* Dynasty NHL

Blank 



Boston Bruins Buffalo Sabres Philadelphia Flyers Washington Capitals Pittsburgh Penguins :: Detroit Red Wings Florida Panthers Chicago Blackhawks Tampa Bay Lightning Carolina Hurricanes 
Edmonton Oilers Montreal Canadiens Toronto Maple Leafs Vancouver Canucks Calgary Flames :: Anaheim Ducks Colorado Avalanche St. Louis Blues Phoenix Coyotes Los Angeles Kings 
Blank --------------------------------------
Blank DNHL Champions
 |
Carolina Hurricanes 11/12 | Chicago Blackhawks 12/13 | Detroit Red Wings 13/14 | Anaheim Ducks 14/15 | Anaheim Ducks 15/16 |

Poll

Should the salary cap be increased next season?

Yes
11 (73.3%)
No
4 (26.7%)

Total Members Voted: 15

Author Topic: 2012/2013 Salary Cap  (Read 4227 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12170
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2011, 02:28:21 PM »
But you picked up a lot of bargain bench players that are going to extend for more than they're costing you now.  I'd like to see how some other teams shape up before we jump to conclusions on this.  We're using 30 man rosters which is more than the NHL but we're not starting any more players than they are in the real game on any given night.  Some of us are using the extra spots for prospects others are stocking up on extra players to change in and out.  A good question is what are you going to be paying for your primary starters?  If that number is significantly lower then I'm not sure we should make drastic cap accommodations for our bench players. 

Offline snugerud

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 3372
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2011, 02:58:02 PM »
i would agree with that, and there are a lot of players on that list I would not be extending. 

I am of course just playing devil's advocate and trying to look at this from the different angles.  I still stand by my original opinion of not changing the cap.  Since i love the free agent frenzy. 
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline GypsieDeathBringer

  • All-Star
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 895
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PIT:
    • :DAL:
    • :ORL:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Pittsburgh:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2011, 04:22:27 PM »
That is kind of fun to extend your whole team to see what they would be worth using just our extension values.  It shows you how much of a bargain or not your team really is.

I am sitting at 102.1m, but yeah I wouldn't extend all those folks.  If I had to extend all my starters I would be up BooYah!  creek for sure, but that is fine because I got good deals and didn't expect to hold onto these players at those amounts.
2011-12 Dynasty NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CAR-NHL:

Offline Whomp

  • *ProFSL Gold
  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 661
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHW:
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Northwestern:
    • :CHI-MLS:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2011, 05:32:08 PM »
I say yes, but based on if the NHL salary cap increases.  That way the league can kind of stay in touch with the NHL.  So, if the NHL raises their cap by 1m we would raise ours by the current ratio of 70m(our cap)/64.3m(nhl cap) or 1.088m.  Already starting off with 70m has made it pretty easy to field a 30 man roster.

Ditto - let's follow the NHL per some formula that relates the real cap per player.
"Someone once said that Bobby could hit a puck through a car wash and not get it wet and that I could hit it just as hard, but not hit the car wash. That was the difference." Dennis Hull

Offline jmtrops

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 1654
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2011, 11:15:55 PM »
you have to look at what the problem is. 1st is we have 30% more players on our roster and 2nd is we have 30% less teams so there are more talented (higher paid players) available to us. I am at the cap limit now and next year when I extend the players whos contracts expiers i will still be at the cap limit and same for the next year. after that Im not sure I will be able to extend my players but I will allways be at the cap limit. I think most teams will be the same so fa will allways be a bargin because no one will have any cap space to spend on them. To compensate for this the cap should be 30% higher than the real NHL cap, then we would have closer to real fa. Like some of you have done is finding out how much your salaries would be if you extended everyone and it gives a true look at the problem. If we made our cap about 80M to 85M about 30% above the real cap we would still have to make some choices on fa but would also give us a more realalistic fa bidding.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12170
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2011, 11:51:39 PM »
you have to look at what the problem is. 1st is we have 30% more players on our roster and 2nd is we have 30% less teams so there are more talented (higher paid players) available to us. I am at the cap limit now and next year when I extend the players whos contracts expiers i will still be at the cap limit and same for the next year. after that Im not sure I will be able to extend my players but I will allways be at the cap limit. I think most teams will be the same so fa will allways be a bargin because no one will have any cap space to spend on them. To compensate for this the cap should be 30% higher than the real NHL cap, then we would have closer to real fa. Like some of you have done is finding out how much your salaries would be if you extended everyone and it gives a true look at the problem. If we made our cap about 80M to 85M about 30% above the real cap we would still have to make some choices on fa but would also give us a more realalistic fa bidding.

