0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So we have two approvals, one undecided, and I'm assuming one veto. Where is the rest of the committee?
To clarify my position, I think the deal can be salvaged with additional assets going to Montreal. As it stands I am 100% against it. My vote is a Veto but allowing for changes to be made and accepted within this thread.
In voting by committee one should reasonably expect voices favouring both sides of a fair and balanced trade. Are we simply determining that while Montreal is losing this deal it is not as unpalatable as risking a bit of friction or debate?So far I have not heard one good reason why it should be approved as written. My question for the two GM's that have approved: Would you do this trade if you managed Montreal?
Well, clearly Favo and I have had our say! Let's get some more votes on this so it can be processed either way!