Author Topic: Trading rules discussion  (Read 1139 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 1922
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :Canada:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2018, 03:52:33 PM »
I think when you've been in the league a long time, your not voting is just indicative of an approval.  So as long as there's enough time for everyone to see a trade posted, it should just pass unless it has vetoes.  72 hours is plenty of time.  Also, a reminder to people when trades are posted via PM is also a good policy.

I'm new here, but not new to trading and vetoes and such.

Realistically, if a trade is bad bad bad, there will be a lot of people that chime in about it.
As Chrisetc said, not voting can often be a sign of approval. If something stands out that we don't like, we'll take the time to say what's on our mind. If it's okay, we couldn't be bothered. From what I've seen on here, when a veto goes down, pretty well all of the other GM's are in agreement that the deal needs to be re-worked. If the trade is ok, sometimes only half or less of the TC actually replies with an approval.

If everyone were active, I would say half of the remaining GM's would have to veto it for it to be a vetoed trade. So in this league's case, 7 of the remaining 14 GM's would have to veto (taking out the 2 GMs making the trade of course).
That said, it seems this league isn't overly active on the voting on trades front (from my short 1-week stint here, with the 4 trades sitting on the board).

So with that said, I'm kind of with blkhwkfn in the sense of thinking bigger picture:

(1) Out of all the votes cast on a trade, majority rules. With the caveat that a tie goes to a veto.
Only problem here is that as mentioned, some people who are indifferent or think a trade is fine, sometimes just don't vote.

(2) Or a set number of of the league (a third) would have to veto. So 5 out of the 14 GM's.
2 people, or even 3 for that matter, having an issue with a trade seems like a low number.
It should be a significant portion of the league.


Perhaps a 48 hour window though instead of 24 hours, as we're all in different time zones and have varying busy schedules. 1 day could be tight, sometime I'm not on here for 20-hours at a time and I'm sure I'm not the only one... But 2 full days is plenty of time.
*And that 48-hour clock starts when one of the league mod's sends a PM out to everyone in the league that there's a trade that needs to be looked at on on the Transactions board.
(Mod could easily change the title of the thread stating expiry date/time also, so it's clear).

At the end of the day, there's really no "correct" formula in free fantasy leagues for how trades should be judged, and accepted or vetoed.

We do have to remember that it's free fantasy we're talking about here too. This isn't life or death, and we're not messing with athletes' actual lives and families here.

Offline blkhwkfn

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 2099
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :OAK-NFL:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Wisconsin:
    • :CHE:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2018, 04:01:15 PM »
I'm new here, but not new to trading and vetoes and such.

Realistically, if a trade is bad bad bad, there will be a lot of people that chime in about it.
As Chrisetc said, not voting can often be a sign of approval. If something stands out that we don't like, we'll take the time to say what's on our mind. If it's okay, we couldn't be bothered. From what I've seen on here, when a veto goes down, pretty well all of the other GM's are in agreement that the deal needs to be re-worked. If the trade is ok, sometimes only half or less of the TC actually replies with an approval.

If everyone were active, I would say half of the remaining GM's would have to veto it for it to be a vetoed trade. So in this league's case, 7 of the remaining 14 GM's would have to veto (taking out the 2 GMs making the trade of course).
That said, it seems this league isn't overly active on the voting on trades front (from my short 1-week stint here, with the 4 trades sitting on the board).

So with that said, I'm kind of with blkhwkfn in the sense of thinking bigger picture:

(1) Out of all the votes cast on a trade, majority rules. With the caveat that a tie goes to a veto.
Only problem here is that as mentioned, some people who are indifferent or think a trade is fine, sometimes just don't vote.

(2) Or a set number of of the league (a third) would have to veto. So 5 out of the 14 GM's.
2 people, or even 3 for that matter, having an issue with a trade seems like a low number.
It should be a significant portion of the league.


Perhaps a 48 hour window though instead of 24 hours, as we're all in different time zones and have varying busy schedules. 1 day could be tight, sometime I'm not on here for 20-hours at a time and I'm sure I'm not the only one... But 2 full days is plenty of time.
*And that 48-hour clock starts when one of the league mod's sends a PM out to everyone in the league that there's a trade that needs to be looked at on on the Transactions board.
(Mod could easily change the title of the thread stating expiry date/time also, so it's clear).

At the end of the day, there's really no "correct" formula in free fantasy leagues for how trades should be judged, and accepted or vetoed.

We do have to remember that it's free fantasy we're talking about here too. This isn't life or death, and we're not messing with athletes' actual lives and families here.
:iatp:  Dilly Dilly
Can't we all just get along?
Rodney King

Offline Jonathan

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21205
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2018, 11:38:36 PM »
48 hours in season seems the right way to go. 

Seems like a small group (4-5) are actually voting. I'm not quite sure why its all the new GM's voting and none of the guys who have been around. Seems like it should be the other way around.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2018, 11:43:27 PM by Jonathan »

Offline blkhwkfn

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 2099
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :OAK-NFL:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Wisconsin:
    • :CHE:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2018, 07:42:24 AM »
48 hours in season seems the right way to go. 

Seems like a small group (4-5) are actually voting. I'm not quite sure why its all the new GM's voting and none of the guys who have been around. Seems like it should be the other way around.
:iatp:
Can't we all just get along?
Rodney King

Offline Anthony

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 8662
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Minnesota:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2018, 07:31:23 PM »
Good discussion going. We will move forward with making a change after baseball free agency is finished. It's been a rush getting that going over the last few weeks so when it's done, I want to use that down time to make any rule/procedural changes.
:win: Title Town 2011/12 Stanley Cup Champion

:win: Dynasty NHL 2012/13 Stanley Cup Champion

Offline chrisetc21

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 15402
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2018, 08:20:16 PM »
I think one thing is clear to me in that we need a trade deadline before the end of the regular season.  Perhaps two weeks before the end.  Teams loading up with players right at the end of the entire season is always something that has seemed like an odd way to do things.  The season should matter, not just have these huge deals happen right at the end that change the balance of the season.
:BOS: 2014 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2014 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:GS: 2014-2015 NBA Finals Champion - Free Market Kings
:HOU: 2015 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU-NFL: 2017 Super Bowl Champion - The Gridiron Franchise
:HOU-NBA3: 2017-2018 NBA Finals Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU-NFL3: 2018 Super Bowl Champion -Title Town
*Special thanks to all my imaginary fake accounts*

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 1922
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :Canada:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2018, 08:29:20 PM »
I think one thing is clear to me in that we need a trade deadline before the end of the regular season.  Perhaps two weeks before the end.  Teams loading up with players right at the end of the entire season is always something that has seemed like an odd way to do things.  The season should matter, not just have these huge deals happen right at the end that change the balance of the season.

While I somewhat agree, but also kind of like that the deadline is right up until the playoffs.
Allows more teams to really figure out if they're buyers or sellers, which generally gets more trades going.

If more teams are "in the hunt" for playoffs, and the trade deadline is too early, then no one's going to make moves.
As it is there weren't really many trades, which leads me to believe that trade deadline right before playoffs is actually quite fine.

If teams want to sell young players and prospects for veterans before the playoffs, I see no reason to stop them. Getting an extra guy or two isn't going to necessarily make or break a team's playoff run. In fantasy playoffs, anything can happen.

From what I've seen, the more time to make trades in here, the better. Keeps people a little more engaged for an extra week or two at the very least.

**FYI - speaking solely for the hockey portion of this league

Offline chrisetc21

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 15402
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2018, 08:41:53 PM »
While I somewhat agree, but also kind of like that the deadline is right up until the playoffs.
Allows more teams to really figure out if they're buyers or sellers, which generally gets more trades going.

If more teams are "in the hunt" for playoffs, and the trade deadline is too early, then no one's going to make moves.
As it is there weren't really many trades, which leads me to believe that trade deadline right before playoffs is actually quite fine.

