2041
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: C Rodney Daal
« on: January 17, 2014, 04:50:34 PM »
PC + 100K
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2041
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: C Rodney Daal« on: January 17, 2014, 04:50:34 PM »
PC + 100K
2042
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Invalid Transactions / Re: C Wil Nieves« on: January 17, 2014, 04:48:15 PM »
I agree with Sean. How about we just make a new annotation for offering this type of contract instead of using time to distinguish when it is okay to sign a vet to minor league deal. In real baseball vets are signed all the time to minor league deals before other bigger players are signed. I say let the market dictate which vets can be signed to minor league deals. Following my proposal as shown below votto could be offered a minor league deal (of course like real life it would immediately be blown out the water) but it would help for those tweeners.
Instead of PC + $ you can offer a major league vet IST (Invitation to Spring Training) + $ Each bid offer must increase by 50K. Winner pays the one time bonus amount and has the player in minor leagues for 1 season only. At any point if that player is called up the salary defaults to 400K. Basically the same as minor league free agents except you only have them for one season regardless if you ever put them on 40 man roster At any point during FA bidding if someone offers a ML contract of any value then it trumps all IST + $ bids. Real teams do this every year for players trying to hang on but are not good enough for ML contracts. Thoughts? 2043
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: C Brayan Pena« on: January 17, 2014, 04:28:09 PM »
2 years, 950K, 1.9M total
2044
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: C Brayan Pena« on: January 17, 2014, 04:11:50 PM »
1 year 900k
2045
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: Free Agency Begins January 17th, 12pm CST« on: January 17, 2014, 03:02:50 PM »"Limiting the number of bids per player to two bids" would be a horrible idea, IMO. Certain positions are so limited as it is and only allowing two owners to bid on each player would ensure that only two or three teams would actually be able to get a player worth owning at those very limited positions, such as 2B & SS.. Chris can correct me if I am mistaken but I'm pretty sure he meant each owner can only make 2 bids per player. That way when you bid you have to make it count. Otherwise you can have 2 people bidding 20 times each on a player like Votto over the course of 3 weeks as they slowly raise the bid in a standoff. Example - owner 1 6.5M, owner 2 bids 7M, next day owner 1 bids 7.5M.........and it drags on like that for weeks until somebody wins at 60M or something If each owner can only bid twice on each player you really have to think and make your bids count. Personally, I am fine with it the way it is but if we do run into issues the 2 bid limit per owner per player is a solid idea. 2046
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: Fantrax 2014« on: January 17, 2014, 02:54:02 PM »At some point, every team has to be responsible for making sure their players on their rosters. It's impossible for a handful of people to police the entirety of every roster. So I'll try to check each player that's listed in free agency to make sure he's available but ultimately that's the responsibility of each owner to verify. I agree as well. If I happen to notice something on my own like Kenley Jansen I feel it's my responsibility as a fantrax exec to fix it but I do agree that it is each teams responsibility to make sure their own players are on fantrax and spreadsheets accordingly. 2047
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: Fantrax 2014« on: January 17, 2014, 01:45:40 PM »Thanks. As far as I can tell they are actually FA However, I did notice Kenley Jansen is still out there as a free agent but he should be on the Red Sox roster. I will fix that now. I'm hoping that is an isolated incident though because the fantrax committee and Chris combed over the rosters pretty thoroughly. If I remember correctly, Jansen was traded from the dodgers to the Red Sox around the time fantrax was getting set up so that's probably why he slipped through the cracks. If anybody notices a discrepancy in that a player is shown available on fantrax but shouldn't be just let Chris or someone on the fantrax committee know and we can take care of it. 2048
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: Need New Scoring System« on: January 17, 2014, 03:28:44 AM »
I would vote 4th option as well.
2049
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: Free Agency Begins January 17th, 12pm CST« on: January 16, 2014, 06:04:56 PM »
Sounds good to me.
2050
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: Rockies & Rays Trade« on: January 14, 2014, 08:14:57 PM » |
|