ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues

Fantasy Leagues => Franchise NHL: Transactions => Franchise NHL => NHL Leagues => Franchise NHL: Completed Transactions => Topic started by: joeshmoe on November 04, 2010, 02:33:01 PM

Title: Contracts Problem
Post by: joeshmoe on November 04, 2010, 02:33:01 PM
Ok, so, when I set the league up the NHL was still in Free Agency.  Many players had options not yet exercised.  Some contract values weren't available etc.  Every team has players not signed through this season.  They have no contract value either.  Theyre essentially free players.  I let it be, because it worked for the DME and it would be rectified in this upcoming offseason anyways. 

However, does anyone think we should address this now?

We could have a deadline for signing extensions, but what are the values?  Do we release the players to the open market?  I say we get an extensions system established, allow a period for extensions to occur, and then release the unowned players to the free agent market. 

Any other ideas?
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: teddy369 on November 09, 2010, 10:49:24 PM
Sounds good.. now we just need an extension system.
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: bravesfan4 on November 10, 2010, 09:40:07 PM
Well we definately need something in place for extensions. Lets all take a few days and look over the contracts of the best players on here and get a rough idea. Lets try and send a pm to all RC members by monday with what they think the values should be. Then go from there. What do you think?
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: joeshmoe on November 10, 2010, 10:40:01 PM
Well we definately need something in place for extensions. Lets all take a few days and look over the contracts of the best players on here and get a rough idea. Lets try and send a pm to all RC members by monday with what they think the values should be. Then go from there. What do you think?

I like that.  We need to establish scoring to establish player value.  So lets get scoring locked up asap.
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: joeshmoe on November 18, 2010, 12:49:05 PM
Scoring is taken care of, so aren't extensions.  Now lets do this:

All players with no contract values, except for prospects of course, must be signed to an extension by...Jan 1.

On Jan 1st all players not signed to a contract, except prospects, will be released to the free agent pool.

I need votes, I vote yes.
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: Drew on November 18, 2010, 02:06:59 PM
Yes, so anyone in minor league is exempt until the end of the season (July 1).  :iatp:
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: joeshmoe on November 18, 2010, 02:08:13 PM
Yes, so anyone in minor league is exempt until the end of the season (July 1).  :iatp:

Their contract starts when they've played in 40 NHL games.  Then they follow an arbitration process while on an entry draft contract, which is a mandated salary based on draft order.
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: bravesfan4 on November 18, 2010, 02:44:34 PM
So we would pay them whatever the real-life arbitrator says?
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: teddy369 on November 18, 2010, 02:47:41 PM
Yes
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: joeshmoe on November 18, 2010, 02:54:56 PM
nope...there are rules for arbitration under the contracts section
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: Drew on November 20, 2010, 08:10:58 PM
Scoring is taken care of, so aren't extensions.  Now lets do this:

All players with no contract values, except for prospects of course, must be signed to an extension by...Jan 1.

On Jan 1st all players not signed to a contract, except prospects, will be released to the free agent pool.

I need votes, I vote yes.

Is this true for players that are on teams without managers as well. There could be a lot of free agents on Jan. 1st I am excited.
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: teddy369 on November 21, 2010, 02:08:13 AM
Is this true for players that are on teams without managers as well. There could be a lot of free agents on Jan. 1st I am excited.

Teams without managers and those with managers who are about to be cut should be exempt. There's nothing thats worse then having to take over a team thats been robbed blind.
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: Drew on November 21, 2010, 02:21:08 AM
I meant like, managers who don't really pay attention like us, like they log on but don't really make any moves and such
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: joeshmoe on November 22, 2010, 05:18:29 PM
Well, there's a difference between not logging on and logging on and making moves.  Anyone not signed by teams, and the commish's office will sign extensions for the unowned franchises. 
Title: Re: Contracts Problem
Post by: joeshmoe on December 16, 2010, 10:27:22 AM
Consider this decided  :judge: