« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Milwaukee Bucks  (Read 332 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ProFSL

Milwaukee Bucks
« on: December 09, 2010, 11:54:32 AM »
Milwaukee Bucks :MIL-NBA:
Last Updated: 12/27/11
GM: nerwffej

Roster (17 players)
PF/C Bargnani, Andrea (Age: 26)
G Bayless, Jerryd (Age: 23)
C Bogut, Andrew  (Age: 26)
FC Brockman, Jon  (Age: 23)
GF/SF Delfino, Carlos  (Age: 28)
PG Dooling, Keyon  (Age: 30)
GF Douglas-Roberts, Chris  (Age: 23)
FC/PF Gooden, Drew  (Age: 29)
SF Harris, Tobias (Age: 19)
F/PF Ilyasova, Ersan  (Age: 23)
PG Irvin, Kyrie (Age: 19)
PG Jennings, Brandon  (Age: 21)
F/SG Maggette, Corey  (Age: 31)
F/SF Mbah a Moute, Luc Richard  (Age: 24)
GF/SG Salmons, John  (Age: 30)
FC/C Sanders, Larry  (Age: 22)
C Thabeet, Haseem (Age: 24)

« Last Edit: December 27, 2011, 05:11:43 PM by MillerTime »
Logged
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Share ProFSL on Social Media

ProFSL Fantasy Sports

Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Mr.TradeKing: the new re-sign values do not go into effect until AFTER our World Series
    Today at 12:37:14 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: it says in the rules
    Today at 12:37:19 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: correct sky
    Today at 12:37:28 AM
  • 9inches: if you read it how it's typed... "$3.0m/3 extension before June1"
    Today at 12:37:43 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: but still using the "old" re-sign values
    Today at 12:37:43 AM
  • 9inches: "$2.3m/3?"
    Today at 12:38:01 AM
  • Sky: mtk, so am i correct in 3 years @ 2.3m?
    Today at 12:38:15 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: Tony, I'm not sure what you're referring too lol
    Today at 12:38:25 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: no, it would be $3m
    Today at 12:38:35 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: the 2.3m would be correct if he was the 49th ranked CI after our WS
    Today at 12:38:55 AM
  • 9inches: that is text directly from Paul's email (sky's link).
    Today at 12:39:10 AM
  • 9inches: right Aubrey.
    Today at 12:39:21 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: the two sets of re-sign values are separated by the "bolded and underlined" statement
    Today at 12:39:39 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: ah ok Tony
    Today at 12:39:51 AM
  • 9inches: or if he had underperformed in 2013. say he was #70 CI right now... after June 1 he would be $2.3m resign.
    Today at 12:39:54 AM
  • 9inches: yeah.
    Today at 12:40:05 AM
  • 9inches: im not trying to be a dick... just saying i think the rule states something different. Corey or Paul can clarify. It will all get cleared up.
    Today at 12:40:47 AM
  • Sky: are you referring to what Paul typed in bold letters?
    Today at 12:41:20 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: yeah as long as he doesn't achieve past the $2.3m mark in 2013, he should still be 2.3m
    Today at 12:41:40 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: No Sky, under the Rules thread/contracts and extensions
    Today at 12:41:57 AM
  • 9inches: no.
    Today at 12:42:02 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: you will see the new and old re-sign values posted
    Today at 12:42:19 AM
  • 9inches: right, but he's outperformed that.
    Today at 12:42:23 AM
  • 9inches: if you wait to resign, you risk missing him at $3m and might pay more (maybe) depennding on his performance the rest of the year.
    Today at 12:42:55 AM
  • 9inches: aubrey, read what Paul typed after Lind's name here...
    Today at 12:43:34 AM
  • 9inches: [link]
    Today at 12:43:39 AM
  • 9inches: sorry, sky typed it first.
    Today at 12:44:13 AM
  • fantasyguru: MTK still here
    Today at 12:45:13 AM
  • 9inches: i understand there is NO option on lind. you do have the option to resign him before June 1 ($3m/yr) or after (higher MV of 2012 and 2013 to date).
    Today at 12:47:02 AM
  • fantasyguru: dang it Griz will lose this series
    Today at 12:49:42 AM
  • Sky: Hey 9, please confirm with Corey. it was my understanding it would be 2.3m which uses the new values
    Today at 12:50:59 AM
  • Sky: but not a big deal as it's only .7m difference
    Today at 12:51:32 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: yeah im around Reid
    Today at 01:06:27 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: Im not sure what Paul is talking about
    Today at 01:06:35 AM
  • Mr.TradeKing: not real clear
    Today at 01:06:38 AM
  • 9inches: Paul's comment (bold) is directed at Sky's note "We needed a CI and Lind fit the bill. And if he can re-establish himself again. The options on him will be picked up on the cheap. Angels continue to turn over our roster."
    Today at 01:10:03 AM
  • 9inches: options
    Today at 01:10:09 AM
  • jnorris: evening guys
    Today at 01:10:54 AM
  • 9inches: if we're using the new values, we should make sure everyone knows before June 1... as some might resign based on those values, but not the old ones.
    Today at 01:10:57 AM
  • 9inches: hey jon.
    Today at 01:11:00 AM
  • Sky: hey jon
    Today at 01:11:34 AM
  • jnorris: hey guys
    Today at 01:12:04 AM
  • fantasyguru: hey jon
    Today at 01:12:19 AM
  • jnorris: hey guru
    Today at 01:13:07 AM
  • OUDAN: Anyone around lookin to talk trades?
    Today at 01:29:15 AM
  • fantasyguru: BK
    Today at 01:33:23 AM
  • fantasyguru: OUDAN, trade?
    Today at 01:39:11 AM
  • OUDAN: BK?
    Today at 01:44:26 AM
  • fantasyguru: made it up
    Today at 01:45:14 AM
  • OUDAN: Lol
    Today at 01:46:02 AM