2631
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: David Wright, CI, NYM
« on: January 13, 2014, 10:33:31 AM »
$5M
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2631
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: David Wright, CI, NYM« on: January 13, 2014, 10:33:31 AM »
$5M
2632
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: Ryan Zimmerman, CI, WAS« on: January 13, 2014, 10:33:10 AM »
$5M
2633
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: Albert Pujols, CI, LAA« on: January 13, 2014, 10:24:57 AM »
$2m
2634
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: David Wright, CI, NYM« on: January 13, 2014, 10:24:36 AM »
$2m
2635
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Re: Ryan Zimmerman, CI, WAS« on: January 13, 2014, 10:24:11 AM »
$2m
2636
Franchise GM / Re: FGM Official Trade Block Thread« on: December 12, 2013, 10:55:49 PM »
These guys would help teams now and I am building for the future. Looking for packages of young ready talent.
SP Price, David, $14m (2017) CI-OF Davis, Chris, $10m (2017) 2637
Franchise GM: Completed Transactions / Angels Roster Move« on: November 26, 2013, 06:37:55 PM »
The Angels will call up:
P n/a Hill, Taylor 2638
Franchise GM: Archives / Re: RC Discussion - Special Case [Betterment of the league] (RC Members Only Please)« on: October 17, 2013, 11:19:29 PM »Since we are resigned to the task of allowing internal transfers I offer the following: Great post. 2639
Franchise GM: Archives / Re: Proposed Idea« on: October 15, 2013, 04:03:45 PM »Not entirely Roy. The primary purpose of the RC in legislation is to create rules that safeguard the league for its future while limiting the negative impact on current GMs. A grandfathering rule for the current 30 satisfies the second part of that statement. The 30 GMs would have to declare favorite teams, and a decent amount of them are already managing their favorite team, so the number is less than 30. Likewise, many GMs are attached to their fantasy franchises and have no interest in managing their favorite team or switching, so this only comes down to a few GMs who have interest in moving to their favorite teams when they open. On top of that, ensuring they have the appropriate service time reduces the field even more. I am not trying to screw things up in this league, I am just asking for a small name change, that's it. It's amazing that if you don't agree with the vast majority thing you are ridiculed for having a favorite team. Let's address the real issue here. There was a huge uproar b/c nobody wanted a manager to switch to a team with Trout, that is the issue although nobody would admit that. 2640
Franchise GM: Archives / Re: Proposed Idea« on: October 15, 2013, 03:59:29 PM »I have never really understand the argument for wanting to GM your favorite team. The players in the league are so mixed up that very few of the original players are still on the same organization so in the end it is only a logo. If my favorite team, the Twins, came open I wouldn't want to change teams because I have put a lot of hard work and effort in to building my current team. It's just a personal preference thing. Like I said in this idea, all I want to do is change the name of the team, that is it. I don't want the players. |
|