0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The A's should be aware of that. "player is considered to moved" changed to "player's contract is considered to moved"The RC thought this was obvious a year ago.
Nope... just the one player.
So wait, so I can trade Howard/Stanton/Gould for Zobrist/Reyes as long as Gould is exposed on the waiver? That doesnt seem right...
Also if no trade is made, the team who makes the claim, does not inherit the player.... Thats not realistic at all.