Author Topic: Backyard Contraction Discussion  (Read 1341 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline whiteghost

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 1142
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :GB:
    • :MEM:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #30 on: September 02, 2020, 10:57:54 AM »
Several good points made above and I appreciate the discussion.  I am torn, as I see value in both positions.  I probably lean toward keeping the teams with the goal of finding managers, but it does present problems with respect to trades and daily management of the club.  I don't mean to waffle, so if I have to vote - leave the teams we have.  If the majority feels different, I am good with that as well.

Finally, I strongly echo the point made by someone regarding getting notified about posts and emails.  I used to get emails, but for some reason I don't anymore.  I am always on email so receiving such a prompt would be highly preferred to having to login everytime.  If anyone knows how to set this setting, please let me know.

Cheers,
Rob
funny
0
like
1
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
jmtrops,
No reactions

Offline Ric_2227

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 1186
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :TOR-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #31 on: September 02, 2020, 11:02:16 AM »
I am not in favor of contraction, I feel that top managers will come out of the process with a stronger Team because of their abilities to find ways to acquire the best players. Keeping 2 openings will bring in new blood that could be an asset for our league.

If the majority wants to contract, like Vik said  I would be ok with it.
funny
0
like
1
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
jmtrops,
No reactions

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #32 on: September 02, 2020, 12:51:20 PM »
I would do a draft based on reverse order of last years standings. I feel that is the fairest way To keep the league competitive or you will create even more league parity if the top teams get to add the best players on those teams for no cost besides cap space which we are going to give them for free with drops
I would say the same thing if I was getting the first pick. Haha
funny
1
like
1
dislike
0
Members reacted funny:
jmtrops,
Members reacted like:
SlackJack,
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Offline DMarch47

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2018
  • Posts: 1143
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Newbie
    • :GB:
    • :MIL-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Wisconsin:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #33 on: September 03, 2020, 12:34:55 PM »
I am for the contraction because the pandemic that has warped the world of sports will continue for the future having people not apply themselves to the serious belief to CODIV-19.
funny
0
like
1
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
jmtrops,
No reactions
Call me Dougie...:CHC: FGM 2020

Offline jlapo11

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 3085
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :MON-MLS:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #34 on: September 03, 2020, 01:52:53 PM »
Do not forget to vote. There is a poll underway for the contraction
funny
0
like
1
dislike
0
No reactions
Members reacted like:
jmtrops,
No reactions

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #35 on: September 03, 2020, 02:09:03 PM »
Hey guys,

I am currently this season not in favour of contraction but maybe we need to get some stipulations around activity. I know I am not as activity as I once was but I try to answer any PMs and respond on the board but some don't but are still active.

I have some issues with contraction at the current time:
- I don't believe FA or reverse draft order are either a fair way of distributing players. I would say if we were able to prepare and knew the players were coming in advance of other transaction then maybe would be fairer. I would also say that the max contracts would need to be reevaluated as 10m is not a ridiculous amount now in comparison to when the max contract was put in.  Reverse draft order wouldn't necessarily be fair as well because having the 1st overall pick in both the entry and a distribution draft seems like way more of a benefit then any other year.

- Contraction means that divisions will need to change or there will no longer be balance between divisions, unless we contracted by 4 teams. This would also change the playoff format, among other things I haven't thought about yet. We could go back to 3 divisions and a 8 team playoff again but I feel our current set up seems "more right".

I'm sure there are other things which we will come across by contracting such as salary inflation for players which will make currently contracted players way more valuable in trades and such.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline Drew

  • Forum Administrator
  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 18307
  • Bonus inPoints: 80
  • Forum Administrator
    • :TEN:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :EDM:
    • :Clemson:
    • :TOR:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #36 on: September 03, 2020, 02:15:21 PM »
I also didn't see the teams that are being talked about contraction prior to my previous post. Before possible contract would anyone like to move open to these 2 teams. They were both playoff teams and both teams have a good core and good goaltenders for use. The reverse draft order would then cause some possible issues with our 3 goalie max rule.

For example if I was able to land:
Andrei Vasilevskiy, $3.8m (2019-20), I would want him over say Joonas Korpisalo, $3.2m (2022-23) but if there was no free drop or I had to make my free drop prior to the draft, I wouldn't know if I could even select him or not or possibly risk dropping Korpisalo to maybe land another tender in the draft.

Just lots to think about.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Drew's Bio & Trophy Case



You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - "Wayne Gretzky"

Offline Tony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 11708
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I like hockey Eh!
    • :BUF:
    • :Blank:
    • :EDM:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #37 on: September 03, 2020, 02:20:25 PM »
I also didn't see the teams that are being talked about contraction prior to my previous post. Before possible contract would anyone like to move open to these 2 teams. They were both playoff teams and both teams have a good core and good goaltenders for use. The reverse draft order would then cause some possible issues with our 3 goalie max rule.

