Show Posts

1

Dynasty NHL: Processed on Fantrax / islander resign

« on: May 30, 2024, 07:11:26 PM »

resign korpasalo 22/23 196 pts x 25000 = 4.9m 3 years

2

Dynasty NHL: Processed on Fantrax / islander extentions

« on: May 22, 2024, 10:00:29 PM »

resign
matthews 519pts = 12,975,000 5 years

fiala 278.8pts = 6,970,000 5 years

nylander 368.85 = 9,221,250 5 years

sandin 159pts + prospect discount = 2,782,500 5 years
$2,784,250

marner 368 pts = 9,200,000 5 years
$8,667,500

sorokin 337pts + prospect discount = 5,897,500 5 years
$5,888,750

kahkonen 131.75 + prospect discount = 2,305,625 5 years

not resigning
moser
federic

3

Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion

« on: May 03, 2024, 03:32:21 PM »

Quote from: Rob on May 03, 2024, 12:00:56 PM

To force more player turnover. Teams will have to re-sign at normal extension values sooner than they would with the 5 year discounted term. In theory this would force more players into Free Agency and promote more trade action.

I dont think it would promote more trades because for most players they would not be worth resigning at the 25k per point. it would increase the number of players in FA but is this really our goal to have a lot of players to be signed cheap in FA?

4

Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion

« on: May 02, 2024, 10:36:48 PM »

Quote from: Rob on May 02, 2024, 09:59:25 AM

Yea, I'm not completely unconvinced that both Shooter and SlackJack aren't AI...

What about a compromise like this:

1) 1st round draftees are NOT eligible as Keepers
2) GM's may keep any number of players drafted by their actual team from rounds 2 and beyond (no reason to limit to 3 - it's not like we have space to keep that many anyway)
3) Increase Supp Draft to 4 rounds
4) Adopt Corey's idea of limiting prospect extensions to 3 years, but Keeper's may be extended to 4 or 5.

By taking the 1st rounders out of the Keeper pool, a lot of the disparity we're talking about would disappear. That and we'll make the Supplemental a lot more interesting.

I like this idea too. this would mostly eliminate the need for us to switch our home team to get better keepers and would help even out this disparity. it would definitely increase the value of draft picks in trades. if we did this we should consider add a couple of minor spots

5

Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion

« on: April 30, 2024, 03:01:28 PM »

my point being be clear as to what are the problems we want to improve or fix for the benefit for the league or we just want to make changes to improve what is a problem for a few managers. for me we should look at what is the biggest thing happening in the league that is not good for the league and see what can be done about that.

some of the things that makes the disparity in the league is allowing teams to sell everything and not being able to field a team for a few years and the fact that some teams are getting top prospects from their home team drafts while others home teams are trading there picks. rob how much does the home team draft hurt you?

I was in a baseball league before that the rule was you could only have 6 guys on your roster at any given time that you resigned. once you had 6 guys you have resigned you could not resign anymore unless you dropped or traded 1 of those six. it looks like we are kind of heading in that dirrection where we only resign our top producers and the rest we get cheaper in FA. that will also help kill trade values for those guys because they are not worth extending. right now I can get half of my d men for 1m a year being around 2ppg but a dman around 2.5-3ppg is going to cost 6m + to resign. same for the 2-3 ppg forwards.

6

Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion

« on: April 30, 2024, 01:34:42 PM »

a good gm has adapted to the rules we have. honestly I dont see any of these changes will make things better it will just make them different. If we are not actually solving a problem why make a change. if its not broke dont fix it

7