ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues

Archive => Backyard NHL: Transactions => Backyard NHL => Archive => Backyard NHL: Invalid Transactions => Topic started by: norrya66 on October 08, 2013, 04:21:57 PM

Title: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: norrya66 on October 08, 2013, 04:21:57 PM

:VAN: receives:

Brooks Laich, $3.6m (2013-14)
Colin Greening, $4.0m (2013-14)
Erik Gustafsson, $0.5m (2014-15)
Michal Neuvirth, $1.6m (2014-15)

:MIN-NHL: receives:

Evgeni Malkin, $8.7m (2013-14)
Lauri Korpikoski, $1.5m (2013-14)
Niklas Hjalmarsson, $1.4m (2014-15)
:MIN-NHL: Round 4

:MIN-NHL: confirms this deal.  I HATE moving Neuvy.  I really think Oates is going to ride whoever is hot in Washington.  Holtby has already struggled a bit early on.  I needed a dman, and Hjalmarsson helps with that.  I also get the stud in Malkin!

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: Gilly on October 08, 2013, 04:26:42 PM

Alright,

So we all know I wont win this year or any year with my goalie situation...I have Hackett in the minors, now Greiss, Neuvirth, Bryz and Ellis, that sounds good but its really depressing, Im praying for a miracle here with my goalies, lol and not feeling the miracle anytime soon but i have to try!!

Thanks Norry for the deal!!

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: SlackJack on October 08, 2013, 04:33:30 PM

:beer: I like it....
....and the trade looks good too.

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: Tony on October 08, 2013, 04:55:14 PM

 :iatp:

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: yahoolando on October 08, 2013, 05:10:34 PM

Maybe we only can start 1 goalie a night and can carry only 3 on the roster.  Some of these goal-tending deals are absurd.

 :soapbox:

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: norrya66 on October 08, 2013, 05:13:07 PM

Quote from: yahoolando on October 08, 2013, 05:10:34 PM

Maybe we only can start 1 goalie a night and can carry only 3 on the roster.  Some of these goal-tending deals are absurd.

I agree, but that's how this league is.  There is so much value in goalies, even back ups. 

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: Tony on October 08, 2013, 05:18:12 PM

Quote from: yahoolando on October 08, 2013, 05:10:34 PM

Maybe we only can start 1 goalie a night and can carry only 3 on the roster.  Some of these goal-tending deals are absurd.

 :soapbox:

That is something that could be implemented in future seasons?

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: Drew on October 08, 2013, 05:21:00 PM

Quote from: yahoolando on October 08, 2013, 05:10:34 PM

Maybe we only can start 1 goalie a night and can carry only 3 on the roster.  Some of these goal-tending deals are absurd.

 :soapbox:

Ya I don't like this deal at all as it is complete risk with not a high chance of a good reward. Malkin one of the top players in the league for a back-up goalie.

I don't think goalies can ever change in this league as it has been that way for years. But this is not a deal that warrants the move of a top player.

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: yahoolando on October 08, 2013, 05:33:13 PM

 :veto:

I veto. Malkin is a top player I don't care how desperate you are Gilly.

You know I rarely veto but this is too much IMO.

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: Drew on October 08, 2013, 08:15:04 PM

BTW I  :veto:

Title: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: Gilly on October 09, 2013, 09:39:49 AM

This deal veto-ed correct?

Title: Re: Wild/Canucks Deal
Post by: favo_zomg on October 09, 2013, 10:25:46 AM

I  :veto: too. I just don't like the looks of the deal.