If teams want to sell young players and prospects for veterans before the playoffs, I see no reason to stop them. Getting an extra guy or two isn't going to necessarily make or break a team's playoff run. In fantasy playoffs, anything can happen.

From what I've seen, the more time to make trades in here, the better. Keeps people a little more engaged for an extra week or two at the very least.

**FYI - speaking solely for the hockey portion of this league

If after several months you're not "in the hunt" with two weeks left then you're not in the hunt.   :o

 :thumbsup:
:BOS: 2014 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2014 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:GS: 2014-2015 NBA Finals Champion - Free Market Kings
:HOU: 2015 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU-NFL: 2017 Super Bowl Champion - The Gridiron Franchise
:HOU-NBA3: 2017-2018 NBA Finals Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU-NFL3: 2018 Super Bowl Champion -Title Town
*Special thanks to all my imaginary fake accounts*

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 1922
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :Canada:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2018, 08:58:28 PM »
If after several months you're not "in the hunt" with two weeks left then you're not in the hunt.

Again, just speaking for hockey in my short time, but the standings were pretty bunched up for making playoffs.

The last 2 weeks of matchups made or broke some teams making and missing the playoffs.

2 teams had the same records as me and missed the playoffs, while I'm in the 4th seed right now.

I find that if teams aren't making playoffs, they're (hopefully) trying to get as many picks and prospects as they can to rebuild their teams up (ie. NYI franchise).
If you take that away from them with a trade deadline too far away from playoffs, they have literally zero reason to be on the hockey site until the summer for the draft and FA.
That's a long time to have off ... To lose interest in the hockey team all together and forget about it.

I don't really see it being an issue in the hockey league. If anything it benefits the few active hockey managers who are making trades - more so the ones who want to rebuild up their teams gaining the young assets.

Maybe it's a bigger issue in the other sports leagues here though. But there were what, 3 trades close to the deadline in NHL, and from what I've heard, those were the first 3 trades in a really long time in the hockey portion of this league too.

Offline Jonathan

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21205
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #19 on: March 13, 2018, 12:19:03 AM »
I'd propose a month before playoffs. In RL its actually more than a month.

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: This week im top 9 (with 3 opponents top 5) :rofl: wouldve been worse but the :NYY: had a rare avg team week.
    June 16, 2019, 11:01:25 PM
  • Daddy: I still think @cliff youve done a great job. Scheduling every team over 162 games isnt easy.
    June 16, 2019, 11:02:40 PM
  • Daddy: Next week i get Arizona again i think this is the 5th time in 12 weeks.
    June 16, 2019, 11:06:23 PM
  • Daddy: We should play only twice a season
    June 16, 2019, 11:07:15 PM
  • Yeagg: Cliff I was just curious. I didn't know if you were aware or not
    June 16, 2019, 11:18:04 PM
  • Yeagg: It doesn't matter to who I play because I'll beat all of you
    June 16, 2019, 11:18:38 PM
  • Yeagg: Especially you Daddy
    June 16, 2019, 11:18:44 PM
  • Yeagg: Diamondbacks are officially in first place all by themselves
    June 16, 2019, 11:19:27 PM
  • Daddy: 30 total interleague games 2 per team. The rest should be my league games
    June 16, 2019, 11:40:03 PM
  • Daddy: That said im gonna kick your Diamondback ass next week!
    June 16, 2019, 11:40:42 PM
  • Yeagg: Trade me Sanchez
    June 16, 2019, 11:40:53 PM
  • Yeagg: You sound scared
    June 16, 2019, 11:41:04 PM
  • Daddy: No and never. Im gonna get you, and whenever i do im gonna talk mad BooYah! .
    June 16, 2019, 11:49:33 PM
  • Daddy: We probably play 8 more times so i should get plenty of chances :rofl:
    June 16, 2019, 11:50:08 PM
  • Yeagg: Even if you don't beat me I expect you to talk mad BooYah!
    Yesterday at 12:13:23 AM
  • Yeagg: That's half the fun
    Yesterday at 12:13:30 AM
  • Yeagg: Brian seriously, where do you find these guys you try to sign
    Yesterday at 03:39:13 AM
  • Yeagg: BooYah! Cliff, I just posted that roster move yesterday. That was quick!!
    Yesterday at 03:40:13 AM
  • Vik: Stuck at work, but wow, over 2mil people downtown celebrating Raps!
    Yesterday at 02:34:47 PM
  • Thecliff: Congrats @Vik  :win: and the Raptors!
    Yesterday at 02:47:32 PM
  • Yeagg: Congrats Vic
    Yesterday at 03:01:31 PM
  • Yeagg: Also, Vic. Check my trade block
    Yesterday at 03:01:41 PM
  • Vik: Cheers guys, as much as I was hoping we win, still kind of shocker they came through. Well deserved!  :toast:
    Yesterday at 03:10:12 PM
  • Vik: GS was not full strenght, but none the less just getting to finals was no easy feat  Philly/Milwaukee series were a grind
    Yesterday at 03:11:37 PM
  • Vik: Yeagg, had a quick glance but let me look in more detail
    Yesterday at 03:12:14 PM
  • Daddy: My 8yr old princess sees me moving heavy objects.... She looks at me with love and admiration in her eyes...   She says "Daddy you're strong".  I say "for a little while longer baby, yes I am... But someday soon I will need my children to grow up and be rich because I will need someone to do all this lifting as I will be old"  My little girl looks at me and says.. "don't worry Daddy, I'm going to be an Uber driver".   Fml
    Yesterday at 03:16:01 PM
  • Thecliff: In FGM I veto the trade [link]
    Yesterday at 03:36:26 PM
  • Thecliff: :doh:
    Yesterday at 03:38:05 PM
  • Mets Donations Accepted: Cliff, I can respond to your concerns very easily
    Yesterday at 03:43:15 PM
  • Yeagg: Who is in charge of Armchair?
    Yesterday at 10:06:03 PM
  • indiansnation: i am why
    Yesterday at 10:13:07 PM
  • Yeagg: Am I allowed to demote a player to my minors that is still on his arbitration contract
    Yesterday at 10:24:32 PM
  • Daddy: That question alone means that your Armchair team sucks.
    Yesterday at 10:26:43 PM
  • Daddy: Good!
    Yesterday at 10:26:51 PM
  • Vik: Yeagg, Armchair allows anyone to be demoted to minors but the salary will still count and player has to pass waivers
    Yesterday at 10:30:31 PM
  • Vik: Also, I'll look into options for your last PM but if those are only guys we might not be a good fit right now
    Yesterday at 10:31:21 PM
  • RyanJames5: Checking things out Vik. I’ll get back to you in a bit
    Yesterday at 10:31:22 PM
  • Vik: Sounds good Ryan
    Yesterday at 10:32:20 PM
  • indiansnation: any body sent down in armchair has to go threw waivers always been that way.
    Yesterday at 11:19:46 PM
  • Flash: @indiansnation - Dario Agrazal needs a contract on the FGM board
    Yesterday at 11:29:16 PM
  • indiansnation: omw @flash
    Yesterday at 11:46:49 PM
  • indiansnation: flash pm
    Today at 12:08:11 AM
  • Flash: PM?  I don’t see one....
    Today at 12:55:54 AM
  • indiansnation: just sent it again flash
    Today at 02:03:39 AM
  • indiansnation: only 3 more teams left to do on fantrax for war
    Today at 02:22:53 AM
  • Yeagg: Vic that isn't what the rules say though. The rules state that there are unlimited options
    Today at 02:27:57 AM
  • Yeagg: Daddy it isn't my Bush team but I'm still in 5th place
    Today at 02:28:12 AM
  • Daddy: Your Bush team scored -18 points today :)
    Today at 02:29:56 AM
  • Daddy: Mine scored -77 points :(
    Today at 02:30:24 AM
  • Flash: No PM Brian
    Today at 02:54:09 AM