Author Topic: Trading rules discussion  (Read 1225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anthony

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 8709
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Minnesota:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Trading rules discussion
« on: February 17, 2018, 04:32:51 PM »
I want to get some discussion going about trading rules. There's been a lot of turnover, and some opinions about the whole league getting a vote. Wanted to see if that's the best process, or if we should go back to having a TC. There's a handful of trades on the board with almost no votes, so I'm thinking that a lot of people are unclear about the rule.
:win: Title Town 2011/12 Stanley Cup Champion

:win: Dynasty NHL 2012/13 Stanley Cup Champion

Offline chrisetc21

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 15391
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2018, 06:50:28 PM »
I favor letting everyone vote.  When there's a TC in the past it's been an issue where certain owners try to get on simply to block trades from their competitors.  Letting everyone vote gives people ownership in their league, it shouldn't be confined to a certain few. 
:BOS: 2014 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2014 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:GS: 2014-2015 NBA Finals Champion - Free Market Kings
:HOU: 2015 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU-NFL: 2017 Super Bowl Champion - The Gridiron Franchise
:HOU-NBA3: 2017-2018 NBA Finals Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU-NFL3: 2018 Super Bowl Champion -Title Town
*Special thanks to all my imaginary fake accounts*

Offline Billy

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 44775
  • Bonus inPoints: 197
    • :WAS-NFL:
    • :GS:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :OldDominion:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2018, 06:56:39 PM »
I honestly prefer a TC. It is nearly impossible to actually get the whole league to vote on a trade compared to a 7 person TC. If we go with whole league, at what point would we just approve the trade if it gets to be more than 2 days and not even half the league votes on a trade?
CCD 2012-13 7th Seed in West/Lost in 2nd round
CCD 2013-14 5th Seed in West/Lost in 1st Round
CCD 2014-15 2nd Seed in West/Lost in West Finals

PG- Tyus Jones/D.J. Augustin/Shaun Livingston (SG)
SG- Kent Bazemore (SF)/Solomon Hill (SF)
SF- Justice Winslow/Kelly Oubre Jr./Rondae Hollis-Jefferson
PF- Kristaps Porzingas/Miguel Williams (SF)
C- Karl-Anthony Towns/Darrell Arthur (PF)
D-League- Jonas Jerebko/Brandon Bass/Montrezl Harrell/Christian Wood/Robert Upshaw

Billy's ProFSL Trophy Case

Offline Anthony

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 8709
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Minnesota:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2018, 06:59:55 PM »
I favor letting everyone vote.  When there's a TC in the past it's been an issue where certain owners try to get on simply to block trades from their competitors.  Letting everyone vote gives people ownership in their league, it shouldn't be confined to a certain few.

Not that I disagree about the ownership part, and I don't have an opinion yet on TC, but letting everyone vote doesn't solve the problem of having people blocking trades from their competitors since 2 vetos kills a trade. Is that a rule that needs to be addressed? I do think that 2 vetos is a good number since 2 of 14 eligible voters having issue with the trade is significant, not to mention usually you only get a handful of votes on trades.
:win: Title Town 2011/12 Stanley Cup Champion

:win: Dynasty NHL 2012/13 Stanley Cup Champion

Offline Anthony

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 8709
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Minnesota:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2018, 07:00:47 PM »
I honestly prefer a TC. It is nearly impossible to actually get the whole league to vote on a trade compared to a 7 person TC. If we go with whole league, at what point would we just approve the trade if it gets to be more than 2 days and not even half the league votes on a trade?

Which is my issue with the current system. I want trades to be processes quicker, but just putting a 48 or 72 hour clock won't solve anything if people aren't voting.
:win: Title Town 2011/12 Stanley Cup Champion

:win: Dynasty NHL 2012/13 Stanley Cup Champion

Offline chrisetc21

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2013
  • Posts: 15391
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2018, 07:10:41 PM »
Not that I disagree about the ownership part, and I don't have an opinion yet on TC, but letting everyone vote doesn't solve the problem of having people blocking trades from their competitors since 2 vetos kills a trade. Is that a rule that needs to be addressed? I do think that 2 vetos is a good number since 2 of 14 eligible voters having issue with the trade is significant, not to mention usually you only get a handful of votes on trades.

