That would be awesome, but your Cubs transfer is not dead in the water yet.

Well even when changing names and the teams remain the same becomes and issue then we have bigger issues.  After these latest rulings it means that unless you were part of the original owners and were able to get your favorite team from the start up, should you be a replacement owner at some point you would more than likely never get or be allowed to get your favorite team.  The only two ways you could is if 1. you were in the league from the start or 2. a vacant team is your favorite team and you are new to FGM as if you are a current manager you are not allowed to change to your favorite team even if it is for the betterment of the league.   

Since all these votes are coming from me wanting to switch to the Cubs and it looks like that is going to be voted down, I proposed another solution.

Can I just have the team logo/name and keep my Angels team and the Cubs team goes to the Angles which would help the new owner as it would be a better team and it would have Trout actually on the Angels which would be appealing to a new owner.  The salary caps are close enough that it really wouldn't make a difference. 

EDR Full.  I'll pass.

So, how do people go about running their favorite franchises if those were taken when they got into the league?  For me, the Angels were the only team available so I took him.  However, I hate everything the real life Angels stand for as they have become the Yankees of the west trying to buy a championship by signing every high priced FA.  The Cubs tried the samething for awhile, but under the new direction of Epstien I like the direction they are heading.  I've been a Cubs fan since I used to tell my Grandpa that Greg Maddux was going to be good if he could ever stop having one bad inning.  I just think that there should be something in place for managers to eventually get to run their favorite team should that team come available. 

P Kendall, Ian, $0.5m (P-n/a)
P Ackerman, Hunter, $0.5m (P-n/a)