • Scalious: Its over-pay still. Obviously
    Today at 08:28:04 PM
  • Baseballnut83: true red. i did redeem myself by only signing kang for 30m in btl
    Today at 08:29:30 PM
  • Baseballnut83: never said i didnt overpay LOL
    Today at 08:29:50 PM
  • Baseballnut83: i know scalious i just cant wrap my head around the fact he could go 150 or more LOL
    Today at 08:31:58 PM
  • Baseballnut83: I have 64 mil in cap in 108 i could yhrow bid on him..... LOL
    Today at 08:32:34 PM
  • redbeard82: somebody will take a chunk out of their cap space...works for me
    Today at 08:34:02 PM

Forum Search