Dynasty NHL

Fantrax :: Rules :: Transactions :: History



::
::

Past Champions
2011/12 :: 2012/13 :: 2013/14 :: 2014/15 :: 2015/16 :: 2016/17 :: 2017/18


Author Topic: 2012/2013 Salary Cap  (Read 6093 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 14836
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2011, 02:28:21 PM »
But you picked up a lot of bargain bench players that are going to extend for more than they're costing you now.  I'd like to see how some other teams shape up before we jump to conclusions on this.  We're using 30 man rosters which is more than the NHL but we're not starting any more players than they are in the real game on any given night.  Some of us are using the extra spots for prospects others are stocking up on extra players to change in and out.  A good question is what are you going to be paying for your primary starters?  If that number is significantly lower then I'm not sure we should make drastic cap accommodations for our bench players. 

Offline snugerud

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 3911
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2011, 02:58:02 PM »
i would agree with that, and there are a lot of players on that list I would not be extending. 

I am of course just playing devil's advocate and trying to look at this from the different angles.  I still stand by my original opinion of not changing the cap.  Since i love the free agent frenzy. 
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline GypsieDeathBringer

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1109
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :ORL:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Pittsburgh:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2011, 04:22:27 PM »
That is kind of fun to extend your whole team to see what they would be worth using just our extension values.  It shows you how much of a bargain or not your team really is.

I am sitting at 102.1m, but yeah I wouldn't extend all those folks.  If I had to extend all my starters I would be up BooYah!  creek for sure, but that is fine because I got good deals and didn't expect to hold onto these players at those amounts.
2011-12 Dynasty NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CAR-NHL:

Offline Whomp

  • Veteran
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 768
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Northwestern:
    • :CHI-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2011, 05:32:08 PM »
I say yes, but based on if the NHL salary cap increases.  That way the league can kind of stay in touch with the NHL.  So, if the NHL raises their cap by 1m we would raise ours by the current ratio of 70m(our cap)/64.3m(nhl cap) or 1.088m.  Already starting off with 70m has made it pretty easy to field a 30 man roster.

Ditto - let's follow the NHL per some formula that relates the real cap per player.
"Someone once said that Bobby could hit a puck through a car wash and not get it wet and that I could hit it just as hard, but not hit the car wash. That was the difference." Dennis Hull

Offline jmtrops

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 2000
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #24 on: September 16, 2011, 11:15:55 PM »
you have to look at what the problem is. 1st is we have 30% more players on our roster and 2nd is we have 30% less teams so there are more talented (higher paid players) available to us. I am at the cap limit now and next year when I extend the players whos contracts expiers i will still be at the cap limit and same for the next year. after that Im not sure I will be able to extend my players but I will allways be at the cap limit. I think most teams will be the same so fa will allways be a bargin because no one will have any cap space to spend on them. To compensate for this the cap should be 30% higher than the real NHL cap, then we would have closer to real fa. Like some of you have done is finding out how much your salaries would be if you extended everyone and it gives a true look at the problem. If we made our cap about 80M to 85M about 30% above the real cap we would still have to make some choices on fa but would also give us a more realalistic fa bidding.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 14836
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #25 on: September 16, 2011, 11:51:39 PM »
you have to look at what the problem is. 1st is we have 30% more players on our roster and 2nd is we have 30% less teams so there are more talented (higher paid players) available to us. I am at the cap limit now and next year when I extend the players whos contracts expiers i will still be at the cap limit and same for the next year. after that Im not sure I will be able to extend my players but I will allways be at the cap limit. I think most teams will be the same so fa will allways be a bargin because no one will have any cap space to spend on them. To compensate for this the cap should be 30% higher than the real NHL cap, then we would have closer to real fa. Like some of you have done is finding out how much your salaries would be if you extended everyone and it gives a true look at the problem. If we made our cap about 80M to 85M about 30% above the real cap we would still have to make some choices on fa but would also give us a more realalistic fa bidding.

I think 30% is excessive.  Like I said before on any given night we don't start 30 players, we start about as many players as a normal NHL team starts.  The extra bench slots are really there for flexibility.  I think we should be looking at it primarily based on what we're paying for our starting players.   There's also a huge savings from the prospect contracts which needs to be considered.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 14836
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2011, 09:12:37 AM »
Actually, if you shave that down to 25% to account for cheaper prospects and base it off last years cap, since all our numbers are based on last year, it would put us right around $75m. 

Offline jmtrops

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 2000
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :TBL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2011, 09:34:54 PM »
If we were able to have that one time free drop of bad contracts then the 75M would be perfect but I think in 2 years most teams will not be able to resign a lot of there players.

Offline Rob

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 14836
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #28 on: September 18, 2011, 11:36:49 AM »
If we all could extend all our players every year there wouldn't be much point to a cap anyway.  Look at what CHI and PHI have had to do with their rosters the last couple years to stay within the cap.  There's going to be some tough decisions for teams to make over the years but I think it adds strategy.