For example if I was able to land:
Andrei Vasilevskiy, $3.8m (2019-20), I would want him over say Joonas Korpisalo, $3.2m (2022-23) but if there was no free drop or I had to make my free drop prior to the draft, I wouldn't know if I could even select him or not or possibly risk dropping Korpisalo to maybe land another tender in the draft.

Just lots to think about.
:iatp: I hope we don’t rush this decision as well. We have time.

As for the goalie max issue. You should be able to take a goalie and be over your maximum as long as you drop, buyout Or trade one before the new season starts.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:   2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2016-17 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :CHI-NHL:

 2013-14  NHL Invitational Stanley Cup Champion :PIT-NHL:

Offline Anthony

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 10065
  • Bonus inPoints: 10000
    • :CHI:
    • :CHI-NBA:
    • :CHI-NHL:
    • :Minnesota:
    • :CHC:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #38 on: September 03, 2020, 02:30:48 PM »
I keep going back and forth on this. In any situation we would have to rethink our max contract rule, as well as the minimum contract length rule. With the level of talent, I could see a non contenting team throwing 20m for 1 year to Draisaitl and then extending at a regular rate next year. On the other hand, if we kept the 10m max contract, it's just first come first serve which also isn't fair.

I'm against a draft. It gives way too much value into being bad and tanking. To the argument that the rich would only get richer: free agency always benenfits teams with more cap space and theres a strong corelation with bad teams and having a lot of cap space.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline SlackJack

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 5155
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • Director of Media Relations
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Backyard Contraction Discussion
« Reply #39 on: September 03, 2020, 03:15:33 PM »
I love the nitty gritty details and fully agree we don't have to rush anything. But my focus with contraction remains big picture. Do we have a full slate of active participating GM's and /or is it likely that we will moving forward. It's hard not to make the case that we have had empty seats and MIA GM's for the last couple of years now. Over that time we have lost core members, some of which that were foundational to the league. So in a nutshell I'd say contraction let's us consolidate and build from strength. Last, I'm coming at this from a good place and with renewed energy. If I can help by moving to either DET or NYR just PM me.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  2015-16, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 Backyard NHL Stanley Cup Champion :STL-NHL:

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Whoever takes over that expansion gets to name the team.
    Yesterday at 11:07:01 PM
  • Daddy: Probably four years before the actual NBA does it. To hell with 2028.
    Yesterday at 11:07:53 PM
  • Braves155: Las Vegas Gold Diggers
    Yesterday at 11:08:26 PM
  • Daddy: I dig it
    Yesterday at 11:10:25 PM
  • Bigdon: I am chicago right
    Yesterday at 11:29:29 PM
  • Daddy: Sign up Bigdon. Chicago is gone already.
    Yesterday at 11:36:50 PM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE [link] Pre-reserved sign up
    Yesterday at 11:37:29 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill switch for Vegas if he wants the bulls
    Yesterday at 11:39:17 PM
  • Daddy: Sounds good
    Yesterday at 11:43:59 PM
  • Daddy: I knew Vegas would be tempting :rofl:
    Yesterday at 11:44:25 PM
  • Daddy: He still needs to select NCAA
    Yesterday at 11:44:40 PM
  • Daddy: You get to name them sir. NBA LIVE will start with an expansion draft, followed by the rookie draft.
    Yesterday at 11:45:39 PM
  • Daddy: Vegas will get the #1 pick :toast:
    Yesterday at 11:46:07 PM
  • Daddy: Super Sonics #2 pick (insert eye emoji)
    Yesterday at 11:46:44 PM
  • Daddy: All subject to trade before the draft of course.
    Yesterday at 11:47:03 PM
  • Brent: With an expansion draft, does that mean we select x number of players on our roster to protect?
    Yesterday at 11:47:51 PM
  • Brent: Also, I might have missed it, but will it be a H2H cats or points league?
    Yesterday at 11:48:39 PM
  • Daddy: @Brent yes & @Brent CATs
    Yesterday at 11:49:36 PM
  • Daddy: It will all be in the handbook as per usual.
    Yesterday at 11:50:04 PM
  • Daddy: Think MLB LIVE hoop style only not quite as deep scoring in basketball.
    Yesterday at 11:51:08 PM
  • Daddy: We are trying something thats never been done to our knowledge.
    Yesterday at 11:53:06 PM
  • Brent: I like it.
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: No other basketball league in the world has a Vegas NBA team. Till tonight.
    Yesterday at 11:54:13 PM
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:45 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah got to figure a solid name out for it
    Yesterday at 11:55:35 PM
  • Daddy: Had a few good suggestions. Just dont be corny.. this represents all of us.
    Yesterday at 11:57:03 PM
  • Daddy: We are the first to give Vegas a suggestion. Lets let it be a good one. Make them take notice.
    Yesterday at 11:57:48 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE Pre-Reserve sign up sheet [link] updated!
    Today at 02:31:32 AM