Author Topic: Orioles Contract Restructuring  (Read 3412 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Orioles Contract Restructuring
« Reply #40 on: March 12, 2013, 10:17:29 AM »
I am not just upset with you ruling but am challenging the basis on how you reached your decision. Your main arguments up to this point have been that this situation doesn't happen in real life MLB and that it doesn't follow the spirit of the FGM rules.

1) I have given a clear example of how this situation has happened in MLB before. The Cincinnati Reds restructured Scott Rolen's contract to lower his salary, gave him a signing bonus and then signed him to a 2 year extension. So this situation does realistically happen in the MLB.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/reds-restructure-extent-rolens-contract.html

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20091219&content_id=7832380&vkey=news_cin&fext=.jsp&c_id=cin

2) The spirit of the FGM rules is to mimic the real life MLB rules as close as possible. Now if something happens in the real life MLB then it should be allowed to happen in FGM.

My main argument for why this transaction should be allowed is that it has happened in the MLB before, it is clearly legal in the rules that currently govern FGM and is even within the spirit of the FGM principle that the rules should help the league mimic MLB as close as possible. I have yet to hear a compelling reason from you on why this transaction should not be allowed.

The AROD to Boston situation? 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Orioles Contract Restructuring
« Reply #41 on: March 12, 2013, 10:40:09 AM »
By not allowing a restructuring and extension that is a legal move to happen is changing the rules. You have added a rule that says this type of legal move can not be done and have usurped power from the rules committee.

Also for those who say that this is not realistic in MLB baseball you can follow the following links that dicsuss a contract restructuring that the Cincinnati Reds and Scott Rolen did. You will see that this contract extension is the exact same thing that I am trying to do with Morneau. The Reds Lowered the current year contract and gave Rolen a signing bonus that was equal to the decrease in the current year contract value. They then signed him to an extension for two years.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2009/12/reds-restructure-extent-rolens-contract.html

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20091219&content_id=7832380&vkey=news_cin&fext=.jsp&c_id=cin

I believe that the reason Rolen was okay is because there was in fact, as it appears a very small increase in has actually moneys earned.   Much like the reasoning behind the denial of the AROD issue as I alluded to. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Orioles Contract Restructuring
« Reply #42 on: March 12, 2013, 11:26:23 AM »
The underlying and overwhelming points here are the following.
- shooter47 found a loophole in the rules to make contract extensions less expensive. 
- We should applaud him for finding this, but the loophole should be fixed immediately as it goes against the intention of the rules.
- This is a free league.  Just because shooter47 found a loophole doesn't mean we should allow it.  When these things happen, we need to step back, make an adjustment, and allow us all to continue to play and have fun.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Dan Wood

  • Guest
Re: Orioles Contract Restructuring
« Reply #43 on: March 13, 2013, 11:07:33 AM »
I stopped reading along time ago, but here's my two cents. Shooter found a loop hole and it should be allowed. But this leads to two additions that I think we need to make to the rules...

1. Every action that is not specifically talked about in the rules should be brought for review - such as when someone finds a loophole. We are not going to be able to cover every little aspect...this signing is the perfect example. 

2. I think we need to do away with contract restructuring. And yes is does benefit high market teams because they can take large salary hits in a restructure. Most mid and low market teams will stagger a contract over years because it is financially more feasible. We have put in place certain aspects to resigning a player such as 30% MV decreases, and contracts that start at the end of a current contract. I think when this rule was created there were a lot of residual MLB contracts still left - Lowe, Andruw Jones, etc. - we've come to a point where those no longer exist.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: @jwalkerjr88 aint never done more but use my account. Im paying for 32 teams and only watching the Rams.
    Yesterday at 05:20:53 PM
  • Daddy: I want my money back. I just looked it up. I want 31/32 refund. Well my Dad & Son benefited so 29/32 refund.
    Yesterday at 05:21:56 PM
  • indiansnation: How much it cost?
    Yesterday at 05:22:50 PM
  • Daddy: A lot. I think about $300 per season.
    Yesterday at 05:24:18 PM
  • Daddy: Added to the cable bill of like $200. That nobody ever used.
    Yesterday at 05:25:01 PM
  • Daddy: So i had DirecTV for 12 months to use Sunday ticket for 3 months and paid like 3 installments of roughly $100 added to my $200m bill.
    Yesterday at 05:26:18 PM
  • Daddy: For that i got two TVs that could watch any game any time any where. Problem is they getting played at the same times. You cant watch every game. Why you charging me for every game?
    Yesterday at 05:27:40 PM
  • Daddy: If thats the case i should have access to 32 different monitors. Right?
    Yesterday at 05:30:19 PM
  • Daddy: Or maybe 16. I would take 16. But two. Give me my bread back Mafia!
    Yesterday at 05:31:38 PM
  • Daddy: Making me watch  Bo Nix + Zach Wilson + Jared Stidham = you should be paying me
    Yesterday at 05:33:56 PM
  • Daddy: Me and coach Payton [link]
    Yesterday at 05:34:53 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Thats cap by the way. I pay for my own way to watch my team
    Yesterday at 05:41:55 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I dont have your account or login
    Yesterday at 05:42:07 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I used yours for 1-2 seasons.
    Yesterday at 05:43:32 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I used my mothers for a decade before that
    Yesterday at 05:43:46 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: But ive used my way for the past few years. Ill be paying attention like i said
    Yesterday at 05:44:27 PM
  • Daddy: She deserves a refund too
    Yesterday at 05:46:27 PM
  • Daddy: The point was DirecTV never got in your pockets and it was a rip-off but they had a monopoly on the product. Im not loving all the streaming games but DTV will be paying $$$.
    Yesterday at 05:48:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: The new iteration with Youtube TV isnt the greatest either but an improvement on Directtv version
    Yesterday at 05:48:37 PM
  • Daddy: And your grandfather used it every year besides those two :rofl:
    Yesterday at 05:49:26 PM
  • Daddy: I kept DirecTV and always willing to share. But thats my point.
    Yesterday at 05:49:47 PM
  • Daddy: If i had 3 monitors rather than two or four rather than two, either me or moms save money. Lots of it.
    Yesterday at 05:50:26 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea your point is just wrong is all. Theyve gotten into my pockets directly and indirectly
    Yesterday at 05:51:03 PM
  • Daddy: Oh, i was unaware. DTV must have got us all.
    Yesterday at 05:51:55 PM
  • Daddy: I know you dont endorse them. Never did. I paid for lots of crap i never used. Just for NFL Sunday Ticket.
    Yesterday at 05:52:45 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I dont and didnt endorse cable period. The irony is streaming is becoming cable now.
    Yesterday at 05:55:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I paid for directtv version 1-2 years when i had my apartment. Not as much as the 35+ crowd but they did
    Yesterday at 05:56:34 PM
  • Daddy: Still never watched a game on YouTube. I miss the days of CBS = AFC >> FOX/NBC = NFC >> ABC = MNF
    Yesterday at 05:56:42 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: There was no reason to have directtv outside of sunday ticket. My apartment couldnt get it so i paid ONLY for sunday ticket
    Yesterday at 05:57:04 PM
  • Daddy: I was ok with TNF & SNF.
    Yesterday at 05:57:43 PM
  • Daddy: Its all over the place now. So ive stuck with what i know. The Ticket. I can't miss a Rams game. Not gonna do it.
    Yesterday at 05:58:45 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Now they stream some games only on amazon and peacock. I need a streaming lawsuit
    Yesterday at 06:01:20 PM
  • indiansnation: Dont forget disney + soon u will stream games pn their
    Yesterday at 09:43:09 PM
  • indiansnation: Disney trying yo buy nfl network and using espn as part of the trade off nfl will own a certain % of espn. First deal eas 70m for nfl network but nfl turned that down real quick
    Yesterday at 09:46:43 PM
  • indiansnation: Anyone want to talk trade nfl live,mlb live,fgm,armchair
    Yesterday at 10:00:02 PM
  • indiansnation: And any other league that im in that i didnt post yet
    Yesterday at 10:00:35 PM
  • Daddy: They keep throwing insane money at the NFL to televise games and owners share those shiny pennies just enough with the players.
    Yesterday at 10:39:25 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I'm available.  Not sure if we match up anywhere other than NHL Live, but let me know if there's something you're interested in @Brian
    Yesterday at 10:45:39 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: The other leagues for me are FGM, MLB Live and DNHL in case any-one else is looking to do a deal
    Yesterday at 10:49:01 PM
  • Daddy: Healthy mix. Couple baseball, couple hockey, different scoring options.
    Yesterday at 11:08:15 PM
  • Daddy: You probably kick ass in all of them although NHL LIVE hasnt officially started.
    Yesterday at 11:08:42 PM
  • Daddy: I respect your gaming options
    Yesterday at 11:09:54 PM
  • Daddy: I would for sure be an FGM or Armchair owner if i were here for baseball. Powerhouse too. Why not? Great leagues with better LMs.
    Yesterday at 11:16:38 PM
  • Daddy: DNHL must be 15 years old. Gotta be doing something right. Most leagues dont make it past 5. Very few make it 10.
    Yesterday at 11:20:45 PM
  • Daddy: I think Rob been running that league longer than ive been on profsl. Legendary LM.
    Yesterday at 11:22:42 PM
  • indiansnation: Jmntl82 pm important messave about armchair
    Yesterday at 11:45:05 PM
  • jmntl82: indiansnation-replied
    Yesterday at 11:48:26 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: thanks @daddy.  I hold my own
    Today at 12:05:43 AM
  • Braves155: Will be around today for deal talks - ANY sport
    Today at 10:12:32 AM
  • Daddy: You tellem @Braves!
    Today at 11:47:14 AM