ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues

Fantasy Leagues => Franchise NHL: Transactions => Franchise NHL => NHL Leagues => Franchise NHL: Completed Transactions => Topic started by: Drew on August 19, 2012, 09:04:08 PM

Title: Hal Gill
Post by: Drew on August 19, 2012, 09:04:08 PM
$0.2m


aug21-12: added team icon.
Title: Re: Hal Gill
Post by: hockeyfreak47 on August 21, 2012, 11:35:20 PM
Quote from: Drew on August 19, 2012, 09:04:08 PM
$0.2m


contract please  :thumbsup:

should be league minimum 2 years 200k  :bump:  again
Title: Re: Hal Gill
Post by: Drew on August 22, 2012, 08:36:55 PM
1 year, pretty sure you can do it
Title: Re: Hal Gill
Post by: PigsRule on August 23, 2012, 01:42:40 AM
Quote from: hockeyfreak47 on August 21, 2012, 11:35:20 PM
contract please  :thumbsup:

should be league minimum 2 years 200k  :bump:  again

correct hf47!

Quote from: Drew on August 22, 2012, 08:36:55 PM
1 year, pretty sure you can do it
min. contract length is 2yrs in FNHL for FA and extension contracts.
LINK to Contracts pg: http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=8270.0


pl. see the 1yr contract discussion in this new split out thread. seems ppl are very used to a homogenized hky product on profsl... hmmmm
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=70428.msg382599#msg382599
Title: Re: Hal Gill
Post by: Drew on August 23, 2012, 12:16:43 PM
I'll wait and see on both Gill and Sutton how the 1 year discussion comes out.
Title: Re: Hal Gill
Post by: Drew on August 27, 2012, 01:58:10 PM
Has a decision been made on 1 year contracts. After posting my findings I believe 1 year contracts are a thing.

hockeyfreak6000 or joeshome can attest to it as previous commissioners
Title: Re: Hal Gill
Post by: PigsRule on August 28, 2012, 12:01:53 AM
Quote from: Drew on August 27, 2012, 01:58:10 PM
Has a decision been made on 1 year contracts. After posting my findings I believe 1 year contracts are a thing.

hockeyfreak6000 or joeshome can attest to it as previous commissioners

i've rendered a decision ... not sure why it's being challenged again after repeatedly explaining it.

also, past decisions by joeshmoe + hf6k concerning P-2012 contracts were also dismissed by you so why wait for their input?

i do think we need to move forward as this should not be such a deal breaker of a rule. these are already inexpensive contracts as it is.
Title: Re: Hal Gill
Post by: Drew on August 28, 2012, 12:08:23 AM
Quote from: PigsRule on August 28, 2012, 12:01:53 AM
i've rendered a decision ... not sure why it's being challenged again after repeatedly explaining it.

also, past decisions by joeshmoe + hf6k concerning P-2012 contracts were also dismissed by you so why wait for their input?

i do think we need to move forward as this should not be such a deal breaker of a rule. these are already inexpensive contracts as it is.
Well if your going to be a rule nazi about it I guess I have no chance of stating my case even if the evidence is all showing that there is 1 year contracts and they were previously allowed.

2 years, $0.2m
Title: Re: Hal Gill
Post by: PigsRule on August 28, 2012, 12:54:41 AM
Quote from: Drew on August 28, 2012, 12:08:23 AM
...
2 years, $0.2m


Hal Gill, $0.2m (2013-2014)


fantrax + team pg updated.
:judge: