Author Topic: +/- Obsolete Stat?  (Read 804 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5153
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
+/- Obsolete Stat?
« on: December 14, 2017, 11:15:43 PM »
Has there been a conversation about doing away with the +/- stat? It is a poor metric for today's game! 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19204
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2017, 08:37:03 AM »
 We haven't discussed it. I disagree that it's obsolete though.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline GypsieDeathBringer

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3241
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :ORL:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Pittsburgh:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2017, 09:49:04 AM »
I think with the onslaught of advanced metrics +/- and pitcher wins have really gotten crapped on.  If you are on the ice for a goal against that is a bad thing and most likely had a hand in giving up the goal, not always, but certainly most of the time.  The opposite is true as well.  If you are a high possession player that has a garbage +/- that might mean your unlucky, but it more probably means your team and you suck at defending. 

Having said that if we could swap +/- for a game score rating that would be rad.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
2011-12 Dynasty NHL Champion :CAR-NHL:
[Dynasty NHL :PIT-NHL:]
[ProFSL Dynasty Hockey :PIT-NHL:]

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19204
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #3 on: December 15, 2017, 10:00:54 AM »
If we're going to discuss this, here's a little data.  I also setup a dummy league removing this stat so if there's any player you want to compare let me know.  Or I can invite you to the dummy league.  Corey - I don't see GSR in the Fantrax scoring options.  Snuggy - is there something equivalent that I'm missing?

Top 100 players (current settings)
Player   FPts   FP/G
Ovechkin, Alex   171.3   5.19
Kucherov, Nikita   169.4   5.46
Schenn, Brayden   163.3   4.95
Tarasenko, Vladimir   152.1   4.61
Stamkos, Steven   148.5   4.79
Kopitar, Anze   144.5   4.52
Schwartz, Jaden   142.2   4.74
Tavares, John   137.75   4.3
Kessel, Phil   133.6   4.05
Brown, Dustin   133.55   4.17
Gaudreau, Johnny   132.45   4.14
Couturier, Sean   132.4   4.27
McDavid, Connor   132   4.12
Lee, Anders   130.1   4.07
Scheifele, Mark   129.4   4.04
Forsberg, Filip   127.25   4.1
Benn, Jamie   125.45   3.92
Wheeler, Blake   124.55   3.89
Voracek, Jakub   123.7   3.99
Trocheck, Vincent   123.35   3.85
Kane, Evander   122.85   3.84
Monahan, Sean   122.35   3.82
Point, Brayden   121.15   3.91
MacKinnon, Nathan   120.5   3.89
Seguin, Tyler   120.1   3.75
Giroux, Claude   119.2   3.85
Toffoli, Tyler   115.25   3.6
Crosby, Sidney   114.3   3.46
Kane, Patrick   114.1   3.57
Namestnikov, Vladislav   114.1   3.68
Hall, Taylor   113.55   3.78
Stone, Mark   113.55   3.78
Staal, Eric   113.5   3.66
Kuznetsov, Evgeny   112.65   3.41
Matthews, Auston   112.05   4.31
Pastrnak, David   111.25   3.84
Boeser, Brock   110.75   3.82
Bailey, Josh   109.6   3.42
Zucker, Jason   109.6   3.54
Barkov, Aleksander   108.5   3.5
Kadri, Nazem   108.35   3.28
Anderson, Josh   108.2   3.61
Karlsson, William   107.8   3.48
Marchessault, Jonathan   106.95   3.82
Laine, Patrik   106.55   3.33
Huberdeau, Jonathan   106.4   3.33
Couture, Logan   105.9   3.53
Neal, James   105.6   3.41
Doughty, Drew   105.2   3.29
Ehlers, Nikolaj   102.3   3.2
Grabner, Michael   99.9   3.22
Arvidsson, Viktor   99.85   3.22
Pietrangelo, Alex   99.75   3.33
Panarin, Artemi   99.3   3.1
Marchand, Brad   97.7   4.65
Hornqvist, Patric   96.3   3.21
Lucic, Milan   96.1   3
Malkin, Evgeni   95.35   3.29
Barzal, Mathew   94.75   2.96
van Riemsdyk, James   94.35   2.95
Oshie, T.J.   93.9   3.35
Gallagher, Brendan   93.85   2.93
DeBrincat, Alex   93.5   2.92
Josi, Roman   91.9   3.28
Palat, Ondrej   91.85   2.96
Buchnevich, Pavel   91.65   2.96
Landeskog, Gabriel   91.6   3.39
Toews, Jonathan   91.35   2.85
Smith, Reilly   90.9   2.93
Eberle, Jordan   90.35   2.82
Bergeron, Patrice   90.05   3.75
Smith, Craig   90.05   2.9
Faksa, Radek   90   2.9
Radulov, Alexander   89.9   2.81
Guentzel, Jake   89.35   2.71
Sergachev, Mikhail   89.15   2.88
Werenski, Zach   89.15   2.79
Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan   88.4   2.76
Perron, David   88.35   3.53
Kreider, Chris   87.8   2.83
Gibbons, Brian   87.75   2.83
Skinner, Jeff   87.55   2.92
Pearson, Tanner   87.45   2.73
Muzzin, Jake   86.9   2.72
Pacioretty, Max   86.55   2.7
Zuccarello, Mats   86.55   2.79
Marleau, Patrick   86.45   2.62
Klingberg, John   86.25   2.7
Ferland, Micheal   86.1   2.78
Backstrom, Nicklas   85.85   2.68
Gourde, Yanni   85.85   2.77
Nylander, William   85.1   2.58
Saad, Brandon   85   2.66
Subban, P.K.   84.95   2.74
Horvat, Bo   84.8   3.03
Bjorkstrand, Oliver   84.6   2.64
Haula, Erik   84.55   3.13
Mantha, Anthony   84.55   2.73
Staal, Jordan   84.3   2.81

Top 100 players (removing +/-)
Player   FPts   FP/G
Ovechkin, Alex   165.3   5.01
Kucherov, Nikita   160.4   5.17
Schenn, Brayden   140.3   4.25
Stamkos, Steven   136.5   4.4
Tarasenko, Vladimir   136.1   4.12
Tavares, John   135.75   4.24
Kessel, Phil   134.6   4.08
Kane, Evander   130.85   4.09
Kopitar, Anze   130.5   4.08
Lee, Anders   130.1   4.07
Gaudreau, Johnny   128.45   4.01
Trocheck, Vincent   128.35   4.01
McDavid, Connor   127   3.97
Benn, Jamie   123.45   3.86
MacKinnon, Nathan   122.5   3.95
Scheifele, Mark   121.4   3.79
Seguin, Tyler   121.1   3.78
Wheeler, Blake   120.55   3.77
Crosby, Sidney   120.3   3.65
Forsberg, Filip   120.25   3.88
Couturier, Sean   119.4   3.85
Schwartz, Jaden   119.2   3.97
Brown, Dustin   118.55   3.7
Monahan, Sean   118.35   3.7
Voracek, Jakub   117.7   3.8
Hall, Taylor   117.55   3.92
Kane, Patrick   115.1   3.6
Pastrnak, David   113.25   3.91
Kuznetsov, Evgeny   112.65   3.41
Boeser, Brock   110.75   3.82
Giroux, Claude   110.2   3.55
Laine, Patrik   107.55   3.36
Stone, Mark   107.55   3.58
Bailey, Josh   106.6   3.33
Barkov, Aleksander   106.5   3.44
Huberdeau, Jonathan   106.4   3.33
Point, Brayden   106.15   3.42
Namestnikov, Vladislav   106.1   3.42
Staal, Eric   105.5   3.4
Ehlers, Nikolaj   104.3   3.26
Toffoli, Tyler   104.25   3.26
Neal, James   103.6   3.34
Zucker, Jason   102.6   3.31
Kadri, Nazem   102.35   3.1
Marchessault, Jonathan   101.95   3.64
Couture, Logan   100.9   3.36
Karlsson, William   100.8   3.25
Hornqvist, Patric   99.3   3.31
Anderson, Josh   99.2   3.31
Matthews, Auston   99.05   3.81
van Riemsdyk, James   98.35   3.07
Guentzel, Jake   97.35   2.95
Malkin, Evgeni   97.35   3.36
Gallagher, Brendan   95.85   3
Skinner, Jeff   95.55   3.19
Keller, Clayton   95.35   2.8
Pacioretty, Max   94.55   2.95
Mantha, Anthony   93.55   3.02
Panarin, Artemi   93.3   2.92
Oshie, T.J.   92.9   3.32
Radulov, Alexander   92.9   2.9
Nugent-Hopkins, Ryan   92.4   2.89
Lucic, Milan   92.1   2.88
Eichel, Jack   91.9   2.87
Arvidsson, Viktor   91.85   2.96
Doughty, Drew   91.2   2.85
Buchnevich, Pavel   90.65   2.92
Barzal, Mathew   89.75   2.8
DeBrincat, Alex   89.5   2.8
Hoffman, Mike   89.3   2.98
Smith, Craig   89.05   2.87
Rantanen, Mikko   88.9   2.87
Kreider, Chris   88.8   2.86
Ekman-Larsson, Oliver   88.5   2.6
Eberle, Jordan   88.35   2.76
Ferland, Micheal   88.1   2.84
Leddy, Nick   88.05   2.75
Grabner, Michael   87.9   2.84
Josi, Roman   87.9   3.14
Marchand, Brad   87.7   4.18
Marleau, Patrick   87.45   2.65
Letang, Kris   86.6   2.62
Toews, Jonathan   86.35   2.7
Zibanejad, Mika   86.3   3.6
Simmonds, Wayne   86   2.77
Pietrangelo, Alex   85.75   2.86
Landeskog, Gabriel   85.6   3.17
Maroon, Patrick   85.1   2.66
Smith, Reilly   84.9   2.74
Haula, Erik   84.55   3.13
Staal, Jordan   84.3   2.81
Burns, Brent   84.1   2.8
O'Reilly, Ryan   83.8   2.62
Rakell, Rickard   83.75   3.1
Zuccarello, Mats   83.55   2.7
Larkin, Dylan   83.4   2.69
Perron, David   83.35   3.33
Stastny, Paul   83.2   2.52
Werenski, Zach   83.15   2.6
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19204
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2017, 10:07:30 AM »
The most drastic differences are obviously with the best and worst +/- guys.  Those STL forwards with incredible numbers this year take a pretty big FP dip (20-30 points this year).  Meanwhile a guy like OEL who is notoriously bad in +/- would see a decent bump in production. 

Though based on what I'm seeing, I think Slack is right (at least from a fantasy perspective, I still appreciate +/- in real life even though others don't).  However, it's really not a huge factor in our scoring. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snugerud

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2017, 10:29:00 AM »
The most drastic differences are obviously with the best and worst +/- guys.  Those STL forwards with incredible numbers this year take a pretty big FP dip (20-30 points this year).  Meanwhile a guy like OEL who is notoriously bad in +/- would see a decent bump in production. 

Though based on what I'm seeing, I think Slack is right (at least from a fantasy perspective, I still appreciate +/- in real life even though others don't).  However, it's really not a huge factor in our scoring.

I personally see no point in changing it as we are a points based league and as Rob pointed out it does little to change the overall stats.  If you were to replace it my best suggestion is Blocked Shots.  Under the premium scoring features there is a Corsi% however I dont know if we want to start paying $85 a year just to score corsi and not even sure how you would score corsi ... It seems more a head to head category league thing. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19204
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2017, 10:32:32 AM »
I personally see no point in changing it as we are a points based league and as Rob pointed out it does little to change the overall stats.  If you were to replace it my best suggestion is Blocked Shots.  Under the premium scoring features there is a Corsi% however I dont know if we want to start paying $85 a year just to score corsi and not even sure how you would score corsi ... It seems more a head to head category league thing.

We've discussed Blocked Shots in the past.  I've never been a fan of that stat even though it would help with Defensive scoring.  However, I believe I recall in prior conversations that this change would do too much to disrupt the overall scoring, and the value of certain players.  I never liked the idea.  And if we did it we'd need a long preparation period - like 2 seasons, so that GM's could prepare for that kind of change.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Rob

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19204
  • Bonus inPoints: 3
    • :NE:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :NewHampshire:
    • :NER:
    • :BOS:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #7 on: December 15, 2017, 10:34:21 AM »
I personally see no point in changing it as we are a points based league and as Rob pointed out it does little to change the overall stats.  If you were to replace it my best suggestion is Blocked Shots.  Under the premium scoring features there is a Corsi% however I dont know if we want to start paying $85 a year just to score corsi and not even sure how you would score corsi ... It seems more a head to head category league thing.

I'm not opposed to paying for the league - never have been.  There's just been no reason to do it so far other than the Minor League stats which we enable in the offseason anyway.  I kinda wish I bought that lifetime membership they offered a couple years ago.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snugerud

  • League Moderator
  • MVP
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #8 on: December 15, 2017, 10:41:37 AM »
I'm not opposed to paying for the league - never have been.  There's just been no reason to do it so far other than the Minor League stats which we enable in the offseason anyway.  I kinda wish I bought that lifetime membership they offered a couple years ago.

You and me both... Really wished i had bought it....
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline WestCoastExpress

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 4316
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: +/- Obsolete Stat?
« Reply #9 on: December 15, 2017, 04:23:06 PM »
As a former player, and now fan, +/- is still important and I don't think it should be taken out. It's always been a part of any league I'm in, H2H or points.
In our pts league here, I was surprised to see not a ton difference in the rankings. I know for my team on quick glance, EK's +/- is horrible this year and his fp/g take a hit because of it, same with Kris Letang. For the majority of players though, I don't see it as a big deal. There aren't going to be half your team of + or - 35 players at the end of the season unless you're really lucky/unlucky. An you generally know what a guy's +/- will be. OEL has always been poor, and heading into this year you could have predicted that for COL and ARI players probably at least.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    May 05, 2024, 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    May 05, 2024, 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    May 05, 2024, 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    May 05, 2024, 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    May 05, 2024, 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    May 05, 2024, 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    May 05, 2024, 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    May 05, 2024, 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    May 05, 2024, 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    May 05, 2024, 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    May 05, 2024, 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    May 05, 2024, 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    May 05, 2024, 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    May 05, 2024, 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    May 05, 2024, 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    May 05, 2024, 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    May 05, 2024, 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    May 05, 2024, 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    May 05, 2024, 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    May 05, 2024, 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    May 05, 2024, 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    May 05, 2024, 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    May 05, 2024, 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    May 05, 2024, 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    May 05, 2024, 06:45:54 PM
  • dbreer23: @BigDon you around? Get a hold of me over at FT if you are.
    May 05, 2024, 08:22:38 PM
  • Daddy: Big ol NFL LIVE trade to get the day started on a Monday.
    Yesterday at 11:03:41 AM
  • Daddy: Congratulations to both GMs
    Yesterday at 11:03:58 AM
  • Daddy: If anyone didnt know.. The Philadelphia Phillies are good at baseball :)
    Yesterday at 11:14:22 AM
  • indiansnation: Dave w pm
    Yesterday at 03:10:22 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: FGM is looking for a GM.  If you are interested, please PM me
    Yesterday at 04:35:04 PM
  • Daddy: If i weren't so busy i would take it. FGM is a great league well run.
    Yesterday at 04:38:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    Yesterday at 05:08:40 PM
  • Daddy: 23,575 views.. in a couple months. What am i talking about? "One" of the NHL LIVE sign up sheet.
    Yesterday at 07:06:21 PM
  • Daddy: See for yourself [link]
    Yesterday at 07:06:43 PM
  • Daddy: Now either there are a lot of people copying our style or trying to learn it.. or possibly there is just that much interest by visitors. Maybe both. Either way, we got to be doing something right. The NHL LIVE season, will start with an amateur draft.
    Yesterday at 07:08:56 PM
  • Daddy: Hard as it is to believe. There are a couple Franchises still available. See for yourself what all the fuss is about.
    Yesterday at 07:14:35 PM
  • Braves155: Will be around for talks tonight
    Yesterday at 08:43:53 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Braves I messaged u back yesterday got no reply yet
    Yesterday at 08:56:53 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Just sent it again in case it didn't go through yesterday
    Yesterday at 08:57:27 PM
  • Braves155: Replied BAB
    Yesterday at 09:11:26 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Back to ya
    Yesterday at 09:43:46 PM
  • indiansnation: Kylerap pm
    Today at 12:47:06 AM
  • indiansnation: Stlblues91 pm
    Today at 12:47:38 AM
  • Daddy: If you are in NCAA Football & decide to do NCAA Basketball... Your same school will carry over to the new sport.
    Today at 02:09:40 AM
  • Daddy: Soon the NBA LIVE Pre Reserve sign up sheet will go up. A lot of people have been asking.
    Today at 02:10:36 AM
  • Daddy: The NFL teams come with NCAA. The NBA teams will be the same. NCAA Basketball will end with a 32 team tournament as a 64 team league. More details to come. Thanks!
    Today at 02:13:48 AM
  • Rhino7: NBA LIVE  :taco: :bacon:
    Today at 10:16:50 AM
  • indiansnation: Daddy pm
    Today at 01:50:45 PM
  • indiansnation: Lets talk trade who is up for it any league
    Today at 03:09:50 PM