Author Topic: Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation  (Read 2865 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CRS245

  • *Senior Staff
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 29799
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT:
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :Blank:

    • 0_: :EPL13INVITEE: :NFL13INVITEE: :EPL12INVITEE: :NHL12INVITEE: :NFL12INVITEE: :NBA12INVITEE: :MLB12INVITEE: :NFL11FINALIST: :NHL11INVITEE: :NBA11INVITEE: :MLB11INVITEE: :MLB10INVITEE: :MLB09CHAMP:
    • View Profile
    • ProFSL
  • Fantasy Sport: :MLB:
Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation
« on: March 23, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »

Delta-Gamma-Theta Approximation

The definition of the Taylor Series is:

f(x)=f(x_0)+f'(x_0)(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}f''(x_0)(x-x_0)^2+\ldots

Let's do some one-to-one substitutions to make the Taylor Series fit our subject, option pricing.  Let  x=S_t and E=S_t-S_0  then if the "output" is the Option Price (f(x)=C(s_t)), the 1st derivative with respect to stock price will be Delta and the 2nd derivative with respect to stock price will be Gamma.  The infinite amount of terms following the 3rd term would, in most cases, be relatively small.  Therefore, in this case, those terms can be replaced by one simple error term.

Rewriting the Taylor Series equation gives us:

C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \text{error term}

Example
Using the same parameters from the 2nd example, estimate the change in call's value if the stock price increases to 210.

Recall that S_0=200, r=0.05,\sigma=0.2  and \Delta=0.8554 , so the approximate value of the call is:

C(S_t)=C(S_0)+\Delta E + \frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2
C(S_t)=27.95+0.8554(10)+0.5\Gamma(100)=36.504+50\Gamma

The value of the call is highly dependent upon Gamma, the 2nd derivative of option price with respect to stock price.  Concavity and convexity will only forecast if the stock will level off or change even more in value, so those aspects of Calculus are important for forecasting stock prices.  What can we expect Gamma to be in this example?

There really isn't enough information given to calculate or predict the Gamma.  All that we know is that Gamma will be the same whether it is a call or a put.  Assuming Gamma to be zero makes the option follow a more linear pattern which is not a good estimation of the option itself, so an arbitrarily small value for Gamma will suffice.

Let's assume that:  \Gamma=0.02

 36.504+50\Gamma=37.504

The call value is expected to increase by 9.554, which is less than 10, the change in stock price.  This follows the laws of arbitrage and the increase in the call can be expected with the increase in the stock price.

The Error Term in Hedging
The approximation used in the last example is actually Delta-Gamma approximation.  To apply Delta-Gamma-Theta approximations to option values, the parameter of time must be introduced to the equation.  Specifically, the Greek of Theta must be used.  The additional error term, albeit small, will most often reduce the approximate option value because Theta is usually negative.  Why is Theta usually negative?  Theta measures the increase in option price with respect to the decrease in time to maturity, and options increase in value as maturity time increases due to extra room for volatility.

Less maturity time => Lower variance => Decreased expected value

The error term is measured in days, and time in the Delta-Gamma-Theta approximation is measured in years, so in order to keep all time variables equal, it must be converted like so:

C(S_t)=S_0+\Delta E+\frac{1}{2}\Gamma E^2 + \frac{t\theta}{365}

The number of days in a year is a matter of convention.  The banker may use 360 days whereas the actuary would use 365.25 days.  The investor may use actual number of days, 365 or 366, depending whether the current year is a leap year or not.

References

W. McDonald, R.L., Derivatives Markets (Second Edition), Addison Wesley, 2006

Contributors

Colby
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 06:35:16 PM by Colby »
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

 

Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

ProFSL Fantasy Sports

Community Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Orange Country: saw earlier we had 92 members on site, love it
    Yesterday at 11:39:03 PM
  • ajm5551: I WANT A SPOT IN BTL
    Yesterday at 11:43:37 PM
  • patjossom: thats why i didnt get all his hints...
    Yesterday at 11:45:11 PM
  • Corey: I didn't even check that
    Yesterday at 11:45:45 PM
  • patjossom: is he still on cuz hes not going to be my fan if he doesnt make another choice soon
    Yesterday at 11:46:12 PM
  • Ace: imo rendon is available
    Yesterday at 11:46:21 PM
  • jblum: already under cap by 95m... Smoking Gunnn
    Yesterday at 11:46:25 PM
  • jblum: in BTL
    Yesterday at 11:50:47 PM
  • Corey: Ace can you explain to me why you think he is. So I can understand where you are coming from
    Yesterday at 11:51:42 PM
  • patjossom: i think you will be fine jblum i have in another league at $30 but hes money when he pitches
    Yesterday at 11:52:45 PM
  • Ace: because every pre-arb player's contract for the following season is a team option
    Yesterday at 11:54:11 PM
  • Corey: He is a beast
    Yesterday at 11:54:25 PM
  • Corey: Hmm.
    Yesterday at 11:54:55 PM
  • Ace: it's just written in advance for rendon because he signed a major league contract so he couldn't have his service time overly manipulated
    Yesterday at 11:55:05 PM
  • Ace: the contract was a 6m signing bonus plus 1.2m guaranteed on top
    Yesterday at 11:55:36 PM
  • Corey: mm
    Today at 12:05:34 AM
  • Corey: Excellent job guys on getting a bunch of picks in tonight
    Today at 12:11:29 AM
  • Ace: serious q; do we have a resident mlb cba/cap expert?
    Today at 12:18:33 AM
  • Corey: not that I know of
    Today at 12:19:26 AM
  • Corey: NBA is definitely garfield
    Today at 12:19:35 AM
  • Ace: my intuition is that Rendon signed a major league contract largely similar to others which specifies base salary for certain years
    Today at 12:19:40 AM
  • Ace: nba is me
    Today at 12:19:45 AM
  • Ace: i teach garfield now ;-)
    Today at 12:20:08 AM
  • Ace: the problem with rendon is that we can't actually see the contract
    Today at 12:21:05 AM
  • Ace: [link]
    Today at 12:21:38 AM
  • Ace: check strasburg
    Today at 12:21:47 AM
  • Corey: lol Ace that is good to know
    Today at 12:22:13 AM
  • Corey: To me Stras is an FA
    Today at 12:22:45 AM
  • Ace: yeah, i'm just trying to find all the ml contracts signed by draft picks, here's hultzen [link]
    Today at 12:23:33 AM
  • Corey: Anyone who picks him, I would immediately say invalid
    Today at 12:23:46 AM
  • Ace: [link] bauer is more illuminating
    Today at 12:24:26 AM
  • Corey: Passed Rookie threshold in 2010 and has an expiring contract
    Today at 12:24:30 AM
  • Corey: Bauer is an FA
    Today at 12:24:53 AM
  • Ace: [link] no details for bundy
    Today at 12:24:57 AM
  • Ace: yeah i know, i'm trying to find the protocol for recent major league deals signed by draft picks
    Today at 12:25:36 AM
  • Corey: Hultzen is like Soler. Eligible for the MILR draft but you do not get the Prospect deal
    Today at 12:25:44 AM
  • Ace: hultzen would be p-2015 then, with a 430k contract seeing that we don't count signing bonuses
    Today at 12:28:40 AM
  • Ace: there's a difference between a draft pick signing a major league deal and an int prospect
    Today at 12:29:11 AM
  • kylerap: Corey what about Chris Davis? He's ran eligible but would have surpassed a P- contract like 4 years ago..
    Today at 12:29:12 AM
  • Corey: All P deals are 600k regardless
    Today at 12:29:24 AM
  • Corey: Davis is a FA
    Today at 12:29:51 AM
  • Corey: I checked on him when my pick was up
    Today at 12:30:01 AM
  • Corey: Should we compile a list of FA's?
    Today at 12:30:34 AM
  • Ace: maybe; thoughts on bauer?
    Today at 12:32:00 AM
  • Jpsprague10: Corey- probably couldn't hurt. But is a hug advantage not having one if you do your own homework.
    Today at 12:32:25 AM
  • Jpsprague10: *huge
    Today at 12:32:50 AM
  • Corey: Jp I agree 100% which is why I am against it
    Today at 12:34:13 AM
  • Corey: Same reason why I didnt post all players and there deals here like some guys wanted
    Today at 12:34:49 AM
  • Corey: Its a $$$ league so let guys do there work. You get what you put into it
    Today at 12:35:02 AM
  • Jpsprague10: I agree with that assessment.
    Today at 12:37:37 AM

Forum Search