ProFSL: Pro Fantasy Sports Leagues

Archive => Archive => Backyard NHL => Topic started by: Drew on January 21, 2011, 03:11:15 AM

Title: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 21, 2011, 03:11:15 AM
Please post any questions you have in this thread. Thanks  :toast:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on January 27, 2011, 11:26:30 PM
How is the draft order chosen is it random?? and will there be anyway to trade picks??
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 28, 2011, 12:53:19 AM
How is the draft order chosen is it random?? and will there be anyway to trade picks??

Yes it is chosen at random and no you can't trade picks because it will be all done on fantrax and I don't know exactly how to trade picks on there for the initiate draft
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 28, 2011, 01:47:49 AM
A bunch of questions to read through for new profsl members or those who would like a review of the rules in short form.

Edmonton Oilers: u sent me an email right
Dallas Stars: yeah, I was confused for a bit...I get it now...was confused on the draft stuff
Dallas Stars: its late and the mind goes late at night
Edmonton Oilers: o ya so fantrax is only the place where we keep track of points and do the draft
Edmonton Oilers: make sure to ur personal message on profsl to send message, trade approvals, questions and such
Dallas Stars: it was the salary's and contracts that had me lost was all
Edmonton Oilers: ok ya it is all tracked on profsl
Dallas Stars: So the driaft is done here?
Dallas Stars: see where Im lost
Edmonton Oilers: yep but I will transfer all rosters from here to the profsl site
Dallas Stars: how do i know about the salarys and stuff...after the draft is done?
Edmonton Oilers: o yes, i have to change that thread, thanks
Dallas Stars: I dont mean to be a dumb dumb, just a curious guy
Edmonton Oilers: um hockeybuzz.com has all the salaries for the players, after the draft is done I will post up all the info necessary in the roster pages
Dallas Stars: ok, I thought we were drafting based on a salary cap and when this thing im in now showed no salarys I got confused
Edmonton Oilers: ya so when you draft you can observe and keep track of salaries yourself
Edmonton Oilers: but if your over cap after the draft you will have like a week to get yourself under cap after the rosters have been posted
Dallas Stars: Ok so whil e im drafting here, I need to make sure I don't go over my cap.....so grabbing a team of star players like yahoo does isn't gonna be an option, which makes this much more difficult and much more fun
Dallas Stars: Good good, this is right up my alley cause i love my hockey!!
Dallas Stars: So signing someone to a 4 year contract would lower the overall salary your using per year which allows you more room correct
Edmonton Oilers: not necessarily
Dallas Stars: just reading that, your right not necessarily
Edmonton Oilers: we will have a wide talent pool to scoop up from though but yes a lot of stars will leave you with not much room for anyone else
Edmonton Oilers: to qualify for a 4 year contract the per year value of the contract must be greater than or equal to 6.5m per
Edmonton Oilers: so you can't sign a 4 year 1.5m contract
Dallas Stars: ok last question after Ive got the team and im a little over in the salary cap, so I need to make room, I can possiibly extend a contract were possible to lower my cap that
Dallas Stars: cause it could work out by extending the contract the sal per year is lowered and thus lowering my cap to the right level
Edmonton Oilers: ya that would work or a trade or a may let teams have a free drop or 2 depending on how many are over cap
Dallas Stars: or is it easier to drop a guy to get me below and pick up someone that wont put me over
Edmonton Oilers: ya
Edmonton Oilers: well i guess you wouldn't be able to sign an extension
Dallas Stars: How many can you drop after the draft if your over
Edmonton Oilers: because there is an extension period there is not extensions throughout the year
Dallas Stars: I see
Edmonton Oilers: i will check the rosters and then decide, probably not move then 1 or 2
Edmonton Oilers: *more
Dallas Stars: Firstly get the draft done, then get your boys under the cap limit, then can play around a bit
Dallas Stars: under if need be
Dallas Stars: It sounds quite fun once you get under the salary cap
Edmonton Oilers: yep it will be easy once we get the draft done
Edmonton Oilers: leagues this way are so much fun
Edmonton Oilers: i have 3 teams on profsl and 2 on yahoo and I prefer profsl for sure
Dallas Stars: So when i got to hockeybuzz and see the salaries, for Sidney if he is making 6 mill a year, if I draft him Ive already spent 6 mill of my 50 mill lets say cap
Edmonton Oilers: yep well cap is 59.4
Dallas Stars: lol good to know....you can spend that quickly
Edmonton Oilers: and crosby is 8.7m
Dallas Stars: yeah I know, i was just saying a number for example
Edmonton Oilers: ok haha
Dallas Stars: I can dream though eh that I could get cros for 6 lol
Edmonton Oilers: yes i am in Franchise NHL and I do't have too many big name players and if aam first in the league so
Dallas Stars: gonna be fun....lots for me to learn as I go...but it will come...like I said Im gathering getting a decent team under or around the cap is first and like u said I can go from there
Edmonton Oilers: ya exactly
Edmonton Oilers: lots of cap moves are made
Dallas Stars: By trade correct
Edmonton Oilers: yep
Dallas Stars: No other way correct
Edmonton Oilers: buyouts are possible
Edmonton Oilers: works same as real NHL and also by sending players to minors
Dallas Stars: So if im at my salary cap limit and someone offers me something that puts me over after the trade is done....how do I get back under
Dallas Stars: trade again, or can I send anyone to the minors to get back under
Edmonton Oilers: buyouts(drops), minors, or ya trade again
Edmonton Oilers: there are waivers for minors but yes that is an option
Dallas Stars: I see but after 40 games they have to come back from the minors
Edmonton Oilers: yes they come up free, so no waivers, then if you want to send them down they go through waivers
Dallas Stars: cool, okay, its late and my brain is on overload of excitement learning all this, so i better stop lol
Edmonton Oilers: haha ok
Dallas Stars: ok, wait a sec....if i pick up a guy coming from the minors on waivers, I get him for free?
Dallas Stars: I still pay the contract rght
Edmonton Oilers: rules are in waivers in homepage
Edmonton Oilers: backyard nhl - league rules - waivers
Edmonton Oilers: coming up is cheaper then when claiming going down
Dallas Stars: I see, ive read them, but I just needed to read them a little more carefully
Edmonton Oilers: haha yep
Edmonton Oilers: down you take over full salary
Edmonton Oilers: up you take over half salary
Dallas Stars: I see, i think I was confused if I put guys on my team to the minors are they available for people to pick up
Edmonton Oilers: so say crosby is sent down with no claim then he is called back up the person only owes half of his contract so 4.35 rounds to 4.4m
Dallas Stars: i see
Edmonton Oilers: and if he was claimed on way down then he salary would be 8.7m
Dallas Stars: so if I sent crosby down to lower my cap, somebody can pick him up
Edmonton Oilers: yes
Dallas Stars: so sending people to the minors lowers your cap but you will most likely lose the playertl
Dallas Stars: boo yaa I get it
Dallas Stars: god dam Im dumb tonight
Edmonton Oilers: sweet
Dallas Stars: lol
Edmonton Oilers: once it gets going everyone will get use to it
Dallas Stars: Well good times this is gonna be fun
Edmonton Oilers: awesome
Dallas Stars: thanks for letting me asking 80 sorta dumb ass questions bu
Dallas Stars: bud
Edmonton Oilers: that's alright
Edmonton Oilers: i am gonna post this so people can look it over as well
Dallas Stars: post what
Dallas Stars: this chat
Edmonton Oilers: yep just in the questions in case others have the same questions
Dallas Stars: haha so maybe my questions werent so bad
Edmonton Oilers: nope all good
Edmonton Oilers: it's good so then everyone knows the rules and fully understands
Dallas Stars: Thanks man, your awesome, :) ....I did read them, but needed clarity is all
Edmonton Oilers: yep cool
Edmonton Oilers: best of luck
Dallas Stars: :)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on January 28, 2011, 02:08:37 AM
Good job bud that was a huge help just to clarify some questions I had and like he said I think that everyone will start to understand once we get going.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: BeanTown on February 14, 2011, 02:56:43 PM
Just curious to the cap... I looked at my rester and counted my cap (so far) to come to around 73.7, so well over the cap. Is this a correct representation of my cap? Also, with the bench spots we have, do we just get them from bidding on the waivers?

Thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 14, 2011, 03:25:50 PM
Just curious to the cap... I looked at my rester and counted my cap (so far) to come to around 73.7, so well over the cap. Is this a correct representation of my cap? Also, with the bench spots we have, do we just get them from bidding on the waivers?

Thanks
Rosters are all up to date now, so you can observe your cap space there. I have posted on the main page a couple ways to get your team under the cap. If your over the cap to claim a player via free agency you must be under the cap before you can claim them (I believe after a FA win you have 24 hours to make space to make room for player or you will be subject to penalties, See Free Agency in Rules)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: BeanTown on February 14, 2011, 09:47:43 PM
Where do you find rankings for re-signing???

Thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 14, 2011, 11:26:45 PM
Where do you find rankings for re-signing???

Thanks
Players tab in fantrax.
On pull down menus:
Change to All instead of All Available
Change to position seeking
Suggest changing search from 20 to 100
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 15, 2011, 02:51:22 PM
Extensions for 2010 - 2011, do i have to sing my players by feb 28? as the actual contract does not end yet. Wanting clarification
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 15, 2011, 02:57:08 PM
Extensions for 2010 - 2011, do i have to sing my players by feb 28? as the actual contract does not end yet. Wanting clarification
Yes you have to sign them by Feb. 28 but the players will not be released until the end of the season if they are not re-signed.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 15, 2011, 03:04:31 PM
Yes you have to sign them by Feb. 28 but the players will not be released until the end of the season if they are not re-signed.

If I resign players now like stamkos, purcell, niemi would put me over the cap, but their actual contract does not end until the end of the 2010-2011 season, I do not see the point of signing extensions now.

If I were to extend Stamkos Purcell Niemi for nest season I would be under the cap
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 15, 2011, 03:21:35 PM
If I resign players now like stamkos, purcell, niemi would put me over the cap, but their actual contract does not end until the end of the 2010-2011 season, I do not see the point of signing extensions now.

If I were to extend Stamkos Purcell Niemi for nest season I would be under the cap
Yes I see, but I have already started doing it that way for everyone, so I will have to continue at least till the end of the season. Then there can be a rule edit.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 15, 2011, 03:24:49 PM
Yes I see, but I have already started doing it that way for everyone, so I will have to continue at least till the end of the season. Then there can be a rule edit.

Alright will do then thanks for clarifying
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 15, 2011, 03:26:55 PM
New one, sending down players to the MInors will it affect the max 10 player roster??
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 15, 2011, 03:28:06 PM
Also is their any relief for teams with players that are gone for the season, such as Roy, Malkin
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on February 15, 2011, 03:30:01 PM
I was going to ask that about players who are injured for the year how does it work
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 15, 2011, 03:30:54 PM
Alright will do then thanks for clarifying
I am creating a rules change discussion folder in the Rules Section. So if anyone has any problems with the rules or would like to suggest a rule change please post in there.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 15, 2011, 03:41:41 PM
New one, sending down players to the MInors will it affect the max 10 player roster??
The max minor league roster is 10, so if you send someone down of course they will affect the size of your roster. So if you already have 10 players, you will have to buy someone out or place someone on re-entry waivers to make room for the player being sent down.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 15, 2011, 03:43:38 PM
Also is their any relief for teams with players that are gone for the season, such as Roy, Malkin
Sorry no relief, you can use the waivers system to save cap space but it is just luck of the draw that players get hurt long-term. Sending them down subjects them to claims both ways though.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 15, 2011, 03:45:54 PM
I thought I just posted this but it did not show up so here goes again.....

I am confused do to the fact that you say my Corey Perry who makes $5.3mil has to be signed to a 1 yr, 2 yr or 3 yr but not a 4 yr deal @ $5.3/yr.

But you give this example in the rules....Ex. a 9 million free agent bid can be a 3 year - $3m, 2 year - $4.5m, or a 1 year - $9m but can not be a 4 year - $2.3m

Does this only apply to FAs won? So does this mean that if I win Pominville @ $5.3 I can sign him to a 3 yr deal @ $1.8/yr?

Please see the post in the transaction hub. The limits apply to FA and extensions. It can not be a 3 year deal because the value per year is not between 3m-6.4m.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 15, 2011, 03:47:41 PM
We can not reply to the rules discussion page you just made.......
Moved to main page
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 15, 2011, 03:50:17 PM
The max minor league roster is 10, so if you send someone down of course they will affect the size of your roster. So if you already have 10 players, you will have to buy someone out or place someone on re-entry waivers to make room for the player being sent down.

Just clarification as on the rules page then rosters it says on the bottom after Max roster "This is subject to change" just thought I would ask
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 15, 2011, 04:12:38 PM
Just clarification as on the rules page then rosters it says on the bottom after Max roster "This is subject to change" just thought I would ask
Yes that was for the total roster size from 25 players but I don't think that will change due to salary cap level and that nobody will be able to field all 25 since the talent pool is very diverse. I will fix it later and remove the subject to change
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 16, 2011, 12:40:52 PM
Just a clarification on the prospects, like other teams some prospects do not have contracts, do they need to have before the feb 28 th deadline
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 16, 2011, 07:35:11 PM
Just a clarification on the prospects, like other teams some prospects do not have contracts, do they need to have before the feb 28 th deadline
Nope prospects are kind of in a league of their own for us so far. Once they reach 40 games played or a GM decides to call up a prospect they have to be signed to a contract.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 16, 2011, 07:36:26 PM
Nope prospects are kind of in a league of their own for us so far. Once they reach 40 games played or a GM decides to call up a prospect they have to be signed to a contract.

Great Thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 17, 2011, 09:00:32 AM
Nope prospects are kind of in a league of their own for us so far. Once they reach 40 games played or a GM decides to call up a prospect they have to be signed to a contract.

Does this include prospects that already have a contract? Is the same rules applied to experienced players pushed into the minors when their contracts end, or do they hit the FA market?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 17, 2011, 02:34:17 PM
Does this include prospects that already have a contract? Is the same rules applied to experienced players pushed into the minors when their contracts end, or do they hit the FA market?
Yes applies to all prospects under 40 games played, if they already have a contract they will be bought up with the contract. Experienced players will become free agents when their contracts end. When a prospects contract end they remain in the minors until they hit 40 games then they are signed to a contract corresponding to their draft position or extension value which ever is higher.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: djkamensek on February 20, 2011, 10:20:33 AM
Is there a  waiting period for players picked up off waivers or signed as FA to make it to the team on fantrax?  I see that Bergfors (FA signing) and Peverley (picked up off waivers) have been on my team roster here for a few days but they haven't been fantraxed so I figured I'd ask.  Thanks - BOS.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 20, 2011, 11:51:39 AM
Is there a  waiting period for players picked up off waivers or signed as FA to make it to the team on fantrax?  I see that Bergfors (FA signing) and Peverley (picked up off waivers) have been on my team roster here for a few days but they haven't been fantraxed so I figured I'd ask.  Thanks - BOS.
Both players are on your fantrax already, if anyone else has issues like this you can PM me and I will get to looking at it right away.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on February 20, 2011, 08:45:55 PM
When can we start bidding on other teams prospects that are free agents?? There are a few players in a couple of teams prospects list that I would like to bid on but teams like NYR haven't done their minor league teams so when can we bid on their prospects??? Is it you snooze you lose or is there going to be a deadline for teams to have a say on who they want in their minor league system???
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 20, 2011, 10:50:10 PM
When can we start bidding on other teams prospects that are free agents?? There are a few players in a couple of teams prospects list that I would like to bid on but teams like NYR haven't done their minor league teams so when can we bid on their prospects??? Is it you snooze you lose or is there going to be a deadline for teams to have a say on who they want in their minor league system???
Wait until the 29th after which the minor league rosters have to be filled
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 23, 2011, 06:39:22 AM
Will our budgets nudge along the same course as the NHL every year, or will they stay in the same spot.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 23, 2011, 11:03:41 PM
Will our budgets nudge along the same course as the NHL every year, or will they stay in the same spot.
Will follow NHL
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 28, 2011, 11:45:19 PM
What happens to the FA that were signed by Toronto and have failed to give contracts within the 4 day window???
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 28, 2011, 11:46:40 PM
What happens to the FA that were signed by Toronto and have failed to give contracts within the 4 day window???
That rule was created after they failed to do so, I sent the Toronto GM an email and he has 3 days to sign the contracts or they will be considered invalid.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Redlight0516 on March 02, 2011, 12:46:34 AM
Is there a way to tell which players on the FA list on Fantrax are in fact free agents and which are just in the minors?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 02, 2011, 12:57:44 AM
Is there a way to tell which players on the FA list on Fantrax are in fact free agents and which are just in the minors?
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?board=825.0
The waivers board, players that are locked are currently in minors
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on March 02, 2011, 10:13:27 AM
So I am a little confused are we signing 1 year deals because I want to sign a RW for the rest of this year but not next year???
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 02, 2011, 11:44:44 AM
So I am a little confused are we signing 1 year deals because I want to sign a RW for the rest of this year but not next year???
Sorry but no 1 year contracts for this season. It will all be fixed for next season
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Gilly on March 02, 2011, 12:56:41 PM
One thing I guess if I had to be picky that I would like to be looked at is.

If I call someone up from the minors than their subject to waivers and if someone takes that player they only pay half the salary and I pay the difference...I love this cause it saves people sending players up and down whenever....buttttttt......If I make a trade lets say for "Joe Thorton" who i currently have in the minors than if Jesse was to take him he would go to Jesse's minor's and be subject to waivers like normal.   Is it possible to get a player from someone else's minors straight up onto your main roster than the GM can decide weather to send that player down or not and do waivers that way.

Cause enlese I missed something Joe Thorton is stuck on my minor team for life!! lolol  (way he is playing he should be anyways, haha)

:)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Mariner on March 02, 2011, 06:58:55 PM
One thing I guess if I had to be picky that I would like to be looked at is.

If I call someone up from the minors than their subject to waivers and if someone takes that player they only pay half the salary and I pay the difference...I love this cause it saves people sending players up and down whenever....buttttttt......If I make a trade lets say for "Joe Thorton" who i currently have in the minors than if Jesse was to take him he would go to Jesse's minor's and be subject to waivers like normal.   Is it possible to get a player from someone else's minors straight up onto your main roster than the GM can decide weather to send that player down or not and do waivers that way.

Cause enlese I missed something Joe Thorton is stuck on my minor team for life!! lolol  (way he is playing he should be anyways, haha)

:)

The way I understand the rules is that if you trade anybody that is currently on your minor league roster that player will automatically be placed on the other teams main roster. If that GM wants the player on his minor league roster he would have to send him down and hopes he clears waivers.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 02, 2011, 07:13:33 PM
The way I understand the rules is that if you trade anybody that is currently on your minor league roster that player will automatically be placed on the other teams main roster. If that GM wants the player on his minor league roster he would have to send him down and hopes he clears waivers.
No this is the way it works in Franchise NHL, here a minor leaguer is traded and remains in the minor league because a GM could trade, say Thornton, to another team then they could trade them back and therefore get them out of the minors free of charge.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Mariner on March 02, 2011, 08:03:32 PM
No this is the way it works in Franchise NHL, here a minor leaguer is traded and remains in the minor league because a GM could trade, say Thornton, to another team then they could trade them back and therefore get them out of the minors free of charge.

Ok, I stand corrected. Being in both leagues sometimes things can get confusing as there are differences.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Redlight0516 on March 03, 2011, 12:32:48 AM
Do Minor League Players follow the same extension rules as The Main Roster counterparts. Maybe I was looking in the wrong section but I couldn't find an answer
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 03, 2011, 01:31:09 AM
Do Minor League Players follow the same extension rules as The Main Roster counterparts. Maybe I was looking in the wrong section but I couldn't find an answer
Minor league players under 40 games do not have to be signed to a contract until they reach 40 games or until the GM wants to call them up. Experienced players can't be signed to extensions if they are in the minors
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesselton on March 03, 2011, 03:35:32 PM
No this is the way it works in Franchise NHL, here a minor leaguer is traded and remains in the minor league because a GM could trade, say Thornton, to another team then they could trade them back and therefore get them out of the minors free of charge.

As the commissioner you could easily stop a team from trying to do that. I like the idea of traded players automatically being placed on the NHL team. High salary players like Gaborik, or any player for that matter (who are only sent down in the first place to make cap room) are practically impossible to trade from the minor league squad since to be called up they have to go through the re-entry waivers, and having to take on half of any given players salary (for the duration of the contract) is great for the team that would claim him, but for the team wanting to recall him to potentially make a trade is to big of a risk in my opinion. 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 03, 2011, 03:58:49 PM
As the commissioner you could easily stop a team from trying to do that. I like the idea of traded players automatically being placed on the NHL team. High salary players like Gaborik, or any player for that matter (who are only sent down in the first place to make cap room) are practically impossible to trade from the minor league squad since to be called up they have to go through the re-entry waivers, and having to take on half of any given players salary (for the duration of the contract) is great for the team that would claim him, but for the team wanting to recall him to potentially make a trade is to big of a risk in my opinion.

As someone who just got jacked by this rule, I like the idea... It also opens up more trade options.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 03, 2011, 03:59:16 PM
As the commissioner you could easily stop a team from trying to do that. I like the idea of traded players automatically being placed on the NHL team. High salary players like Gaborik, or any player for that matter (who are only sent down in the first place to make cap room) are practically impossible to trade from the minor league squad since to be called up they have to go through the re-entry waivers, and having to take on half of any given players salary (for the duration of the contract) is great for the team that would claim him, but for the team wanting to recall him to potentially make a trade is to big of a risk in my opinion.
Yes but that is how it works in NHL that is why you don't ever see many high salary players sent to minors because they don't want to run the risk of their players being poached. I am currently weighing the possibility of a waiver free period in the off-season, so this would solve the problem of skilled players in the minors. That is cap permitting as well and therefore if a player is traded now or during that period they could be called up during that period for that team.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesselton on March 03, 2011, 04:44:39 PM
Yes but that is how it works in NHL that is why you don't ever see many high salary players sent to minors because they don't want to run the risk of their players being poached. I am currently weighing the possibility of a waiver free period in the off-season, so this would solve the problem of skilled players in the minors. That is cap permitting as well and therefore if a player is traded now or during that period they could be called up during that period for that team.

Okay that would be very nice (waiver free period), but back onto the current waiver situation, unlike the NHL this is an 18 team league with the same amount of elite players and same CAP as the teams in real life, so there are going to be a lot more circumstances with waivers then what would normally be in the real world. Just putting in my two cents :) Still enjoying my time here.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesselton on March 06, 2011, 03:34:03 PM
Any thoughts on a league wide CAP of 65-75 mil

To put it simply. Agree or disagree. I don't like to have to make a trade just to stay under cap space year in and year out. I put my team together and I like my team a lot. I understand having to maybe trade away 2-3 or even letting them go to FA if a deal can't be done, but trading away most of a team that I built is not satisfying at all, especially with the extention $$ amounts being so high and out of wack.