Perhaps three is a better barometer.  I think when you've been in the league a long time, your not voting is just indicative of an approval.  So as long as there's enough time for everyone to see a trade posted, it should just pass unless it has vetoes.  72 hours is plenty of time.  Also, a reminder to people when trades are posted via PM is also a good policy. 
:BOS: 2014 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2014 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:GS: 2014-2015 NBA Finals Champion - Free Market Kings
:HOU: 2015 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - American Baseball Legion
:HOU: 2017 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU-NFL: 2017 Super Bowl Champion - The Gridiron Franchise
:HOU-NBA3: 2017-2018 NBA Finals Champion - Title Town
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Armchair Fantasy Baseball
:HOU: 2018 World Series Champion - Title Town
:HOU-NFL3: 2018 Super Bowl Champion -Title Town
*Special thanks to all my imaginary fake accounts*

Offline Mets Donations Accepted

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 2440
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :NYG-NFL:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :NYR:
    • :NotreDame:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2018, 03:29:47 PM »
I have no problem with a committee as long as those on it vote. We’re all busy but there’s no reason a trade should sit up for 4-5 days with only a couple of votes
Bush League - Cincinnati Reds

Armchair League - Atlanta Braves

Franchise GM - Detroit Tigers

Wild Card 2 - Baltimore Orioles

Wonderboy Baseball - Houston Astros

Offline Jonathan

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21609
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • :PHI:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2018, 05:54:21 PM »
I'm against a committee too. There is no point here, and like Chris said is creates biases. What about posting the trades as polls? Require comment for Veto.

Offline Anthony

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 8709
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Minnesota:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2018, 07:30:27 PM »
I'm against a committee too. There is no point here, and like Chris said is creates biases. What about posting the trades as polls? Require comment for Veto.

I don't think that improves anything, but I mean I guess if the person creating the trade makes it a poll, we can vote that way.

I don't think as commish I can edit a post to make it a poll if it isn't one to start with.
:win: Title Town 2011/12 Stanley Cup Champion

:win: Dynasty NHL 2012/13 Stanley Cup Champion

Offline blkhwkfn

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 2461
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :OAK-NFL:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Wisconsin:
    • :CHE:
    • View Profile
Re: Trading rules discussion
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2018, 11:33:40 AM »
In general political elections (Local and State) not everyone votes, some skip the process. So in that case we should run it like that if 9 vote and the result is 5 approve and 4 veto then the trade stands. 24 hours is long enough once open the trade to vote. Also when a trade is up for vote a mass pm to the league should be sent, maybe put out beer and cookies. Something simple shouldnt be difficult. Just my 2 cents
Can't we all just get along?
Rodney King

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Brent: What's up guys?
    October 17, 2019, 12:35:17 AM
  • Vik: Hey Brent
    October 17, 2019, 12:40:32 AM
  • Vik: I found new Hornets GM so back to full again in BOD
    October 17, 2019, 12:40:54 AM
  • Brent: Awesome.  I got someone to join and it looks like he is going to take the Broncos in NFLC.
    October 17, 2019, 12:48:18 AM
  • Brent: That would make the AFC West complete with 4 GMs.  NFC South has 4 GMs.  NFC West is 3/4, AFC South is 2/4, NFC East is 2/4, AFC East is 3/4 and NFC North is 3/4.
    October 17, 2019, 12:50:52 AM
  • Brent: AFC North is 3/4.
    October 17, 2019, 12:53:01 AM
  • Vik: Nice, we can hopefully fill rest come offseason
    October 17, 2019, 01:19:17 AM
  • Daddy: What would you give up for Ramsey @Brian?
    October 17, 2019, 01:49:51 AM
  • Daddy: Khalil Mack or Laremy Tunsel even? What is fair value in your opinion?
    October 17, 2019, 01:50:50 AM
  • Daddy: Would you trade Frank Ragnow & Noah Fant for Jalen Ramsey? (Be careful, ive seen a lot of your trades)
    October 17, 2019, 02:01:41 AM
  • Daddy: I ask because I see our picks somewhere between 20-32 and those 2 guys were drafted @ #20 in 2018 & 2019 respectively. Ramsey is imo the best at what he does. Are they?
    October 17, 2019, 02:04:28 AM
  • indiansnation: Na im keeping him
    October 17, 2019, 09:52:12 AM
  • Daddy: Exactly. Just like Bob Barker. The Price is Right.
    October 17, 2019, 11:04:11 AM
  • Mets Donations Accepted: Brian you’re OTC
    October 17, 2019, 11:51:56 AM
  • indiansnation: Pick is in
    October 17, 2019, 01:01:15 PM
  • Vik: Get home and turn on tv 1st thing I see is Mahomes with potentially serious knee injury
    October 17, 2019, 10:22:57 PM
  • Daddy: Yeah thats no good.
    October 17, 2019, 11:25:15 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy rumor is phillies will make decision on coach by next thursday
    October 17, 2019, 11:34:10 PM
  • indiansnation: Im hearing girardi is getting serious about phillies job
    October 17, 2019, 11:34:55 PM
  • indiansnation: I am so ov rd r lbj as a plyer and person after i heard he is kissing china ass
    October 17, 2019, 11:36:45 PM
  • indiansnation: Already got rid of my jersey of him
    October 17, 2019, 11:37:17 PM
  • Daddy: Doesnt matter who we get as manager if we dont get some Pitching.
    Yesterday at 12:48:51 AM
  • Daddy: Phillies can do better, so can the Flyers. It sucks when your team makes poor personnel moves and doesnt draft well.
    Yesterday at 12:50:52 AM
  • Daddy: 76ers process is the way to go. Ive got big hopes for them. The present and future.
    Yesterday at 12:51:58 AM
  • Daddy: My Rams also are a team built for present & future so im happy there as well, although we need to show improve
    Yesterday at 12:53:11 AM
  • Daddy: How bout you? Cavs, Indians, Browns, & idk who you got in hockey? How are your teams coming along in your own opinion?
    Yesterday at 12:54:32 AM
  • indiansnation: Cavs are rebuilding, indians cutting back payroll,browns are the browns, columbus bluejackets are probably only team that could make playoffs this yr
    Yesterday at 07:16:22 AM
  • indiansnation: Sad day when u cant send your kid to school because school gets a threat on the kids
    Yesterday at 07:19:19 AM
  • Thecliff: :agent: 1stG Game 6 highlights [link] Enjoy  :toth:
    Yesterday at 09:47:45 AM
  • Thecliff: :judge: First & Goal has 2 dead teams (Detroit & Jacksonville)
    Yesterday at 09:48:49 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot about the Blue Jackets. You ride n die with them like you do the rest?
    Yesterday at 10:08:02 AM
  • indiansnation: Yep our only chance for a championship
    Yesterday at 03:34:50 PM
  • Daddy: Indians are strong, Browns improving and Cavs already delivered. Columbus has a very good team
    Yesterday at 05:48:55 PM
  • Jonathan: best hope is Ohio State
    Yesterday at 08:06:52 PM
  • Daddy: Apparently the MLB has put forth the idea of reducing the number of minor-league teams by more than a quarter (42 teams would be cut in the reported proposal). Additionally, MLB's proposal would reduce the draft to 20 rounds, reduce the number of contracted players in each organization, and alter the structure -- with some affiliates moving up or down in level.
    Yesterday at 09:54:11 PM
  • indiansnation: Trying to pay players in minors more noney and cut down the cost of it also. I think once these moves are done i can see mlb doing a baseball realinement for mlb teams also
    Yesterday at 11:04:41 PM
  • indiansnation: Im hearing mlb might let rays move to vegas within next 2 seasons
    Yesterday at 11:06:21 PM
  • blkhwkfn: Vegas Rays? Hmmmmm.....Sun Rays
    Today at 12:26:54 AM
  • indiansnation: Also hearing oakland interested also
    Today at 12:28:10 AM
  • indiansnation: Papps pm
    Today at 12:28:39 AM
  • indiansnation: Looking for vets in busch league hit me up
    Today at 12:33:20 AM
  • indiansnation: Yeagg pm
    Today at 01:16:21 AM
  • indiansnation: Blk pm
    Today at 01:36:32 AM
  • Daddy: Unfortunately for Oakland they have lost the Warriors, they will lose the Raiders, and the As are wanting to stay but more likely they will lose them too.
    Today at 12:15:12 PM
  • Daddy: Rays or As will end up in Vegas.
    Today at 12:16:08 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey daddy how u doung
    Today at 03:19:09 PM
  • indiansnation: Doing
    Today at 03:19:29 PM
  • Daddy: No complaints. Work promotion and lots of travel.
    Today at 03:23:30 PM
  • Daddy: Life is good.
    Today at 03:23:46 PM
  • Thecliff: :judge: NASCAR TCRL Race 32 preview [link]
    Today at 09:20:55 PM