### Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 4848 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### Colby

• MLFB Founder
• MVP
• Join Date: Jan 2009
• Posts: 30419
• Bonus inPoints: 27
• Fantasy Prestige 57
##### Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

## Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

$f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots$

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  $x=S_t$ and $E=S_t-S_0$  then if the "output" is the Option Price ($f(x)=C(s_t)$), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}$

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that $S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2$  and $\Delta=0.8554$ , so the approximate value of the call is:

$C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2$
$C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma$

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  $\Gamma=0.02$

$36.504+50\Gamma=37.504$

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

$C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}$

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

### References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

### Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about inPoints and the Invitationals.

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
Last name of MLB all-time HR leader:
Who won the 2015 mens NCAA basketball championship (school name only):

### Quick Profile

Did you miss your activation email?

### Chat Room

• izaman3: Cally, are there like 4 guys in the league or what? lol
November 16, 2017, 04:34:32 PM
• Rob: Cally, Claude Julien isn't walking through that door anymore...
November 16, 2017, 04:47:12 PM
• Rob: and Torey Krug sucks at defense
November 16, 2017, 04:47:46 PM
• Rob: He's really just good at PP, otherwise he's a negative on the ice.
November 16, 2017, 04:47:58 PM
• Rob: Chara is a shadow of his former self
November 16, 2017, 04:48:08 PM
• Rob: a couple good young grinders, but otherwise their core is crap.
November 16, 2017, 04:48:26 PM
• Rob: McAvoy being the outlier
November 16, 2017, 04:48:31 PM
• WestCoastExpress: Iza - nah I’m just good at drafting. 10-team league. Got lucky with Brown/Schwartz and also Vas (he was my 3rd goalie haha). Also Karlsson dropped to round 2 because of his injury. Took Burns/EK 1-2 picks haha. Followed by Duby/Rask. Pavelski was my first forward taken lol
November 16, 2017, 05:39:39 PM
• WestCoastExpress: Also got lucky with Giroux falling. Love when Yahoo ranks players lower than they should. Lots of guys rely too heavily on the Yahoon ranks! Brown’s been a home run tho, he was close to a last round pick
November 16, 2017, 05:40:48 PM
• izaman3: I like to look and laugh at yahoo's rankings, and even fantrax's projections. I almost wish they would just stop lol. Brown's resurgance has been key for the Kings. I know people have been complaining about his contract for years. I'm also a big Giroux fan, so I like him lighting it up on the wing. Though I sold low on Courtier earlier this year in FNHL and am half starting to kick myself and half skeptical that he keeps it up.
November 16, 2017, 05:53:36 PM
• WestCoastExpress: Yeah there’s always the few surprises - that’s what helps you win the 1-year leagues. So far I’ve gotten lucky with some picks but so have other guys.
November 16, 2017, 06:15:04 PM
• WestCoastExpress: So should I accept this Kuch for Vasilevskiy deal? Think I’ll be alright with Duby/Helly holding the G stats down, along with Rask/Anderson? Realistically it’s kind of silly to have 5 goalies. 4 is a lot too if they’re all starters. Scooped Helly from FA for free tho
November 16, 2017, 06:16:25 PM
• indiansnation: Looking to trade in wcb2,armchair,abl
November 16, 2017, 07:24:25 PM
• blkhwkfn: Toronto on a severe power outtage in FNHL
November 16, 2017, 10:56:26 PM
• Donfraze: maydab-pm
November 16, 2017, 11:07:16 PM
• Daddy: Toronto is having an ok week.
Yesterday at 01:56:59 AM
• Daddy: Boston is on a severe power outage week.
Yesterday at 01:57:52 AM
• Daddy: @izaman3 the Courtier trade was stout. He looks really good.
Yesterday at 02:00:55 AM
Yesterday at 02:08:59 AM
Yesterday at 02:09:11 AM
• blkhwkfn: Hellebyuck was the only thing i had going for a sec. No goals 1 assist 8 shots finally someone bent the twine
Yesterday at 06:59:21 AM
• snugerud: Yes, take that deal.  Helly and dub will hold the fort enough for what you will gain in getting kuch
Yesterday at 11:18:22 AM
• snugerud: and if not, you still have rask and anderson who could both heat up.
Yesterday at 11:25:31 AM
• snugerud: My moto is when you have an option between getting some kouch and vaslene, you take the Kouch.
Yesterday at 11:26:39 AM
• WestCoastExpress: Showing another side of you Snug, haha
Yesterday at 01:39:44 PM
• WestCoastExpress: Accepted the deal. Kinda worked for both sides. I needed goalscoring and PPP and he needed a goalie badly. FreddyAnd with Smith, Raanta,
Yesterday at 01:40:39 PM
• WestCoastExpress: And Brian Elliott
Yesterday at 01:40:56 PM
• Flash: available in FGM
Yesterday at 04:26:12 PM
• Daddy: Hello Brian, sorry I had signed off before. I hope all is well my friend.
Yesterday at 04:37:37 PM
Yesterday at 04:50:11 PM
• indiansnation: Hey flash
Yesterday at 04:51:04 PM
• indiansnation: Cam atkins gets 7 yr deal
Yesterday at 08:54:39 PM
• Daddy: Yeah, not as much as I gave him, but a nice haul.
Yesterday at 09:14:31 PM
• Daddy: I hope he earns it, he isn't off to a blazing start.
Yesterday at 09:15:01 PM
• indiansnation: Im excited he took less money and more yrs
Yesterday at 09:30:07 PM
Yesterday at 10:47:50 PM
• Daddy: Cleveland doesn't have one, and I've never asked. I know you love the Cavs, Browns, Indians, where is your loyalty in hockey?
Yesterday at 10:48:48 PM
• indiansnation: Pittsburgh my team
Yesterday at 11:02:37 PM
• indiansnation: But i have to root for my home columbus
Yesterday at 11:03:19 PM
• Daddy: Pittsburgh? Yuck...thats like Yankees or Cowboys just because you've witnessed them win.
Yesterday at 11:35:32 PM
• Daddy: My Son is from PA, lives in MD, but likes Alabama for instance. I wish he didn't fall into that category.
Yesterday at 11:36:30 PM
• Daddy: Lots of fans out there created due to National TV biased and wanting to cling to team's they see have success. No offense meant.
Yesterday at 11:37:49 PM
• indiansnation: Im a fan of them
Yesterday at 11:58:32 PM
• indiansnation: Lemieux,jagr
Yesterday at 11:59:02 PM
• indiansnation: Old teams would whip these guys know on puttsburgh
Today at 12:02:03 AM
• indiansnation: Love the 89 penguins take 2017 penguins on it would be awsome
Today at 12:04:30 AM
• indiansnation: Give me lemieux,recci,bourge,cullen
Today at 12:06:39 AM
• blkhwkfn: Ill take a beer
Today at 01:01:33 AM
• Nonsense: Dilly dilly
Today at 03:58:08 AM
• PsychoticPondGoons: Afternoon FNHLers!
Today at 03:27:29 PM