Dynasty NHL



Poll

Should the salary cap be increased next season?

Yes
11 (73.3%)
No
4 (26.7%)

Total Members Voted: 15

Author Topic: 2012/2013 Salary Cap  (Read 5848 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 14260
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
  • Fantasy Prestige 10
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2011, 02:28:21 PM »
But you picked up a lot of bargain bench players that are going to extend for more than they're costing you now.  I'd like to see how some other teams shape up before we jump to conclusions on this.  We're using 30 man rosters which is more than the NHL but we're not starting any more players than they are in the real game on any given night.  Some of us are using the extra spots for prospects others are stocking up on extra players to change in and out.  A good question is what are you going to be paying for your primary starters?  If that number is significantly lower then I'm not sure we should make drastic cap accommodations for our bench players. 

Online snugerud

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 3779
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 2
    • :Blank:
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2011, 02:58:02 PM »
i would agree with that, and there are a lot of players on that list I would not be extending. 

I am of course just playing devil's advocate and trying to look at this from the different angles.  I still stand by my original opinion of not changing the cap.  Since i love the free agent frenzy. 
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline GypsieDeathBringer

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1057
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 1
    • :PIT:
    • :DAL:
    • :ORL:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Pittsburgh:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2011, 04:22:27 PM »
That is kind of fun to extend your whole team to see what they would be worth using just our extension values.  It shows you how much of a bargain or not your team really is.

I am sitting at 102.1m, but yeah I wouldn't extend all those folks.  If I had to extend all my starters I would be up BooYah!  creek for sure, but that is fine because I got good deals and didn't expect to hold onto these players at those amounts.
2011-12 Dynasty NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CAR-NHL:

Offline Whomp

  • *ProFSL Gold
  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 740
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :CHW:
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Northwestern:
    • :CHI-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2011, 05:32:08 PM »
I say yes, but based on if the NHL salary cap increases.  That way the league can kind of stay in touch with the NHL.  So, if the NHL raises their cap by 1m we would raise ours by the current ratio of 70m(our cap)/64.3m(nhl cap) or 1.088m.  Already starting off with 70m has made it pretty easy to field a 30 man roster.

Ditto - let's follow the NHL per some formula that relates the real cap per player.
"Someone once said that Bobby could hit a puck through a car wash and not get it wet and that I could hit it just as hard, but not hit the car wash. That was the difference." Dennis Hull

Offline jmtrops

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 1918
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2011, 11:15:55 PM »
you have to look at what the problem is. 1st is we have 30% more players on our roster and 2nd is we have 30% less teams so there are more talented (higher paid players) available to us. I am at the cap limit now and next year when I extend the players whos contracts expiers i will still be at the cap limit and same for the next year. after that Im not sure I will be able to extend my players but I will allways be at the cap limit. I think most teams will be the same so fa will allways be a bargin because no one will have any cap space to spend on them. To compensate for this the cap should be 30% higher than the real NHL cap, then we would have closer to real fa. Like some of you have done is finding out how much your salaries would be if you extended everyone and it gives a true look at the problem. If we made our cap about 80M to 85M about 30% above the real cap we would still have to make some choices on fa but would also give us a more realalistic fa bidding.

Online Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 14260
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
  • Fantasy Prestige 10
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2011, 11:51:39 PM »
you have to look at what the problem is. 1st is we have 30% more players on our roster and 2nd is we have 30% less teams so there are more talented (higher paid players) available to us. I am at the cap limit now and next year when I extend the players whos contracts expiers i will still be at the cap limit and same for the next year. after that Im not sure I will be able to extend my players but I will allways be at the cap limit. I think most teams will be the same so fa will allways be a bargin because no one will have any cap space to spend on them. To compensate for this the cap should be 30% higher than the real NHL cap, then we would have closer to real fa. Like some of you have done is finding out how much your salaries would be if you extended everyone and it gives a true look at the problem. If we made our cap about 80M to 85M about 30% above the real cap we would still have to make some choices on fa but would also give us a more realalistic fa bidding.

I think 30% is excessive.  Like I said before on any given night we don't start 30 players, we start about as many players as a normal NHL team starts.  The extra bench slots are really there for flexibility.  I think we should be looking at it primarily based on what we're paying for our starting players.   There's also a huge savings from the prospect contracts which needs to be considered.

Online Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 14260
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
  • Fantasy Prestige 10
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2011, 09:12:37 AM »
Actually, if you shave that down to 25% to account for cheaper prospects and base it off last years cap, since all our numbers are based on last year, it would put us right around $75m. 

Offline jmtrops

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 1918
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 0
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2011, 09:34:54 PM »
If we were able to have that one time free drop of bad contracts then the 75M would be perfect but I think in 2 years most teams will not be able to resign a lot of there players.

Online Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 14260
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
  • Fantasy Prestige 10
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #28 on: September 18, 2011, 11:36:49 AM »
If we all could extend all our players every year there wouldn't be much point to a cap anyway.  Look at what CHI and PHI have had to do with their rosters the last couple years to stay within the cap.  There's going to be some tough decisions for teams to make over the years but I think it adds strategy.

I'm leaning towards an increase to $75m.  After all this discussion I think it makes the most sense.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 11:47:34 AM by Robo »

Online -BA-

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 5488
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Fantasy Prestige 7
    • :CHC:
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #29 on: September 19, 2011, 03:54:43 PM »
If we all could extend all our players every year there wouldn't be much point to a cap anyway.  Look at what CHI and PHI have had to do with their rosters the last couple years to stay within the cap.  There's going to be some tough decisions for teams to make over the years but I think it adds strategy.

I'm leaning towards an increase to $75m.  After all this discussion I think it makes the most sense.

I think the $75m is a good number.
"You go to the box. Two minutes by yourself and... you feel shame. You know... and then you get free."

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
Last name of MLB all-time HR leader:
New England Patriots QB last name:

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Afternoon FNHLers!
    November 18, 2017, 03:27:29 PM
  • hockeygoon33: Afternoon PPG!
    November 18, 2017, 04:25:44 PM
  • blkhwkfn: HA I said dilly dilly at the bar and people just looked at me like I was an idiot.
    November 18, 2017, 05:58:26 PM
  • indiansnation: Blk lmao
    November 18, 2017, 06:40:00 PM
  • hockeygoon33: Hahahaha
    November 18, 2017, 06:49:19 PM
  • Jonathan: I think Rask will be ok. His point total should be on the rise with the new combinations. They moved Teuvo up to play with Staal and its not Rask Skinner and Elias together. Skinner is the best scorer they got by a mile.
    November 18, 2017, 07:38:39 PM
  • Jonathan: *now
    November 18, 2017, 07:38:55 PM
  • Daddy: @snugerud I fully understand now, @JoJo I think there are only 3 and none are 31 team's or $ involved.
    November 18, 2017, 08:31:43 PM
  • Daddy: I'm looking forward to tomorrow's NFL slate of games, it's been a fun season.
    November 18, 2017, 08:33:27 PM
  • Daddy: Rosen to Cleveland #1 overall Brian. Help is on the way. Im not sure about Darnold or any USC QBs
    November 18, 2017, 08:36:02 PM
  • Daddy: They play each other tonight, as a Browns fan I would have a beer and check it out.
    November 18, 2017, 08:39:53 PM
  • chrisetc21: Smack talk [link]
    November 18, 2017, 09:38:34 PM
  • AntMan: Mmmmm Beer
    November 18, 2017, 09:47:24 PM
  • Donfraze: chris pm
    November 18, 2017, 10:07:49 PM
  • indiansnation: Donfraze pm
    November 18, 2017, 11:04:32 PM
  • Jonathan: Vikes smoked them
    November 19, 2017, 05:42:22 PM
  • Jonathan: Someone give Peterman the Heimlich Maneuver.
    November 19, 2017, 06:42:17 PM
  • Daddy: My goodness, live, eat, sleep, it's obssesion. That's scary.
    November 19, 2017, 07:18:55 PM
  • chrisetc21: Rams lost huh
    November 19, 2017, 08:25:22 PM
  • chrisetc21: lol
    November 19, 2017, 08:25:27 PM
  • Flash: BHows - PM
    November 19, 2017, 08:39:54 PM
  • BHows: Ernie- Check your EMail
    November 19, 2017, 08:50:40 PM
  • Daddy: Lol, not the first time, won't be the last. This is funny.
    November 19, 2017, 09:20:06 PM
  • Daddy: Pathetic, but extremely funny :rofl:
    November 19, 2017, 09:21:38 PM
  • blkhwkfn: I wouldnt rely on CBS mock drafts. Cleveland should trade down to get more picks
    November 19, 2017, 09:25:19 PM
  • blkhwkfn: then look to either Wyoming or Auburn QBs after a first round WR pick
    November 19, 2017, 09:26:59 PM
  • Flash: BHows - Got it! Thanks!
    November 19, 2017, 09:41:27 PM
  • Daddy: Mock drafts are terrible. Cleveland needs to get QB figured out.
    November 19, 2017, 09:57:15 PM
  • Daddy: I think they will
    November 19, 2017, 09:57:35 PM
  • blkhwkfn: Not with a first, they have so many needs. How many times can a franchise wiff on a QB?
    Yesterday at 12:03:24 AM
  • blkhwkfn: Intresting that you like Rosen for Cleveland.......as do many Mock drafts. If I was the GM for the Browns and picking a QB it would be Josh Allen
    Yesterday at 12:20:49 AM
  • kidd5jersey: Josh Allen can't read defense, throws too many picks, and plays 2nd rate competition
    Yesterday at 12:59:49 AM
  • chrisetc21: And he has two first names
    Yesterday at 01:15:28 AM
  • Daddy: Yes I think Rosen is legit. Not sure on Darnold and/or Allen but who really knows.
    Yesterday at 02:05:30 AM
  • Daddy: I think you whiff until you get it right. You can't keep passing on guys. The Browns won't be bad forever. No team is.
    Yesterday at 02:06:32 AM
  • Daddy: We the public always lump seasons together and draw an overall picture of team's to suit the workings of the mind.
    Yesterday at 02:07:49 AM
  • Daddy: The truth is every NFL season is an all new one that can go any way, Cleveland can be a playoff team next year if they draft right and fix a few things.
    Yesterday at 02:09:07 AM
  • blkhwkfn: I'd take that bet
    Yesterday at 02:34:20 AM
  • blkhwkfn: So what would you grade the competition that Carson Wentz played against at NDSU?
    Yesterday at 02:39:44 AM
  • Daddy: Not great but neither was Jerry Rice's comp and a bunch of others.
    Yesterday at 03:51:03 AM
  • Daddy: It comes down to the player, and no way I bet on Cleveland but the NFL is the league where it "could" happen in one season.
    Yesterday at 03:52:07 AM
  • Daddy: The Browns won't always be terrible. They get a QB and it's a start. I like Rosen but there is no sure bets.
    Yesterday at 03:53:31 AM
  • Daddy: You also need a HC, O Line, and a good team built around a young QB. Without those things they are all busts.
    Yesterday at 03:54:50 AM
  • Daddy: How is Dak looking these days? How about Luck, RG3, Winston, Tannehill, the list of guys coming up lacking is very long.
    Yesterday at 04:02:19 AM
  • Daddy: And all those names had decent success or better early on.
    Yesterday at 04:02:55 AM
  • Vanadio: :tor: OTC in Armchair draft
    Yesterday at 10:49:14 AM
  • Vanadio: :TOR:
    Yesterday at 10:49:22 AM
  • Daddy: Posts disappear and reappear elsewhere?
    Yesterday at 05:29:40 PM
  • Daddy: Magic act
    Yesterday at 05:29:52 PM
  • TheBeef: Trade posted BurkesBoys Thanks.
    Today at 03:06:19 PM