Author Topic: Questions  (Read 90483 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline favo_zomg

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 3042
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #250 on: March 30, 2013, 09:07:14 AM »
That is a great question. I think the higher seed should get the win. IMO

I don't like that... It gives an unfair advantage to the teams that finished higher in the standings.

I think we should do it with stats. For example, Team A has 6 goals this week while his opponent, Team B, has 13 goals this week. Thus, Team B wins that stat. The team that wins the most stats wins the round.

If you count shut outs, we have 15 total stats that could help determine the winner.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #251 on: March 30, 2013, 02:03:28 PM »
I don't like that... It gives an unfair advantage to the teams that finished higher in the standings.

I think we should do it with stats. For example, Team A has 6 goals this week while his opponent, Team B, has 13 goals this week. Thus, Team B wins that stat. The team that wins the most stats wins the round.

If you count shut outs, we have 15 total stats that could help determine the winner.
Higher seeded teams should have the advantage.

Also you could still have teams that tie in the stats department as well.


Just my opinion.  :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Offline favo_zomg

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 3042
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #252 on: March 30, 2013, 03:04:24 PM »
Higher seeded teams should have the advantage.

Also you could still have teams that tie in the stats department as well.


Just my opinion.  :thumbsup:

Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Questions
« Reply #253 on: March 30, 2013, 08:56:32 PM »
Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.
Hoping that there is no ties in playoffs. Haha.
But I'll have to see what is in rules but I think regular season is an important factor.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline nelly85

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 1369
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :GB:
    • :Blank:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • :Portugal:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #254 on: March 30, 2013, 11:09:53 PM »
Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.

 :iatp: I don't think we should give a win based on the person had a better season many factors injuries ect it's unfair in my opion it should be based on the week why not do wht the invatastional tournament did use stats like g/ga/a/sv/hits/blk/ and a point for each and the winner in most categories should get the win I think this would be more fair for every team and not on bc they higher seed team. It's weekly match ups should be based on the week
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline norrya66

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 3292
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DET-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :WAS-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #255 on: March 31, 2013, 01:18:20 PM »
:iatp: I don't think we should give a win based on the person had a better season many factors injuries ect it's unfair in my opion it should be based on the week why not do wht the invatastional tournament did use stats like g/ga/a/sv/hits/blk/ and a point for each and the winner in most categories should get the win I think this would be more fair for every team and not on bc they higher seed team. It's weekly match ups should be based on the week

 :iatp:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:win:  2013-14 NHL Casino Champion

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Questions
« Reply #256 on: March 31, 2013, 02:30:37 PM »
But I'll have to see what is in rules but I think regular season is an important factor.
:iatp:

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Tyler

  • Guest
Re: Questions
« Reply #257 on: April 01, 2013, 08:56:00 AM »
IMO regular season should count as a factor because it shows the best true reflection of a team and a GM and what that GM can do with the team regardless of injuries etc. 1 lucky week in the playoffs can happen, but no one gets lucky for an entire season.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

yahoolando

  • Guest
Re: Questions
« Reply #258 on: April 01, 2013, 12:50:06 PM »
Goals are the heaviest weighted stat worth 2 points and should be used in determining the winner.  Use the most goals and if is still a tie then go to Assists and if its still a tie then take the higher seed.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Questions
« Reply #259 on: April 02, 2013, 02:19:22 AM »
Standings Tie Breakers
1. Most fantasy points for entire season
2. Head-to-head record
3. Least fantasy points against for entire season

So I will go with this:
1. Head-to-head record
2. Higher Seed

I hope everyone is fine with this, regular season does matter or else we wouldn't play the games, it is very important where you place and how well you perform during the season. Head to head is the only transferable tie breaker so it gets the first spot. Again hopefully there is no ties and maybe this is something we can look into in the off-season.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Yesterday at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Yesterday at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Yesterday at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Yesterday at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Yesterday at 11:29:29 PM
  • Daddy: Sign up Bigdon. Chicago is gone already.
    Yesterday at 11:36:50 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] Pre-reserved sign up
    Yesterday at 11:37:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill switch for Vegas if he wants the bulls
    Yesterday at 11:39:17 PM
  • Daddy: Sounds good
    Yesterday at 11:43:59 PM
  • Daddy: I knew Vegas would be tempting :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:44:25 PM
  • Daddy: He still needs to select NCAA
    Yesterday at 11:44:40 PM
  • Daddy: You get to name them sir. NBA LIVE will start with an expansion draft, followed by the rookie draft.
    Yesterday at 11:45:39 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas will get the #1 pick :toast:
    Yesterday at 11:46:07 PM
  • Daddy: Super Sonics #2 pick (insert eye emoji)
    Yesterday at 11:46:44 PM
  • Daddy: All subject to trade before the draft of course.
    Yesterday at 11:47:03 PM
  • Brent: With an expansion draft, does that mean we select x number of players on our roster to protect?
    Yesterday at 11:47:51 PM
  • Brent: Also, I might have missed it, but will it be a H2H cats or points league?
    Yesterday at 11:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent yes & @Brent CATs
    Yesterday at 11:49:36 PM
  • Daddy: It will all be in the handbook as per usual.
    Yesterday at 11:50:04 PM
  • Daddy: Think MLB LIVE hoop style only not quite as deep scoring in basketball.
    Yesterday at 11:51:08 PM
  • Daddy: We are trying something thats never been done to our knowledge.
    Yesterday at 11:53:06 PM
  • Brent: I like it.
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: No other basketball league in the world has a Vegas NBA team. Till tonight.
    Yesterday at 11:54:13 PM
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:45 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah got to figure a solid name out for it
    Yesterday at 11:55:35 PM
  • Daddy: Had a few good suggestions. Just dont be corny.. this represents all of us.
    Yesterday at 11:57:03 PM
  • Daddy: We are the first to give Vegas a suggestion. Lets let it be a good one. Make them take notice.
    Yesterday at 11:57:48 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE Pre-Reserve sign up sheet [link] updated!
    Today at 02:31:32 AM