I'm leaning towards an increase to $75m.  After all this discussion I think it makes the most sense.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2011, 11:47:34 AM by Robo »

Online -BA-

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 5497
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIN-NFL:
    • :MIN-NBA:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :Michigan:
    • View Profile
Re: 2012/2013 Salary Cap
« Reply #29 on: September 19, 2011, 03:54:43 PM »
If we all could extend all our players every year there wouldn't be much point to a cap anyway.  Look at what CHI and PHI have had to do with their rosters the last couple years to stay within the cap.  There's going to be some tough decisions for teams to make over the years but I think it adds strategy.

I'm leaning towards an increase to $75m.  After all this discussion I think it makes the most sense.

I think the $75m is a good number.
"You go to the box. Two minutes by yourself and... you feel shame. You know... and then you get free."

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • indiansnation: See everyone in morning
    April 17, 2018, 12:30:42 AM
  • snugerud: rob you can always get me back if you win by putting up Marchand. I hate that guys face
    April 17, 2018, 11:54:16 AM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: FNHLers! What's happening?!
    April 17, 2018, 12:03:38 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: You're all hyperactive in FNHL. It's been like doing taxes processing all the trades on the board!?!!! :puke:
    April 17, 2018, 12:04:21 PM
  • AntMan: Oh the leagues never been more valuable; it’s like taxes with a big refund check
    April 17, 2018, 12:12:18 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Not for me. I get squat
    April 17, 2018, 12:26:08 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: But there's some fun in the whole crazy process
    April 17, 2018, 12:26:22 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Too bad we can't sell the whole league!
    April 17, 2018, 12:26:39 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Teams have value which is great!
    April 17, 2018, 12:26:48 PM
  • ALL4U2NV: PM Psychoticpondgoons
    April 17, 2018, 02:06:12 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Done
    April 17, 2018, 02:07:46 PM
  • ALL4U2NV: I changed the Round 3 to T Carrick in the original trade post
    April 17, 2018, 02:09:53 PM
  • ALL4U2NV: Crossed out the old and added the new :toast: Is that OK
    April 17, 2018, 02:10:10 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: I'm OK with it.
    April 17, 2018, 02:10:26 PM
  • ALL4U2NV: Great
    April 17, 2018, 02:14:25 PM
  • ALL4U2NV: Thanks
    April 17, 2018, 02:14:33 PM
  • ALL4U2NV: Any chance you will have time to process the other remaining Vegas trades today?
    April 17, 2018, 02:46:51 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Maybe
    April 17, 2018, 02:54:51 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: Juggling now
    April 17, 2018, 02:54:58 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: VGK & TB done :judge:
    April 17, 2018, 03:10:09 PM
  • PsychoticPondGoons: VGK & SJ done :judge:
    April 17, 2018, 03:32:11 PM
  • Thecliff: THE BUSH LEAGUE UPDATE [link]
    April 18, 2018, 12:17:47 AM
  • indiansnation: Minn takeing offers on bobby ryan in fnhl
    April 18, 2018, 07:47:15 AM
  • indiansnation: Fnhl taken offer on paul byron
    April 18, 2018, 08:26:08 AM
  • indiansnation: Tampa
    April 18, 2018, 08:26:25 AM
  • Rock On: Morning guys
    April 18, 2018, 11:29:03 AM
  • izaman3: Morning Rock On
    April 18, 2018, 12:15:57 PM
  • Rock On: Hi Izaman
    April 18, 2018, 12:34:53 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey guys
    April 18, 2018, 01:08:09 PM
  • halo99: PM Indians
    April 18, 2018, 03:25:31 PM
  • halo99: Let me know what it would take
    April 18, 2018, 03:25:38 PM
  • indiansnation: Looking know halo
    April 18, 2018, 03:56:10 PM
  • Rock On: It's up Indiansnation
    April 18, 2018, 04:18:52 PM
  • Rock On: Chat later. Will be back tonight
    April 18, 2018, 04:24:46 PM
  • indiansnation: Roco on and antman pm
    April 18, 2018, 09:16:48 PM
  • indiansnation: Dnhl pirates listening offers on karlsson c
    April 18, 2018, 09:17:31 PM
  • indiansnation: Dnhl penguins lol
    April 18, 2018, 09:17:46 PM
  • indiansnation: Rock on pm
    April 18, 2018, 09:18:08 PM
  • Rock On: It's on Indians
    April 18, 2018, 09:24:55 PM
  • rotodojo: modified nym trade block in armchair
    April 19, 2018, 07:07:19 AM
  • Rob: DNHL alltime rankings are updated for 17/18:  [link]
    April 19, 2018, 03:09:12 PM
  • JimmySmithers: Flash Pm
    April 20, 2018, 12:26:59 AM
  • Colby: NICE POST ROB
    April 20, 2018, 03:33:45 AM
  • Colby: FGM paid
    April 20, 2018, 12:44:26 PM
  • leppardkev: In AFB, Washington is looking for CI or SS, I have OF and C to offer. Anyone wanna deal?
    April 20, 2018, 12:45:25 PM
  • BHows: Thanks Colby!
    April 20, 2018, 12:54:28 PM
  • indiansnation: Lepp im giants
    April 20, 2018, 01:22:58 PM
  • Flash: Thanks Colby!  Much appreciated!
    April 20, 2018, 01:32:57 PM
  • JimmySmithers: Thanks Colby. Is it possible to sort something out so we can split it?
    April 20, 2018, 06:50:00 PM
  • Colby: Sort what out?
    Today at 02:29:12 PM