9551
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: Samuel deduno sp
« on: February 09, 2015, 08:02:27 AM »
2m
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 9551
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: Samuel deduno sp« on: February 09, 2015, 08:02:27 AM »
2m
9552
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Giants and Rockies Trade« on: February 09, 2015, 07:36:55 AM »
Giants get
Jason Castro c 2.45m 2015 Charlie blackmon of .440 2015 Rockies get: Aaron hill 2b 7m 2016 Giancarlo stanton of 6.5m 2015 Hector Sanchez c .512 2015 International money 500k $2M Cash in 2015 I hate to lose Stanton but I got a good of return in Blackmon 9553
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: Scott Atchison, RP, CLE« on: February 08, 2015, 08:17:43 PM »
.750m
9554
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / trade between Indians and tampa« on: February 08, 2015, 07:57:53 PM »
Indians get:
Jimmy nelson p .500 2016 Richie Shaffer ci .500 (p/na) Brandon Guyer of .500 2016 Jesse Chavez sp .500 2015 Reese mcguire c .500 (p/na) Jake Sisco so .500(p/na) Tampa gets Pablo sandoval 5.5m 2017 I like this trade more I'm getting a young pitcher in nelson the brewers are very high on him and could start this year for him. Shaffer is a interesting spec I could see him on the team maybe sometime this year or next year depending if he gets his bat going. I feel this trade is a lot better. 9555
Franchise GM: Archives / Re: Trade rules seem unclear« on: February 08, 2015, 06:46:16 PM »
Thanks for letting me know I was confused that's all. Then I agree with voting I have no problems with it at all
9556
Franchise GM: Archives / Re: Trade rules seem unclear« on: February 08, 2015, 06:28:33 PM »I am good with that but we need to make rules state that because as it is seems unfair to have 8 people on committee and pick which members vote is one that actually gets used. Say one didn't vote yet and tar heels vote for then last minute one vetoes does trade get passed because had the 5 needed or veto because 3rd guy chimmed in for the 3. As rules show we should honor the 5 passes because it is what is in the rules and if gets amended then so be it.Its a double standard I agree with nerwffei u have votes OK then it should go thru but it didn't because of the 3rd veto why is that.I'm not trying g to cause a problem I just want get a clarification on this 9557
Franchise GM: Invalid Transactions / Re: Rays and Indians agree to deal« on: February 08, 2015, 06:04:00 PM »
Wow the people that veto the trade why haven't u made a offer for him u guys think he is like the next trout out there. I have a player on my team who I don't even want I think him going to Boston is not going to matter I never liked him at all so I try and make 3 different trades first 2 trades maybe I could have got more u guys comp!aimed I didn't get a top prospect for him so I work out a trade with volt and then same thing happens again. So I guess I'll set him on my reserve not play him and wait till contract up and get 3 1st rd picks for him seeing he is that good in your guys eyes
9558
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: Irrevocable Outright Waivers« on: February 08, 2015, 05:23:36 PM »
Giants claim daisuke matsuzaka sp/rp
9559
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: SP Kyle Lobstein, DET« on: February 08, 2015, 04:17:24 PM »
PC+700
9560
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: Ubaldo Jimenez, SP, BAL« on: February 08, 2015, 04:15:38 PM »
2.5m
|
|