ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues
Fantasy Leagues => Franchise GM: Rules Changes => Franchise GM: History Books => Franchise GM => MLB Leagues => Franchise GM: Clarifications & Discussion => Topic started by: rcankosy on September 17, 2012, 03:23:20 PM
-
Guys,
Please vote on one of the following three options:
1. Keep the 65 IP limit with NO GS limit
2. Institute 7 GS rule PLUS 65 IP - whichever happens first (like Moneyball)
3. Institute 8 GS rule PLUS 65 IP - whichever happens first (like MB)
I did not pose 9 GS as an option, because I think it would lead to too many IP for the week.
Thanks,
Roy
-
Guys,
Please vote on one of the following three options:
1. Keep the 65 IP limit.
2. Institute 7 GS rule.
3. Institute 8 GS rule.
I did not pose 9 GS as an option, because I think it would lead to too many IP for the week.
Thanks,
Roy
1) Yes.
2) No.
3) Yes.
I voted for the 8 GS rule rather than the 7 GS for two reasons.
A) Realistically, it allows for the idea of 8 games player per week which happens in MLB when there are make-up games via double headers.
B) With our teams being fantasy franchises, the schedule of our starters has some volatility. One week, we may only have 5-6 starts whereas another week we have 8-9 starts from our pitchers. A team with 6 starters one week and 8 starters the next would average 7 starts per week @ the 8 GS rule, but only 6.5 starts per week @ the 7 GS rule.
-
8 starts in 2013, 7 starts in 2014 as Howe had suggested
-
I vote #3
-
8 starts in 2013, 7 starts in 2014 as Howe had suggested
:iatp:
This is the best option in my opinion.
-
To clarify, option # 2 and # 3 is 65 IP limit PLUS 7 GS (option # 2) or 8 GS (option # 3). Option # 1 means 65 IP W/O a specific GS limit.
I am voting for # 3. I agree with Colby that we should be flexible to allow for rainouts and double-headers.
-
I am also going to agree with Howe and vote on 65IP + 8GS in 2013, 65IP + 7GS in 2014.
-
This tally is 3-3 with 3 teams voting for 8 GS + 65 IP and 3 in favor of 8/7 + 65.
-
This tally is 3-3 with 3 teams voting for 8 GS + 65 IP and 3 in favor of 8/7 + 65.
We need a 2-1 approval or better, right?
-
We all voted #3, but 3 of us think we should go to #2 in 2014. Can we tentatively agree on #3, and reconvene after we see how it plays out?
-
We all voted #3, but 3 of us think we should go to #2 in 2014. Can we tentatively agree on #3, and reconvene after we see how it plays out?
:iatp:
BTW, I was saying 2-1 or better to mean two thirds or better.
-
#3
-
I vote for option #3
-
Option # 3 wins by a margin of 5-3. Therefore, our new rule will be 8 GS plus 65 IP.