ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
Archive => Backyard NHL: Transactions => Backyard NHL => Archive => Backyard NHL: Invalid Transactions => Topic started by: izaman3 on September 30, 2018, 02:37:52 PM
-
To Detroit
Dylan Larkin, $3.6m (2020-21)
Sami Vatanen, $3.6m (2018-19)
Lucas Elvenes, N/C (0 games)
:VAN: Round 3
To Vancouver
Frederik Andersen, $8.2m (2018-19)
Rick Nash, $2.3m (2019-20)
Freddie Andersen is a great fantasy goalie, but I really like the guys that I'm picking up. I see Larkin continuing to get better this year, Vatanen should be the #1 PPQB in NJ and Elvenes and the 3rd help Detroit's future. I'm also happy to be shedding Nash's contract as I think he'll retire soon.
Thankd for the deal Rob
-
Thumbs up from the Canucks!
Appreciate the deal!
:beer:
-
:iatp:
-
:iatp: like this better for vancover than detroit.
-
Goalies are GOLD in Backyard. Frederik Andersen was the 3rd highest scoring goalie and player last year in Backyard with 391.05 pts. Plus, Toronto is a stronger team this year. Larkin was the #39 Center and Vatanen was the #71 D-man. Their combined total was 231.65. Thats a difference of 159.4 pts. The cap savings of $3.3m equals, according to fantrax a P. Kane, Kuz type player. Even with a slight up-tick in production, the cap savings + a 5th rd. player + a 3rd rd. pick does not equal that type of return. I've offered more for a lesser goalie was was turned down flat. Starting goalies of this caliber are worth more than this IMO given their production. TC can weigh in on their opinion.
:veto:
-
Have to agree, not enough for a starter. Would at least need a backup with upside in return to make this reasonable.
:veto:
-
:iatp:
-
Nope
:veto:
-
Ok, can we get some resolution on this trade? We currently have the following votes from the listed trade commission:
1. Drew - Against
2. izaman3 - Approve
3. SlackJack - Against
4. Anthony - ?
5. winter - Against
6. Vik - Approve
7. jmtrops - Approve
8. Thecliff - ?
So that is 3 in favor and 3 against, plus another Approve from Jonathan.
Based on the rules posted, it takes three approvals for a trade to go forward.
What should happen?
Thanks,
Rob
-
Ok, can we get some resolution on this trade? We currently have the following votes from the listed trade commission:
1. Drew - Against
2. izaman3 - Approve
3. SlackJack - Against
4. Anthony - ?
5. winter - Against
6. Vik - Approve
7. jmtrops - Approve
8. Thecliff - ?
So that is 3 in favor and 3 against, plus another Approve from Jonathan.
Based on the rules posted, it takes three approvals for a trade to go forward.
What should happen?
Thanks,
Rob
I don't count as an approval as I'm involved in the trade and ineligible to vote as a TC member. meaning that it 2 approvals and 3 vetoes right now. We need Anthony or Cliff to weigh in
-
Don`t treat it like a vote. Three veto's means it's toast.
-
That is fine, but that is not what it says in the rules - so if that is the case, then it should be stated. I am not trying to be difficult, but the stated rules say a trade is approved if three of the committee approve.