INVALID (SJ over roster & cap limits) - Vegas & Sharks trade

[Daddy]

Vegas sends:
D Luca Sbisa, $2.0m (2017-2020)
RW Teemu Pulkkinen, $0.4m (2017-2019)

Sharks send:
D Nick DeSimone, $0.6m (2017-2019)
& Buyout Both
RW Daniel Zaar, $0.2m (2016-2018) > 100k cap hit '18
RW Anton Rodin, $0.2m (2017-2019) >
100k cap hit '19

Vegas does this deal for additional roster flexibility. Both Zaar & Rodin will be immediate Buyouts posted here on the trade to save logistics for mods.

Sharks to confirm

[indiansnation]

Sharks agree to the trade. I add some assests to my team

[jojowalkwalk]

Approved. The Daddy and Brian connection strikes again

[izaman3]

Approve

[PsychoticPondGoons]

Approve but Sharks also posted a Buyout for DiSimone & Zaar?

[Daddy]

Approve but Sharks also posted a Buyout for DiSimone & Zaar?

Geezus, the only thing I can think is he panicked? Idk but this trade was agreed to prior to that posting. I can't speak for Brian but would love to have him drug tested sometimes.

 

[PigsRule]

Approve

Both guys will stay busy, prefer not to see this but it happens. We do notice a strong pattern of trades weighted in one team's fav. Will continue to monitor.

[Daddy]

Approve

Both guys will stay busy, prefer not to see this but it happens. We do notice a strong pattern of trades weighted in one team's fav. Will continue to monitor.

huh? Which team's favor?
What EXACTLY is being implied here?

[Burkes Boys]

Approved with 2 thumbs up!

Vegas & Tampa usually. Don't fight it Daddy.

[Daddy]

Approved with 2 thumbs up!

Vegas & Tampa usually. Don't fight it Daddy.

I make good and bad trades like everyone in the history of trading. Including with Brian like this gem http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=282118.msg1211920#new

I'm not trying to lose on trades. Usually I have a plan that's bigger than one trade. I stay active. This trade as I stated was for flexibility. Looks like he was going to release these game changers I'm collecting here.

Your comment seemed more like a compliment then an implication of wrong doing. At least that's how I read it. I can make a case that Brian and I are the 2 most active in the league, and we own multiple team's to boot.

We all make good and bad deals, why are we voting approvals and after the fact voicing concern? Vote veto on deals that should be vetoed, if you approve then what's the hindsight backhanded slight about?

I paid for my team's, I will do what I want. I don't speak for Brian or pay his bills, but he paid for his team's too. If he makes deals people don't like, then veto them or refund his money or stfu and play hockey.