Sure staying under the cap is a challenge, but honestly unrealistic unless you have a completely different core of players every single year. Just take a look at your cap situation right now, look at the extensions you will need to sign next year, and you will see how many players you WON'T be able to afford unless you trade 3/4 of them or just simply let them go to FA at years end. Everyone has an opinion, commish has the final say, this is my opinion on the topic. Thanks for reading :)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on March 06, 2011, 03:43:54 PM
I am not looking forward to letting my core go I was thinking about this too if we did it like the NHL our cap would be around 90 million (30 teams x 59.4 million cap=1.782 billion divide that by the 18 teams in our pool would = 99 million) that is how the NHL does it. its based on the revenue brought in by the league divided by the amount of teams. I don't think we need to go up that high because that would be ridiculous but I do feel like we should have the cap somewhere between 5-8 million more then the real NHL cap. thats my opinion.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 06, 2011, 04:16:15 PM
I like the cap the way it is. Maybe we can have the highest paid player on your roster not count towards the cap?
What do you guys think?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 06, 2011, 05:45:20 PM
I like the way the contract extensions and salary cap is currently at, as these rules add more drama to the development of your team. Sure, its gonna stink to trade or lose valuable pieces of your team, but that is what makes this league interesting to me... That IS the drama.

I wouldn't mind if the cap goes up every season, but I don't see how a 5 to 10M upgrade is gonna make this just as challenging as it is now... Just be smarter in your spending and know what your team needs in the long run (which I think is terrible that we got rid of 1 year contracts... I don't want to sign all of my players to 2 year deals. Some are just rentals.)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 06, 2011, 07:30:07 PM
I like the way the contract extensions and salary cap is currently at, as these rules add more drama to the development of your team. Sure, its gonna stink to trade or lose valuable pieces of your team, but that is what makes this league interesting to me... That IS the drama.

I wouldn't mind if the cap goes up every season, but I don't see how a 5 to 10M upgrade is gonna make this just as challenging as it is now... Just be smarter in your spending and know what your team needs in the long run (which I think is terrible that we got rid of 1 year contracts... I don't want to sign all of my players to 2 year deals. Some are just rentals.)
1 year contracts will be returned next season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: thunderblade on March 06, 2011, 08:14:58 PM
My first reaction after the draft was, Holy Crap I am over the cap. When I checked the rosters at least 3/4 were over the cap. Now you have to adjust by league rules. Great players are sent to the minors because no one can afford them. Managers original vision of their team have to be rethought. My opinion is, over time every team will adjust there roster to meet the cap. For the first few years the teams that drafted wisely checking salary and contract lengths will have the advantage. But the astute managers will catch up eventually. The question is, will the league be able to last, during this breaking in period.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 07, 2011, 12:00:45 PM
Any thoughts on a league wide CAP of 65-75 mil

To put it simply. Agree or disagree. I don't like to have to make a trade just to stay under cap space year in and year out. I put my team together and I like my team a lot. I understand having to maybe trade away 2-3 or even letting them go to FA if a deal can't be done, but trading away most of a team that I built is not satisfying at all, especially with the extention $$ amounts being so high and out of wack.

Sure staying under the cap is a challenge, but honestly unrealistic unless you have a completely different core of players every single year. Just take a look at your cap situation right now, look at the extensions you will need to sign next year, and you will see how many players you WON'T be able to afford unless you trade 3/4 of them or just simply let them go to FA at years end. Everyone has an opinion, commish has the final say, this is my opinion on the topic. Thanks for reading :)
I think increasing cap will just make it harder to stay under the roster limit of 25. It is just the challenge of maintaining a core and filling it with role players or young talent. Can't change extensions because I wouldn't know where to start and they were stolen from the other NHL league here and seems to work well there. I think the off-season free agency will be most interesting because teams will not be handing out "huge" contracts with long length. We will see some of these things will pan out in the off-season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: djkamensek on March 07, 2011, 01:27:38 PM
I think increasing cap will just make it harder to stay under the roster limit of 25. It is just the challenge of maintaining a core and filling it with role players or young talent. Can't change extensions because I wouldn't know where to start and they were stolen from the other NHL league here and seems to work well there. I think the off-season free agency will be most interesting because teams will not be handing out "huge" contracts with long length. We will see some of these things will pan out in the off-season.

I agree with an increased cap, regardless of the FA situation.  Reason being - we're mirroring the NHL cap, which is cool - but we're not mirroring the # of NHL teams, so it's not working as intended.  We're running just over half the number of teams of the NHL, with much smaller rosters due to the cap size and we're managing to extremely tight margins without any IR relief (as we've discussed in another thread).  My cap in an ESPN league with 16 teams is 89 mil, and while that sounds high we use different contract rules that make players more expensive over time (base contract + performance each year).  I feel that the cap should be adjusted to what it would be if the NHL ran the same size league we do.  No idea what the math is on that, but I'm guessing it would add another 18-20 mil or so of cap space.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: CBJ61 on March 07, 2011, 04:59:54 PM
I am not in favor of increasing the cap other than minor inflation increases that mirror the NHL.

We drafted our rosters with the 59m cap in mind, and signed extensions based on this.  This is not a rule
that can be changed at this point without blowing it up and starting over.  If you increase by 20 or 30 mil
that would change the approach to how we set up our teams.

I know some teams got stuck because of the auto draft, as the computer didn't pay attention to cap
hits when drafting, just best available player.  But I think most of us who did attend the draft, drafted
with the 59m cap in mind.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 07, 2011, 05:10:34 PM
I am not in favor of increasing the cap other than minor inflation increases that mirror the NHL.

We drafted our rosters with the 59m cap in mind, and signed extensions based on this.  This is not a rule
that can be changed at this point without blowing it up and starting over.  If you increase by 20 or 30 mil
that would change the approach to how we set up our teams.

I know some teams got stuck because of the auto draft, as the computer didn't pay attention to cap
hits when drafting, just best available player.  But I think most of us who did attend the draft, drafted
with the 59m cap in mind.
That is a good point, teams probably would have drafted completely different. I know I would have taken a shot at the high salary players more, like the low drafted Thornton or Malkin because of their high salaries. It could have also been that these high salary players could have gone to free agency then their contracts could be half of what they actually are.

Amiss my rambling I could propose this, players who are over 7m per year could be dropped for free by their team. Then they go to free agency. Just putting this out there, not saying this will happen.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 07, 2011, 05:34:15 PM
That is a good point, teams probably would have drafted completely different. I know I would have taken a shot at the high salary players more, like the low drafted Thornton or Malkin because of their high salaries. It could have also been that these high salary players could have gone to free agency then their contracts could be half of what they actually are.

Amiss my rambling I could propose this, players who are over 7m per year could be dropped for free by their team. Then they go to free agency. Just putting this out there, not saying this will happen.

From a personal note, I do not approve of this... I wanted one of these high salary players on my team, and I worked to make him fit under his current salary. Doing this will not be fair to the teams who want to keep their top end players and have been able to fit them under the cap. If you want them, make it work or wait until they drop into free agency (P.S. I heard Big Buff is available next year).... Use your brain a little, guys.

As CBJ stated, we knew the rules going in. And if we drastically change them now (aka adding more salary or dropping high salary guys into free agency for free), than we might as well start all over (and you can bet I am first picking a goalie this time lol).
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 07, 2011, 05:41:44 PM
We need to keep the cap the way it is.  That is my opinion.



CHI
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 07, 2011, 05:54:28 PM
From a personal note, I do not approve of this... I wanted one of these high salary players on my team, and I worked to make him fit under his current salary. Doing this will not be fair to the teams who want to keep their top end players and have been able to fit them under the cap. If you want them, make it work or wait until they drop into free agency (P.S. I heard Big Buff is available next year).... Use your brain a little, guys.

As CBJ stated, we knew the rules going in. And if we drastically change them now (aka adding more salary or dropping high salary guys into free agency for free), than we might as well start all over (and you can bet I am first picking a goalie this time lol).
Thank you favo! Ya I was just putting that out there didn't have an intention of actually putting it through unless there is full league approval. Yes all of us had to make decisions already involving who to keep and who to let go. So players like Bogosion and Stafford are young guys for me that were too much to extend, so they are heading to free agency. Weber was a guy who I couldn't part with so I re-signed him and worked my team from there. If cap is raised up too much there will never be any turn over because you will always have to retain your players. Teams in the NHL have problems re-signing players also, see Chicago this off-season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on March 07, 2011, 07:11:13 PM
I am not in favor of increasing the cap other than minor inflation increases that mirror the NHL.

We drafted our rosters with the 59m cap in mind, and signed extensions based on this.  This is not a rule
that can be changed at this point without blowing it up and starting over.  If you increase by 20 or 30 mil
that would change the approach to how we set up our teams.

I know some teams got stuck because of the auto draft, as the computer didn't pay attention to cap
hits when drafting, just best available player.  But I think most of us who did attend the draft, drafted
with the 59m cap in mind.

I agree with CBJ, I drafted with the cap in mind. I had to rework my team to get my core of players such as dropping Cammy & Pitkanen ( and a certain someone picked up Cammy) but the Cap should stay where it is. My 2  cents :judge:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on March 07, 2011, 08:24:54 PM
Will the 40 games played rule be applied to the prospects that we signed through the FA??
For example, if I were to send down Pickard, his salary will not count towards my cap. If his contract ends this year do I have to call him up again to resign him to a new contract?? But he has never played an NHL game, much less reach the 40 game maximum.
I dont know if I explained that right but that just came to me today.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 07, 2011, 09:18:44 PM
Will the 40 games played rule be applied to the prospects that we signed through the FA??
For example, if I were to send down Pickard, his salary will not count towards my cap. If his contract ends this year do I have to call him up again to resign him to a new contract?? But he has never played an NHL game, much less reach the 40 game maximum.
I dont know if I explained that right but that just came to me today.
Only players that have been drafted by that team, that is without an * are available for the 40 games played rule. Prospects not drafted and signed through free agency would have to be called up (through re-entry waivers) then signed to a contract if made through waivers. It is just the risk you take signing prospects that haven't played a game yet.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on March 07, 2011, 09:52:25 PM
Would you guys really draft differently if the cap was 3-5 million more??? 3-5 million would help resigning and not make it so that there is no turn over. I don't think the cap should be raised by more then that but I know that 3-5 million would help so much and not make it overly unrealistic. I mean we are going to baseball playoffs so already we are not like the real NHL so what would a few million more on the cap hurt??????
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 07, 2011, 10:50:05 PM
Would you guys really draft differently if the cap was 3-5 million more??? 3-5 million would help resigning and not make it so that there is no turn over. I don't think the cap should be raised by more then that but I know that 3-5 million would help so much and not make it overly unrealistic. I mean we are going to baseball playoffs so already we are not like the real NHL so what would a few million more on the cap hurt??????
I have to say I would have drafted a person with a higher salary earlier and so may have others so the whole draft could have changed. I can't change cap mid-season anyway too. Also people have already made choices on who to let go and who to re-sign. Choices just have to be made and a core of players will always be held onto. I think is cap is fine and should mimic the actual NHL, yes the NHL has more teams but we have less players per team as well.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on March 08, 2011, 01:30:56 PM
Only players that have been drafted by that team, that is without an * are available for the 40 games played rule. Prospects not drafted and signed through free agency would have to be called up (through re-entry waivers) then signed to a contract if made through waivers. It is just the risk you take signing prospects that haven't played a game yet.

Ok thanks for clarifying
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesselton on March 11, 2011, 07:52:32 PM
Why is fantrax website stating that I have an illegal roster on the live scoring page? It tells me to go to my roster screen for details yet there are no details. Tried removing some of my active players that are playing tonight into reserve slots yet that doesn't do anything either.  ???

Fixed the problem. Ignore this post.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on March 12, 2011, 09:49:30 PM
So how does free agent signing in the off season work??? what I mean is if someone who has not signed a contract in real life what do we go off of to offer him a contract???
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 14, 2011, 04:07:46 AM
So how does free agent signing in the off season work??? what I mean is if someone who has not signed a contract in real life what do we go off of to offer him a contract???
It starts on July 15th so hopefully the big free agents are signed to contracts in the real NHL then their contracts here will be able to go by those numbers. If they are unsigned they will become free agents here too so no contract and can be signed at a league minimum of 200k.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on March 17, 2011, 10:02:24 AM
Will the 2 way contract apply to players who have not played a game but were drafted during the fantasy draft? Well my example is Gudbranson
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 17, 2011, 02:06:26 PM
Will the 2 way contract apply to players who have not played a game but were drafted during the fantasy draft? Well my example is Gudbranson
No because that was by choice and they are not in your minors. This only applys to player drafted at the entry draft or in the minors in the teams respective system
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on March 17, 2011, 02:34:07 PM
No because that was by choice and they are not in your minors. This only applys to player drafted at the entry draft or in the minors in the teams respective system

Ok thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 17, 2011, 06:31:13 PM
Are all times for the deadlines Eastern time?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 17, 2011, 09:19:51 PM
Are all times for the deadlines Eastern time?
It is whatever the clock says on this website which I believe is Eastern
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 20, 2011, 11:14:26 AM
Will the new extensions rule apply in the next extension period (where extensions are really extensions)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 20, 2011, 04:07:28 PM
Will the new extensions rule apply in the next extension period (where extensions are really extensions)
Take place at the next extension period which will not occur until next February.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 20, 2011, 06:50:17 PM
When will we have access to our buyout money?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 20, 2011, 07:57:11 PM
When will we have access to our buyout money?
Any buyouts expiring this season will be available the day prior to the draft, I think would be right so people can make trades on draft day.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on March 20, 2011, 08:05:44 PM
Will draft day be when all the players with expiring contracts be put in free agency or will that happen closer to free agency
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 20, 2011, 08:38:12 PM
Will draft day be when all the players with expiring contracts be put in free agency or will that happen closer to free agency
Sounds like a good plan for this season as well so everyone will know exactly what they teams look like going into the draft. Probably weekend before the draft this will happen, the rosters should be updated and free agent dropped.

I am hoping everyone will hop on the yahoo messenger ban wagon as it will make drafting players much easier in one big messenger board as well as draft day trades could be easier as well.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 20, 2011, 09:46:06 PM
Sounds like a good plan for this season as well so everyone will know exactly what they teams look like going into the draft. Probably weekend before the draft this will happen, the rosters should be updated and free agent dropped.

I am hoping everyone will hop on the yahoo messenger ban wagon as it will make drafting players much easier in one big messenger board as well as draft day trades could be easier as well.

Will we have a resigning period before the draft or after the draft? Cause from what I understood, we were gonna have a resigning period before the FAs were dropped. Its cool with me either way, I just want to make sure this is clarified now and for future seasons (as I definitely plan on staying... great league ^.^)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 20, 2011, 10:04:27 PM
Will we have a resigning period before the draft or after the draft? Cause from what I understood, we were gonna have a resigning period before the FAs were dropped. Its cool with me either way, I just want to make sure this is clarified now and for future seasons (as I definitely plan on staying... great league ^.^)
Not this off-season, there will be no extension period. But for future seasons there will be an off-season and in-season extension period.

That is great that your planning on it  8-)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on March 21, 2011, 12:04:44 AM
Are we allowed to put back players in our MiLR that removed near the beginning o the season? After the draft
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 21, 2011, 12:18:47 AM
Are we allowed to put back players in our MiLR that removed near the beginning o the season? After the draft
Don't know exactly what your asking but there will be a waiver free period after the draft where you can bring up and send down players as you want. But if they are sent down on a 1 way contract then they will have a * by their name
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on March 21, 2011, 11:35:42 AM
Don't know exactly what your asking but there will be a waiver free period after the draft where you can bring up and send down players as you want. But if they are sent down on a 1 way contract then they will have a * by their name

I was asking about the players that were removed from the MiLR to make space for players being sent down for example I asked to remove Eddie Lack G from my Minor Roster, the question now is will I be able to place him back in the MiLR, after the draft this year? If I read correctly we can bring in prospects as long as they are in the organization in the real NHL
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 21, 2011, 04:29:26 PM
I was asking about the players that were removed from the MiLR to make space for players being sent down for example I asked to remove Eddie Lack G from my Minor Roster, the question now is will I be able to place him back in the MiLR, after the draft this year? If I read correctly we can bring in prospects as long as they are in the organization in the real NHL
No, it was only at the beginning where we could pick up prospects from our teams. Now we can only sign free agents and send them down or get them through the draft.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on March 21, 2011, 05:08:11 PM
No, it was only at the beginning where we could pick up prospects from our teams. Now we can only sign free agents and send them down or get them through the draft.

Cool thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 26, 2011, 12:23:47 AM
With this free waiver period, can we send players down to the minors as well?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 26, 2011, 04:26:17 PM
With this free waiver period, can we send players down to the minors as well?
Yes both up and down freely
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Miku on March 27, 2011, 03:37:09 PM
I don't know if this has been asked yet, but how is the draft going to work this year? I'm wondering will whoever gets last place for wins get to pick first or since there are no playoffs will the teams just be random as to who will get to pick in what order?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 27, 2011, 05:46:19 PM
I don't know if this has been asked yet, but how is the draft going to work this year? I'm wondering will whoever gets last place for wins get to pick first or since there are no playoffs will the teams just be random as to who will get to pick in what order?
Reverse of the standing so whoever got 18th gets 1st pick and so on to 1st place gets 18th pick.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Miku on March 31, 2011, 04:05:43 PM
When will we be able to trade again? I've got a couple deals where I will be moving some draft picks so I wanted to know when we can trade again. Also when will we be losing our players not on contracts anymore? Will we be losing them before the draft or after the draft? I can't trade for players until those players are gone. :(
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 31, 2011, 04:12:35 PM
When will we be able to trade again? I've got a couple deals where I will be moving some draft picks so I wanted to know when we can trade again. Also when will we be losing our players not on contracts anymore? Will we be losing them before the draft or after the draft? I can't trade for players until those players are gone. :(
They will be gone before the draft for sure, probably in May because I will have sufficient time then. Trade will be re-opened at conclusion of season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on April 09, 2011, 11:52:24 PM
Is it just me or does the date for when free agency opens keep changing???? I would like to see it early July not late July
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on April 09, 2011, 11:59:14 PM
I think its in late july because we have to give the NHL teams time to sign the new free agents. So we know what the players salaries will be.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on April 10, 2011, 12:17:41 AM
But we could start them off at 200k and go up from there
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 10, 2011, 02:01:51 AM
Is it just me or does the date for when free agency opens keep changing???? I would like to see it early July not late July
Ya this is done because we would want the major NHL free agents to be signed so we can go off their contracts for our references. It will be in middle of July the week after the entry draft.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Miku on April 26, 2011, 08:44:57 PM
Is there a way to make it so that we play all the teams from our division at least once? Last year Toronto didn't play any games against NYR or WSH. It would have been nice to play them since they are from my division.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 26, 2011, 09:52:53 PM
Is there a way to make it so that we play all the teams from our division at least once? Last year Toronto didn't play any games against NYR or WSH. It would have been nice to play them since they are from my division.
Yes we will for sure have a game against everyone in our division. Hopefully fantrax will have their new format up which represents the actually NHL better which is a more divisional heavy schedule.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on April 26, 2011, 11:57:54 PM
Yes we will for sure have a game against everyone in our division. Hopefully fantrax will have their new format up which represents the actually NHL better which is a more divisional heavy schedule.

Really? Can you link me where this was announced? Cause if so, that would be INCREDIBLE!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 27, 2011, 01:32:43 AM
i just looked at the info and it says a divisional based schedule coming soon  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on April 27, 2011, 02:12:02 AM
i just looked at the info and it says a divisional based schedule coming soon  :thumbsup:

AWESOME!  :toast:

Watch out, Montreal! Our rivalry just got spicier!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on July 24, 2011, 11:42:20 PM
How current is the waiver list on fantrax?
The one on ProFsl is the one we go by. The fantrax one is all screwed up
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on July 25, 2011, 02:18:32 AM
If "No player with 0 games of NHL experience can be bidded on" How can I sign that player from free Agency?
You can't you have to wait until they play 1 NHL game or draft them through the draft
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesselton on October 17, 2011, 03:49:12 PM
What do people think about a goalie cap?? Not money wise, but number of players. We stress that goalies are of huge importance in this league, so why not make it a little more balanced in that regard. Say a max of 3?

I know we can't take goalies off of rosters, but if this was to be implemented some teams would just have to choose which goalies to keep once the contracts start running out...

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: BeanTown on October 17, 2011, 03:57:08 PM
What do people think about a goalie cap?? Not money wise, but number of players. We stress that goalies are of huge importance in this league, so why not make it a little more balanced in that regard. Say a max of 3?

I know we can't take goalies off of rosters, but if this was to be implemented some teams would just have to choose which goalies to keep once the contracts start running out...

Thoughts?

I'd be ok with it but think 4 woud be more fair as some would have 2 decent G's and maybe 2 that are career backups for a game here and there. But i wouldnt be totally against the idea of it. Would hvw to be standardized somehow though!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesselton on October 17, 2011, 04:11:14 PM
I'd be ok with it but think 4 woud be more fair as some would have 2 decent G's and maybe 2 that are career backups for a game here and there. But i wouldnt be totally against the idea of it. Would hvw to be standardized somehow though!

Yeah, for sure. I was just throwing a number out there for discussion purposes.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: BeanTown on October 17, 2011, 04:17:54 PM
Yeah, for sure. I was just throwing a number out there for discussion purposes.

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on October 17, 2011, 05:59:35 PM
What do people think about a goalie cap?? Not money wise, but number of players. We stress that goalies are of huge importance in this league, so why not make it a little more balanced in that regard. Say a max of 3?

I know we can't take goalies off of rosters, but if this was to be implemented some teams would just have to choose which goalies to keep once the contracts start running out...

Thoughts?
I like the idea of a goalie cap. It could be done for next year. Not fair to do it this year as some teams have build there team around their goalies.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on October 17, 2011, 08:27:38 PM
I like the idea of a goalie cap. It could be done for next year. Not fair to do it this year as some teams have build there team around their goalies.
I'll start up a discussion thread. This would be for the rules committee to decide but full league discussion is appreciated.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on October 17, 2011, 08:46:14 PM
What do people think about a goalie cap?? Not money wise, but number of players. We stress that goalies are of huge importance in this league, so why not make it a little more balanced in that regard. Say a max of 3?

I know we can't take goalies off of rosters, but if this was to be implemented some teams would just have to choose which goalies to keep once the contracts start running out...

Thoughts?
I am totally against this. Why even be part of this league if we are going to be told how to spend our cap are we going to have a cap on how many Centers we have too?? Yeah some teams have 6 goalies but they are hurting in other areas. Mine area that I am weak in is Defense.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on November 17, 2011, 05:23:51 PM
Anybody else have trouble using the link to Fantrax on this page?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on November 17, 2011, 05:57:42 PM
Anybody else have trouble using the link to Fantrax on this page?
I just got an error, I'll check in with Colby on it
Anybody else have trouble using the link to Fantrax on this page?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on November 23, 2011, 06:58:01 AM
It there going to be an increase in minor league roster next year? Or I have an idea of maybe making N/C not count towards a roster spot.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 02, 2011, 02:46:43 PM
 :bump:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 15, 2011, 06:30:08 AM
Still waiting???  lol
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on December 15, 2011, 01:03:18 PM
Still waiting???  lol
Wow missed this, I don't know about increasing minor league rosters. I guess we can see after the draft has completed where most teams are at?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on December 16, 2011, 06:29:52 AM
so whats gonna happen to those players we want to send down to minors but are not on 1 year contact and no one wants them ??? are we stuck with them i really dont think thats fair either???
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on December 16, 2011, 01:56:53 PM
so whats gonna happen to those players we want to send down to minors but are not on 1 year contact and no one wants them ??? are we stuck with them i really dont think thats fair either???
Yep pretty much it is to cover people signing bad contracts and have to either buy them out or try to free waiver them.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on January 16, 2012, 06:28:44 AM
I see that Free Agency and the Waiver Period End on February 7th, 2012 @ 8:00pm. So does this mean we can't send up and down IR replacements? or sign IR replacements?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 16, 2012, 10:07:30 AM
I see that Free Agency and the Waiver Period End on February 7th, 2012 @ 8:00pm. So does this mean we can't send up and down IR replacements? or sign IR replacements?
I will have to decide on that but I will say probably still can use that part. Just no signing IR replacements or free agents and no sending other players up or down. Also any IR replacement called up after this period would have to be sent down and could not be maintained on the roster. 2 ways would still be able to be used because they do not use the waiver system.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on February 24, 2012, 05:20:22 AM
When does trading open up agian? after the next extension period?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 28, 2012, 05:17:07 PM
When does trading open up agian? after the next extension period?
Unsure as of yet. Should be figured out after the season is over.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on February 28, 2012, 06:15:59 PM
Unsure as of yet. Should be figured out after the season is over.
OK, a few of the guys were wondering.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 28, 2012, 06:40:54 PM
OK, a few of the guys were wondering.
Any players that go unsigned after the 2nd extension period will be released to free agency after that extension period.

I will most likely put it up for discussion after the season is over.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 28, 2012, 02:03:03 PM
Do I have this right?

Example comparison of Free Agent Signing vs. Extensions.

LW Matt Moulson Ranked 30th in 11-12 and 51st in 10-11, so as the 30th Ranked LW would be required to Extend at 4m/year up to a maximum of 3 years.

If released to Free Agency he would be eligible for resigning at 50% of his Hockeybuzz Cap Hit (3,133,133) so half of 3.1m or 1.6m/year up to a maximum of 4 years.

Notwithstanding competitive bids it seems preferable to let most players walk and resign them later as FA's. There are a small number of exceptional players that should obviously be extended but in most cases it would seem better to play out a contract rather than signing an extension.

Even taking hostile bidding into consideration, given how little cap space GM's have to work with it's conceivable that a player like Mouslon could be re-acquired for less than 4m/year and at a term of 4 years rather than the 3 offered by extension. After all, the League only has 54 active roster slots at LW.

Is there strong enough incentive to pay a premium for the services of the 30th Ranked player even if his stock is somewhat on the rise?

Also, why is the length of the extension linked to the value of the re-signing? This entire clause seems to be written for young rapidly appreciating stars to keep them from being signed artificially low for a long period of time. That makes sense to me but why prohibit a player like Moulson from signing a 4 year extension when he could sign for 4 years via free-agency?

At the upper end of the scale I'll use the example of James Neal (the 2nd Ranked LW). I'm guessing he was dropped rather than being re-signed at the 8.5m/year extension number. As a Free Agent however bidding can start as low as 2.5m/year. That's quite a gap and I'm thinking there's room to extend the player at something closer to market value (both actual NHL and BY League).

Off the cuff I'm wondering if we could give our GM's an option to retain a player at a new value as determined by the market during Free Agency. In other words, release a player to free agency but have the ability to match the winning bid.

This may offer too much protection to GM's but by including a simple dis-incentive (an additional .5m/year added to the matched bid in order to bring that player back) may be enough to prevent GM's from releasing all their players to free-agency. Furthermore, GM's could be limited to matching one FA bid per season.


My rambling speculation aside I think we should be able to extend an aging veteran to a cheap 4 year contract.

The intent of this post is not to challenge the rules.
Rather, it is to ask if I have the correct understanding of them.


  :beer:


 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 28, 2012, 03:23:46 PM
Do I have this right?

Example comparison of Free Agent Signing vs. Extensions.

LW Matt Moulson Ranked 30th in 11-12 and 51st in 10-11, so as the 30th Ranked LW would be required to Extend at 4m/year up to a maximum of 3 years.

If released to Free Agency he would be eligible for resigning at 50% of his Hockeybuzz Cap Hit (3,133,133) so half of 3.1m or 1.6m/year up to a maximum of 4 years.

Notwithstanding competitive bids it seems preferable to let most players walk and resign them later as FA's. There are a small number of exceptional players that should obviously be extended but in most cases it would seem better to play out a contract rather than signing an extension.

Even taking hostile bidding into consideration, given how little cap space GM's have to work with it's conceivable that a player like Mouslon could be re-acquired for less than 4m/year and at a term of 4 years rather than the 3 offered by extension. After all, the League only has 54 active roster slots at LW.

Is there strong enough incentive to pay a premium for the services of the 30th Ranked player even if his stock is somewhat on the rise?

Also, why is the length of the extension linked to the value of the re-signing? This entire clause seems to be written for young rapidly appreciating stars to keep them from being signed artificially low for a long period of time. That makes sense to me but why prohibit a player like Moulson from signing a 4 year extension when he could sign for 4 years via free-agency?

At the upper end of the scale I'll use the example of James Neal (the 2nd Ranked LW). I'm guessing he was dropped rather than being re-signed at the 8.5m/year extension number. As a Free Agent however bidding can start as low as 2.5m/year. That's quite a gap and I'm thinking there's room to extend the player at something closer to market value (both actual NHL and BY League).

Off the cuff I'm wondering if we could give our GM's an option to retain a player at a new value as determined by the market during Free Agency. In other words, release a player to free agency but have the ability to match the winning bid.

This may offer too much protection to GM's but by including a simple dis-incentive (an additional .5m/year added to the matched bid in order to bring that player back) may be enough to prevent GM's from releasing all their players to free-agency. Furthermore, GM's could be limited to matching one FA bid per season.


My rambling speculation aside I think we should be able to extend an aging veteran to a cheap 4 year contract.

The intent of this post is not to challenge the rules.
Rather, it is to ask if I have the correct understanding of them.


  :beer:
I'll get a full explain a bit later, maybe we can discuss the ability of the original GM being able to match the player in FA. We will look at all options!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 28, 2012, 04:53:34 PM
Sorry Drew, I didn't mean to go off track with suggestions for changes. I just wanted to make sure I understood the way it's structured at the moment. The only thing that really struck me as odd is that I can't extend to the same length of term as I could on a FA contract.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 28, 2012, 08:57:15 PM
Sorry Drew, I didn't mean to go off track with suggestions for changes. I just wanted to make sure I understood the way it's structured at the moment. The only thing that really struck me as odd is that I can't extend to the same length of term as I could on a FA contract.
Of course you can extend and sign a FA to the same contract years. This is the contract limits:

All contracts must be no longer than 4 years.  Also, for a given salary, all contacts (extension, FA) have term limits (max years contract can be per the salary) as provided below.

Maximum Years
</= $2.9m, 2 years
$3.0m - $6.4m, 3 years
>$6.5m, 4 years
Contracts can be less in length then the given values but can't exceed the given years. Ex. a 9 million free agent bid can be a 3 year - $3m, 2 year - $4.5m, or a 1 year - $9m but can not be a 4 year - $2.3m
Note: Maximum dollars for a single season is $10m

Let me know if you don't completely understand this.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 28, 2012, 10:29:12 PM
What I understand from that is I can extend a 3-6.4m contract by a max of 3 years while the same player signed as a free agent could sign for 4 years regardless of what he is paid.

This is a knock against signing players to an extension.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 28, 2012, 10:38:44 PM
Here is a more in-depth explanation
 
Maximum Years
</= $2.9m, 2 years
- so an extension or signing can be 2 years that is in value of 0.2m to 2.9m
- 0.2m to 2.9m can also be a 1 year contract

$3.0m - $6.4m, 3 years
- so an extension or signing can be 3 years that is in value of 3.0m to 6.4m
- 3.0m to 6.4m can also be a 1 or 2 year contract

>$6.5m, 4 years
- so an extension or signing can be 4 years that is in value of over 6.5m
- over 6.5m contract can also be a 1, 2, or 3 year contract

Contracts can be less in length then the given values but can't exceed the given years. Ex. a 9 million free agent bid can be a 3 year - $3m, 2 year - $4.5m, or a 1 year - $9m but can not be a 4 year - $2.3m
Note: Maximum dollars for a single season is $10m
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 28, 2012, 10:47:12 PM
Here is a more in-depth explanation
 
Maximum Years
</= $2.9m, 2 years
- so an extension or signing can be 2 years that is in value of 0.2m to 2.9m
- 0.2m to 2.9m can also be a 1 year contract

$3.0m - $6.4m, 3 years
- so an extension or signing can be 3 years that is in value of 3.0m to 6.4m
- 3.0m to 6.4m can also be a 1 or 2 year contract

>$6.5m, 4 years
- so an extension or signing can be 4 years that is in value of over 6.5m
- over 6.5m contract can also be a 1, 2, or 3 year contract

Contracts can be less in length then the given values but can't exceed the given years. Ex. a 9 million free agent bid can be a 3 year - $3m, 2 year - $4.5m, or a 1 year - $9m but can not be a 4 year - $2.3m
Note: Maximum dollars for a single season is $10m

I get this.

If I have a player that is resigned to an extension in the 3-6.4m range (for example) then I can extend said player for 1, 2, or 3 years.

However....

If I let that same player go to Free Agency instead of extending them.....then I can sign said player to a contract of up to 4 years.
________________

Therefore, there is a built-in incentive to sign Free Agents rather than signing Extensions as a contract signed during Free Agency is more flexible.

Right?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 29, 2012, 07:15:04 PM
I get this.

If I have a player that is resigned to an extension in the 3-6.4m range (for example) then I can extend said player for 1, 2, or 3 years.

However....

If I let that same player go to Free Agency instead of extending them.....then I can sign said player to a contract of up to 4 years.
________________

Therefore, there is a built-in incentive to sign Free Agents rather than signing Extensions as a contract signed during Free Agency is more flexible.

Right?
I don't get exactly what you mean, if the value is between 3.0m to 6.4m, it can only be a 1,2,3 year contract, it can not be a 4 year contract no matter what way you are signing. If you mean you can sign him at 6.5m or over through free agency and a 4 year contract, you can also do that as an extension by simply paying the player more.
If the player's value is a $1.5m contract, you can only sign him for 1-2 years but you can increase his contract to $3.0m if you want a 3 year contract.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 29, 2012, 09:10:49 PM
No worries Drew, just pecking over the finer points of things to be sure I've got it figured out. Thanks for your patience.  :toast:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on May 01, 2012, 12:22:34 AM
Is there a minimum bid for players that are still unsigned UFA's at the beginning of free agency on July 15th?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 01, 2012, 12:26:55 AM
Is there a minimum bid for players that are still unsigned UFA's at the beginning of free agency on July 15th?
Nope, such as KHL players that don't have binding NHL contracts. Their contracts are then the league minimum at $0.2m.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on June 08, 2012, 12:02:30 AM
Goalies now get 10 points for a goal??
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 08, 2012, 12:40:43 AM
Goalies now get 10 points for a goal??
Yes, if a goalie gets a goal they should get a good slice of points. There has only been 12 goals in NHL history by a goalie so it probably won't happen for some time again.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on June 08, 2012, 02:37:13 AM
Yes, if a goalie gets a goal they should get a good slice of points. There has only been 12 goals in NHL history by a goalie so it probably won't happen for some time again.
I understand what your saying but I think it should only be 2 points like players.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 08, 2012, 08:57:26 PM
I understand what your saying but I think it should only be 2 points like players.
Well I believe it should be more than a player as it rarely happens. A reasonable point for a goalie scoring a goal would be number of goals scored by forwards divided by number of goals scored by goalies as that is how often it happens in comparison and times that by 2 as that is the points
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on June 08, 2012, 09:32:51 PM
Well I believe it should be more than a player as it rarely happens. A reasonable point for a goalie scoring a goal would be number of goals scored by forwards divided by number of goals scored by goalies as that is how often it happens in comparison and times that by 2 as that is the points

OK  :toast:

but you could argue that defenseman should get more points for a goal then a forward and points  shorthanded should be more then the powerplay.

Maybe Im being a pain as usual? lol
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: hockeyfreak47 on June 08, 2012, 09:46:17 PM
OK  :toast:

but you could argue that defenseman should get more points for a goal then a forward and points  shorthanded should be more then the powerplay.

Maybe Im being a pain as usual? lol

i think those sugestions could be good for a new league  :thumbsup:

great thinking Tony :judge:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 08, 2012, 09:52:37 PM
OK  :toast:

but you could argue that defenseman should get more points for a goal then a forward and points  shorthanded should be more then the powerplay.

Maybe Im being a pain as usual? lol
If I could I would have made defensemen scoring goals worth more than forwards to equal it out but fantrax doesn't allow it I believe?

I think 10 is a fair amount for a goaltender goal for something that rarely happens. It is always good to be through Tony especially in the Backyard.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on June 08, 2012, 09:56:41 PM
Well if a goalie scores in the last second of the 3rd to tie the game he doesn't get an extra point and win it too. Just sayin.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on July 16, 2012, 12:21:53 AM
So a quick q me and Abby were chatting is there a restriction in FA on players that have played less then 40 games while our draft is still going on??  Sorry Abby and I( inside Joke about my grammar ) :rofl:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on July 16, 2012, 12:26:54 AM
So a quick q me and Abby were chatting is there a restriction in FA on players that have played less then 40 games while our draft is still going on??
Was thinking the same thing. I was just about to PM Drew.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on July 16, 2012, 01:57:22 AM
So a quick q me and Abby were chatting is there a restriction in FA on players that have played less then 40 games while our draft is still going on??  Sorry Abby and I( inside Joke about my grammar ) :rofl:

LOL........ Not great grammar Nelly...... but at least I can read your thread!!!  :rofl: Great question and I'm sure we will have the answer asap
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 16, 2012, 03:30:33 AM
Fairest thing right now is no players with under forty games experience can be bid on till draft is complete.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on July 16, 2012, 04:31:29 AM
Fairest thing right now is no players with under forty games experience can be bid on till draft is complete.
:iatp:  I think that is a great idea.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on July 16, 2012, 11:54:19 AM
:iatp:  I think that is a great idea.  :thumbsup:


 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on July 16, 2012, 11:22:38 PM
 

 :iatp:

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on July 18, 2012, 10:52:58 PM
Quote
Players must be signed to a contract emulating they real contract. When signing a free agent they salary must be greater than or equal to 50% the real salary.

What if that player is an RFA without a posted salary (ex. Del Zotto) at current time?

Would you use 50% of their extension value or 50% of their last contract? Some other benchmark? Free to sign at league minimum??
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on July 18, 2012, 11:14:11 PM
What if that player is an RFA without a posted salary (ex. Del Zotto) at current time?

Would you use 50% of their extension value or 50% of their last contract? Some other benchmark? Free to sign at league minimum??
As far as I know they can be paid as low as 0.2M per yer.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 19, 2012, 01:36:55 AM
As far as I know they can be paid as low as 0.2M per yer.  :thumbsup:
:winner:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on July 26, 2012, 03:07:43 PM
Waiver Priority

Once someone has claimed a player, do they go to the bottom of the priority list? 
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 26, 2012, 06:21:29 PM
Waiver Priority

Once someone has claimed a player, do they go to the bottom of the priority list?
Yes as you will see Detroit, Boston and Columbus are now at the bottom
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on July 31, 2012, 03:49:26 AM
Hey so just came across something that just seems wierd example Ryan Murphy car defenseman makes $1.375 mill a year in NHL but for me to sign him I have to pay him 1.5 mill bc 12th over all just wondering how this makes sense since we do FA half the salarys and the extrentions have changed ? Any thoughts? I don't see y I have to pay more then his real NHL contract
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on July 31, 2012, 04:02:32 AM
Hey so just came across something that just seems wierd example Ryan Murphy car defenseman makes $1.375 mill a year in NHL but for me to sign him I have to pay him 1.5 mill bc 12th over all just wondering how this makes sense since we do FA half the salarys and the extrentions have changed ? Any thoughts? I don't see y I have to pay more then his real NHL contract
It all equals out in the end. You want to pay Yakupov 3.8m instead of 3m?  :rofl:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on July 31, 2012, 04:09:00 AM
Lol was a q but think they should be 1/4 less of there actual NHL contract or something like NHL contract divided by 1.25
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 31, 2012, 09:09:45 PM
Lol was a q but think they should be 1/4 less of there actual NHL contract or something like NHL contract divided by 1.25
It is unfortunate that some players will make more in our league then other but I think it is the standard we have had for 2 years and I don't wish to change it unless others are for this as well.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on August 03, 2012, 03:48:32 PM
So I have a q how do we sign our n/c guys in minors if they were undrafted?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 04, 2012, 08:38:39 PM
So I have a q how do we sign our n/c guys in minors if they were undrafted?
Sorry for late response but 200k for someone undrafted.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on August 13, 2012, 04:33:12 PM
Just had a q if we were to buy someone out that's in our minors does that 66.6% of salary go agianst major roaster cap or minor roster cap?
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 13, 2012, 05:30:06 PM
Just had a q if we were to buy someone out that's in our minors does that 66.6% of salary go agianst major roaster cap or minor roster cap?
Yes exactly, it would go against your major league cap. This also happens if someone retires in the minors as well.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on August 14, 2012, 02:02:36 PM
Two way contracts are eligible for players who have been drafted by their respective teams.

If I trade for a draftee with N/C and (for example) no games played, would I be able to then sign him to a 2-way contract? Is that only possible to the original team that made the pick?

Would the 3rd party team be required to pay the additional $500k that is applied to FA 2-way contracts? (A clause that would make sense to drop for the sake of simplicity and ease of governance....why not just let all players under 40 games be eligible?)

Otherwise....I have inherited a number of prospects with N/C and limited games but have no idea if the were FA's, draftees, or the result of a trade.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on August 14, 2012, 06:42:23 PM
Yes you can sign a player you received from a trade with a N/C, to a 2 way contract as only contracts with N/C were drafted within the entry draft in backyard.

Only FA's that were signed that are under the 40 game limit will have to pay the extra 500K

Hope this helps
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 14, 2012, 09:33:03 PM
any contract with N/C can be given a two way contract free of charge, no matter whether they were traded or not.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on August 14, 2012, 09:43:54 PM
Thanks guys
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on January 13, 2013, 11:54:32 AM
When can we place players on IR?
Title: Questions
Post by: Jesse on January 13, 2013, 12:26:32 PM
Also is Free Agency open
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on January 13, 2013, 02:49:23 PM
And when is the waiver free period
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 13, 2013, 02:58:55 PM
IR and free agency open 1 week into the season. Waiver free opens in January 15th, for waiver free please post in the transaction board and not waiver board.
This will all be reflected in the deadlines soon as well as other dates now that the nhl schedule has been released.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 13, 2013, 05:39:21 PM
IR and free agency open 1 week into the season. Waiver free opens in January 15th, for waiver free please post in the transaction board and not waiver board.
This will all be reflected in the deadlines soon as well as other dates now that the nhl schedule has been released.
Updated some deadlines!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on January 23, 2013, 03:19:51 AM
So I just have a q seems kinda strange but just to clarify what's the rule on juggling players back and forth from the minors to major ie two contracts on a semi daily basis? I'm not one that would do this but just a thought
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 23, 2013, 09:45:55 AM
So I just have a q seems kinda strange but just to clarify what's the rule on juggling players back and forth from the minors to major ie two contracts on a semi daily basis? I'm not one that would do this but just a thought
We had this discussion before but I won't allow a team to take advantage of the system. Little lone I don't process requests all daily so they wouldn't get done.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on January 23, 2013, 11:20:48 AM
Just a question about buyouts

I am thinking of buying out Reimer and I currently have 11.4 m in cap space I should be able to as reimer is owed 30 mil in next 3 years and 66.66%  will be 20.1 something to buy him out

So reimer currently has a 10 mil cap hit & I ahve 11.4 mil in spcae. that should cover the buyout for this year? just want to clarify

still thinkgin about it thoguugh

thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 23, 2013, 11:34:20 AM
Just a question about buyouts

I am thinking of buying out Reimer and I currently have 11.4 m in cap space I should be able to as reimer is owed 30 mil in next 3 years and 66.66%  will be 20.1 something to buy him out

So reimer currently has a 10 mil cap hit & I ahve 11.4 mil in spcae. that should cover the buyout for this year? just want to clarify

still thinkgin about it thoguugh

thanks
Yes his buyout would be $20m if paid all this year. I believe you would have the cap space to do this.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on January 31, 2013, 08:11:28 PM
So a q if I call up a guy from my minors as a ir replacement that still has 2 years left ie *Chris Pronger, $4.9m (2013-14) when my player returns can I send him down or does he have to stay on my main roster?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 31, 2013, 10:12:33 PM
So a q if I call up a guy from my minors as a ir replacement that still has 2 years left ie *Chris Pronger, $4.9m (2013-14) when my player returns can I send him down or does he have to stay on my main roster?
Yes if he is an IR replacement he can be sent back down.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on February 09, 2013, 07:22:02 PM
So another q maby it's just me but last season weren't we able to change our line ups for the day for later games ie goalies or injurys during morning skate were we are able to adjust for these? If not is there a way we can I know in other leagues they do this.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 09, 2013, 07:37:09 PM
When will we pass the trade deadline?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 09, 2013, 09:54:14 PM
So another q maby it's just me but last season weren't we able to change our line ups for the day for later games ie goalies or injurys during morning skate were we are able to adjust for these? If not is there a way we can I know in other leagues they do this.
Nope in this league they are set once first game is played.

There are other leagues that use this feature but we don't and I believe there was discussion of keeping it fair for everyone this way instead of the keeners getting the advantage.

When will we pass the trade deadline?
I am thinking end of week 6 to somewhere near the middle of week 8, what is everyone's thoughts. I think end of week 7 would be good (first day of week 8) because every team should have a pretty good idea of their direct by that time.

Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 09, 2013, 10:08:54 PM

I am thinking end of week 6 to somewhere near the middle of week 8, what is everyone's thoughts. I think end of week 7 would be good (first day of week 8) because every team should have a pretty good idea of their direct by that time.

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on February 09, 2013, 10:15:50 PM
Just curious how does it make it less fair the players are all on our roster already it just makes it easier for game time decisions
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on February 09, 2013, 10:37:26 PM
Just curious how does it make it less fair the players are all on our roster already it just makes it easier for game time decisions
:iatp:

I tried getting this changed a few years ago but it was shot down would love it changed espically on days when games start at 8:30am who is up that early on a weekend
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on February 09, 2013, 10:48:27 PM
:iatp:

I tried getting this changed a few years ago but it was shot down would love it changed espically on days when games start at 8:30am who is up that early on a weekend
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=19456.0
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on February 09, 2013, 10:53:42 PM
And everyone is still equal it's not favoring one team more then the other
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 09, 2013, 11:16:28 PM
And everyone is still equal it's not favoring one team more then the other

But it is favoring those that can check the web sites during work and/or in the middle of an important event. The current setting forces everyone to set their schedules and work with the same info at the same time.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on February 09, 2013, 11:42:40 PM
Ya read ur guy's heated descousion from the past I don't want to bring up term oil but just thought would be better ill keep my peace
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 10, 2013, 12:44:22 AM
Ya read ur guy's heated descousion from the past I don't want to bring up term oil but just thought would be better ill keep my peace
Ya no point in bringing up a heated discussion again haha. Anyway thanks Jesse for finding it, so it was voted on and a decision was made. I will honour that decision and my reasons as I think others reasons for or against will remain the same.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on February 10, 2013, 01:17:59 AM
Ya no point in bringing up a heated discussion again haha. Anyway thanks Jesse for finding it, so it was voted on and a decision was made. I will honour that decision and my reasons as I think others reasons for or against will remain the same.
Heated discussions are always fun.  You guys see how mean Jesse was to me?  :rofl:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 10, 2013, 01:38:41 AM
I am thinking end of week 6 to somewhere near the middle of week 8, what is everyone's thoughts. I think end of week 7 would be good (first day of week 8) because every team should have a pretty good idea of their direct by that time.

I should have elaborated on my stance... I think the last day of week 7 would be the best day to have it. There are only five games that day, so any last minute transactions should not disturb too much. On top of that, by that day, everyone should know where they stand in the play off race. I think it will be perfect.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on February 10, 2013, 03:18:25 AM
I should have elaborated on my stance... I think the last day of week 7 would be the best day to have it. There are only five games that day, so any last minute transactions should not disturb too much. On top of that, by that day, everyone should know where they stand in the play off race. I think it will be perfect.

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on February 16, 2013, 01:27:12 AM
So another q sorry but can a ur replacement be sent on ir lol
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 16, 2013, 12:37:29 PM
So another q sorry but can a ur replacement be sent on ir lol
No they can not be.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on February 16, 2013, 09:10:07 PM
Drew just a quick question on this years extentions. Are we going to be using this shortened season at all as a bench mark or will we be using last years rankings???
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 16, 2013, 09:23:23 PM
Drew just a quick question on this years extentions. Are we going to be using this shortened season at all as a bench mark or will we be using last years rankings???
Same as always. We will be using their ranking from this season and the ranking from last year as well.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 17, 2013, 07:15:51 PM
Hey Drew, it's not clear to me if a vet IR replacement called up from the minors can be sent back early (before the IR player is back in action) or not. Specifically, can I send Tomonen back down before Karlsson is healthy?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 17, 2013, 07:21:49 PM
Yes they can be sent back at any time through normal waivers
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 20, 2013, 02:15:52 PM
I was just looking at my extensions and was thinking about the cap for next season, is there any changes there ?
Yes there is a change down to 64.3m expected. I will try and update that in the projected cap space part.
Title: Questions
Post by: Jesse on February 20, 2013, 02:41:07 PM
Yes there is a change down to 64.3m expected. I will try and update that in the projected cap space part.
Is there going to be a free buyout or something to help with the drop in cap ??
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 20, 2013, 03:21:47 PM
Is there going to be a free buyout or something to help with the drop in cap ??
That can be discussed, although with re-signing period teams won't be allowed to go over cap either.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on February 20, 2013, 03:57:34 PM
We can add salary to an extension right?? In my case Patric Hornqvist's extension unless he goes crazy in the next week and moves up 40 spots on the scoring list is 2.7m per year for 2 years can I add 0.3m per year to make it 3m a year for 3 years??
Title: Questions
Post by: Tyler on February 20, 2013, 04:00:02 PM
Can't wait!!! I'm getting some great extension saving values right now :)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on February 20, 2013, 04:03:12 PM
Can't wait!!! I'm getting some great extension saving values right now :)
Me too not going to cost me a whole lot to keep my core together
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 20, 2013, 04:09:28 PM
We can add salary to an extension right?? In my case Patric Hornqvist's extension unless he goes crazy in the next week and moves up 40 spots on the scoring list is 2.7m per year for 2 years can I add 0.3m per year to make it 3m a year for 3 years??
Yep you can always bump it up.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 07, 2013, 09:40:39 PM
Anyone else having trouble loading pages on profsl on mobile device were it all of a sudden redirects u to a add page?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 08, 2013, 05:48:36 AM
Just curious I can't remmber what my cap space is.. Drew since ur very busy can we get some one to help with the transactions? Maby me tony slapjack. Or someone really active while ur busy with ur personal stuff? Just for time being to get things really active?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 08, 2013, 12:16:30 PM
Just curious I can't remmber what my cap space is.. Drew since ur very busy can we get some one to help with the transactions? Maby me tony slapjack. Or someone really active while ur busy with ur personal stuff? Just for time being to get things really active?
I am gonna try pound out the extensions right now then see what time it is and try to pound out some more transactions. I have today off from school so going to try and get done what I can haha.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 08, 2013, 03:11:05 PM
I am gonna try pound out the extensions right now then see what time it is and try to pound out some more transactions. I have today off from school so going to try and get done what I can haha.

Ok just know we all here and understand u busy we. Willing to help ya ;)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 08, 2013, 04:15:28 PM
Ok just know we all here and understand u busy we. Willing to help ya ;)
Done all trades and extensions!!!! After 3-4 hours I have it all done. I should keep most transactions up to date from here on.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 09, 2013, 12:04:12 AM
Is the projected cap space for next season based off of a cap of 70.2M or is it based off of a cap of 64.3M? I recounted all of your math, and it looks like you are projecting our cap to be 70.2M instead of 64.3, which is exactly what the NHL's cap is going to be.

Only reason I ask is because a lot of teams are clamoring for cap space next season, and this might throw a couple people off. The only reason I notice is because I have everything in my files for 2013-14 set to 64.3M instead of 70.2M.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 09, 2013, 12:26:16 AM
Is the projected cap space for next season based off of a cap of 70.2M or is it based off of a cap of 64.3M? I recounted all of your math, and it looks like you are projecting our cap to be 70.2M instead of 64.3, which is exactly what the NHL's cap is going to be.

Only reason I ask is because a lot of teams are clamoring for cap space next season, and this might throw a couple people off. The only reason I notice is because I have everything in my files for 2013-14 set to 64.3M instead of 70.2M.
I just checked, I can put up a new file but I have them all set to 64.3m which it is expected to drop to. Should be based on the 64.3m let me know if that is wrong.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 09, 2013, 12:35:49 AM
I just checked, I can put up a new file but I have them all set to 64.3m which it is expected to drop to. Should be based on the 64.3m let me know if that is wrong.

I am not basing this off of your file; I am basing everything I see you put up on the Official Roster pages. I have my own files that I keep on my team, which is the only reason why I seen the error on the Official Roster pages.

70.2 (this years cap space) - 51.7 (total I have spent next season in players) = 18.5

64.3 (next years cap space) - 51.7 (total I have spent next season in players) = 12.6

You currently have my projected cap number on the Philadelphia Flyers Official Roster page as 18.4 for next season.

I do not know how many players use the files you put up as opposed to the players who base all of their decisions on the Official Roster page (as I personally hate the look of Spreadsheets), but I just wanted to make sure everything is accurate as this could have huge repercussions next season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 09, 2013, 12:29:24 PM
I am not basing this off of your file; I am basing everything I see you put up on the Official Roster pages. I have my own files that I keep on my team, which is the only reason why I seen the error on the Official Roster pages.

70.2 (this years cap space) - 51.7 (total I have spent next season in players) = 18.5

64.3 (next years cap space) - 51.7 (total I have spent next season in players) = 12.6

You currently have my projected cap number on the Philadelphia Flyers Official Roster page as 18.4 for next season.

I do not know how many players use the files you put up as opposed to the players who base all of their decisions on the Official Roster page (as I personally hate the look of Spreadsheets), but I just wanted to make sure everything is accurate as this could have huge repercussions next season.
Here is what I have for you (they should all be based on 64.3m unless the spreadsheet is doing something wrong):
C - 1.5m
LW - 9.9m
RW - 12.5 (Oh nevermind)
found the error, Callahan was put in as a 2 year contract instead of a 3 year on the spreadsheet, so now I have
RW - 17.9m
D - 14.2m
G - 7.8m
For total of 51.3m which would mean you should have 13m going into next season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 09, 2013, 01:34:07 PM
Here is what I have for you (they should all be based on 64.3m unless the spreadsheet is doing something wrong):
C - 1.5m
LW - 9.9m
RW - 12.5 (Oh nevermind)
found the error, Callahan was put in as a 2 year contract instead of a 3 year on the spreadsheet, so now I have
RW - 17.9m
D - 14.2m
G - 7.8m
For total of 51.3m which would mean you should have 13m going into next season.

Awesome! Thank you very much Drew. You are definitely the best commish in the business   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 09, 2013, 03:03:21 PM
Awesome! Thank you very much Drew. You are definitely the best commish in the business   :thumbsup:
  :iatp: This league is so active and it must be hard to keep up.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on March 12, 2013, 10:30:06 PM
To be clear, the amnesty buy-out will be 100% free with no lasting impact to our roster other than the ability to drop a contract (provided it has not been extended this season)?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 13, 2013, 11:22:07 AM
To be clear, the amnesty buy-out will be 100% free with no lasting impact to our roster other than the ability to drop a contract (provided it has not been extended this season)?
Yep
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 15, 2013, 05:01:25 PM
Just curious who's all in the trade committee?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 15, 2013, 05:42:20 PM
Just curious who's all in the trade committee?
Members:
1. Drew
2. Anthony
3. cho34
4. Tony
5. hockeyfreak47
6. Tyler
7. favo_zomg
8. norrya66

http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=19072.0
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 15, 2013, 05:50:09 PM
Thanks tony new there was a link so since cho isn't here for now are we gonna elect someone?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on March 16, 2013, 12:04:59 AM
Yeah there are like 12 trades that need votes badly.  I have voted on all that i'm not involved in.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Gilly on March 16, 2013, 01:19:41 AM
1)  I offered to join TC and when Drew isn't busy Im sure he will address it :)

2)  The buy-out, when are we doing that, i missed reading it somewhere, is it at seasons end?  like I mean during the offseason!!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 16, 2013, 01:45:43 AM
1)  I offered to join TC and when Drew isn't busy Im sure he will address it :)

2)  The buy-out, when are we doing that, i missed reading it somewhere, is it at seasons end?  like I mean during the offseason!!

Poll locked, that is 18 if I include Tyler's

Vote was in favour 1 buyout to be used anywhere. I am good with this as it can be used by some to get players out of the minors that could be on major league teams and can be used to reduce cap due to the 6m drop in cap space.

Stipulations:
- Will be a period from after Extension Period #2 to a week before the 2013 Entry Draft that the buyout can be used
- Can not be used on players that were signed to extensions in 2012-13

Up for debate:
- Be used on players who retire following the 2012-13 season, yes or no
- Others?
:toast:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 16, 2013, 03:31:40 PM
1)  I offered to join TC and when Drew isn't busy Im sure he will address it :)

2)  The buy-out, when are we doing that, i missed reading it somewhere, is it at seasons end?  like I mean during the offseason!!
I am going to put Gilly in as a TC member due to the activity that he has. Welcome Gilly to the TC.

Buy-out will happen in the off-season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 17, 2013, 05:45:11 PM
So I know drew is very busy with by and school and stuf but was thinking if all transactions ie trades and suck be done once a week like a Friday or something bc it makes it more fair to all teams
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on March 17, 2013, 06:01:15 PM
So I know drew is very busy with by and school and stuf but was thinking if all transactions ie trades and suck be done once a week like a Friday or something bc it makes it more fair to all teams
:iatp:

It made the Trade deadline really hard as I had no idea who was on my team and where my cap stands. I know there are a bunch of us willing to help out if u need it Drew
Title: Questions
Post by: Gilly on March 17, 2013, 06:51:19 PM
I personally had no issue as i keep my roster on a word document and update as needed, Drew does a great job and remember this is a free league gents :)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 17, 2013, 07:04:21 PM
I advise that you guys use the spreadsheet for the time being. I have been super busy with school but Tony has finished all the transactions on fantrax. I hope to start putting a dent in these transactions soon.
Also I ask for some leeway here as it is my first time in two years that things aren't being kept completely up to date. Here are my recommendations:
- use the spreadsheet, easiest way to manage your team without me having to keep it completely up to date
- be patient I will get things up to date
- Tony has everything up to date on fantrax and that is what is really important

Again sorry guys and hopefully things will be up to date soon.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on March 17, 2013, 07:12:34 PM
I didnt mean to come across as complaining and I cant pull the spreadsheet up as I only have my phone with internet right now. 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 17, 2013, 07:28:15 PM
I didnt mean to come across as complaining and I cant pull the spreadsheet up as I only have my phone with internet right now.
No problem just giving a recommendation for those who need it.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 17, 2013, 07:53:15 PM
Sorry drew didn't mean to sound complaining I had no issue about my roster more so about fantrax yesterday I missed out on points bc trade didn't go threw and today I set my roster and trade was processed and now losing more points is all I was pointing out is there a better way that it is fair and equal to all gms?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 17, 2013, 10:50:26 PM
We had a issue with Thomas Vokoun today.  He should have been on Calgary's roster but for some reason he was dropped after I proceeded some trades today.  I thought the rosters would have been set after the first game?


nelly85 missed out on 8.75 points.  Should this be added to his weekly total? I feel that he should.





Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 17, 2013, 11:08:37 PM
We had a issue with Thomas Vokoun today.  He should have been on Calgary's roster but for some reason he was dropped after I proceeded some trades today.  I thought the rosters would have been set after the first game?


nelly85 missed out on 8.75 points.  Should this be added to his weekly total? I feel that he should.
Just has to be retroactively set, I will change when I get time
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 18, 2013, 09:40:38 AM
We had a issue with Thomas Vokoun today.  He should have been on Calgary's roster but for some reason he was dropped after I proceeded some trades today.  I thought the rosters would have been set after the first game?


nelly85 missed out on 8.75 points.  Should this be added to his weekly total? I feel that he should.

Could he have been dropped because Calgary is over the 5 goalie limit? If you look at his roster on Sunday, he has six goalies (Kabi, Vokoun, Garon, Lindback, Peters, and Fasth).
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 18, 2013, 11:27:35 AM
Could he have been dropped because Calgary is over the 5 goalie limit? If you look at his roster on Sunday, he has six goalies (Kabi, Vokoun, Garon, Lindback, Peters, and Fasth).
Seems like Khabby was on IR, Peters would had to been sent down to make them have a valid roster at time that Khabby was taken off IR. Peters could then be called up once Vokoun was traded. I will look into this situation.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 18, 2013, 11:31:06 AM
Seems like Khabby was on IR, Peters would had to been sent down to make them have a valid roster at time that Khabby was taken off IR. Peters could then be called up once Vokoun was traded. I will look into this situation.
Ok so here is what I think should be done, Peters kept on roster and Vokoun traded as of March 15th or Peters is sent down from games taken place on 15th to 17th then when Vokoun is traded Peters can be called back up.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 18, 2013, 03:18:58 PM
Ok so here is what I think should be done, Peters kept on roster and Vokoun traded as of March 15th or Peters is sent down from games taken place on 15th to 17th then when Vokoun is traded Peters can be called back up.
Due to recommendation Vokoun would be an invalid player as of March 15th so therefore will not receive any points for any games happening on March 15th and there after.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 18, 2013, 04:05:46 PM
Due to recommendation Vokoun would be an invalid player as of March 15th so therefore will not receive any points for any games happening on March 15th and there after.
:iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 18, 2013, 05:55:51 PM
Ok so here is what I think should be done, Peters kept on roster and Vokoun traded as of March 15th or Peters is sent down from games taken place on 15th to 17th then when Vokoun is traded Peters can be called back up.

I could have left kabby on ir Wich I believe have 48 hrs to adjust but it's all good I agree with what ever u guys say  :beer:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on March 18, 2013, 10:18:00 PM
I won a IR bid on Alex Killorn. I would like to sign him and keep him now that his IR player is back. Do I pay him half his salary or the bid amount.......and if it is the bid amount can I divde the salary over years??
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on March 18, 2013, 10:52:36 PM
I advise that you guys use the spreadsheet for the time being. I have been super busy with school but Tony has finished all the transactions on fantrax. I hope to start putting a dent in these transactions soon.
Also I ask for some leeway here as it is my first time in two years that things aren't being kept completely up to date. Here are my recommendations:
- use the spreadsheet, easiest way to manage your team without me having to keep it completely up to date
- be patient I will get things up to date
- Tony has everything up to date on fantrax and that is what is really important

Again sorry guys and hopefully things will be up to date soon.

I didn't make your job any easier....made one too many transactions and couldn't keep up with my own changes.  :doh:

Tony has done a great job with Fantrax.....don't worry about the rest. We're all good.
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 18, 2013, 11:07:21 PM
I won a IR bid on Alex Killorn. I would like to sign him and keep him now that his IR player is back. Do I pay him half his salary or the bid amount.......and if it is the bid amount can I divde the salary over years??
IR contract has to be the same as the bid amount can't be divided by years.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 30, 2013, 01:06:03 AM
In the play offs, how would a tie be broken?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 30, 2013, 03:21:09 AM
In the play offs, how would a tie be broken?
That is a great question. I think the higher seed should get the win. IMO
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 30, 2013, 09:07:14 AM
That is a great question. I think the higher seed should get the win. IMO

I don't like that... It gives an unfair advantage to the teams that finished higher in the standings.

I think we should do it with stats. For example, Team A has 6 goals this week while his opponent, Team B, has 13 goals this week. Thus, Team B wins that stat. The team that wins the most stats wins the round.

If you count shut outs, we have 15 total stats that could help determine the winner.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 30, 2013, 02:03:28 PM
I don't like that... It gives an unfair advantage to the teams that finished higher in the standings.

I think we should do it with stats. For example, Team A has 6 goals this week while his opponent, Team B, has 13 goals this week. Thus, Team B wins that stat. The team that wins the most stats wins the round.

If you count shut outs, we have 15 total stats that could help determine the winner.
Higher seeded teams should have the advantage.

Also you could still have teams that tie in the stats department as well.


Just my opinion.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 30, 2013, 03:04:24 PM
Higher seeded teams should have the advantage.

Also you could still have teams that tie in the stats department as well.


Just my opinion.  :thumbsup:

Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 30, 2013, 08:56:32 PM
Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.
Hoping that there is no ties in playoffs. Haha.
But I'll have to see what is in rules but I think regular season is an important factor.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 30, 2013, 11:09:53 PM
Maybe we can pick 5 to 7 stats to determine the tie instead. Either way, I feel as though giving the higher seeded teams that advantage is unfair, and this is coming from a team that is currently sitting 2nd. With the exception of seeding, I feel that basing anything else in the playoffs based on how you did in the regular season is an unfair advantage. Match ups should be about that week.

 :iatp: I don't think we should give a win based on the person had a better season many factors injuries ect it's unfair in my opion it should be based on the week why not do wht the invatastional tournament did use stats like g/ga/a/sv/hits/blk/ and a point for each and the winner in most categories should get the win I think this would be more fair for every team and not on bc they higher seed team. It's weekly match ups should be based on the week
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on March 31, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
:iatp: I don't think we should give a win based on the person had a better season many factors injuries ect it's unfair in my opion it should be based on the week why not do wht the invatastional tournament did use stats like g/ga/a/sv/hits/blk/ and a point for each and the winner in most categories should get the win I think this would be more fair for every team and not on bc they higher seed team. It's weekly match ups should be based on the week

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 31, 2013, 02:30:37 PM
But I'll have to see what is in rules but I think regular season is an important factor.
:iatp:

Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tyler on April 01, 2013, 08:56:00 AM
IMO regular season should count as a factor because it shows the best true reflection of a team and a GM and what that GM can do with the team regardless of injuries etc. 1 lucky week in the playoffs can happen, but no one gets lucky for an entire season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: yahoolando on April 01, 2013, 12:50:06 PM
Goals are the heaviest weighted stat worth 2 points and should be used in determining the winner.  Use the most goals and if is still a tie then go to Assists and if its still a tie then take the higher seed.

Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 02, 2013, 02:19:22 AM
Standings Tie Breakers
1. Most fantasy points for entire season
2. Head-to-head record
3. Least fantasy points against for entire season

So I will go with this:
1. Head-to-head record
2. Higher Seed

I hope everyone is fine with this, regular season does matter or else we wouldn't play the games, it is very important where you place and how well you perform during the season. Head to head is the only transferable tie breaker so it gets the first spot. Again hopefully there is no ties and maybe this is something we can look into in the off-season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: yahoolando on April 02, 2013, 04:28:24 PM
I know this is so off the topic right now but I was wondering if we can use defunct minor league franchises for our minor league logos?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 02, 2013, 06:17:47 PM
I know this is so off the topic right now but I was wondering if we can use defunct minor league franchises for our minor league logos?
Not sure on that yet.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 08, 2013, 12:38:21 PM
Not sure on the order of operations as contracts expire....do I have it right?

IR Replacements and Contracts End - April 28th, 2013 @ 12:00pm
Extension Period 2 Begins - April 30th, 2013 @ 12:00am

The way I have been reading this is that IR replacements can be released/signed to an extension simultaneous to releasing unwanted expiring contracts.

Scenario: I would be able to move two IR replacements back to my minor system (say Nash and Shwartz) which is currently at 19/20 players. To make room I intended to drop someone like Mason.

The second part of this question is: will I be able to hold-over some expiring contracts so that I may extend them? Example: Justin Faulk.

I guess the confusion for me is really about the expiring contracts and how long they can stay on our rosters because I am assuming they don't all dissipate immediately.

The two-day window between contracts expiring and the extension period is just there to allow time to update the projected cap space isn't it?
 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 08, 2013, 01:33:42 PM
Not sure on the order of operations as contracts expire....do I have it right?

IR Replacements and Contracts End - April 28th, 2013 @ 12:00pm
Extension Period 2 Begins - April 30th, 2013 @ 12:00am

The way I have been reading this is that IR replacements can be released/signed to an extension simultaneous to releasing unwanted expiring contracts.

Scenario: I would be able to move two IR replacements back to my minor system (say Nash and Shwartz) which is currently at 19/20 players. To make room I intended to drop someone like Mason.

The second part of this question is: will I be able to hold-over some expiring contracts so that I may extend them? Example: Justin Faulk.

I guess the confusion for me is really about the expiring contracts and how long they can stay on our rosters because I am assuming they don't all dissipate immediately.

The two-day window between contracts expiring and the extension period is just there to allow time to update the projected cap space isn't it?
So IR contracts can always be extended when released doesn't matter the time.

After the extension period the players who were not extended will be released to free agency.

Yes the two days are for me to try and ensure everything is up to date and everyone has released IR contracted players or moved them to the minors.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 08, 2013, 01:52:25 PM

After the extension period the players who were not extended will be released to free agency.

As contracts end on the 28th, can we not release players at this time to make room for movement to our minors?
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 08, 2013, 02:32:53 PM
As contracts end on the 28th, can we not release players at this time to make room for movement to our minors?
Buyouts can happen at any time
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 08, 2013, 02:59:44 PM
Not sure that you are understanding what I am trying to clarify but I included some very specific examples in my original post.

Contracts end on the 28th, therefore I should be able to release (for example) *Chris Mason, $1.1m (2012-13) on the 28th. This would not be a buy-out.

If I have this wrong it could have a large impact on my roster.

Title: Re: Questions
Post by: yahoolando on April 08, 2013, 06:00:14 PM
Can we trade prospective FAs during the Extension Period 2 (April 30th, 2013 @ 12:00am to May 13th, 2013 @ 11:59pm)?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on April 08, 2013, 06:38:26 PM
Can we trade prospective FAs during the Extension Period 2 (April 30th, 2013 @ 12:00am to May 13th, 2013 @ 11:59pm)?
I think we decided in the past to not allow this because it is hard to determine what is a fair trade. Will wait to see what Drew says.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 08, 2013, 08:34:52 PM
I think we decided in the past to not allow this because it is hard to determine what is a fair trade. Will wait to see what Drew says.  :thumbsup:
Yep trading is closed currently and will not be re-opened before the extension deadline passes.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: yahoolando on April 08, 2013, 08:36:17 PM
Yep trading is closed currently and will not be re-opened before the extension deadline passes.

Thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 08, 2013, 09:16:04 PM
Not sure that you are understanding what I am trying to clarify but I included some very specific examples in my original post.

Contracts end on the 28th, therefore I should be able to release (for example) *Chris Mason, $1.1m (2012-13) on the 28th. This would not be a buy-out.

If I have this wrong it could have a large impact on my roster.

Sorry Drew, I'm baffled.   :bump:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 09, 2013, 01:09:02 AM
Not sure that you are understanding what I am trying to clarify but I included some very specific examples in my original post.

Contracts end on the 28th, therefore I should be able to release (for example) *Chris Mason, $1.1m (2012-13) on the 28th. This would not be a buy-out.

If I have this wrong it could have a large impact on my roster.
So as per the rules only IR contracts expire, sorry that the deadlines aren't completely clear on that:
IR Replacements and Contracts End - April 28th, 2013 @ 12:00pm - should state instead IR replacements and IR contracts end

2012-13 contracts expire after the extension period is done. You can buyout these players if you wish but they can't be released free of cost until after that extension period is complete.

Hopefully this clears it up more, sorry for confusion.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 09, 2013, 10:38:46 AM
So as per the rules only IR contracts expire, sorry that the deadlines aren't completely clear on that:
IR Replacements and Contracts End - April 28th, 2013 @ 12:00pm - should state instead IR replacements and IR contracts end

2012-13 contracts expire after the extension period is done. You can buyout these players if you wish but they can't be released free of cost until after that extension period is complete.

Hopefully this clears it up more, sorry for confusion.

Thanks Drew, it clears it up now but I've overloaded my rosters on the wording that "contracts end". I'll look to see if I can buy my way out but I could be in trouble.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 09, 2013, 10:59:35 AM
Thanks Drew, it clears it up now but I've overloaded my rosters on the wording that "contracts end". I'll look to see if I can buy my way out but I could be in trouble.

Looks like I'll be able to make room on the roster numbers but not on cap space. Timmonen will have to get sent down to the Nailers and there's just no way I can make the cap space work. Honestly thought his contract would be over and he'd be released.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 09, 2013, 03:15:45 PM
Looks like I'll be able to make room on the roster numbers but not on cap space. Timmonen will have to get sent down to the Nailers and there's just no way I can make the cap space work. Honestly thought his contract would be over and he'd be released.
2012-13 contracts will have no affect on projected cap space for 2013-14. If you need to create cap space for players and don't have room in your minors, just simply buyout some players that have contracts ending in 2012-13 to try and make the appropriate space.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 09, 2013, 04:29:23 PM
2012-13 contracts will have no affect on projected cap space for 2013-14. If you need to create cap space for players and don't have room in your minors, just simply buyout some players that have contracts ending in 2012-13 to try and make the appropriate space.

I get it but there's no way I'll be able to create $6.3m in cap room for this year. That's what I'm trying to say, I think there'll be a problem.

Regardless, you have explained that the deadlines should be worded more clearly and I appreciate that. We can deal with my predicted problems as they arise.
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 09, 2013, 08:24:05 PM
I get it but there's no way I'll be able to create $6.3m in cap room for this year. That's what I'm trying to say, I think there'll be a problem.

Regardless, you have explained that the deadlines should be worded more clearly and I appreciate that. We can deal with my predicted problems as they arise.
Ya I guess we'll cross that road when we get to it. Might end up in a warning or a cap penalty or something.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 30, 2013, 03:01:38 PM
Will our Prospect Draft take place before or after the June 30th Draft in Jersey?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 30, 2013, 03:59:31 PM
Will our Prospect Draft take place before or after the June 30th Draft in Jersey?
It always takes place after because our auto-picks are respective to where they get drafted in real life.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 30, 2013, 04:43:25 PM
It always takes place after because our auto-picks are respective to where they get drafted in real life.

TY....also wondering when the 2012/13 Buy-outs are removed from our rosters?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 30, 2013, 04:47:56 PM
TY....also wondering when the 2012/13 Buy-outs are removed from our rosters?
All 2012-13 contracts, including buyouts, will be removed after this extension period and we will be rolling over all contracts into the 2013-14 season! Amnesty buyouts will occur right after this period then trading will open once all amnesty buyouts have been accounted for.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on July 28, 2013, 08:26:53 PM
(7/10/13) Sharks general manager Doug Wilson is unsure of Martin Havlat's long-term status with the team. Havlat underwent surgery on his pelvic area at the end of June and will start the season on the long-term injured reserve.

This is a quote I copied and pasted from Fantrax. Now that FA is here...... am I able to put him on IR and free that money to bid on a replacement?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 29, 2013, 03:44:09 PM
When is the waiver free period ?
Waiver free will be a 2 week period that starts 1 week before the season to 1 week into the season.

(7/10/13) Sharks general manager Doug Wilson is unsure of Martin Havlat's long-term status with the team. Havlat underwent surgery on his pelvic area at the end of June and will start the season on the long-term injured reserve.

This is a quote I copied and pasted from Fantrax. Now that FA is here...... am I able to put him on IR and free that money to bid on a replacement?
Unfortunately as per the rules every year, being able to place a player on IR doesn't open until 1 week into the season.
The Sharks will also not be able to place Havlat on IR until the being on the season as well so it will also not be official that he is on IR until then as well.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on September 13, 2013, 02:54:48 PM
 :bump:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on September 19, 2013, 05:18:49 PM
Any idea when rosters are going to be updated?  I have to FA's out there, plus some minor signings and my recent trade.  I'm just curious where I'm at.  Thanks!  :toast:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: thunderblade on September 19, 2013, 05:33:24 PM
Good question, the quietest I ever saw it around here.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: yahoolando on September 19, 2013, 05:36:29 PM
Pretty disappointing for a new guy like me.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on September 19, 2013, 09:07:50 PM
Any idea when rosters are going to be updated?  I have to FA's out there, plus some minor signings and my recent trade.  I'm just curious where I'm at.  Thanks!  :toast:
I'll try and do everything next week on Tuesday afternoon. I still don't have internet at my house because I live in the middle of no where. I have access to internet at the school but that is all really.
Thanks to everyone for being patient though, it has been absolutely brutal for me not keeping this up to date or the standard it should be.
Title: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on September 25, 2013, 03:11:12 PM
Just a reminder drew, I am still playing Columbus 3 straight weeks in a row. Thank you.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on September 25, 2013, 06:47:14 PM
Do Teams have a bye- week this year? I see on fantrax I am not playing in scoring period 3
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on September 25, 2013, 06:53:06 PM
Just a reminder drew, I am still playing Columbus 3 straight weeks in a row. Thank you.
Do Teams have a bye- week this year? I see on fantrax I am not playing in scoring period 3
Thanks for the reminder, no I have to insert the schedule still because I believe the first time I did it, it did not save. Will be doing this tomorrow so we are ready for the season starting on Tuesday!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on September 26, 2013, 12:35:38 AM
Thanks for the reminder, no I have to insert the schedule still because I believe the first time I did it, it did not save. Will be doing this tomorrow so we are ready for the season starting on Tuesday!

Roger that Chief
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on September 28, 2013, 03:18:27 PM
Are the team headers coming back on main page makes it easier to look at teams rosters
Title: Re: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on September 28, 2013, 03:20:53 PM
Are the team headers coming back on main page makes it easier to look at teams rosters
They should be, I'll post a help desk ticket tomorrow.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: BlueJaysTO on October 25, 2013, 02:04:04 PM
Wha is the difference between the AHL roster and the junior roster?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on October 25, 2013, 02:13:46 PM
Wha is the difference between the AHL roster and the junior roster?

No real difference other than the fact the AHL roster players are all under contract.
Title: Questions
Post by: Drew on November 02, 2013, 03:19:09 PM
No real difference other than the fact the AHL roster players are all under contract.
Exactly you can also change your minor leagues if you wish ( Toronto that is can).
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tyler on January 17, 2014, 11:33:36 AM
Just wanna be clear on removing Minor [layers. as example I have someone like Bob Sanguennetti in my minors on last yr of contract. If I want to release him what are my options?

If it's a buy out where does the penalty hit, my minor cap or major cap?

Sorry just not 100% sure here1
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 17, 2014, 03:05:48 PM
Just wanna be clear on removing Minor [layers. as example I have someone like Bob Sanguennetti in my minors on last yr of contract. If I want to release him what are my options?

If it's a buy out where does the penalty hit, my minor cap or major cap?

Sorry just not 100% sure here1
Buying someone out in your minors would affect your major league cap and be placed in the buyout section of the roster.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on January 24, 2014, 07:05:02 PM
Looked around, but couldn't find the answer.  If someone could help that would be great!  :toast:

Can bought out players be traded?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 24, 2014, 08:51:05 PM
Looked around, but couldn't find the answer.  If someone could help that would be great!  :toast:

Can bought out players be traded?

Players that have been bought out are no longer under contract and thus cannot be traded. They are free agents.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jesse on January 24, 2014, 11:10:09 PM
Players that have been bought out are no longer under contract and thus cannot be traded. They are free agents.
It would be sweet if we could
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on January 25, 2014, 09:42:45 AM
Players that have been bought out are no longer under contract and thus cannot be traded. They are free agents.

Thank you sir!  That's what I figured
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 26, 2014, 10:18:16 PM
When do the playoffs start?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 26, 2014, 11:22:56 PM
When do the playoffs start?
Would have to look at the fantrax schedule but should be the last 4 weeks of season
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 26, 2014, 11:32:25 PM
My Fantrax schedule is only showing two more match-ups....probably not looking in the right place as I'm just trying to use the drop-down in live scoring and it's a bit sticky. Anyhow....no idea when they start.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 27, 2014, 12:09:01 AM
My Fantrax schedule is only showing two more match-ups....probably not looking in the right place as I'm just trying to use the drop-down in live scoring and it's a bit sticky. Anyhow....no idea when they start.
Should be at least three match ups left. Olympics make us loss two match ups as they aren't full weeks.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on January 27, 2014, 12:20:12 AM
I count 5 more match ups, excluding the two break weeks. So I am assuming play offs start in 7 weeks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 27, 2014, 03:03:39 PM
I count 5 more match ups, excluding the two break weeks. So I am assuming play offs start in 7 weeks
Playoffs start March 22 or week 24. Week 19 and 20 have no matchups because of the Olympics. We are currently in week 17 so there should be 5 matchups remaining until playoffs.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on January 29, 2014, 07:17:41 PM
Quick question??  If a player is currently on a two-way and is signed to an extension that is a one-way.  Is the two-way still valid until the end of the season?



Thanks,
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 29, 2014, 10:13:53 PM
Quick question??  If a player is currently on a two-way and is signed to an extension that is a one-way.  Is the two-way still valid until the end of the season?



Thanks,
Yes the two way is honoured until that contract expires.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Gilly on February 04, 2014, 04:44:54 PM
We allowed to take someone already bought out that's over 2 years and make it one year after the fact?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 04, 2014, 05:01:51 PM
We allowed to take someone already bought out that's over 2 years and make it one year after the fact?
Not after it has been processed.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 04, 2014, 10:45:04 PM
Quote
Posted in the rules, will take affect at the roll-over stage but will not result in a penalty until the first scoring period. Also this is for active goalies so a goalie can be used as an IR replacement.

Does this mean we can exceed 3 active goalies by calling up a 4th goalie as an IR replacement for a defender or forward? Or does it mean that we can call up a goalie as an IR replacement in the case of a goalie injury?

The question opens up an old idea of only being able to fill IR positions with the same classification of player. The idea was shot down but maybe we should stipulate that a goalie can only sub-in in place of another goal tender that is out of action due to injury, thereby maintaining the rule of a maximum of 3 active goalies on the roster at any given time.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on February 05, 2014, 12:00:32 AM
Does this mean we can exceed 3 active goalies by calling up a 4th goalie as an IR replacement for a defender or forward? Or does it mean that we can call up a goalie as an IR replacement in the case of a goalie injury?

The question opens up an old idea of only being able to fill IR positions with the same classification of player. The idea was shot down but maybe we should stipulate that a goalie can only sub-in in place of another goal tender that is out of action due to injury, thereby maintaining the rule of a maximum of 3 active goalies on the roster at any given time.

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 05, 2014, 06:32:30 PM
Does this mean we can exceed 3 active goalies by calling up a 4th goalie as an IR replacement for a defender or forward? Or does it mean that we can call up a goalie as an IR replacement in the case of a goalie injury?

The question opens up an old idea of only being able to fill IR positions with the same classification of player. The idea was shot down but maybe we should stipulate that a goalie can only sub-in in place of another goal tender that is out of action due to injury, thereby maintaining the rule of a maximum of 3 active goalies on the roster at any given time.
I believe I asked this in the rules discussion and there wasn't really discussion around this, currently the rules state 4 active goalies on the roster so if you have a player on IR he is not "active" so you can call up goalie to replace him as long as you don't exceed 4 active goalies. But the way this was, I believe Walt stated is that if the goalie is being brought will most likely not be as good as the player they are replacing. But we can open this back up for discussion as well.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 05, 2014, 07:54:22 PM
Don't think we need further discussion as long as it is clear in the new wording that we will have a maximum of 3 playable goalies at any given time.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 06, 2014, 04:37:01 AM
I believe I asked this in the rules discussion and there wasn't really discussion around this, currently the rules state 4 active goalies on the roster so if you have a player on IR he is not "active" so you can call up goalie to replace him as long as you don't exceed 4 active goalies. But the way this was, I believe Walt stated is that if the goalie is being brought will most likely not be as good as the player they are replacing. But we can open this back up for discussion as well.

I don't remember saying anything like that. But I do remember mentioning that we should define an active player and an inactive player in the rules so this confusion does not come up. To me, a player on IR should not be considered active. Which is why the rules should say "3 active goalies per team".
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on February 06, 2014, 09:33:41 AM
I don't remember saying anything like that. But I do remember mentioning that we should define an active player and an inactive player in the rules so this confusion does not come up. To me, a player on IR should not be considered active. Which is why the rules should say "3 active goalies per team".

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 07, 2014, 02:27:29 PM
Put this up for vote as it is a simple yes or no.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 22, 2014, 10:43:32 PM
Missing a Olympic break power ranking   :beer:

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 22, 2014, 11:33:34 PM
Missing a Olympic break power ranking   :beer:

Oh, that's easy! It's :CHI-NHL: followed by everyone else.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 24, 2014, 04:00:31 PM
How about a post-olympics rankings, which takes into perspective injuries! Haha, also I'll try to get all the rosters updated today!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on March 04, 2014, 07:18:57 PM
Should we not set a time during the day that transactions need to be posted by for them to be processed for that night's games?

I posted about Pekka Rinne tonight, but Tony told me it was too late to process for tonight.  I'm fine with that.  I don't expect Drew or Tony to be on every night to check on transactions to be processed for that night, but shouldn't we have a daily deadline?

I don't really think it's fair if someone posts a transaction one day at 3 PM and it gets processed, and the next day another team posts at 3 PM, and it doesn't get processed in time.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 04, 2014, 07:49:42 PM
Should we not set a time during the day that transactions need to be posted by for them to be processed for that night's games?

I posted about Pekka Rinne tonight, but Tony told me it was too late to process for tonight.  I'm fine with that.  I don't expect Drew or Tony to be on every night to check on transactions to be processed for that night, but shouldn't we have a daily deadline?

I don't really think it's fair if someone posts a transaction one day at 3 PM and it gets processed, and the next day another team posts at 3 PM, and it doesn't get processed in time.
I think this is a good idea to ensure fairness. I say a cut off of noon each day would be a fair time for everyone but really this shouldn't happen to often but can happen.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 04, 2014, 09:09:21 PM
Should we not set a time during the day that transactions need to be posted by for them to be processed for that night's games?

I posted about Pekka Rinne tonight, but Tony told me it was too late to process for tonight.  I'm fine with that.  I don't expect Drew or Tony to be on every night to check on transactions to be processed for that night, but shouldn't we have a daily deadline?

I don't really think it's fair if someone posts a transaction one day at 3 PM and it gets processed, and the next day another team posts at 3 PM, and it doesn't get processed in time.
I think they should all be done once a week.  Maybe every Friday night before the new week begins?  Thoughts?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on March 04, 2014, 09:13:16 PM
Again, I don't want anyone to think I am whining...I just think there should be a time (whether it's weekly or daily at noon) to ensure the fairness to all owners.  I would lean towards daily at noon, but then we would have to think about weekend games that start at 1 PM. 

I would be fine with weekly as long as it is the same for everyone.  I actually like weekly lineups, but I know that isn't going to happen.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 04, 2014, 09:24:40 PM
While Drew was out, tony would normally get transactions done after the days games were complete. I like that time frame personally.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on March 04, 2014, 09:44:05 PM
While Drew was out, tony would normally get transactions done after the days games were complete. I like that time frame personally.

Yeah but my whole point is that we should have a daily time that the transaction needs to be posted by so that it's a level playing field.  It's not fair to owners that one day a transaction gets processed, and the next day, a transaction posted at the same time of the day doesn't get done for that night's games.  Drew and Tony aren't on every night at the same time, and they shouldn't have to be.  I'm just saying that we need to set a daily deadline on when they need to be posted by so that we can ensure fairness to the entire league.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on March 04, 2014, 10:12:11 PM
Yeah but my whole point is that we should have a daily time that the transaction needs to be posted by so that it's a level playing field.  It's not fair to owners that one day a transaction gets processed, and the next day, a transaction posted at the same time of the day doesn't get done for that night's games.  Drew and Tony aren't on every night at the same time, and they shouldn't have to be.  I'm just saying that we need to set a daily deadline on when they need to be posted by so that we can ensure fairness to the entire league.

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 04, 2014, 11:43:46 PM
I think a daily time to be processed on fantrax is fair. Just ensures everyone is on the same page and there doesn't happen to be one thing happening one day and one another day.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on March 05, 2014, 12:36:38 AM
I think a daily time to be processed on fantrax is fair. Just ensures everyone is on the same page and there doesn't happen to be one thing happening one day and one another day.

I say it should be after all games on the day are completed. This will work better for you guys cause of being on the west coast.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on March 05, 2014, 08:50:06 AM
I say it should be after all games on the day are completed. This will work better for you guys cause of being on the west coast.

I understand what you are saying, but I think we still need to set a time.  Maybe 7 PM for the next night...or maybe midnight for the next night.  I kind of like midnight for the next night.  I know Tony is on late most nights, and then it gives Drew and Tony around 19 hours on a normal day to process.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on March 05, 2014, 10:23:16 AM
Personally I don't expect daily processing. Sometimes it goes quick, other times we wait a bit. At no time have I ever felt it unfair.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 05, 2014, 10:56:11 AM
Personally I don't expect daily processing. Sometimes it goes quick, other times we wait a bit. At no time have I ever felt it unfair.
This is just on fantrax and I am sure tony and me can handle ensuring that each day by a certain time the transactions are done on fantrax.
Also it rarely happens that someone posts in the morning to get a player into their lineup for the night games.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on March 09, 2014, 09:48:47 PM
For a player that is eligible, is there any extra cost to signing a player to a two-way contract?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 10, 2014, 02:22:48 PM
For a player that is eligible, is there any extra cost to signing a player to a two-way contract?
In free agency it is an extra 500k but for players in your minors there is no extra cost other than their draft value cost.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on April 23, 2014, 04:29:59 AM
Is there going to be any trading before the draft?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tyler on April 23, 2014, 12:24:29 PM
When can players be called up rom Minors?

I have a few guys with the * because they were 2 way players given the 1 way contract... do they get called up now or would they have to clear waivers?

Just was going to do my call ups/send downs to make sure all the cap was level before FA etc.

Thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 23, 2014, 03:27:58 PM
When can players be called up rom Minors?

I have a few guys with the * because they were 2 way players given the 1 way contract... do they get called up now or would they have to clear waivers?

Just was going to do my call ups/send downs to make sure all the cap was level before FA etc.

Thanks
They can be called up if they were on 2 ways this season as we are still on the 2013-14 season schedule. If they have a * beside their name and it was there in the 2013-14 season then they can only be called up at the waiver free period. If they had a * beside their name they can also not be re-signed.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Gilly on April 23, 2014, 05:05:12 PM
So anyone without a * if they are eligible for a two way can be given a two way now and be called up?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jwalk100 on April 23, 2014, 09:17:34 PM
When do our players w/o contracts come off the roster?

I would like to make moves after they are off the roster.

Thanks.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 23, 2014, 10:36:38 PM
When do our players w/o contracts come off the roster?

I would like to make moves after they are off the roster.

Thanks.
You can release them at any time during this period.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on April 23, 2014, 11:22:14 PM
Is there going to be any trading before the draft?
:bump:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 24, 2014, 01:31:53 AM
:bump:
Of course I am thinking about opening up trading on June 1st. Obviously up for discussion.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on April 24, 2014, 01:47:50 AM
Of course I am thinking about opening up trading on June 1st. Obviously up for discussion.
OK.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 24, 2014, 11:42:25 AM
So anyone without a * if they are eligible for a two way can be given a two way now and be called up?
Yep as well as players that were on 2 ways for this season can be called up even if they have a * by the name now.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 26, 2014, 02:46:41 PM
Will we have a Waiver Free Period before Free Agency opens next season? (ie. Free up AND down movement)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 26, 2014, 11:24:18 PM
Will we have a Waiver Free Period before Free Agency opens next season? (ie. Free up AND down movement)
Yep
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 29, 2014, 07:06:38 PM
I'd like to sign Niklas Svedberg to a 3 year (2-way) contract through 2016-17 at $0.2m per.....is this possible? IE. is there a window after the current 2013-14 season but before the new $0.5m minimum kicks in?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 29, 2014, 07:19:55 PM
I'd like to sign Niklas Svedberg to a 3 year (2-way) contract through 2016-17 at $0.2m per.....is this possible? IE. is there a window after the current 2013-14 season but before the new $0.5m minimum kicks in?
If he is signed now he will still be under contract for 2014-15, 2015-16 and 2016-17 as for all contracts given in this period are for the next season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 29, 2014, 07:49:37 PM
Where is the cut-off so that if I sign a 3-year it will run through 2018? Jan. 1st?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 29, 2014, 11:58:06 PM
Where is the cut-off so that if I sign a 3-year it will run through 2018? Jan. 1st?
The next season at this time. Any prospect signed during the season, will have their contract start in that season. This part of the season is the exception as no games will be played on the new contract.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on May 09, 2014, 10:38:29 AM
When will trades open?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 10, 2014, 11:48:16 AM
When will trades open?
I currently have trading opening on June 1st so that we can enjoy the actual NHL playoffs!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on June 15, 2014, 11:57:44 PM
Rules Handbook link in the header is broken.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 16, 2014, 02:50:52 AM
Rules Handbook link in the header is broken.
Thanks will have fixed when realignment is figured
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on July 06, 2014, 07:51:22 PM
What kind of a schedule we going to do? Want me to do it again?

Last year we did two games against divisional opponents and one against everyone else for a 22 game schedule.


Thoughts? 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 06, 2014, 08:16:01 PM
What kind of a schedule we going to do? Want me to do it again?

Last year we did two games against divisional opponents and one against everyone else for a 22 game schedule.


