With this logic, whoever has Anderson for 10M a year, should of already bought him out, because most teams are up against the cap, meaning nobody could possible make a bid anywhere near that. Seems like a risk-free situation and nobody is paying him 10M to start with.
If a GM wins someone they buy-out, shouldn't they get the original contract back? This is confusing for me. How can they even drop someone and then immediately start bidding on them? Makes no sense to me.
I say leave it alone also. I know I had to limit my spending significantly, because I had a few guys that had to be called up or I would of lost them. This would be a very re-active move IMO.
Looking to make a few moves, Backstrom can be dealt for depth, but I need a nice package for him. Ovie is not going anywhere, but most my other guys can be dealt in the right deal, a deal that helps us now.
Show Posts
