Author Topic: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT  (Read 968 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fitzy1962

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4355
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« on: January 20, 2015, 12:50:19 AM »
How could this guy be available in our league?

He just signed within the last 2 weeks? How could he be signed last year legally?

Here's the link:

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=172158.0
« Last Edit: January 20, 2015, 02:53:18 AM by Jss0062 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2015, 02:50:18 AM »
How could this guy be available in our league?

He just signed within the last 2 weeks? How could he be signed last year legally?

Here's the link:

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=172158.0

He should not have been signed, the eligibility rule was amended on 8/25 and Kang did not become eligible until 1/16 so we will void that transaction and Kang will be available as a normal free agent when middle infielders are up for bid.  Next up after catchers are the corner infielders.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2015, 05:50:12 AM »
Someone please explain to me why he was not eligible to sign?

International players over age 23 with at least 3 years pro experience don't have to be signed to a MLB club in order to be signed. He is age 27 and been pro since 2006 in KBO.

The rules verbatim...

One exception to this rule is any non-draft eligible player who has not previously been part of an MLB organization and is at least 23 years of age and has played three seasons of professional baseball outside of the United States.  These players will be regular free agents. 

Reading that he is the same as a cuban pro and there have been many of those signed in our league before officially signing with an MLB club.

There have been lots of players signed like this in the past. I even have Kenta Maeda on a major league contract from a year ago as a speculative add. Am I missing something? Did the team in question use international funds or something? What eligibility rule change? The rule i copied and pasted is still under our rules section.

Thanks for any insight.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline chriscvc

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 1585
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Cincinnati:
    • View Profile
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2015, 09:13:20 AM »
I'm also confused why this is suddenly being brought up and why the Kang bid has been removed. As seen above our rule clearly allows age 23 and up players to be signed even if they're internationals, and Kang is 27 (maybe 26 when signed, but shouldn't matter either way) and played for way more than 3 years in Korea. If there was a rule change it has not been stated in there and I have not heard of anything that would make the rule invalid.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2015, 10:37:21 AM »
Many was not a free agent at that point because he had not been posted and was under control of his KBO team. International players need to be signed in the real world before we have access to them. Maeda should not have been done but that was before me.  If you want to dump his contract that is fine with me. We are trying to replicate MLB closely in this league.  Trying to stash guys in the minors who aren't available is not doing that. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2015, 10:42:27 AM »
The very first line of the free agency rules is "Players considered to be free agents can be bid on by any team."  He was not considered a free agent when he was signed because he was still under control of his KBO team.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2015, 11:24:31 AM »
Directly from the league rules:

"International free agents under age 23 who have not signed a contract with a major league franchise as of July 1st of the previous year are NOT eligible for the regular free agent period.  These international free agents will be part of the international free agency period beginning in July.  International players over age 23 who do not have a contract with an MLB organization are regular free agents. While a major league contract automatically trumps a minor league contract regardless of value, no minor leaguer under the age of 23 may be offered a major league contract."

That states an international player need not be signed to an MLB club to be a free agent in AFB if over 23 years old. I also believe the line you are referring to is free agent in the AFB sense, not real life.

If you want to change the rules now that you are running things is fine but I think it should be put to a vote and changes made to the rules stating that any international player not subject to international funds must be signed by MLB team before being allowed to be a free agent and signed in AFB.

As the rules plainly state this was a legal transaction. I don't have a problem putting things up to a vote and changing the rules but I do have a problem with disregarding the rules.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2015, 11:44:56 AM »
The line you have bolded just states that they are not subject to the international signing bonus pools and rules. It does not make them an eligible free agent.
The Asian players who have to be posted really are not eligible until they sign a contract over here. Just being posted isn't enough because sometimes an agreement can't be reached.
A player cannot be considered a free agent if his rights are held by club in a foreign league.
This was not a problem last year with Tanaka and Abreu because it was widely known they were ELIGIBLE free agents and everyone waited for the free agency period to bid on them.  Same is true Yoan Machada, he isn't cleared to sign yet and there has been no bidding on him even though he falls under J2 rules.

I will clear up the wording in the rules.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2015, 12:06:12 PM »
I guess we have vastly different interpretations of the rules. Regardless, many signings such as this one have been made by many teams in the 1 1/2 years I have been in this league without objection or complications until now. To start rectroactively voiding those deals is a slippery slope I would advise against. My suggestion would be to reword the rules and make it known to owners via email what the rules are and how you interpret them. Then start strictly applying them from this point forward. The worst thing is ambiguity which is what we now have with this thread. That is not fair to owners who have been building their teams over the last year plus using apparently differing interpretations of the rules.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: SS,MI,UTKang, Jung-ho (R) - PIT
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2015, 01:54:12 PM »
I wrote the rule when I took over the league.  The intent was to allow players over 23 to be regular free agents not subject to the posting rules or international free agent pools.  This opens the pool of free agents to the entire world, not just those contracted to major league teams or posted to MLB.

Writing the rule this way would allow owners in this league to research players outside of the US and sign them before they became MLB properties.  It takes time to research these things and I felt if someone wanted to spend that time they should be able to reap the benefits of that research.  Plus, I wanted a consistent rule for all players regardless of what foreign countries they were from.  As it stands in MLB, players from some countries are posted, some players need clearance from MLB, and other players are just free agents.  It's inconsistent, it's dumb, and I wanted something more uniform. 

Jeremy has taken over the league now however so it's his call how he'll interpret it I suppose.  Just wanted to explain to clear the intent of the rule. 