Thoughts?
For sure, if you have that master copy all you have do to is then switch the divisions around. Matchups like that sound good to me.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jwalk100 on July 06, 2014, 09:01:07 PM
What kind of a schedule we going to do? Want me to do it again?

Last year we did two games against divisional opponents and one against everyone else for a 22 game schedule.


Thoughts?

 :iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on July 06, 2014, 09:06:53 PM
What kind of a schedule we going to do? Want me to do it again?

Last year we did two games against divisional opponents and one against everyone else for a 22 game schedule.


Thoughts?

 :winner:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on July 06, 2014, 10:31:51 PM
Can you make it so I don't have to play....... Chi, Ana, St.Louis, or Philly??   :rofl: :rofl: :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on July 23, 2014, 12:08:47 AM
Just wondering when free agents are open? I'll be on holidays from aug 9-23 and won't have any acces to a comp or cell service
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 23, 2014, 04:04:41 AM
Just wondering when free agents are open? I'll be on holidays from aug 9-23 and won't have any acces to a comp or cell service
With only 4 picks left in the draft, it is likely that the draft could be over by tomorrow. You therefore 1 week after the draft would put us at a date of July 30th for the first day of free agency.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on July 23, 2014, 08:07:03 PM
So in that case if I am gone is it allowed for someone else to do my bidding for me? While I'm away?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 23, 2014, 09:25:57 PM
So in that case if I am gone is it allowed for someone else to do my bidding for me? While I'm away?
Yep, if you want I can bid for you since my roster isn't allowing me to be very active in free agency right now.
But you should have a good week of bidding before you'll go inactive.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Gilly on July 23, 2014, 10:47:15 PM
When is waivers open?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 23, 2014, 10:51:14 PM
When is waivers open?
1 week after free agency is open. So therefore July 6th is when waivers will open.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Gilly on July 27, 2014, 06:53:05 PM
Can we move draft picks for next season now? I want to acquire a few and have some trade offers ready to post to get some .
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 27, 2014, 11:35:17 PM
Can we move draft picks for next season now? I want to acquire a few and have some trade offers ready to post to get some .
Yes you can now move 2015 picks.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: ursanator on November 22, 2014, 03:28:25 PM
I have tried on numerous occasions to change line up with no luck
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on November 22, 2014, 03:36:06 PM
I have tried on numerous occasions to change line up with no luck
What exactly is issue? Are you setting on a phone?

Maybe try change to easy click method if not already there. It is at the bottom of the lineup page. You could be in drag and drop which is difficult on a phone to use.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on November 27, 2014, 09:15:41 AM
When will Extension Period 1 Begin ?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on November 27, 2014, 04:19:53 PM
When will Extension Period 1 Begin ?
I'll have to check but usually it is in February and I will try place it where the all-star weekend is, so there is a bit of stability in the rankings.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 05, 2014, 07:37:43 AM
I'll have to check but usually it is in February and I will try place it where the all-star weekend is, so there is a bit of stability in the rankings.
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 05, 2014, 07:39:14 AM
I see the Backyard Finals is two weeks long now. Is that going to happen or done by accident?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on December 05, 2014, 01:47:04 PM
I see the Backyard Finals is two weeks long now. Is that going to happen or done by accident?
I believe that is how we have done it in the past. But we can have discussion around it.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 08, 2014, 05:05:39 AM
I believe that is how we have done it in the past. But we can have discussion around it.
I don't think we did a full two weeks.  I guess we could discuss it and see what everybody thinks.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on December 08, 2014, 05:17:49 AM
I always remember it being two weeks and it does make a huge difference because those last couple of games, the back up goalies usually play and that helped seal the deal. Although I think it makes things exciting tom have the final in two weeks.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 08, 2014, 06:35:05 AM
I always remember it being two weeks and it does make a huge difference because those last couple of games, the back up goalies usually play and that helped seal the deal. Although I think it makes things exciting tom have the final in two weeks.
Last year was 9 days and the year before was 8.


Anybody else have thoughts on this?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on December 08, 2014, 01:04:41 PM
Last year was 9 days and the year before was 8.


Anybody else have thoughts on this?
Hum. They are always merged the last two weeks but I guess this year it just feel right that it ends up being 13 days.

We can either stay merged or go just 1 week?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on December 08, 2014, 03:54:55 PM
Hum. They are always merged the last two weeks but I guess this year it just feel right that it ends up being 13 days.

We can either stay merged or go just 1 week?

 I like one week. That's 7 days.........makes it feel like a 7 game series. Just like the playoffs are. Just my opinion
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tyler on December 18, 2014, 11:53:50 AM
Do we have another Waiver Free period, or is it done for the year?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on December 18, 2014, 12:13:30 PM
Do we have another Waiver Free period, or is it done for the year?

See what Drew says but I believe it is just the one per year.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tyler on December 18, 2014, 12:45:01 PM
See what Drew says but I believe it is just the one per year.

I think so as well, but couldn't remember lol
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on December 19, 2014, 01:03:12 AM
I think so as well, but couldn't remember lol
Only 1 time at start if year.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 30, 2014, 08:03:00 AM
I see the Backyard Finals is two weeks long now. Is that going to happen or done by accident?
:bump: So whats going to be the final decision on this?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 02, 2015, 12:39:13 PM
:bump: So whats going to be the final decision on this?
I'll post as a question.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 23, 2015, 12:15:32 AM
What is the last day we can post roster moves? April 10th?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: ursanator on January 25, 2015, 05:28:50 PM
Being new to league for extensions can you do them during off season before next season? The only advantage I can see doing it now is if you figure player will rank higher this year and is right now around the same ranking. Next Subban is on his last year of contract and he is 17th right now and 4th year before so it would be  $6.0 million per with max of 3 years could you raise it to $6.5 million so you could sign him for 4 years?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 25, 2015, 08:52:39 PM
Being new to league for extensions can you do them during off season before next season? The only advantage I can see doing it now is if you figure player will rank higher this year and is right now around the same ranking. Next Subban is on his last year of contract and he is 17th right now and 4th year before so it would be  $6.0 million per with max of 3 years could you raise it to $6.5 million so you could sign him for 4 years?
Yep you can always choose to up the dollar value to give more years. There is another extension period that lasts 2 weeks after the season is done.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 25, 2015, 09:57:09 PM
What is the last day we can post roster moves? April 10th?
:bump:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 26, 2015, 01:20:32 AM
:bump:
Sorry. What do you mean roster moves? Each section closes at a different date.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 26, 2015, 10:17:52 AM
Sorry. What do you mean roster moves? Each section closes at a different date.

Up and down movement for players on two-way contracts.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 26, 2015, 11:59:40 AM
Up and down movement for players on two-way contracts.
They are allowed to move up and down freely as you wish and don't close. The official change over of contracts is May 2nd, so any player that is on a 2 way contract for this season and will get a 1 way contract next season will get their new contract then.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Eric on February 04, 2015, 09:40:02 AM
Alright here is my first question LOL

I wanna resign Yakupov, whom is 3m. Now when I resign him does his contract have to be a minimum of 3m?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 04, 2015, 11:33:45 AM
Alright here is my first question LOL

I wanna resign Yakupov, whom is 3m. Now when I resign him does his contract have to be a minimum of 3m?

No, it is 100% based on his ranking for the current season and the last. Whichever is higher and at the position he is highest at (in the case of multi-position eligibility).
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Eric on February 04, 2015, 12:58:19 PM
Cool thanks Slack
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on March 08, 2015, 09:07:20 PM
I've read that next years cap could bump to $70-$71m but that it could actually drop to $68m depending on an NHLPA vote re: a wage escalator clause. Do we already have a projected cap in place for next season and if so where is it posted? If not, when will it be determined?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 15, 2015, 12:42:06 PM
I've read that next years cap could bump to $70-$71m but that it could actually drop to $68m depending on an NHLPA vote re: a wage escalator clause. Do we already have a projected cap in place for next season and if so where is it posted? If not, when will it be determined?
Ya I should really post it in the cap space section of the rules. I have updated rosters to reflect it in the "projected cap space section". It is $73.0m I believe is where I set it. Our cap will follow the actual NHL cap though if it goes up or down.

Edited, I did set to $73.0m here for proected:
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=194600.0
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on March 29, 2015, 05:41:40 PM
How long before games start are the rosters locked on Fantrax?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jwalk100 on March 29, 2015, 05:55:51 PM
How long before games start are the rosters locked on Fantrax?

Lineups
Lineup Change System: Owners enter lineup changes
Lineup changes are executed: Daily
Lineup Changes are locked 0:01 (hours:minutes) Set amount of time before 1st game of the day

This was on Fantrax
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on March 29, 2015, 06:39:13 PM
Lineups
Lineup Change System: Owners enter lineup changes
Lineup changes are executed: Daily
Lineup Changes are locked 0:01 (hours:minutes) Set amount of time before 1st game of the day

This was on Fantrax
Yeah....I thought we could change right up until puck-drop. Tried to swap Luongo out for Svedberg with 25 min grace today (from my PC) but it wouldn't let me. No big deal but has me a little confused.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 31, 2015, 01:28:05 AM
Yeah....I thought we could change right up until puck-drop. Tried to swap Luongo out for Svedberg with 25 min grace today (from my PC) but it wouldn't let me. No big deal but has me a little confused.
Yes the lineups lock 1 minute before the start of the first game of the day.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 10, 2015, 08:15:57 PM
Does the award (10% signing reduction) for winning your Division expire? Do we have to use it right away or can I hang on to it for a couple years?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on April 10, 2015, 10:14:41 PM
Does the award (10% signing reduction) for winning your Division expire? Do we have to use it right away or can I hang on to it for a couple years?

You have to use it the very next season. So the discounts you won this season (10% for division and 10% for 2nd) have to be used in 2015-16.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on April 13, 2015, 12:24:03 AM
When is the next extension??? :toth:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 13, 2015, 12:27:48 AM
18th
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on April 13, 2015, 12:29:59 AM
18th

That was quick...........Thanks Slack. What are you doing..........stalking me???..........hahahha
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 17, 2015, 05:51:25 PM
I see our projected cap for next season is $73m. Does anyone know when the number is finalized? (Are we following the NHL exactly on this?)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 18, 2015, 02:03:48 AM
I see our projected cap for next season is $73m. Does anyone know when the number is finalized? (Are we following the NHL exactly on this?)

Also:

I don't understand where we are at with the FA's right now, regardless of the vote (the results of which won't be in effect for another year). So....will all current FA's that go unsigned through Extension #2 just be released to free-agency or was there a window last year to deal them? I can't remember. 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on April 18, 2015, 08:14:34 AM
Also:

I don't understand where we are at with the FA's right now, regardless of the vote (the results of which won't be in effect for another year). So....will all current FA's that go unsigned through Extension #2 just be released to free-agency or was there a window last year to deal them? I can't remember.

The window was last years trade deadline. Trading will not open again until after extension #2, thus all unsigned players will be released to free agency.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 18, 2015, 10:35:44 AM
The window was last years trade deadline. Trading will not open again until after extension #2, thus all unsigned players will be released to free agency.

Thanks Favo, that's what I thought.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 19, 2015, 04:31:34 PM
I see our projected cap for next season is $73m. Does anyone know when the number is finalized? (Are we following the NHL exactly on this?)
That is our cap for next season now. It becomes fixed at the first extension period.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on April 19, 2015, 10:48:38 PM
so I got a q and cant remember if I got a answer but a two way player that 2014-15 was his last year what resigning contract do I go by his extention value or his draft value? ie Zach dalpe and Stephan da costa?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 19, 2015, 11:06:03 PM
so I got a q and cant remember if I got a answer but a two way player that 2014-15 was his last year what resigning contract do I go by his extention value or his draft value? ie Zach dalpe and Stephan da costa?
Purely just their extension values. Draft value is only for drafted players with no contract (N/C).
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on May 19, 2015, 02:05:42 PM
Hey Drew, are you opening trading June 1st same as last year?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 19, 2015, 11:58:38 PM
Hey Drew, are you opening trading June 1st same as last year?
Yep it will be open then!  :winner:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on June 23, 2015, 09:24:44 AM
Where is the rest of the :TC: at?  I know it's the offseason, but some of these deals have been sitting a while.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 27, 2015, 12:37:36 PM
Where is the rest of the :TC: at?  I know it's the offseason, but some of these deals have been sitting a while.
Added izaman3 to the TC
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on July 05, 2015, 11:26:36 AM
When is FA open?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 05, 2015, 11:49:44 AM
When is FA open?
It will open approximately a week after the draft is done.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on July 18, 2015, 05:05:32 PM
I was just reading that the NHL cap next year will be 71.4m and not the 73m we were anticipating.  Is this correct?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 19, 2015, 02:16:43 AM
I was just reading that the NHL cap next year will be 71.4m and not the 73m we were anticipating.  Is this correct?
Yep it is lower but we still stick with that confirmed projected amount just so we have real numbers to think about during extension period.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on July 22, 2015, 09:18:41 PM
Where are we at with the Header?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on July 24, 2015, 07:30:54 PM
Just a couple of things...

1. Have minor league rosters been updated recently?  I know the entry draft picks aren't on there yet, but it seems like my roster size count and salary room are way off.

2. Are we still able to move two-way players back and forth from NHL to AHL and vise versa without waivers in the off-season?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 26, 2015, 05:54:30 PM
Where are we at with the Header?
It is in the forum administration hands. Corey will get back to me sometime with a solution but right now there is an internal error since Backyard is one of the eldest leagues that was brought over from the original system. One possible solution would be complete new boards which would happen to reset our visitor numbers to Backyard so not ideal.

Just a couple of things...

1. Have minor league rosters been updated recently?  I know the entry draft picks aren't on there yet, but it seems like my roster size count and salary room are way off.

2. Are we still able to move two-way players back and forth from NHL to AHL and vise versa without waivers in the off-season?
1. I will be updating minor rosters today as much as I can with the draft picks and making sure all games played are correct. If you see an error in cap and roster size, just let me know so I can do a reevaluation!

2. Yes, two way players can be moved back and forth at anytime and don't need waivers to be open.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: jlapo11 on August 14, 2015, 03:52:34 PM
Is this rule still valid? if yes can I put Viktor Fasth, $1.2m (2016-17) on it or it must be a buyout?

D) Claimable Waivers
Players with more than 1 year left on their contract can be put on claimable waivers. Claimable waivers will last 24 hours and can only be done twice a year per team.

Same question for the Amnesty Buyout? Is this still in place?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 14, 2015, 08:09:02 PM
Is this rule still valid? if yes can I put Viktor Fasth, $1.2m (2016-17) on it or it must be a buyout?

D) Claimable Waivers
Players with more than 1 year left on their contract can be put on claimable waivers. Claimable waivers will last 24 hours and can only be done twice a year per team.

Same question for the Amnesty Buyout? Is this still in place?
Claimable waivers are still valid and can be used.

There is no more Amnesty buyouts that was only for the beginning of the 2014-15.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on August 15, 2015, 03:39:07 PM
Does anybody know when Fantrax updates position eligibility or does it just happen as the season progresses?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jwalk100 on August 15, 2015, 03:43:36 PM
Does anybody know when Fantrax updates position eligibility or does it just happen as the season progresses?

Go to Commissioner --> All Options --> Player Position Eligibility. In that screen you will be able to choose any player in your league and select which positions you want that player to be eligible at. Any position(s) selected will override that player's current eligible position(s), and will be effective from the start of your season (Period #1).

It seems the commish can do this.

Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on August 15, 2015, 03:46:25 PM
Go to Commissioner --> All Options --> Player Position Eligibility. In that screen you will be able to choose any player in your league and select which positions you want that player to be eligible at. Any position(s) selected will override that player's current eligible position(s), and will be effective from the start of your season (Period #1).

It seems the commish can do this.
Um....yeah, but we never have. No reason to ask Drew to do it on a case by case either. Interesting though.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jwalk100 on August 15, 2015, 03:51:00 PM
Um....yeah, but we never have. No reason to ask Drew to do it on a case by case either. Interesting though.

There were some other options. The commish can set it up to do it automatically when a player reaches the threshold.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on August 15, 2015, 03:55:28 PM
There were some other options. The commish can set it up to do it automatically when a player reaches the threshold.
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 18, 2015, 01:33:00 PM
Does anybody know when Fantrax updates position eligibility or does it just happen as the season progresses?
I think they reupdate at the start of the season. Usually we just wait.

Also sorry for not updating lately, been very busy getting First and Goal off the ground.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on September 30, 2015, 10:36:00 AM
Its probably a stupid question but Im gonna ask anyway, Waiver Free period is when I can send down(as long as last year of contract) and up right

Just want to make sure
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on September 30, 2015, 10:38:21 AM
Its probably a stupid question but Im gonna ask anyway, Waiver Free period is when I can send down(as long as last year of contract) and up right

Just want to make sure

I just PM'd Drew with the same question.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on September 30, 2015, 10:57:20 AM
I just PM'd Drew with the same question.

Yes. Players in the final year of their contract are not subject to claim during this period.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: jlapo11 on October 14, 2015, 01:34:53 PM
For an IR replacement do we have to start the bid at 50% of his NHL salary or any bid could do the job?

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on October 14, 2015, 02:05:09 PM
For an IR replacement do we have to start the bid at 50% of his NHL salary or any bid could do the job?

 :thumbsup:
50% as with any free agent.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on October 16, 2015, 10:10:25 AM
Question about Fantrax:  On the team page there's some default stat views that I would like to change on my end if possible.  I'd love for it to default to Year to Date stats for NHL while it currently defaults to Scoring period for the points scored for the fantasy team.  Is this a league setting or is there a way for me to change my defaults.  I believe there used to be options to change this but I can't find them anywhere.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on October 16, 2015, 10:12:44 AM
Question about Fantrax:  On the team page there's some default stat views that I would like to change on my end if possible.  I'd love for it to default to Year to Date stats for NHL while it currently defaults to Scoring period for the points scored for the fantasy team.  Is this a league setting or is there a way for me to change my defaults.  I believe there used to be options to change this but I can't find them anywhere.

Nevermind, I found the settings  :beer:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on November 17, 2015, 02:26:53 PM
question about claimable waivers - if the players remains unclaimed after 24 hours do they go to back to the major or are they sent down to the minors?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on November 17, 2015, 04:51:18 PM
They move from the main roster to the minor league if they are eligible. (ie. last year of contract, with sufficient cap space in the minors)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on November 17, 2015, 08:30:36 PM
They move from the main roster to the minor league if they are eligible. (ie. last year of contract, with sufficient cap space in the minors)

Thanks Slack I get the gist of that part but here is the rule that I wanted some clarity, the part in bold. Major or Minor

D) Claimable Waivers
Players with more than 1 year left on their contract can be put on claimable waivers. Claimable waivers will last 24 hours and can only be done twice a year per team. If a player is claimed by a team, the team takes on their full contract and salary. If the player is unclaimed they return to their team at same contract and salary. Transactions will occur in the Waivers folder and topic should look as follows:
Sidney Crosby - Claimable Waiver
- please also change the message icon to reflect the team putting the player on claimable waivers
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on November 17, 2015, 08:59:08 PM
Quote
D) Claimable Waivers
Players with more than 1 year left on their contract can be put on claimable waivers. Claimable waivers will last 24 hours and can only be done twice a year per team

Sorry, this is not the same as regular Waivers....can only be done at certain times of year according to the Deadlines.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on November 18, 2015, 01:05:48 PM
Thanks Slack I get the gist of that part but here is the rule that I wanted some clarity, the part in bold. Major or Minor

D) Claimable Waivers
Players with more than 1 year left on their contract can be put on claimable waivers. Claimable waivers will last 24 hours and can only be done twice a year per team. If a player is claimed by a team, the team takes on their full contract and salary. If the player is unclaimed they return to their team at same contract and salary. Transactions will occur in the Waivers folder and topic should look as follows:
Sidney Crosby - Claimable Waiver
- please also change the message icon to reflect the team putting the player on claimable waivers
Yes this is correct and what Slack has said. Although if you place a player on waviers in the last year of their contract they do not need to be stated as a claimable waiver because essentially they already are and you are just "wasting" a claimable waiver. Normal waivers they will be sent down to the minors. Claimable they are returned to your team.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on November 19, 2015, 04:08:01 PM
Yes this is correct and what Slack has said. Although if you place a player on waviers in the last year of their contract they do not need to be stated as a claimable waiver because essentially they already are and you are just "wasting" a claimable waiver. Normal waivers they will be sent down to the minors. Claimable they are returned to your team.

Sounds good is their any timeline when the claimable waiver can posted, or could I post it now?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on November 20, 2015, 12:13:34 AM
Sounds good is their any timeline when the claimable waiver can posted, or could I post it now?

I believe claimable waivers can be posted as long as regular waivers are open; thus, you can post it now if you want.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on November 20, 2015, 02:30:40 PM
I believe claimable waivers can be posted as long as regular waivers are open; thus, you can post it now if you want.

Great thanks guys
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on November 29, 2015, 10:45:46 AM
Morning all which site do we use for contracts? Just want to be on same page

Thanks :toast:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on November 29, 2015, 11:28:12 AM
Morning all which site do we use for contracts? Just want to be on same page

Thanks :toast:
This one. http://www.hockeybuzz.com/cap-central/index.php
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on November 29, 2015, 01:20:40 PM
Morning all which site do we use for contracts? Just want to be on same page

Thanks :toast:

Hockey Buzz............they have a Cap Central Heading
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on November 30, 2015, 11:18:23 AM
Hockey Buzz............they have a Cap Central Heading
Yep!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: norrya66 on November 30, 2015, 01:34:08 PM
Any way we can get the header updated? It's getting pretty hard to find teams when their profile has one team and our header doesn't match up. And the Rules link is broke as well
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on November 30, 2015, 03:03:21 PM
Any way we can get the header updated? It's getting pretty hard to find teams when their profile has one team and our header doesn't match up. And the Rules link is broke as well
Still waiting on admins of the site to find a solution. Very sorry guys :(
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on December 17, 2015, 02:52:59 PM
On the roster page:

Quote
2016-17 Projected Cap Space

What is this number based on?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on December 18, 2015, 02:46:12 AM
On the roster page:

What is this number based on?
Currently isn't up to date. Is usually based on current cap until an official announcement is made.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on January 03, 2016, 10:35:10 PM
just curious as to when our first extentions will be?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 05, 2016, 07:19:45 PM
just curious as to when our first extentions will be?
Have I not posted yet. Should start the all star weekend.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 01, 2016, 10:58:57 PM
how are the signing bonuses applied?

Erik Karlsson, $6.5m extension value *10% = 0.65 (round down?) $0.6m bonus = $5.9m contract

Erik Karlsson, $6.5m extension value *90% = 5.85 (round down?) $0.7m bonus = $5.8m contract
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 01, 2016, 11:28:41 PM
We can extend the minors now??
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 01, 2016, 11:30:59 PM
We can extend the minors now??
Only players coming off EL contracts.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 01, 2016, 11:47:21 PM
how are the signing bonuses applied?

Erik Karlsson, $6.5m extension value *10% = 0.65 (round down?) $0.6m bonus = $5.9m contract

Erik Karlsson, $6.5m extension value *90% = 5.85 (round down?) $0.7m bonus = $5.8m contract
No signing bonuses. Are you talking about discounts?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 01, 2016, 11:48:18 PM
No signing bonuses. Are you talking about discounts?
Erm....yes.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 01, 2016, 11:50:56 PM
Only players coming off EL contracts.
got it thanks
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 01, 2016, 11:58:34 PM
No signing bonuses. Are you talking about discounts?

