Author Topic: FA bidding  (Read 6013 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

KDoc09

  • Guest
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #30 on: January 08, 2010, 03:34:47 PM »
Just so I'm straight on this...

Under Colby's 90%+yr/130%-yr proposal, Matt Holliday's bidding could look something like this...

$20m/1 yr initial offer
followed by $18m/2 yrs, then $16.5m/ 3 yrs, $15m/4 yrs, $13.5m/5 yrs, as minimums by adding a year per bid

or

$20m/1 yr initial offer
followed by $18m/2 yrs, then $23.5/1 yr in a drop down back to a one year deal

Is that a correct breakdown?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

ChinMusic

  • Guest
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #31 on: January 08, 2010, 04:27:30 PM »
Just so I'm straight on this...

Under Colby's 90%+yr/130%-yr proposal, Matt Holliday's bidding could look something like this...

$20m/1 yr initial offer
followed by $18m/2 yrs, then $16.5m/ 3 yrs, $15m/4 yrs, $13.5m/5 yrs, as minimums by adding a year per bid

or

$20m/1 yr initial offer
followed by $18m/2 yrs, then $23.5/1 yr in a drop down back to a one year deal

Is that a correct breakdown?

That's my understanding of it.

Anyone can jump in and increase the bid on the current year, of course. You don't have to add or take away years, you can add dollars to the existing years
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #32 on: January 11, 2010, 03:03:03 PM »
Anything from the RC?  If we are to pass this then it needs to be done ASAP as FA opens up on the 15th.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #33 on: January 11, 2010, 06:59:45 PM »
Just so I'm straight on this...

Under Colby's 90%+yr/130%-yr proposal, Matt Holliday's bidding could look something like this...

$20m/1 yr initial offer
followed by $18m/2 yrs, then $16.5m/ 3 yrs, $15m/4 yrs, $13.5m/5 yrs, as minimums by adding a year per bid

or

$20m/1 yr initial offer
followed by $18m/2 yrs, then $23.5/1 yr in a drop down back to a one year deal

Is that a correct breakdown?


Is this what you intended Colby, or would you still need to BEAT the previous offer?  Increasing years +1 for salary at 90% only MATCHES the previous offer...  I think any bidding scheme should force new bids to exceed the previous offer, where Colby's suggested valuation can be used to compare offers of different length (to determine what the equivalent salary would be at the different contract length).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #34 on: January 11, 2010, 07:31:02 PM »
Correct Ben... those numbers are used as an equivalence.  An additional $0.5m would have to be tagged on AFTER the conversion.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline rcankosy

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2501
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #35 on: January 11, 2010, 07:35:33 PM »
I believe that FA offers should be judged by the *total* dollars on the contract, not the amount per year.  This method would keep things simple and offer owners an interesting choice.  It would force owners to choose between longer guaranteed contracts at less dollars per year or shorter ones at larger dollars. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #36 on: January 11, 2010, 07:46:28 PM »
Roy that is true but what if someone offers 10 years at 12 mil a year = 120 mil, and someone offer 4 at 25 = 100 mil, then by total contract the person that offered 12 mil per, would be the winner.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #37 on: January 11, 2010, 07:48:17 PM »
I believe that FA offers should be judged by the *total* dollars on the contract, not the amount per year.  This method would keep things simple and offer owners an interesting choice.  It would force owners to choose between longer guaranteed contracts at less dollars per year or shorter ones at larger dollars.

This may force us into long contract situations.  Then again, I do like the simplicity part of it even though small market teams will drop out of bids that go over $40-50m. 

The other issue with this is that it creates a longer bid process.  How long would it take to get up to $90m total contract for Holliday?  I don't know, it may be worth a shot Roy.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #38 on: January 11, 2010, 07:49:49 PM »
Roy that is true but what if someone offers 10 years at 12 mil a year = 120 mil, and someone offer 4 at 25 = 100 mil, then by total contract the person that offered 12 mil per, would be the winner.

5-year term limit prevents that offer....
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Canada8999

  • Guest
Re: FA bidding
« Reply #39 on: January 11, 2010, 08:24:42 PM »
This may force us into long contract situations.  Then again, I do like the simplicity part of it even though small market teams will drop out of bids that go over $40-50m. 

The other issue with this is that it creates a longer bid process.  How long would it take to get up to $90m total contract for Holliday?  I don't know, it may be worth a shot Roy.

My personal preference is discounting using a time-value of money formula.  If we've decided not to go in that direction because we want to keep it simple, which I understand, then I'd personally prefer to keep it really simple and go with something like this (total value, no discounting schema).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea your point is just wrong is all. Theyve gotten into my pockets directly and indirectly
    Yesterday at 05:51:03 PM
  • Daddy: Oh, i was unaware. DTV must have got us all.
    Yesterday at 05:51:55 PM
  • Daddy: I know you dont endorse them. Never did. I paid for lots of crap i never used. Just for NFL Sunday Ticket.
    Yesterday at 05:52:45 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I dont and didnt endorse cable period. The irony is streaming is becoming cable now.
    Yesterday at 05:55:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I paid for directtv version 1-2 years when i had my apartment. Not as much as the 35+ crowd but they did
    Yesterday at 05:56:34 PM
  • Daddy: Still never watched a game on YouTube. I miss the days of CBS = AFC >> FOX/NBC = NFC >> ABC = MNF
    Yesterday at 05:56:42 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: There was no reason to have directtv outside of sunday ticket. My apartment couldnt get it so i paid ONLY for sunday ticket
    Yesterday at 05:57:04 PM
  • Daddy: I was ok with TNF & SNF.
    Yesterday at 05:57:43 PM
  • Daddy: Its all over the place now. So ive stuck with what i know. The Ticket. I can't miss a Rams game. Not gonna do it.
    Yesterday at 05:58:45 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Now they stream some games only on amazon and peacock. I need a streaming lawsuit
    Yesterday at 06:01:20 PM
  • indiansnation: Dont forget disney + soon u will stream games pn their
    Yesterday at 09:43:09 PM
  • indiansnation: Disney trying yo buy nfl network and using espn as part of the trade off nfl will own a certain % of espn. First deal eas 70m for nfl network but nfl turned that down real quick
    Yesterday at 09:46:43 PM
  • indiansnation: Anyone want to talk trade nfl live,mlb live,fgm,armchair
    Yesterday at 10:00:02 PM
  • indiansnation: And any other league that im in that i didnt post yet
    Yesterday at 10:00:35 PM
  • Daddy: They keep throwing insane money at the NFL to televise games and owners share those shiny pennies just enough with the players.
    Yesterday at 10:39:25 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I'm available.  Not sure if we match up anywhere other than NHL Live, but let me know if there's something you're interested in @Brian
    Yesterday at 10:45:39 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: The other leagues for me are FGM, MLB Live and DNHL in case any-one else is looking to do a deal
    Yesterday at 10:49:01 PM
  • Daddy: Healthy mix. Couple baseball, couple hockey, different scoring options.
    Yesterday at 11:08:15 PM
  • Daddy: You probably kick ass in all of them although NHL LIVE hasnt officially started.
    Yesterday at 11:08:42 PM
  • Daddy: I respect your gaming options
    Yesterday at 11:09:54 PM
  • Daddy: I would for sure be an FGM or Armchair owner if i were here for baseball. Powerhouse too. Why not? Great leagues with better LMs.
    Yesterday at 11:16:38 PM
  • Daddy: DNHL must be 15 years old. Gotta be doing something right. Most leagues dont make it past 5. Very few make it 10.
    Yesterday at 11:20:45 PM
  • Daddy: I think Rob been running that league longer than ive been on profsl. Legendary LM.
    Yesterday at 11:22:42 PM
  • indiansnation: Jmntl82 pm important messave about armchair
    Yesterday at 11:45:05 PM
  • jmntl82: indiansnation-replied
    Yesterday at 11:48:26 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: thanks @daddy.  I hold my own
    Today at 12:05:43 AM
  • Braves155: Will be around today for deal talks - ANY sport
    Today at 10:12:32 AM
  • Daddy: You tellem @Braves!
    Today at 11:47:14 AM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves PM
    Today at 03:04:47 PM
  • Braves155: Back
    Today at 03:10:34 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Back
    Today at 03:19:17 PM
  • Daddy: Better be glad Buc dont know hockey. He'd be IndianaPuc on yall asses.
    Today at 03:54:00 PM
  • Braves155: Speaking of NHL. Anyone up for an NHL LIVE deal?
    Today at 04:05:16 PM
  • Braves155: PM Blues
    Today at 04:07:53 PM
  • Brent: I am.  I read up on stuff today, I think I have a direction for my Predators.
    Today at 04:23:17 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Im here for NFL Live. I get the trade itch every day but ive been suppressing it. Waiting for someone to make me submit to the madness again
    Today at 04:48:32 PM
  • Braves155: Pm there buddy
    Today at 04:53:17 PM
  • Braves155: PM as well dbreer
    Today at 04:58:57 PM
  • dbreer23: replied Braves
    Today at 05:10:11 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: PM Braves
    Today at 05:31:50 PM
  • indiansnation: Hey guys whats up
    Today at 05:31:53 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL LIVE FOLKS sharks have zadina otb any interest message me ask is prospects and picks
    Today at 05:32:27 PM
  • indiansnation: Lets talk trade
    Today at 05:32:30 PM
  • indiansnation: Indians mlb live looking to trade
    Today at 05:37:05 PM
  • indiansnation: Nfl live colts looking for starting rb
    Today at 05:37:24 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 05:38:39 PM
  • indiansnation: ldsjayhawks pm
    Today at 05:38:48 PM
  • Daddy: Oh Crap. Trade winds blowing like P Diddy sponsored them.
    Today at 05:45:23 PM
  • Daddy: Flyers, Rams, Blue Jays, 76ers have responded to all inquiries. Not that my inbox gets flooded with offers. My teams all stink.
    Today at 05:47:35 PM
  • Daddy: T Wolves loaded but its too early yet. Cant wait for NBA.
    Today at 05:49:02 PM