* Dynasty NHL

Blank 



Boston Bruins Buffalo Sabres Philadelphia Flyers Washington Capitals Pittsburgh Penguins :: Detroit Red Wings Florida Panthers Chicago Blackhawks Tampa Bay Lightning Carolina Hurricanes 
Edmonton Oilers Montreal Canadiens Toronto Maple Leafs Vancouver Canucks Calgary Flames :: Anaheim Ducks Colorado Avalanche St. Louis Blues Phoenix Coyotes Los Angeles Kings 
Blank --------------------------------------
Blank DNHL Champions
 |
Carolina Hurricanes 11/12 | Chicago Blackhawks 12/13 | Detroit Red Wings 13/14 | Anaheim Ducks 14/15 | Anaheim Ducks 15/16 |

Poll

Should the salary cap be increased next season?

Yes
11 (73.3%)
No
4 (26.7%)

Total Members Voted: 15

Author Topic: 2012/2013 Salary Cap  (Read 4154 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12086
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2011, 02:28:21 PM »
But you picked up a lot of bargain bench players that are going to extend for more than they're costing you now.  I'd like to see how some other teams shape up before we jump to conclusions on this.  We're using 30 man rosters which is more than the NHL but we're not starting any more players than they are in the real game on any given night.  Some of us are using the extra spots for prospects others are stocking up on extra players to change in and out.  A good question is what are you going to be paying for your primary starters?  If that number is significantly lower then I'm not sure we should make drastic cap accommodations for our bench players. 

Offline snugerud

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 3362
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2011, 02:58:02 PM »
i would agree with that, and there are a lot of players on that list I would not be extending. 

I am of course just playing devil's advocate and trying to look at this from the different angles.  I still stand by my original opinion of not changing the cap.  Since i love the free agent frenzy. 
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline GypsieDeathBringer

  • All-Star
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 888
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PIT:
    • :DAL:
    • :ORL:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Pittsburgh:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2011, 04:22:27 PM »
That is kind of fun to extend your whole team to see what they would be worth using just our extension values.  It shows you how much of a bargain or not your team really is.

I am sitting at 102.1m, but yeah I wouldn't extend all those folks.  If I had to extend all my starters I would be up BooYah!  creek for sure, but that is fine because I got good deals and didn't expect to hold onto these players at those amounts.
2011-12 Dynasty NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CAR-NHL:

Offline Whomp

  • *ProFSL Gold
  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 657
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHW:
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Northwestern:
    • :CHI-MLS:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2011, 05:32:08 PM »
I say yes, but based on if the NHL salary cap increases.  That way the league can kind of stay in touch with the NHL.  So, if the NHL raises their cap by 1m we would raise ours by the current ratio of 70m(our cap)/64.3m(nhl cap) or 1.088m.  Already starting off with 70m has made it pretty easy to field a 30 man roster.

Ditto - let's follow the NHL per some formula that relates the real cap per player.
"Someone once said that Bobby could hit a puck through a car wash and not get it wet and that I could hit it just as hard, but not hit the car wash. That was the difference." Dennis Hull

Offline jmtrops

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 1645
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2011, 11:15:55 PM »
you have to look at what the problem is. 1st is we have 30% more players on our roster and 2nd is we have 30% less teams so there are more talented (higher paid players) available to us. I am at the cap limit now and next year when I extend the players whos contracts expiers i will still be at the cap limit and same for the next year. after that Im not sure I will be able to extend my players but I will allways be at the cap limit. I think most teams will be the same so fa will allways be a bargin because no one will have any cap space to spend on them. To compensate for this the cap should be 30% higher than the real NHL cap, then we would have closer to real fa. Like some of you have done is finding out how much your salaries would be if you extended everyone and it gives a true look at the problem. If we made our cap about 80M to 85M about 30% above the real cap we would still have to make some choices on fa but would also give us a more realalistic fa bidding.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12086
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2011, 11:51:39 PM »
you have to look at what the problem is. 1st is we have 30% more players on our roster and 2nd is we have 30% less teams so there are more talented (higher paid players) available to us. I am at the cap limit now and next year when I extend the players whos contracts expiers i will still be at the cap limit and same for the next year. after that Im not sure I will be able to extend my players but I will allways be at the cap limit. I think most teams will be the same so fa will allways be a bargin because no one will have any cap space to spend on them. To compensate for this the cap should be 30% higher than the real NHL cap, then we would have closer to real fa. Like some of you have done is finding out how much your salaries would be if you extended everyone and it gives a true look at the problem. If we made our cap about 80M to 85M about 30% above the real cap we would still have to make some choices on fa but would also give us a more realalistic fa bidding.

I think 30% is excessive.  Like I said before on any given night we don't start 30 players, we start about as many players as a normal NHL team starts.  The extra bench slots are really there for flexibility.  I think we should be looking at it primarily based on what we're paying for our starting players.   There's also a huge savings from the prospect contracts which needs to be considered.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12086
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2011, 09:12:37 AM »
Actually, if you shave that down to 25% to account for cheaper prospects and base it off last years cap, since all our numbers are based on last year, it would put us right around $75m. 

Offline jmtrops

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 1645
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2011, 09:34:54 PM »
If we were able to have that one time free drop of bad contracts then the 75M would be perfect but I think in 2 years most teams will not be able to resign a lot of there players.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12086
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #28 on: September 18, 2011, 11:36:49 AM »
If we all could extend all our players every year there wouldn't be much point to a cap anyway.  Look at what CHI and PHI have had to do with their rosters the last couple years to stay within the cap.  There's going to be some tough decisions for teams to make over the years but I think it adds strategy.