Like....we round up for buy-outs. Do we also round up to calculate the discount? 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 03, 2016, 05:47:46 PM
Like....we round up for buy-outs. Do we also round up to calculate the discount?
Discount rounds as normal rounding.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 06, 2016, 09:56:32 PM
Do we know what next years cap ceiling will be?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 06, 2016, 11:23:03 PM
Do we know what next years cap ceiling will be?
Not yet projected cap is based on this season's cap.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on February 22, 2016, 08:39:24 PM
Not yet projected cap is based on this season's cap.
Can the 2 way system still be used after waiver system is closed
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on February 22, 2016, 09:04:26 PM
Can the 2 way system still be used after waiver system is closed
Yup  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 22, 2016, 09:04:37 PM
Can the 2 way system still be used after waiver system is closed
Absolutely, yes.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 27, 2016, 03:07:17 PM

Quote
Call up experienced minor leaguers without going through re-entry waivers. When the IR player returns these players must be sent down through the normal waiver system or remain on the team and count against cap and roster size.

So even though Waivers are closed, I can call up an experienced minor leaguer as an IR replacement?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on February 27, 2016, 10:14:57 PM
So even though Waivers are closed, I can call up an experienced minor leaguer as an IR replacement?
I think this was changed but not updated?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 27, 2016, 10:38:45 PM
I think this was changed but not updated?
Not updated is....not changed?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 28, 2016, 01:19:40 AM
Not updated is....not changed?
Since waivers are closed players not on 2 ways are ineligible to be sent back down or brought up. The exception is made for those that were already there before the deadline.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 28, 2016, 08:15:12 AM
So last night, I noticed Edmonton had an extra defenseman set and it prevented Edmonton from accumilating points. Now that I check the scores, it shows Edmonton has points and one less defenseman. I got screenshots too. What happened?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 28, 2016, 11:26:13 AM
Since waivers are closed players not on 2 ways are ineligible to be sent back down or brought up. The exception is made for those that were already there before the deadline.
Quote
Call up experienced minor leaguers without going through re-entry waivers.
This statement reads as confusing then as it clearly says you can call up a veteran without going through waivers.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 28, 2016, 11:28:00 AM
Quote
So last night, I noticed Edmonton had an extra defenseman set and it prevented Edmonton from accumilating points. Now that I check the scores, it shows Edmonton has points and one less defenseman. I got screenshots too. What happened?
:iatp: I noticed as well.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 28, 2016, 12:06:38 PM
So last night, I noticed Edmonton had an extra defenseman set and it prevented Edmonton from accumilating points. Now that I check the scores, it shows Edmonton has points and one less defenseman. I got screenshots too. What happened?
That was a combination of myself and Tony. Tony processed transactions which made my roster illegal, adding Kronwall and putting Little on IR. I reversed the transaction and re-processed it with Kronwall being placed on bench instead of active coming off IR.

Sorry I should have PM'd you or the league before doing this but it was late at night when I noticed.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 28, 2016, 12:08:09 PM
That was a combination of myself and Tony. Tony processed transactions which made my roster illegal, adding Kronwall and putting Little on IR. I reversed the transaction and re-processed it with Kronwall being placed on bench instead of active coming off IR.

Sorry I should have PM'd you or the league before doing this but it was late at night when I noticed.
Works for me.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 28, 2016, 12:08:57 PM
This statement reads as confusing then as it clearly says you can call up a veteran without going through waivers.
I understand, I will clarify clearer in the rules. This is the way waivers have been run since it was introduced to the league though.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on February 28, 2016, 01:30:42 PM
 
I understand, I will clarify clearer in the rules. This is the way waivers have been run since it was introduced to the league though.
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on February 28, 2016, 02:05:44 PM
That was a combination of myself and Tony. Tony processed transactions which made my roster illegal, adding Kronwall and putting Little on IR. I reversed the transaction and re-processed it with Kronwall being placed on bench instead of active coming off IR.

Sorry I should have PM'd you or the league before doing this but it was late at night when I noticed.

I'm good with this too.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on February 28, 2016, 07:48:41 PM
I'm good with this too.
Sorry again I should have PM'd you.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on May 03, 2016, 05:15:20 PM
Will waivers open up prior to FA where 16/17 contracts will be eligible to waive? 

Sorry, first offseason for me.  Probably will have several more questions.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 05, 2016, 02:13:01 PM
Will waivers open up prior to FA where 16/17 contracts will be eligible to waive? 

Sorry, first offseason for me.  Probably will have several more questions.
Waivers will open up 1 week after free agency opens in the off-season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on May 08, 2016, 12:39:01 AM
I finished the end of season transaction that I started for St. Louis just to make sure everything is consistent. I will start working on the rest of the transactions next weekend.

Thanks for understanding, guys.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 11, 2016, 12:52:37 AM
I finished the end of season transaction that I started for St. Louis just to make sure everything is consistent. I will start working on the rest of the transactions next weekend.

Thanks for understanding, guys.
Thanks for helping out favo. Also Slack, your banner is on the way. Just need to track down my BY logo!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on July 09, 2016, 11:21:38 PM
How are we going to manage extensions if Fantrax does away with Rankings?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 09, 2016, 11:54:00 PM
How are we going to manage extensions if Fantrax does away with Rankings?
I'll contact fantrax about this before we look into what needs to be done.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on July 10, 2016, 08:46:01 AM
How are we going to manage extensions if Fantrax does away with Rankings?

We count.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on July 10, 2016, 09:16:50 AM
We count.
:rofl: :rofl:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on July 11, 2016, 10:35:29 PM
Not sure if it was decided on yet but when is FA ?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 12, 2016, 12:13:50 AM
How are we going to manage extensions if Fantrax does away with Rankings?
Emailed fantrax and they informed me that rankings were to be added back in in their final update.

Not sure if it was decided on yet but when is FA ?
An exact free agency date will be announced once we finish the draft. Usually begins about a week after we finish the draft.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on August 29, 2016, 11:45:36 AM
What is this year salary cap? 73M?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 30, 2016, 03:13:13 PM
What is this year salary cap? 73M?
$74m

Updated now here, sorry!
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=15464.msg68271#msg68271
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on August 30, 2016, 05:36:31 PM
$74m

Updated now here, sorry!
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=15464.msg68271#msg68271
great thanks I was wondering I was missing 1m from my own calcuations
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on October 05, 2016, 10:33:23 AM
The rules say "Waiver Free" is open today............Is that correct?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on October 05, 2016, 10:57:09 AM
The rules say "Waiver Free" is open today............Is that correct?
Yep get at it folks haha
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on October 05, 2016, 05:12:19 PM
anyone else keep getting bumped off fantrax to ads?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on December 19, 2016, 10:47:28 PM
How did Dvorak end up on my roster? Hartnell should be up as IR replacement for Myers.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on December 20, 2016, 03:40:31 PM
How did Dvorak end up on my roster? Hartnell should be up as IR replacement for Myers.
Not sure, I just processed exactly what was on the moves and Hartnell was waived down and Dvorak was called up.

These are the two transactions I processed:
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=283060.0
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=284545.0
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on December 20, 2016, 06:16:17 PM
q about Anderson so hes not technically injured but hes not returning for awhile bc of his wife is there some clause where I can call up a replacement for him?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on December 20, 2016, 10:09:46 PM
Not sure, I just processed exactly what was on the moves and Hartnell was waived down and Dvorak was called up.

These are the two transactions I processed:
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=283060.0
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=284545.0
We're not keeping up with transactions very well at all. Understand your situation, but missing Favo big time. I have a more recent transaction somewhere that called Hartnell back up...and Dvorak was sent down ages ago.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 23, 2016, 12:21:12 AM
We're not keeping up with transactions very well at all. Understand your situation, but missing Favo big time. I have a more recent transaction somewhere that called Hartnell back up...and Dvorak was sent down ages ago.
Im going to try and keep up with these from the now on.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on December 23, 2016, 06:44:01 PM
q about Anderson so hes not technically injured but hes not returning for awhile bc of his wife is there some clause where I can call up a replacement for him?

anyone???
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on December 23, 2016, 07:15:22 PM
anyone???
i don't think so. drew would have to rule on this.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on December 23, 2016, 07:57:27 PM
anyone???
Sorry we have nothing in place right now.I'll let you know and maybe we can write up a rule for approval.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on December 23, 2016, 08:33:27 PM
Im going to try and keep up with these from the now on.  :thumbsup:
  :winner:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 10, 2017, 09:38:55 PM
Can an FA with under 40 games be signed to a single season 2 way contract?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 12, 2017, 10:45:51 AM
Can an FA with under 40 games be signed to a single season 2 way contract?
2 way contracts must be awarded as a minimum of 2 year contracts.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on February 23, 2017, 03:21:00 PM
Some of us were asked to remove some players off IR. Which we did in a timely manner. Here we are a week later and nothing on Fantax has been updated. What was the point???? What is going on???
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on February 25, 2017, 04:49:20 PM
Waiver Period Ends - February 15th, 2017 @ 11:59pm
so does that mean IR replacements from our minors are closed now as well like I cant put anyone on IR and call someone up?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on February 25, 2017, 05:03:04 PM
Waiver Period Ends - February 15th, 2017 @ 11:59pm
so does that mean IR replacements from our minors are closed now as well like I cant put anyone on IR and call someone up?
only players on two-way contracts can be called up I believe.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on March 23, 2017, 06:23:45 PM
Q will tradeing be open before the expansion draft?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 24, 2017, 02:29:16 AM
Q will tradeing be open before the expansion draft?
Yep, there will be a period in which trading will be open.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on March 30, 2017, 11:32:16 AM
I assume line "B" in the Expansion Rules refers to our minor system?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 30, 2017, 12:37:21 PM
I assume line "B" in the Expansion Rules refers to our minor system?
Which specifically are you referring to?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on March 30, 2017, 04:40:28 PM
Which specifically are you referring to?


Protection Rules................Line b
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on March 30, 2017, 06:46:23 PM

Protection Rules................Line b
So you can protect up to 9 skaters and 1 goalie that aren't being protected as a result of stipulation C (2015 or 2016 draftees)

Hopefully that makes sense.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on March 30, 2017, 08:51:44 PM
So you can protect up to 9 skaters and 1 goalie that aren't being protected as a result of stipulation C (2015 or 2016 draftees)

Hopefully that makes sense.
maybe just make 10 skaters and 1 goalie. Might make it less confusing?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 02, 2017, 01:26:56 PM
I would really like to see an additional waiver free period this year ahead of the expansion draft. It makes sense to me that we should be able to rejig our rosters as best possible before they get picked over. What do you think?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on April 02, 2017, 08:17:31 PM
I would really like to see an additional waiver free period this year ahead of the expansion draft. It makes sense to me that we should be able to rejig our rosters as best possible before they get picked over. What do you think?
:iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 03, 2017, 03:04:43 AM
maybe just make 10 skaters and 1 goalie. Might make it less confusing?
I'm going to stick with the rules right now, we will have time to work through any kinks that happen together.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 03, 2017, 03:05:41 AM
I would really like to see an additional waiver free period this year ahead of the expansion draft. It makes sense to me that we should be able to rejig our rosters as best possible before they get picked over. What do you think?
Could but what would be the purpose of this? To possibly protect an experience minor leaguer?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 03, 2017, 09:19:51 AM
Could but what would be the purpose of this? To possibly protect an experience minor leaguer?
Yes, and for whatever housekeeping GM's feel they need to do.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 03, 2017, 11:35:15 AM
Yes, and for whatever housekeeping GM's feel they need to do.
I kind of feel like that would be circumventing the rules as we knew that when waivers closed that experience minor leagues would be stuck down there until next season.

Could you give me a specific example of how this may benefit a team?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 03, 2017, 08:42:31 PM
I kind of feel like that would be circumventing the rules as we knew that when waivers closed that experience minor leagues would be stuck down there until next season.

Could you give me a specific example of how this may benefit a team?
To be honest Drew, I'm not looking at it the way you are. I really haven't asked the questions I need in order to fully understand your expansion rules. But this ask is not about that. I'd like to do some housekeeping moves so I feel like my roster is an order that makes sense to me.

My specific example (possibly calling Scott Darling up) probably puts me in a less favourable position without circumnavigating anything. I have no interest in calling up previously waived players on expiring contracts. I just think we should be allowed to tinker before we get plundered.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 03, 2017, 08:46:45 PM
Maybe you could answer a different question for me. The expansion rules now indicate that the new teams may select only a single goalie....but it isn't clear if that includes minor league goalies. Can an expansion team take one roster goalie, and then load up on minor league goalies without limit?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 03, 2017, 10:48:34 PM
Maybe you could answer a different question for me. The expansion rules now indicate that the new teams may select only a single goalie....but it isn't clear if that includes minor league goalies. Can an expansion team take one roster goalie, and then load up on minor league goalies without limit?
That would be something that needs to be clarified but my intention was that 1 goalie total but expansion teams must follow the bottom rules when selecting.

a) 17 round snaking draft (this would give these teams full rosters to play with)
          i) Of these 17 players, 9 must have contracts for the 2017-18 season
        ii) The expansion teams must select 10 forwards, 6 defense and 1 goalie.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on April 10, 2017, 12:00:53 AM
Isn't there one more extension period?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on April 10, 2017, 10:58:28 AM
Isn't there one more extension period?

There better be!  lol
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 10, 2017, 01:49:45 PM
Isn't there one more extension period?
There will be one more extension period but after the expansion draft, so any unprotected players with no contract into 2017-18 will be the responsible of an expansion team to extend if picked.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jonathan on May 03, 2017, 08:25:14 PM
Seems to be some confusion on what minors are protected. Is it players draft in the last 2 real life drafts or last 2 fantasy drafts here? Chicago protected Myers, who was drafted here in '16.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on May 04, 2017, 04:48:28 AM
Quote
i) Of these 17 players, 9 must have contracts for the 2017-18 season 
ahm about this... am just confuse,,,
we cant protect expired contracts and can only protect players with 2017 contracts onwards? and also expansion teams cant select players that have an expired contracts?... am i right?
..so those players have expired contracts are safe, not to be pick by an expansion team.. but there fate rely on the current team if they will be resigned or not in the next extension period?...

.. i protected players with expiring contracts lol   :doh: ...
.. want to confirm this question so i can edit my protection list..

 :toth:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on May 04, 2017, 01:10:12 PM
ahm about this... am just confuse,,,
we cant protect expired contracts and can only protect players with 2017 contracts onwards? and also expansion teams cant select players that have an expired contracts?... am i right?
..so those players have expired contracts are safe, not to be pick by an expansion team.. but there fate rely on the current team if they will be resigned or not in the next extension period?...

.. i protected players with expiring contracts lol   :doh: ...
.. want to confirm this question so i can edit my protection list..

 :toth:
That rule is for the expansion team when they draft the unprotected list
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on May 04, 2017, 01:12:12 PM
Seems to be some confusion on what minors are protected. Is it players draft in the last 2 real life drafts or last 2 fantasy drafts here? Chicago protected Myers, who was drafted here in '16.
as far as i know last 2 real nhl draft players are protected given that the GM provides the round and pick.

In terms of Chicago, i believe Myers takes up one of the 5 minor spots regardless of draft year/contract
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 04, 2017, 04:07:49 PM
as far as i know last 2 real nhl draft players are protected given that the GM provides the round and pick.

In terms of Chicago, i believe Myers takes up one of the 5 minor spots regardless of draft year/contract
No the protection is for our last two drafts not the real NHL drafts.

Here are our draft results:
2015 - http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=263710.0
2016 - http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=289286.0

You can also protect expiring contracts if you want.

Clarification, any currently italicized players can be considered a minor league protected. 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on May 04, 2017, 08:41:31 PM
No the protection is for our last two drafts not the real NHL drafts.

Here are our draft results:
2015 - http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=263710.0
2016 - http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=289286.0

You can also protect expiring contracts if you want.

Clarification, any currently italicized players can be considered a minor league protected.
Oh ok thanks for clarifying will update my list then tomorrow
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on May 04, 2017, 09:41:14 PM
Oh ok thanks for clarifying will update my list then tomorrow
oh I thought it was real NHL. I have to fix my list.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on May 05, 2017, 05:51:41 AM
Clarification, any currently italicized players can be considered a minor league protected.
do i need to sent the player to minors first before making him part on my minors protection,??
i have a G that is italicized on my main team..

 :toth:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 05, 2017, 11:44:43 AM
do i need to sent the player to minors first before making him part on my minors protection,??
i have a G that is italicized on my main team..

 :toth:
Yep you can protect any italicized player as a minor leaguer if you want, doesn't have to be in minors.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tyler on May 29, 2017, 04:11:37 PM
For the expansion draft I assume we just have to look through the players from the "unprotected list" and choose from there, correct? Like they won't be available in FanTrax will they so we can toggle with that to see points and position etc?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on May 29, 2017, 04:25:33 PM
Using the "Watch Player" function might be helpful.  Maybe go through the rosters and flag anyone who interests you.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tyler on May 29, 2017, 05:23:23 PM
Using the "Watch Player" function might be helpful.  Maybe go through the rosters and flag anyone who interests you.

Good idea pal.... I was wondering how's I was going to keep it all straight ESP with the expansion rules kept in mind
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 30, 2017, 02:32:30 AM
Using the "Watch Player" function might be helpful.  Maybe go through the rosters and flag anyone who interests you.
This would be the best way possible I believe.

You don't have to select only from the unprotected lists, you can select anyone available as well as long as they have a contact going into next season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on June 02, 2017, 09:20:23 PM
Are we doing awards?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on June 02, 2017, 09:37:07 PM
Are we doing awards?
:SC-NHL:=Tony
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on June 03, 2017, 12:07:57 AM
:SC-NHL:=Tony
  :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL: :SC-NHL:  :SC-NHL::toth: lol.

Title: Re: Questions
Post by: whiteghost on June 04, 2017, 07:47:58 PM
Hey, just wondering about extensions....as I read the rules, you use the highest point total from the past two years (and consider all potential positions). Has there been any thought or discussion given to using an average of the past couple of years? I just wonder as it would give a more accurate in the case of injury, etc. Not trying to be the guy who comes late to the party and wants to turn over the tables, just curious...
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on June 14, 2017, 09:38:01 AM
So when are we doing extensions and entry draft?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 15, 2017, 12:51:33 PM
Hey, just wondering about extensions....as I read the rules, you use the highest point total from the past two years (and consider all potential positions). Has there been any thought or discussion given to using an average of the past couple of years? I just wonder as it would give a more accurate in the case of injury, etc. Not trying to be the guy who comes late to the party and wants to turn over the tables, just curious...
We haven't had much discussion on that because in all honesty it has never been an issue through the entirety of the league. Usually a good player doesn't have 2 bad back to back seasons and if they do, we may not consider them good anymore. As for injuries, it levels out the rise to re-sign them if you are getting them cheap due to injury, it may just happen again. Anyone else have comments on this?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on June 15, 2017, 01:03:21 PM
We haven't had much discussion on that because in all honesty it has never been an issue through the entirety of the league. Usually a good player doesn't have 2 bad back to back seasons and if they do, we may not consider them good anymore. As for injuries, it levels out the rise to re-sign them if you are getting them cheap due to injury, it may just happen again. Anyone else have comments on this?

I like how we do it now for 2 reasons:

1) You cannot get a discount on a Stamkos-like talent where he goes down for a year with injury.  High end talent costs high end dollars, regardless of an injury OR off year.

2) Ease of use.  This has to be a factor.  This would add another variable to the extension equation, which is more work for us and for the league management.  Since I run my own league, I'm particularly sensitive about the management side.  Auditing extensions is one of the most time consuming parts of running a league like this.  Adding this element means more time spent on administration for Drew.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on June 15, 2017, 01:09:19 PM
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO. 

Here's how I handle it in my league:

Quote
Contract Limits
Except for any contract inherited in 2011, all contracts must be no longer than five years. Also, for a given salary, all contracts have term limits (max years contract can be per the yearly salary) as provided below.

Salary - Max Years
$5m+ - 5 years (the overall limit)
$3.5 to $4.9m - 4 years
$2 to $3.4m - 3 years
$0 to $1.9m - 2 years

Contract Limits for Extensions
Contract extensions follow the contract maximum lengths as shown above as well as their own minimum standards.

Salary - Min & Max Years
$6.5m+ - 5 years (the overall limit)
$5 to $6.4m - 4 or 5 years
$3.5 to $4.9m - 3 or 4 years
$2 to $3.4m - 2 or 3 years
$0 to $1.9m - 1 or 2 years
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on June 15, 2017, 08:20:12 PM
Quote
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO.

Backyard's contract structure has been working nicely years. It is the differences between leagues that makes them special.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 16, 2017, 12:17:53 PM
However, on this topic, I would like to again suggest a minimum extension length that depends on the value of the contract.  There's currently very little incentive to signing players longterm.  High value contracts should carry a certain minimum length.  Look at Seguin, for example, I re-signed him for 2 years at $7.5m.  That should have been a minimum 5 year contract length IMO. 

Here's how I handle it in my league:
Could be something for discussion, we had it this way in the beginning and changed it to how it is now. Maybe somehow this could be worked into RFA style rule? If you sign a player under the max then they are place on an "RFA" where their next contract would have to be the max years?

Just food for thought.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on June 16, 2017, 12:24:10 PM
Could be something for discussion, we had it this way in the beginning and changed it to how it is now. Maybe somehow this could be worked into RFA style rule? If you sign a player under the max then they are place on an "RFA" where their next contract would have to be the max years?

Just food for thought.

I like that idea.  Or if you don't sign a certain quality player to the max then they can't be extended again and become a UFA at the end of the contract.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 16, 2017, 01:20:43 PM
I like that idea.  Or if you don't sign a certain quality player to the max then they can't be extended again and become a UFA at the end of the contract.
I don't like the auto release as the reason you sign to a short contract (bridge contract) is to hope to get them cheaper the next time around but if we force into a max extension on the next one that makes sense in terms of the real life "bridge contracts".
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on June 16, 2017, 01:43:07 PM
Yea, true.  Just shooting from the hip. 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on June 19, 2017, 10:35:08 PM
Draft lottery is finished...
when will trade and contract extension opens?

 :toth:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 20, 2017, 12:27:32 PM
Draft lottery is finished...
when will trade and contract extension opens?

 :toth:
Soon, within this week!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on June 25, 2017, 07:48:37 AM
for a new GM here, is it possible to rename team?

 :toth:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on June 25, 2017, 11:54:07 PM
Soon, within this week!
i think so but your options might be limited bacause of your division. Drew will let you know.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 26, 2017, 12:05:41 PM
Draft lottery is finished...
when will trade and contract extension opens?

 :toth:

With Montreal, you would need to swap team names with another GM to a less storied NHL franchise then you could relocate that new team next season.

For this season, currently relocation is over.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Anthony on June 26, 2017, 01:10:51 PM
With Montreal, you would need to swap team names with another GM to a less storied NHL franchise then you could relocate that new team next season.

For this season, currently relocation is over.

I would be willing to switch for next season if there is still interest.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on June 28, 2017, 11:44:07 PM
If anybody has the time and wants to do me a solid can you check the extension rankings for the following players? Can't get fantrax to work

Leo Komarov, $1.1m (2016-17)
Kyle Palmieri, $1.2m (2016-17)
Dan Girardi, $1.6m (2016-17)

Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on June 28, 2017, 11:49:13 PM
If anybody has the time and wants to do me a solid can you check the extension rankings for the following players? Can't get fantrax to work

Leo Komarov, $1.1m (2016-17)
Kyle Palmieri, $1.2m (2016-17)
Dan Girardi, $1.6m (2016-17)

Thanks in advance.

