0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
True but players who are making 2 mil already that have played under 39 games are probably pretty good future prospects that paying a million extra shouldn't seem like too much of a burden. Plus you're not supposed to want to pay them 3 mil, that's why you would have to draft well so that you wouldn't have to pay the extra 1 mil on guys like that. Most players who have played under 39 games are probably going to be worth 0.5m-1m, so 2m for a player who can come up or down to fill your teams needs for 2 years and is probably a future prospect isn't even really that bad of a deal. Especially since if you drafted him you would have him for 2 years, 2 ways for 1m.
Another idea:Players who played under 40 games (30 in the case of a goalie) only cost 500k more a year for a two way deal.Players who played over 40 games (30 in the case of a goalie) cost 1M more a year for a two way deal.No two way deals on extensions.
If we get into this though what's going to stop people from signing players like Iginla on a two-way contract, if your paying 6-7 mil already whats an extra mil right? I think two-way contracts would have to be players under 40 games, and again these are players who we are signing two-way contracts to fill holes in our roster during injuries etc, who we can always re-sign to 1 way deals without paying the extra 1 mil if we plan to keep them in our main rosters.
You won't have them at 2 way for 1 million over 2 years it would be based off their draft position and could be just about 4 million like Taylor Hall
What if we put a cap on the two way deals... Anyone worth more than 3M a year (before the two way deal stuff) cannot be signed to a two way deal. This way, players like Big Buff (who will be going to free agency this summer) cannot get a two way deal, but the option is still out there for filler players (like Marty Reasoner is to me... who conveniently just got injured)