I'm leaning towards an increase to $75m.  After all this discussion I think it makes the most sense.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 11:47:34 AM by Robo »

Online -BA-

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 5386
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHC:
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #29 on: September 19, 2011, 03:54:43 PM »
If we all could extend all our players every year there wouldn't be much point to a cap anyway.  Look at what CHI and PHI have had to do with their rosters the last couple years to stay within the cap.  There's going to be some tough decisions for teams to make over the years but I think it adds strategy.

I'm leaning towards an increase to $75m.  After all this discussion I think it makes the most sense.

I think the $75m is a good number.
"You go to the box. Two minutes by yourself and... you feel shame. You know... and then you get free."

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
New England Patriots QB last name:
Who won the 2015 mens NCAA basketball championship (school name only):

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • fantasyboi: anyone from ML on?
    July 24, 2016, 10:37:43 PM
  • cjbeckel: Im on fantasyboi...wanna deal?
    July 25, 2016, 12:30:34 AM
  • fantasyboi: sure but also need a favor
    July 25, 2016, 12:53:50 AM
  • BHows: Back to you Freddy
    July 25, 2016, 01:47:24 AM
  • Leatherhelmets: NFL~NCAAF DEVY LEAGUE [link]
    July 25, 2016, 09:05:25 AM
  • DeanO22: EPL league?
    July 25, 2016, 11:07:08 AM
  • Leatherhelmets: NFL/College football
    July 25, 2016, 11:28:47 AM
  • CRS245: Chapman to the Cubs, looks like the :NYY: Yankees are indeed selling
    July 25, 2016, 01:32:38 PM
  • cho34: HF47 PM
    July 25, 2016, 01:32:41 PM
  • cho34: wow cubs whole lot better
    July 25, 2016, 01:33:03 PM
  • Drew: NFL Dynasty 16 has 6 openings with some great teams available and some good projects. Entry draft will happen when we are full. [link]
    July 25, 2016, 02:54:37 PM
  • Jonathan: Cole hamels no hit cubs at Wrigley, 1 year ago today.
    July 25, 2016, 03:02:15 PM
  • Jonathan: Woman Beater Junior Gallette is out for 2nd straight year.  Good for him.
    July 25, 2016, 09:36:45 PM
  • fantasyboi: good lord this collaspe by the Giants is gonna be epic
    July 26, 2016, 01:05:43 AM
  • Drew: 4 spots left in NFL Dynasty 16 [link]
    July 26, 2016, 01:53:50 PM
  • Flash: Fantasyboi --PM
    July 26, 2016, 07:17:32 PM
  • Leatherhelmets: NFL Final Cut opening see classified post for roster
    Yesterday at 10:15:30 AM
  • Leatherhelmets: NFL~NCAAF Devy Lg. forum is up in NFL Lg. section 5 slots already taken
    Yesterday at 10:16:58 AM
  • Jonathan: dave, drop lobstein....... you made my team illegal
    Yesterday at 12:56:08 PM
  • Jonathan: Patriots, Cowboys, Steelers and Packers shaking in their boots. Rams are back!
    Yesterday at 01:54:48 PM
  • Tarheels55: Done Jonathan
    Yesterday at 01:57:32 PM
  • Jonathan: Nick Foles 2013 = O's Brady Anderson 1996. Foles NFL record for best single season TD–INT ratio, with 27 TD passes and only 2 INTs
    Yesterday at 07:55:40 PM
  • Leatherhelmets: Opening in NFL Final Cut survivor format, see classifieds
    Yesterday at 08:25:30 PM
  • Scalious: Bundy! Showing some promise..just stay healthy for the love of god
    Yesterday at 09:36:46 PM
  • Jonathan: Number 1 for Dahl
    Yesterday at 09:59:46 PM
  • Eric: Sup guys
    Yesterday at 10:21:33 PM
  • Drew: Eric you want any of those teams in NFL 16?
    Today at 12:28:04 AM
  • Eric: Im just bout to look it over!
    Today at 12:42:25 AM
  • Eric: Whos left open?
    Today at 12:52:58 AM
  • Drew: Check your pm I think I sent the remaining or check the available team thread
    Today at 01:42:47 AM
  • Gilly: Morning folks
    Today at 10:33:41 AM
  • Tarheels55: Gilly  :toth:
    Today at 10:34:35 AM
  • joeshmoe: hey guys
    Today at 10:52:36 AM
  • Tarheels55: :toth: Morning
    Today at 10:54:03 AM
  • JFlapo: Tarheels55 otc in max pro
    Today at 12:04:23 PM
  • Tony: Nice pick JFLapo. Was hoping to pick up shayne with my pick.
    Today at 12:28:43 PM
  • Drew: Would have liked him but couldn't pass up on Puljujärvi
    Today at 12:33:19 PM
  • JFlapo: Hehe thanks
    Today at 12:33:48 PM
  • norrya66: Tony, offer sent
    Today at 12:35:07 PM
  • JFlapo: Anyone interested in seguin im looking for a goalie
    Today at 12:36:03 PM
  • Drew: Yes but don't have a goalie for you
    Today at 12:38:41 PM
  • JFlapo: Too bad
    Today at 12:39:47 PM
  • norrya66: Yes! But I don't have a great goalie either
    Today at 12:46:20 PM
  • Tony: Back at you norrya66
    Today at 12:46:33 PM
  • norrya66: Posting now Tony
    Today at 12:48:18 PM
  • norrya66: Posted. Thanks
    Today at 12:51:31 PM
  • Tony: :toast:
    Today at 12:56:49 PM
  • Leatherhelmets: "Be Part of the Journey" check out the new NFL Devy League [link]
    Today at 04:07:16 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Bush League is looking for 5 GMs: [link]
    Today at 05:10:57 PM
  • Jonathan: familia with an ugly blow
    Today at 05:13:12 PM