Komarov
2016 - LW 42 C 53
2015 - LW 26,C 42

Palmieri
2016 - RW 20
2015 - RW 7

Girardi
2016 - D 80
2015 - D 46
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on June 28, 2017, 11:51:31 PM
Komarov
2016 - LW 42 C 53
2015 - LW 26,C 42

Palmieri
2016 - RW 20
2015 - RW 7

Girardi
2016 - D 80
2015 - D 46
wow that was fast. Thanks again.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: jlapo11 on June 30, 2017, 10:02:56 AM
Free waiver period. Is it only for players in their last year contract or with more than one year?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 30, 2017, 11:41:12 AM
Free waiver period. Is it only for players in their last year contract or with more than one year?
Yes only a player in the last year of their contract may be sent down, anyone may be called up though as some may have (due to extensions) players with contracts past the next season in their minors.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on July 11, 2017, 10:58:11 PM
are we going to get an extra day for extensions since the site was down
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 12, 2017, 12:25:58 AM
are we going to get an extra day for extensions since the site was down
As of right now I don't believe the site being down affected anyone being unable to extend. Tony was the last to extend and I was able to see those after the deadline came and went. If anyone had an issue, please pm me but from my knowledge the site went down after our extension deadline had passed.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on July 12, 2017, 01:11:25 PM
I acquired Fabbri via trade who was not extended prior to the trade.  Does he come to me with extended per the amount indicated in the trade?  If not, do I still have an opportunity to extend?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on July 12, 2017, 11:13:04 PM
I acquired Fabbri via trade who was not extended prior to the trade.  Does he come to me with extended per the amount indicated in the trade?  If not, do I still have an opportunity to extend?
Fabbri is still on contract and not expired,,, i was confuse on this also then but it was explained to me..,,
"Robby Fabbri, $1.0m (2016-17) $1.8m (2018-19)"
the cross out on the 2018-19 season is his new value after the 2016-17 .

Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on July 12, 2017, 11:16:13 PM
Fabbri is still on contract and not expired,,, i was confuse on this also then but it was explained to me..,,
"Robby Fabbri, $1.0m (2016-17) $1.8m (2018-19)"
the cross out on the 2018-19 season is his new value after the 2016-17 .

Thanks cloud - I actually clarified this with Drew already since I was having a minor panic attack! 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jonathan on July 14, 2017, 05:43:11 PM
Why was I not allowed to extend a player I just traded for and more importantly, why was the trade I accepted not the one that was processed?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 14, 2017, 05:57:58 PM
Why was I not allowed to extend a player I just traded for and more importantly, why was the trade I accepted not the one that was processed?
Can you direct me to what your talking about?

I have this for the trade you made: http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=301932.0

and

This is all I have for extensions made: http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=301309.0
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jonathan on July 14, 2017, 06:13:17 PM
Can you direct me to what your talking about?

I have this for the trade you made: http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=301932.0


Yes, the trade I accepted is not the trade you processed. The trade was not approved until the site went bad, and we couldn't make extensions when it came back.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 14, 2017, 11:26:23 PM
Yes, the trade I accepted is not the trade you processed. The trade was not approved until the site went bad, and we couldn't make extensions when it came back.
Not sure, it seems we're seeing two different things.

Christopher Gibson for a 5th was the trade. Trade wasn't processed but was still voted through on July 9th once voted through the player would be yours. There is also the option to extend at the time of the trade just in case. Also others also made trades and extended their players. 

From my knowledge the site went down at approximately 9pm EST on July 10th. Our deadline for extensions was at 12pm EST on July 10th so the site going down would have no bearing on whether a team could of completed extensions.

I'm going to need more clarification on this but as I see it currently, simply a deadline was missed resulting in a player walking.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jonathan on July 14, 2017, 11:35:07 PM
Not sure, it seems we're seeing two different things.

Christopher Gibson for a 5th was the trade. Trade wasn't processed but was still voted through on July 9th once voted through the player would be yours. There is also the option to extend at the time of the trade just in case. Also others also made trades and extended their players. 

From my knowledge the site went down at approximately 9pm EST on July 10th. Our deadline for extensions was at 12pm EST on July 10th so the site going down would have no bearing on whether a team could of completed extensions.

I'm going to need more clarification on this but as I see it currently, simply a deadline was missed resulting in a player walking.

No, that wasn't the trade. I never offered or accepted a trade where pick 5.1 was involved. I could care less about Gibson right now, but I didn't know you could extend a player not on your team.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on July 16, 2017, 03:18:59 PM
No, that wasn't the trade. I never offered or accepted a trade where pick 5.1 was involved. I could care less about Gibson right now, but I didn't know you could extend a player not on your team.
OK I see now I'll fix when I get the chance. When I processed I missed the edit below the transaction.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on August 22, 2017, 11:06:02 PM
Is the waiver free period open yet??
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 22, 2017, 11:35:22 PM
Is the waiver free period open yet??
Haha nope! Waivers are open but waiver free will not open until a week before the season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on August 23, 2017, 03:49:57 AM
questions...

*if player X is under 2-way and in just his 1st yr of the 2yrs of the 2way contract, player X already hit and exceeds the 40GP, does his contract become regular or the 2way will still be used?

*about the claimable waiver, if no one claim you can send the player to minors, right?

thanks.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on August 23, 2017, 07:05:41 AM
questions...

*if player X is under 2-way and in just his 1st yr of the 2yrs of the 2way contract, player X already hit and exceeds the 40GP, does his contract become regular or the 2way will still be used?

*about the claimable waiver, if no one claim you can send the player to minors, right?

thanks.
If player on 2 way hits 40 games the contract remains 2 way until the 2 way contract ends

claimable waivers stays on your team if no other team claims them, also this waiver is used on players with no expiring contract this year. ex I can post a claimable waiver for Holtby (19-20) and not for Vey (17-18)
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: jlapo11 on August 23, 2017, 07:51:02 AM
Haha nope! Waivers are open but waiver free will not open until a week before the season.

Can we change this rule for next year so waiver free is done before or at the same time than FA. This would allow us to free up some space/money in our NHL roster for FA?

Do we have a limited number of players we could send via waiver free?

 :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on August 23, 2017, 07:51:49 AM
If player on 2 way hits 40 games the contract remains 2 way until the 2 way contract ends

claimable waivers stays on your team if no other team claims them, also this waiver is used on players with no expiring contract this year. ex I can post a claimable waiver for Holtby (19-20) and not for Vey (17-18)
thanks for the info.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on August 23, 2017, 08:51:32 AM
Can we change this rule for next year so waiver free is done before or at the same time than FA. This would allow us to free up some space/money in our NHL roster for FA?

Do we have a limited number of players we could send via waiver free?

I think it is working as intended and there is no limit of players to waiver free i beleive
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on August 23, 2017, 09:13:02 AM
I think it is working as intended and there is no limit of players to waiver free i beleive
Yep, working as intended. Free up cap space during the season before hand.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 23, 2017, 12:49:19 PM
Can we change this rule for next year so waiver free is done before or at the same time than FA. This would allow us to free up some space/money in our NHL roster for FA?

Do we have a limited number of players we could send via waiver free?

 :thumbsup:
Ya the waiver free period is not before the FA so that teams have to use the normal waiver system to clear up some cap space and puts more risk to trying to gain that cap space. I currently prefer waiver free where it is.

Only limitation to waiver free is the minor and major caps.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on August 24, 2017, 08:40:22 PM
When a minor league player is bought out does the cap hit transfer to the main roster?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: nelly85 on August 24, 2017, 08:50:26 PM
yes that is correct. I cant see it in the rule but I remember having to buy someone out that was in my minors because they retired and the cap hit was to main roster, not the minor's
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on August 25, 2017, 10:36:12 AM
yes that is correct. I cant see it in the rule but I remember having to buy someone out that was in my minors because they retired and the cap hit was to main roster, not the minor's
Yep buy outs affect only the major league cap no matter where they reside on your team.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: jlapo11 on September 29, 2017, 12:56:40 PM
Can I put a player on Free waiver if his contract expires only in 18-19? or it is reserved only for 17-18 players
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on September 29, 2017, 01:24:48 PM
Can I put a player on Free waiver if his contract expires only in 18-19? or it is reserved only for 17-18 players
Free waiver for any year I believe, I will be calling up Vasi through free wiaver
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on September 29, 2017, 01:26:43 PM
Free waiver for any year I believe, I will be calling up Vasi through free wiaver
Also send down is still end of contract only 17-18 i think
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on September 29, 2017, 01:58:38 PM
Can I put a player on Free waiver if his contract expires only in 18-19? or it is reserved only for 17-18 players
Only players in the last year of their contract can be sent down to the minors.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on September 29, 2017, 02:05:40 PM
Re: Modified Waiver Free Period - Rule states this is available after the second extension but I am wondering if it occurs before the contracts roll-over?

Specifically, Val Nichushkin's contract expires this season. If I want to retain his rights do I have to call him up during scheduled games or can he come up after the second extension? Or, now that I think about it, does the inability to extend him in the minors (*Val Nichushkin) mean that I can't take advantage of this rule?

Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on October 09, 2017, 07:10:22 AM
 just notice the game week days, its from Saturday to Friday and not Monday to Sunday ..is this the normal game week days since then??

 :toth:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Tony on October 09, 2017, 04:08:45 PM
just notice the game week days, its from Saturday to Friday and not Monday to Sunday ..is this the normal game week days since then??

 :toth:
yes, this is the way it’s been done the last few years.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on October 09, 2017, 09:43:34 PM
yes, this is the way it’s been done the last few years.
ok. thanks,

 :toth:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Jonathan on October 13, 2017, 08:02:07 PM
Is there any way to make the 2 way contracts more obvious like bolding or changing color?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on October 13, 2017, 08:27:12 PM
Is there any way to make the 2 way contracts more obvious like bolding or changing color?
Could maybe change the colour, anyone else prefer that?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: izaman3 on October 16, 2017, 11:03:42 AM
Could maybe change the colour, anyone else prefer that?

I wholly support changing the color, sometimes I don't notice the italics.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Ric_2227 on October 17, 2017, 03:41:19 PM
I also support changing the color.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on October 17, 2017, 05:58:55 PM
Re: Modified Waiver Free Period - Rule states this is available after the second extension but I am wondering if it occurs before the contracts roll-over?

Specifically, Val Nichushkin's contract expires this season. If I want to retain his rights do I have to call him up during scheduled games or can he come up after the second extension? Or, now that I think about it, does the inability to extend him in the minors (*Val Nichushkin) mean that I can't take advantage of this rule?
Sorry but I thought I answered this one but seemed to have missed it. This would only be for players that's contracts extend into next season that have been extended in the minors by some means since it comes after the extension period is over.

So for example I could use this period to call up
Marchessault
Watson
Cousins
Lehtera
to my major roster before free agency to ensure a roster spot for them. Calling up someone like Carrier would result in him hitting free agency anyway as there would be no other way to extend him beyond this season.

Hopefully that makes sense.

Could maybe change the colour, anyone else prefer that?
I will attempt some different colours and come up with a solution.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cloud91 on October 22, 2017, 07:12:17 AM
Suggestion related to 2-way players:
im suggesting if it is possible to make a sticky thread in the transactions exclusively for calling up and sending down players under 2-way contract. rather than creating new post after new post.

just a suggestion though..

 :toth:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on October 25, 2017, 05:30:07 PM
Suggestion related to 2-way players:
im suggesting if it is possible to make a sticky thread in the transactions exclusively for calling up and sending down players under 2-way contract. rather than creating new post after new post.

just a suggestion though..

 :toth:
This could work! This would be exclusively for calling up two-ways and not signing and calling up.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Rob on November 01, 2017, 09:43:41 AM
Are waivers open right now?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on November 01, 2017, 11:35:14 AM
Are waivers open right now?
Yep regular waivers are open.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 29, 2018, 08:45:12 PM
Can this be updated?
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=15464.0

Trying to find next seasons salary cap isn't easy. Probably in a message somewhere?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on January 29, 2018, 08:50:07 PM
Can this be updated?
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=15464.0

Trying to find next seasons salary cap isn't easy. Probably in a message somewhere?
Not sure when the NHL finalizes the cap numbers, but we'll be following to about $80m right?
Actually read the PM. :rofl:
 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on January 30, 2018, 11:25:16 AM
Not sure when the NHL finalizes the cap numbers, but we'll be following to about $80m right?
Actually read the PM. :rofl:
 
But yes I should update the projected cap for next season.
Title: Re: Bought Out Players
Post by: abbyroad on February 12, 2018, 11:20:44 PM
Do bought out players count against the roaster count?
Title: Re: Bought Out Players
Post by: SlackJack on February 12, 2018, 11:56:35 PM
Do bought out players count against the roaster count?
Nope
Title: Re: Bought Out Players
Post by: abbyroad on February 13, 2018, 01:57:58 AM
Nope

I didn't think so. Accounting error on my roaster size then.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Vik on February 17, 2018, 02:06:26 PM
For next year, can we can change lineups so they lock at start of each game not the start of 1st games of each day?

I was going to set my lineup prior to the Saber/Kings game but got sidetracked for just a few minutes and then it locked and now have a bunch of guys on my bench. Not the first time it's happened, and I know I can set ahead of time so it's partially on me, but still I'd really like this changed if possible.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 02, 2018, 03:27:59 PM
I recall a conversation last year, largely led by Tyler, around having a window to trade expiring contracts ahead of the roll-over or something like that. I don't see anything on our important dates for this but if I remember correctly we were going to allow a period for trades prior to the end of the 2nd extension period I think. Is this right?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 05, 2018, 06:37:43 PM
I recall a conversation last year, largely led by Tyler, around having a window to trade expiring contracts ahead of the roll-over or something like that. I don't see anything on our important dates for this but if I remember correctly we were going to allow a period for trades prior to the end of the 2nd extension period I think. Is this right?
Yes there will be a period following the season for this to happen! Most likely our second extension period won't happen till mid may.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 05, 2018, 09:51:25 PM
Yes there will be a period following the season for this to happen! Most likely our second extension period won't happen till mid may.
Good to know, thanks!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: abbyroad on May 10, 2018, 01:58:42 PM
Seems we have lost Fantrax privileges for this league............ :doh: :doh: :rool:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: izaman3 on May 10, 2018, 03:03:28 PM
Seems we have lost Fantrax privileges for this league............ :doh: :doh: :rool:

They aren't really lost, they are just hidden. At least for me they are hidden. Using a web browser (I don't use the app), you can click "My Leagues" in the menu then the top option of "View All Current/Past Leagues" and it will show up.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on May 13, 2018, 02:56:58 PM
Seems we have lost Fantrax privileges for this league............ :doh: :doh: :rool:
Should still be there. I do have to renew to the new season though so there will be a new fantrax page coming soon.

They aren't really lost, they are just hidden. At least for me they are hidden. Using a web browser (I don't use the app), you can click "My Leagues" in the menu then the top option of "View All Current/Past Leagues" and it will show up.
This is correct!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: favo_zomg on June 22, 2018, 04:39:38 PM
WI'll our cap go up with the nhls this season?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 27, 2018, 05:29:15 PM
WI'll our cap go up with the nhls this season?
Cap is already set for next season! Set at $83m, there should be post somewhere stating this as well as your roster should reflect a 83m cap in the projected portion.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on June 27, 2018, 06:55:08 PM
Cap is already set for next season! Set at $83m, there should be post somewhere stating this as well as your roster should reflect a 83m cap in the projected portion.
Sorry not 83m but should be $80m.

This is reflected in the cap page as the projected cap.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on November 09, 2018, 09:06:40 PM
Interesting thing...Rask is on a leave of absence. Don't think this has ever come up before, for us anyway. Can I place him on IR? Don't figure it would be fair that he continue to count against my active roster.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: izaman3 on November 10, 2018, 01:51:07 PM
Interesting thing...Rask is on a leave of absence. Don't think this has ever come up before, for us anyway. Can I place him on IR? Don't figure it would be fair that he continue to count against my active roster.

Definitely is an interesting case, but I think it is covered well in the actual rulebook. Our IR spots are for long-term situations and not really supposed to be used for short-term cases. Though the real-life NHL can place players on short-term and retroactive IR, and our rules state that anyone on IR in real life will qualify for IR in Backyard.

Everything I've seen has said Rask is being given a few days, and TSN lists him as day-to-day. Therefore, he doesn't qualify for IR. If he was given a leave of absence and it was framed as a prolonged situation, or if TSN listed him as "out indefinitely" then he would qualify.

https://www.cbssports.com/nhl/news/bruins-grant-tuukka-rask-leave-of-absence-confirm-charlie-mcavoy-is-in-concussion-protocol/ (https://www.cbssports.com/nhl/news/bruins-grant-tuukka-rask-leave-of-absence-confirm-charlie-mcavoy-is-in-concussion-protocol/)

A) IR Spots and Qualification
Each team will have 3 IR spots to place players that will injured. They must be injured for 10 games or 4 weeks (the longest projected time out) from the time the GM submits the IR player. A player put on IR still counts against the cap but doesn't count against the roster size.
Stipulation: If a NHL player is on the real IR they are eligible for the Backyard IR and do not have to be missing 10 games or 4 weeks from the time the GM submits.

We will use this site from reference of injury reserve:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/injuries/
For our purposes out indefinitely will qualify for IR placement. Plus anything over 4 weeks excepted to be out.
We will also used the fantrax data to confirm or dispute these injuries.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on November 10, 2018, 04:58:05 PM
Quote
Everything I've seen has said Rask is being given a few days, and TSN lists him as day-to-day. Therefore, he doesn't qualify for IR. If he was given a leave of absence and it was framed as a prolonged situation, or if TSN listed him as "out indefinitely" then he would qualify
:iatp:
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Anthony on November 28, 2018, 06:42:27 PM
I can't remember for the life of me if you can trade money in this league? From my quick research it seems like no. Maybe I'm just blind and it's in the rules
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: winter on November 28, 2018, 07:00:31 PM
I can't remember for the life of me if you can trade money in this league? From my quick research it seems like no. Maybe I'm just blind and it's in the rules
[/quot

No , never had money trades in Backyard.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on March 31, 2019, 01:17:34 PM
We going to get our awards from last year? 
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: izaman3 on April 03, 2019, 11:00:03 AM
We going to get our awards from last year?

What a horrible time to ask this question, why didn't you say anything earlier in the season?!?!?!   :rofl:

I've never won a Backyard award, so I totally forgot that it was even a thing.

At this point, I'm on the fence. We could award the 2018 and 2019 awards both this off-season, but that would be a lot of discounts and I don't know if any team would get too much of an advantage for 2019-2020. I think it'd be good to have Drew weigh in. Maybe even do a league vote on the issue. Maybe if we award both years, a team couldn't claim the same award twice, I'm not sure if anyone is in that situation.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 03, 2019, 11:26:19 AM
What a horrible time to ask this question, why didn't you say anything earlier in the season?!?!?!   :rofl:

I've never won a Backyard award, so I totally forgot that it was even a thing.

At this point, I'm on the fence. We could award the 2018 and 2019 awards both this off-season, but that would be a lot of discounts and I don't know if any team would get too much of an advantage for 2019-2020. I think it'd be good to have Drew weigh in. Maybe even do a league vote on the issue. Maybe if we award both years, a team couldn't claim the same award twice, I'm not sure if anyone is in that situation.
Just assumed it would get taken care of properly. Lots of time to sort it out yet as the 2nd extension round isn't done. Anyway, as the winner of last years cup it'd be lousy not to get my prize.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Drew on April 04, 2019, 05:33:42 PM
Completely missed guys, but my opinion would be delay extension period 2 until awards are in place from the previous season, there are only a few that affect any discounts. I would say that they could be retroactive to extension period #1 as well but not free agency.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 04, 2019, 07:03:51 PM
For rounding how does it work again?
For example if I apply 10% off on signing say Sean Couturier at an extension of $4.9m, then I would get a $0.49m discount rounded to either $0.5 or $0.4?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on April 12, 2019, 03:18:47 PM
Completely missed guys, but my opinion would be delay extension period 2 until awards are in place from the previous season, there are only a few that affect any discounts. I would say that they could be retroactive to extension period #1 as well but not free agency.
For awards from last season, it would only apply to extensions from period 1 and not period 2 of this season? As i have couple big resigns, it would be helpful to use those in period 2 as well.

Just read the awards section and it states used in the following season, does extension period 2 not part of current season?

Just looking for clarification
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on April 12, 2019, 03:27:00 PM
I have always understood that using the award discount in extension 2 was fine. It is part of the current 2018-2019 season.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: cho34 on April 12, 2019, 03:54:09 PM
I have always understood that using the award discount in extension 2 was fine. It is part of the current 2018-2019 season.
Great thanks will use my divisional discount from last year
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: izaman3 on April 14, 2019, 01:55:31 AM
For awards from last season, it would only apply to extensions from period 1 and not period 2 of this season? As i have couple big resigns, it would be helpful to use those in period 2 as well.

Just read the awards section and it states used in the following season, does extension period 2 not part of current season?

Just looking for clarification

Yes, you can use it during extension period 2.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on August 24, 2019, 11:04:16 PM
Sorry if I've missed it but wondering what the cap is this year?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: izaman3 on September 02, 2019, 11:15:09 AM
Sorry if I've missed it but wondering what the cap is this year?

Our cap mimics the NHL cap, so $81.5m is the upper limit and $60.2m is the lower limit. Sorry, you didn't miss an official announcement, but it was updated in the rulebook.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: SlackJack on September 02, 2019, 12:27:33 PM
Do we have a replacement GM for Calgary?
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: whiteghost on September 02, 2019, 05:52:12 PM
Sorry if I've missed it but wondering what the cap is this year?

Our cap mimics the NHL cap, so $81.5m is the upper limit and $60.2m is the lower limit. Sorry, you didn't miss an official announcement, but it was updated in the rulebook.

My team page only sums to $70.1m, but I should work under the assumption of $81.5m?

Thanks!
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: izaman3 on September 04, 2019, 12:32:42 AM
My team page only sums to $70.1m, but I should work under the assumption of $81.5m?

Thanks!

Yep, the cap is $81.5m, your team page just hadn't been completely updated yet.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Vik on November 13, 2019, 05:52:41 PM
Don't see anything in rules about this specific situation so curious if I am allowed to break apart my IR replacment to only keep 1 of 2. For example, I signed Matt Calvert and called up Marcus Foligno as experience minor I now want only Calvert.

I made above move before Foligno got injured himself so can I send him back to minors and open spot? I would then use open roster spot to call up another minor player or simply sign another player outright.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: izaman3 on November 14, 2019, 12:26:14 PM
Don't see anything in rules about this specific situation so curious if I am allowed to break apart my IR replacment to only keep 1 of 2. For example, I signed Matt Calvert and called up Marcus Foligno as experience minor I now want only Calvert.

I made above move before Foligno got injured himself so can I send him back to minors and open spot? I would then use open roster spot to call up another minor player or simply sign another player outright.

Yes you can send him down, but since he is an experienced player, only if he clears waivers. So you can waive him if you'd like.
Title: Re: Questions
Post by: Vik on November 15, 2019, 01:54:50 AM
Yes you can send him down, but since he is an experienced player, only if he clears waivers. So you can waive him if you'd like.

Perfect thanks  :thumbsup: