Author Topic: Trading rules discussion  (Read 1234 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 2935
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :Canada:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2018, 03:52:33 PM »
I think when you've been in the league a long time, your not voting is just indicative of an approval.  So as long as there's enough time for everyone to see a trade posted, it should just pass unless it has vetoes.  72 hours is plenty of time.  Also, a reminder to people when trades are posted via PM is also a good policy.

I'm new here, but not new to trading and vetoes and such.

Realistically, if a trade is bad bad bad, there will be a lot of people that chime in about it.
As Chrisetc said, not voting can often be a sign of approval. If something stands out that we don't like, we'll take the time to say what's on our mind. If it's okay, we couldn't be bothered. From what I've seen on here, when a veto goes down, pretty well all of the other GM's are in agreement that the deal needs to be re-worked. If the trade is ok, sometimes only half or less of the TC actually replies with an approval.

If everyone were active, I would say half of the remaining GM's would have to veto it for it to be a vetoed trade. So in this league's case, 7 of the remaining 14 GM's would have to veto (taking out the 2 GMs making the trade of course).
That said, it seems this league isn't overly active on the voting on trades front (from my short 1-week stint here, with the 4 trades sitting on the board).

So with that said, I'm kind of with blkhwkfn in the sense of thinking bigger picture:

(1) Out of all the votes cast on a trade, majority rules. With the caveat that a tie goes to a veto.
Only problem here is that as mentioned, some people who are indifferent or think a trade is fine, sometimes just don't vote.

(2) Or a set number of of the league (a third) would have to veto. So 5 out of the 14 GM's.
2 people, or even 3 for that matter, having an issue with a trade seems like a low number.
It should be a significant portion of the league.


Perhaps a 48 hour window though instead of 24 hours, as we're all in different time zones and have varying busy schedules. 1 day could be tight, sometime I'm not on here for 20-hours at a time and I'm sure I'm not the only one... But 2 full days is plenty of time.
*And that 48-hour clock starts when one of the league mod's sends a PM out to everyone in the league that there's a trade that needs to be looked at on on the Transactions board.
(Mod could easily change the title of the thread stating expiry date/time also, so it's clear).

At the end of the day, there's really no "correct" formula in free fantasy leagues for how trades should be judged, and accepted or vetoed.

We do have to remember that it's free fantasy we're talking about here too. This isn't life or death, and we're not messing with athletes' actual lives and families here.

Offline blkhwkfn

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 2463
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :OAK-NFL:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Wisconsin:
    • :CHE:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2018, 04:01:15 PM »
I'm new here, but not new to trading and vetoes and such.

Realistically, if a trade is bad bad bad, there will be a lot of people that chime in about it.
As Chrisetc said, not voting can often be a sign of approval. If something stands out that we don't like, we'll take the time to say what's on our mind. If it's okay, we couldn't be bothered. From what I've seen on here, when a veto goes down, pretty well all of the other GM's are in agreement that the deal needs to be re-worked. If the trade is ok, sometimes only half or less of the TC actually replies with an approval.

If everyone were active, I would say half of the remaining GM's would have to veto it for it to be a vetoed trade. So in this league's case, 7 of the remaining 14 GM's would have to veto (taking out the 2 GMs making the trade of course).
That said, it seems this league isn't overly active on the voting on trades front (from my short 1-week stint here, with the 4 trades sitting on the board).

So with that said, I'm kind of with blkhwkfn in the sense of thinking bigger picture:

(1) Out of all the votes cast on a trade, majority rules. With the caveat that a tie goes to a veto.
Only problem here is that as mentioned, some people who are indifferent or think a trade is fine, sometimes just don't vote.

(2) Or a set number of of the league (a third) would have to veto. So 5 out of the 14 GM's.
2 people, or even 3 for that matter, having an issue with a trade seems like a low number.
It should be a significant portion of the league.


Perhaps a 48 hour window though instead of 24 hours, as we're all in different time zones and have varying busy schedules. 1 day could be tight, sometime I'm not on here for 20-hours at a time and I'm sure I'm not the only one... But 2 full days is plenty of time.
*And that 48-hour clock starts when one of the league mod's sends a PM out to everyone in the league that there's a trade that needs to be looked at on on the Transactions board.
(Mod could easily change the title of the thread stating expiry date/time also, so it's clear).

At the end of the day, there's really no "correct" formula in free fantasy leagues for how trades should be judged, and accepted or vetoed.

We do have to remember that it's free fantasy we're talking about here too. This isn't life or death, and we're not messing with athletes' actual lives and families here.
:iatp:  Dilly Dilly
Can't we all just get along?
Rodney King

Offline Jonathan

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21612
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2018, 11:38:36 PM »
48 hours in season seems the right way to go. 

Seems like a small group (4-5) are actually voting. I'm not quite sure why its all the new GM's voting and none of the guys who have been around. Seems like it should be the other way around.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2018, 11:43:27 PM by Jonathan »

Offline blkhwkfn

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 2463
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :OAK-NFL:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Wisconsin:
    • :CHE:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2018, 07:42:24 AM »
48 hours in season seems the right way to go. 

Seems like a small group (4-5) are actually voting. I'm not quite sure why its all the new GM's voting and none of the guys who have been around. Seems like it should be the other way around.
:iatp:
Can't we all just get along?
Rodney King

Offline Anthony

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 8713
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Minnesota:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2018, 07:31:23 PM »
Good discussion going. We will move forward with making a change after baseball free agency is finished. It's been a rush getting that going over the last few weeks so when it's done, I want to use that down time to make any rule/procedural changes.
:win: Title Town 2011/12 Stanley Cup Champion

:win: Dynasty NHL 2012/13 Stanley Cup Champion

Offline chrisetc21

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 15391
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2018, 08:20:16 PM »
I think one thing is clear to me in that we need a trade deadline before the end of the regular season.  Perhaps two weeks before the end.  Teams loading up with players right at the end of the entire season is always something that has seemed like an odd way to do things.  The season should matter, not just have these huge deals happen right at the end that change the balance of the season.
:BOS: 2014 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2014 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:GS: 2014-2015 NBA Finals Champion - Free Market Kings
:HOU: 2015 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU-NFL: 2017 Super Bowl Champion - The Gridiron Franchise
:HOU-NBA3: 2017-2018 NBA Finals Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU-NFL3: 2018 Super Bowl Champion -Title Town
*Special thanks to all my imaginary fake accounts*

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 2935
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :Canada:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2018, 08:29:20 PM »
I think one thing is clear to me in that we need a trade deadline before the end of the regular season.  Perhaps two weeks before the end.  Teams loading up with players right at the end of the entire season is always something that has seemed like an odd way to do things.  The season should matter, not just have these huge deals happen right at the end that change the balance of the season.

While I somewhat agree, but also kind of like that the deadline is right up until the playoffs.
Allows more teams to really figure out if they're buyers or sellers, which generally gets more trades going.

If more teams are "in the hunt" for playoffs, and the trade deadline is too early, then no one's going to make moves.
As it is there weren't really many trades, which leads me to believe that trade deadline right before playoffs is actually quite fine.

If teams want to sell young players and prospects for veterans before the playoffs, I see no reason to stop them. Getting an extra guy or two isn't going to necessarily make or break a team's playoff run. In fantasy playoffs, anything can happen.

From what I've seen, the more time to make trades in here, the better. Keeps people a little more engaged for an extra week or two at the very least.

**FYI - speaking solely for the hockey portion of this league

Offline chrisetc21

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 15391
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2018, 08:41:53 PM »
While I somewhat agree, but also kind of like that the deadline is right up until the playoffs.
Allows more teams to really figure out if they're buyers or sellers, which generally gets more trades going.

If more teams are "in the hunt" for playoffs, and the trade deadline is too early, then no one's going to make moves.
As it is there weren't really many trades, which leads me to believe that trade deadline right before playoffs is actually quite fine.

If teams want to sell young players and prospects for veterans before the playoffs, I see no reason to stop them. Getting an extra guy or two isn't going to necessarily make or break a team's playoff run. In fantasy playoffs, anything can happen.

From what I've seen, the more time to make trades in here, the better. Keeps people a little more engaged for an extra week or two at the very least.

**FYI - speaking solely for the hockey portion of this league

If after several months you're not "in the hunt" with two weeks left then you're not in the hunt.   :o

 :thumbsup:
:BOS: 2014 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2014 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:GS: 2014-2015 NBA Finals Champion - Free Market Kings
:HOU: 2015 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU-NFL: 2017 Super Bowl Champion - The Gridiron Franchise
:HOU-NBA3: 2017-2018 NBA Finals Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU-NFL3: 2018 Super Bowl Champion -Title Town
*Special thanks to all my imaginary fake accounts*

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 2935
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :Canada:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2018, 08:58:28 PM »
If after several months you're not "in the hunt" with two weeks left then you're not in the hunt.

Again, just speaking for hockey in my short time, but the standings were pretty bunched up for making playoffs.

The last 2 weeks of matchups made or broke some teams making and missing the playoffs.

2 teams had the same records as me and missed the playoffs, while I'm in the 4th seed right now.

I find that if teams aren't making playoffs, they're (hopefully) trying to get as many picks and prospects as they can to rebuild their teams up (ie. NYI franchise).
If you take that away from them with a trade deadline too far away from playoffs, they have literally zero reason to be on the hockey site until the summer for the draft and FA.
That's a long time to have off ... To lose interest in the hockey team all together and forget about it.

I don't really see it being an issue in the hockey league. If anything it benefits the few active hockey managers who are making trades - more so the ones who want to rebuild up their teams gaining the young assets.

Maybe it's a bigger issue in the other sports leagues here though. But there were what, 3 trades close to the deadline in NHL, and from what I've heard, those were the first 3 trades in a really long time in the hockey portion of this league too.

Offline Jonathan

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21612
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #19 on: March 13, 2018, 12:19:03 AM »
I'd propose a month before playoffs. In RL its actually more than a month.

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: No complaints. Work promotion and lots of travel.
    October 19, 2019, 03:23:30 PM
  • Daddy: Life is good.
    October 19, 2019, 03:23:46 PM
  • Thecliff: :judge: NASCAR TCRL Race 32 preview [link]
    October 19, 2019, 09:20:55 PM
  • Teddy: Want to know why you have issues getting new ownership? Questionable integrity.
    October 20, 2019, 05:32:10 PM
  • Teddy: This was allowed to pass [link] and its the only move the Chargers have even made.
    October 20, 2019, 05:33:19 PM
  • Teddy: Maybe I should trade Zeke and company to the Rams or Eagles or Bucs or Houston and not make another move.
    October 20, 2019, 05:34:27 PM
  • Teddy: Im new and my fresh eyes see there are problems here.
    October 20, 2019, 05:36:06 PM
  • blkhwkfn: Being a dynasty league I would rather have what the Chargers received but I’m just a Hockey guy
    October 20, 2019, 05:44:49 PM
  • Teddy: Can't see how it makes the Chargers better or more attractive to own.
    October 20, 2019, 06:13:38 PM
  • Teddy: Looking at the other trades it seems like a massive under sell.
    October 20, 2019, 06:14:25 PM
  • blkhwkfn: Is the charger team idle? No owner?
    October 20, 2019, 06:16:29 PM
  • jojowalkwalk: Ted how are you?
    October 20, 2019, 06:16:40 PM
  • Teddy: Profsl is a different kind of fantasy but if you reverse that trade the Chargers are legit right now. Could be division champs.
    October 20, 2019, 06:17:03 PM
  • jojowalkwalk: You ready for Eagles Cowboys?
    October 20, 2019, 06:17:24 PM
  • Teddy: Im ok Joe! Been busy.
    October 20, 2019, 06:17:42 PM
  • blkhwkfn: Point is if it’s owned then hard to question the vision of the owner.
    October 20, 2019, 06:17:49 PM
  • Teddy: E-A-G-L-E-S Eagles!!!!!!
    October 20, 2019, 06:18:25 PM
  • Brent: Chargers are led by a GM who is a long time GM and has a history of building teams in all sports.  He wanted to build a team withi his vision. That's the beauty of a league like this.  This isn't Yahoo or ESPN where names and current production matter.  Age, contract, cap space, draft picks, etc are all factored in.  Few trades get vetoed as we leave it to the GMs to run their respective teams.
    October 20, 2019, 06:18:43 PM
  • Brent: The Chargers have an active GM who has a vision and is building the team how he wants.  He's been questioned about what he gave to get Josh Allen, but he has defended it repeatedly here in chat.  It is difficult to get young cost controlled QBs so he made a move to get the guy he wanted.
    October 20, 2019, 06:20:15 PM
  • jojowalkwalk: True but I don;t undertand the move
    October 20, 2019, 08:18:41 PM
  • Brent: I was replying to Teddy who questioned the integrity of the league b/c of that trade.  I didn't know you had an issue with it.  We could go through all of the trades in this league and this site and nobody has trades that aren't questionable.
    October 20, 2019, 08:22:58 PM
  • Daddy: Cowboys verse Eagles. I got my popcorn ready. :)
    October 20, 2019, 08:35:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey guys
    October 20, 2019, 11:42:03 PM
  • Daddy: Well all i can say is its a long season.
    Yesterday at 12:37:38 AM
  • Daddy: The only trophies handed out in October belong to baseball.
    Yesterday at 12:38:18 AM
  • Daddy: Hang in there Eagle fans.
    Yesterday at 12:38:40 AM
  • Daddy: 12m for Bennie Fowler? :rofl:
    Yesterday at 12:41:12 AM
  • indiansnation: bite me
    Yesterday at 01:38:25 AM
  • Teddy: hahaha
    Yesterday at 02:25:03 AM
  • Teddy: These dudes were Free Agents before I bid on them?
    Yesterday at 02:31:30 AM
  • Teddy: I heard Profsl was where the best played. That is why I joined.
    Yesterday at 02:33:10 AM
  • Teddy: I hope it is. Especially after being personally called out.
    Yesterday at 02:38:50 AM
  • Teddy: Is there a rule on how long you have to post contracts because I can use a punter
    Yesterday at 02:48:33 AM
  • Brent: You weren't pesonally called out.  You joined and hadn't been on the site in 3 weeks and never on Fantrax.
    Yesterday at 03:04:20 AM
  • Brent: I've reached out to WCE for roster moves.  He's usually very active, but hasn't been as much over the last couple days.
    Yesterday at 03:05:38 AM
  • blkhwkfn: I don’t have a punter, personally I think it’s silly to score a punter. Kind of like the leagues where you draft a coach and get points for the win.JMO
    Yesterday at 08:43:32 AM
  • Brent: This league is designed to be more realistic for players that impact the game.  Punters are scored as they would impacting a RL game.
    Yesterday at 08:48:14 AM
  • blkhwkfn: Ha you don’t have to defend it, it’s just my opinion. It’s a silly stat and as my protest I have no punter lol
    Yesterday at 09:52:53 AM
  • halo99: Punters have feelings too
    Yesterday at 11:29:18 AM
  • indiansnation: Teddy i got 2 punters if u need one in nflc
    Yesterday at 01:29:21 PM
  • indiansnation: Im going to work so pm me if u interested in one
    Yesterday at 01:30:14 PM
  • indiansnation: Evening guys
    Yesterday at 11:41:49 PM
  • Brent: Evening Brian
    Yesterday at 11:45:47 PM
  • indiansnation: Yes finnally won a game in nflc
    Yesterday at 11:54:57 PM
  • Brent: That's good.  I hope you win a lot more to move that pick further down in the 1st that you traded to WCE.
    Yesterday at 11:58:44 PM
  • indiansnation: I will keep winning
    Today at 12:06:50 AM
  • Brent: Hell yeah!
    Today at 12:08:51 AM
  • indiansnation: Sad news if its true ill be done as a indians fan. I will not ever watch a game or go to a game again. Yankees and indians are talking about lindor going to yankees
    Today at 12:30:52 AM
  • indiansnation: Its every. Every soirts radio and news around here is saying are willing to trade just about anyone for lindor
    Today at 12:31:56 AM
  • indiansnation: This is a joke mlb needs to step in and force iwners to sell the team.
    Today at 12:32:56 AM