I think 30% is excessive.  Like I said before on any given night we don't start 30 players, we start about as many players as a normal NHL team starts.  The extra bench slots are really there for flexibility.  I think we should be looking at it primarily based on what we're paying for our starting players.   There's also a huge savings from the prospect contracts which needs to be considered.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12170
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2011, 09:12:37 AM »
Actually, if you shave that down to 25% to account for cheaper prospects and base it off last years cap, since all our numbers are based on last year, it would put us right around $75m. 

Offline jmtrops

  • All-Pro
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 1654
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2011, 09:34:54 PM »
If we were able to have that one time free drop of bad contracts then the 75M would be perfect but I think in 2 years most teams will not be able to resign a lot of there players.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 12170
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :BOS:
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #28 on: September 18, 2011, 11:36:49 AM »
If we all could extend all our players every year there wouldn't be much point to a cap anyway.  Look at what CHI and PHI have had to do with their rosters the last couple years to stay within the cap.  There's going to be some tough decisions for teams to make over the years but I think it adds strategy.

I'm leaning towards an increase to $75m.  After all this discussion I think it makes the most sense.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 11:47:34 AM by Robo »

Offline -BA-

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 5388
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHC:
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #29 on: September 19, 2011, 03:54:43 PM »
If we all could extend all our players every year there wouldn't be much point to a cap anyway.  Look at what CHI and PHI have had to do with their rosters the last couple years to stay within the cap.  There's going to be some tough decisions for teams to make over the years but I think it adds strategy.

I'm leaning towards an increase to $75m.  After all this discussion I think it makes the most sense.

I think the $75m is a good number.
"You go to the box. Two minutes by yourself and... you feel shame. You know... and then you get free."

 

With Quick-Reply you can write a post when viewing a topic without loading a new page. You can still use bulletin board code and smileys as you would in a normal post.

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name: Email:
Verification:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image
Type the letters shown in the picture:
Last name of MLB all-time HR leader:
New England Patriots QB last name:

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • irbwilleo: Vegeta, your :NotreDame: fighting Irish are OTC
    August 18, 2016, 09:59:12 PM
  • irbwilleo: wow those picks went quick
    August 18, 2016, 10:10:10 PM
  • Jonathan: Who needs Giolito when you got a k machine in Lopez
    August 18, 2016, 11:20:31 PM
  • Jonathan: Since being picked No. 1 overall by Texans in 2014, Jadeveon Clowney has missed 46.8% of Houston's games with various injuries.
    August 18, 2016, 11:39:57 PM
  • Eric: What's the time limit in TT draft?
    August 19, 2016, 12:28:46 AM
  • irbwilleo: Everyones schedule adjusted to the new 10 week schedule fyi
    August 19, 2016, 11:33:48 AM
  • Tarheels55: Still two openings in TT
    August 19, 2016, 12:09:41 PM
  • Tarheels55: Get them while their hot  :winner:
    August 19, 2016, 12:10:15 PM
  • cho34: which teams dave?
    August 19, 2016, 04:45:49 PM
  • Eric: Toronto and Arizona
    August 20, 2016, 12:29:55 AM
  • Gilly: evening boys
    August 20, 2016, 09:15:03 PM
  • Draft Legends: who is Gilly
    August 20, 2016, 09:32:46 PM
  • chrisetc21: good question
    August 20, 2016, 09:42:37 PM
  • chrisetc21: :o
    August 20, 2016, 09:42:42 PM
  • cloud91: oh its Gilly.
    August 21, 2016, 03:22:32 AM
  • Tony: Just some goof that comes on once in a while for attention.
    August 21, 2016, 03:50:46 AM
  • Gilly: such a nice fellow you are Tony..some things never change
    August 21, 2016, 09:31:45 AM
  • Tony: :toast:
    August 21, 2016, 01:34:20 PM
  • indiansnation: Good morning been to BooYah! long. Going personal issues righ know but im back
    August 21, 2016, 01:37:18 PM
  • cho34: welcome back brian hope ebeerything is ok now
    August 21, 2016, 01:41:14 PM
  • indiansnation: Kinda
    August 21, 2016, 02:14:06 PM
  • cho34: are you cokming back to the farm brain?
    August 21, 2016, 07:52:10 PM
  • Jonathan: Dak Prescott overreaction machine is powerful, same people that had a hunch the D-Backs MLB leading 24 Spring Training wins was legit.  :toth:
    August 21, 2016, 09:05:09 PM
  • chrisetc21: Well, you did pay $19 for Josh Ferguson
    August 21, 2016, 09:09:37 PM
  • chrisetc21: $19m
    August 21, 2016, 09:09:47 PM
  • chrisetc21: :o
    August 21, 2016, 09:09:51 PM
  • chrisetc21: Eric is a wuss bidder, him and his .3 raises, wtf
    August 21, 2016, 09:12:34 PM
  • chrisetc21: I'll raise .3... and now I'll raise... .3, raise .3
    August 21, 2016, 09:13:05 PM
  • Jonathan: 19.4 and I would do it again. A contract like that has no long term ramifications.
    August 21, 2016, 09:13:26 PM
  • Jonathan: Using a draft pick on him would of cost more. Potential a wasted pick.
    August 21, 2016, 09:14:22 PM
  • chrisetc21: every pick is potentially a wasted pick
    August 21, 2016, 09:15:30 PM
  • Jonathan: I wasn't speaking about any certain league, all leagues he is being overvalued off a few pre-season games.
    August 21, 2016, 09:16:02 PM
  • chrisetc21: I got him in the 5th round in TGF, worth it there
    August 21, 2016, 09:22:41 PM
  • chrisetc21: RB is a special situation, you're not going to find starters in free agency during the season very often, so there's a reason that even long shots are valued highly
    August 21, 2016, 09:23:49 PM
  • chrisetc21: Thomas Rawls for example, undrafted free agent, big return on that investment to whoever signed him or drafted him
    August 21, 2016, 09:24:33 PM
  • Jonathan: RB next year is going to be epic.
    August 21, 2016, 09:31:47 PM
  • chrisetc21: i don't follow college, heh, who's coming?
    August 21, 2016, 09:34:13 PM
  • Jonathan: We've known for a few years now.
    August 21, 2016, 09:34:56 PM
  • Eric: The raise me a bid I won't match....
    August 21, 2016, 09:35:17 PM
  • Jonathan: I still like Cook the most.
    August 21, 2016, 09:36:18 PM
  • chrisetc21: What bid won't you match?  Why don't you just tell me, stop wasting everyone's time.
    August 21, 2016, 09:36:47 PM
  • chrisetc21: .3.3.3.3.3.3.3.3.3.3.3 :o
    August 21, 2016, 09:37:02 PM
  • Eric: Nah I'll pass. Thanks for the opportunity tho :thumbsup:
    August 21, 2016, 09:37:45 PM
  • Scalious: Minium bidding against the minium bidder is the way to go. Waste each others time with trival BS
    August 22, 2016, 12:20:43 AM
  • BHows: Flash- EMail
    August 22, 2016, 09:09:04 PM
  • snbts: kylerap..mendoza trade posted
    August 23, 2016, 10:14:22 AM
  • Jonathan: White Sox and Nationals are only MLB teams so far NOT planning to attend the Tim Tebow dog and pony show next week in LA
    Yesterday at 08:56:04 AM
  • CRS245: dog and pony show is the truth
    Yesterday at 10:15:22 AM
  • Daddy: Josh Norman is running that mouth pretty good.
    Yesterday at 12:36:34 PM
  • Daddy: Excited to see him fail.
    Yesterday at 12:37:22 PM