Several players were signed this way.  Rusney Castillo, Kenta Maeda, and some others I believe. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: NFL Teams in OTAs. Hockey & Baseball Drafts approach
    May 22, 2024, 06:14:26 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah when we were filling rosters we just included everyone we could since they can be cut. I will be cutting a chunk of guys once we start up
    May 22, 2024, 06:14:45 PM
  • Daddy: Trading too. Not just cutting. Virgin teams need diversified. Ive seen owners swap half of they're starting players to get diversified.
    May 22, 2024, 06:16:51 PM
  • Daddy: New leagues should be the most active because everyone has a ton of assets.
    May 22, 2024, 06:18:24 PM
  • Bigdon: Is there any openings in nfl.l8ve
    May 22, 2024, 11:09:21 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey bigdon if u looking to trade in mlb live let me know im guardians
    May 22, 2024, 11:24:50 PM
  • Bigdon: Well listen to all offers I need team in nfl live I am in all other leagues
    May 22, 2024, 11:31:05 PM
  • indiansnation: Bigdon pm sent u trade offer in mlb live
    May 22, 2024, 11:55:00 PM
  • indiansnation: Bigdon sent u new pm with new trade offer
    Yesterday at 12:08:07 AM
  • indiansnation: Bigdon ill post trade right know
    Yesterday at 12:13:33 AM
  • indiansnation: Bigdon trade posted in mlb live
    Yesterday at 12:24:42 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: bigdon sent ya a message also i dont think nfl has any openings rn
    Yesterday at 12:31:00 AM
  • indiansnation: Bayarea Ballers pm about giants in mlb live
    Yesterday at 12:32:31 AM
  • Brent: Angels looking for a power bat in MLB Live.
    Yesterday at 07:17:38 AM
  • Daddy: When i started on profsl in 2010 my first league i had to pay $45 for the Milwaukee Brewers in a start up league called SD.
    Yesterday at 10:45:05 AM
  • Daddy: SD = Scouting Department
    Yesterday at 10:45:26 AM
  • Daddy: Papps recruited me on our job. The only team available in a full and active money league.
    Yesterday at 10:46:25 AM
  • Daddy: They vetoed my first 7 trade attempts. They publicly insulted me, calling me dumb, saying i should be kicked out the league because it was obvious i didnt know what i was doing.
    Yesterday at 10:47:37 AM
  • Daddy: Im year 2 i won the championship and the prize pool. I would win it repeatedly afterwards.
    Yesterday at 10:48:26 AM
  • Daddy: My Dad joined. Then these same fools said he was my burner account.
    Yesterday at 10:48:56 AM
  • Daddy: When it was obvious he was someone else, they started saying we couldn't trade with each other or we were cheating.
    Yesterday at 10:49:44 AM
  • Daddy: Profsl had a bunch of pencil dik crooks on it. All over the place. Corrupt LMs orchestrating trades to try to pre determine who won.
    Yesterday at 10:50:57 AM
  • Daddy: To keep the money between "certain guys". That way it stayed in house and they just kept robbing fools.
    Yesterday at 10:51:49 AM
  • Daddy: I created LIVE because LIVE is what those fake ass leagues were supposed to be.
    Yesterday at 10:52:24 AM
  • Daddy: Real competition. Where your competition cant cheat ya and anyone that beats ya deserved to do so.
    Yesterday at 10:53:15 AM
  • Daddy: All those bums & crooks & morons have either left profsl for good or they stay in the background, watching, and gossiping behind my back like a bunch of street corner hookers.
    Yesterday at 10:54:41 AM
  • Daddy: Now all we do on profsl is play ball.
    Yesterday at 10:55:51 AM
  • Daddy: How did i win a money league that they were cheating in? Because if you cheat, you still gotta be right about the players. They were smart at being crooks. Dumb at building teams.
    Yesterday at 10:59:54 AM
  • OUDAN: I miss money dynasty lesgues
    Yesterday at 11:27:47 AM
  • OUDAN: Ran correctly that is
    Yesterday at 11:28:50 AM
  • Daddy: Agreed Dan. This site was popping 14 years ago with half ass product. Every league here today offers a unique top quality product.
    Yesterday at 01:09:03 PM
  • Daddy: Upcoming $$$ league [link] Powerhouse Baseball @Alpha5 (LIVE moderator) LM.
    Yesterday at 01:57:27 PM
  • OUDAN: Need a $$ basketball league badly
    Yesterday at 02:58:32 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I finally finalized my first off-season trade in CCD
    Yesterday at 03:17:54 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Trading away PJ washington
    Yesterday at 03:18:02 PM
  • Daddy: @Dan Powerhouse is coming to all sports. 20 player redraft concept using LIVE style scoring.
    Yesterday at 04:58:27 PM
  • Daddy: Powerhouse hockey 30 player & football 53 player redraft.... Basketball is 15 players i think but these are in concept stages except baseball. Powerhouse Baseball 2025 is coming.
    Yesterday at 05:02:29 PM
  • Daddy: Powerhouse = $$$ & redraft.
    Yesterday at 05:03:34 PM
  • Daddy: NHL LIVE SS [link]
    Yesterday at 06:25:27 PM
  • Braves155: Evening gents. Anyone up for trade talks?
    Yesterday at 08:44:25 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Sure
    Yesterday at 09:06:09 PM
  • Braves155: NFL LIVE - Speak my language if you are moving 1sts or early 2nds
    Yesterday at 09:30:35 PM
  • Daddy: Have you seen that Man's team? If Buc had picks we would have no chance.
    Yesterday at 09:59:34 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around for deals for a few hours for any leagues I am in.
    Yesterday at 10:04:43 PM
  • STLBlues91: I just went through my MIA roster and think I only have 2-3 guys on offense from when I took the team 2 years ago. Lots of chaos and turnover
    Yesterday at 10:07:09 PM
  • indiansnation: Daddy pm
    Yesterday at 10:48:32 PM
  • Bigdon: Any chance I well get a nfl live team
    Yesterday at 10:54:00 PM
  • Daddy: Win the National Championship in NCAA LIVE and you are guaranteed an NFL LIVE Team.
    Today at 12:05:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: What a nightmare
    Today at 02:55:08 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: *night
    Today at 02:55:17 AM