* Franchise NHL


Author Topic: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules  (Read 3511 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mordecai

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2017
  • Posts: 313
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #30 on: November 10, 2020, 06:20:44 PM »
Com'on Ant! Don't give my Habs a hard time. We haven't played one another enough times to even develop a rivalry.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I never question a person's integrity, their intelligence, yes!

Offline AntMan

  • Veteran
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 965
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #31 on: November 10, 2020, 07:08:40 PM »
Com'on Ant! Don't give my Habs a hard time. We haven't played one another enough times to even develop a rivalry.

You’ll be ok w/o goalie compensation, you have a top team.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #32 on: November 10, 2020, 11:30:33 PM »
AntMan brought the big spoon to stir it up!

Mordecai doesn’t need Price and Vaseline.

King Boseman keeping busy around Profsl.

PPG seemingly on vacay!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline Burkes Boys

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1977
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #33 on: November 11, 2020, 11:11:03 AM »
You’ll be ok w/o goalie compensation, you have a top team.
AntMan's bullying me again MOM! :rofl::rofl: We are all watching you continually assembling the best young roster. :thumbsup: So we don't feel bad for your Colorado Avalanche. Not one bit. But I have to say it'll be tougher without the assistance of Indians. :rofl: Some of us still talk about how the Avs were gifted Cayden Primeau.  :puke::puke::thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I require from my teams, proper levels of anger, belligerence and some good ol' fashion piss 'n' vinegar.

Offline AntMan

  • Veteran
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 965
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #34 on: November 11, 2020, 12:20:53 PM »
AntMan's bullying me again MOM! :rofl::rofl: We are all watching you continually assembling the best young roster. :thumbsup: So we don't feel bad for your Colorado Avalanche. Not one bit. But I have to say it'll be tougher without the assistance of Indians. :rofl: Some of us still talk about how the Avs were gifted Cayden Primeau.  :puke::puke::thumbsup:

I’m happy to discuss this because I think there is a cluster of teams stuck on this one transaction and holding up trade conversations creating a Venn diagram or silo trade circles where we should be wide open but very few are in the overlap.

Let’s remember Cayden was the 29th best goalie spec at the time and hadn’t be regraded as some Price equivalent. Boston trades a Late supplemental to Indians for a first. Colorado then offered up a supplemental on the trade block having two left and we struck a deal with indians agreeing on two supplementals for Primeau. IMO at that time the first was worth the same or slightly more than Primeau so I had the lesser of the deals. There was a trade committee and I’d say they (yourself included) agreed at that moment demand and value was high on those supplemental picks. You just have to vote and move on and you must have agreed then.

Certainly no more of a gift than Binnington who’s actually producing in FNHL.  :puke:

Let’s also remember some trades go bad for Colorado and others also. Who deals for Beartschi giving up McAvoy.

Pick your poison in a league of sharks. That’s why we need parity rules so the big sharks get challenged. You’re the biggest shark right now BB. They’re going to come for you...
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Burkes Boys

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 1977
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #35 on: November 11, 2020, 01:38:03 PM »
You know I'm just adding my version of Antman to this thread right. But I have to say Indians ripped my heart out when he traded away Sebastian Aho, Nikita Gusev AND Johnny Gaudreau from my heavily scouted former San Jose Sharks franchise. At least Rock On has worked on rebuilding the minors over there. :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I require from my teams, proper levels of anger, belligerence and some good ol' fashion piss 'n' vinegar.

Offline AntMan

  • Veteran
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2016
  • Posts: 965
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :STL-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #36 on: November 11, 2020, 02:46:11 PM »
You know I'm just adding my version of Antman to this thread right. But I have to say Indians ripped my heart out when he traded away Sebastian Aho, Nikita Gusev AND Johnny Gaudreau from my heavily scouted former San Jose Sharks franchise. At least Rock On has worked on rebuilding the minors over there. :thumbsup:

Feels like a separate unique perspective entirely. I’d just call it a Burkeeee

I think we both value prospects so I could see how that might be viewed as wreckless management.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline TheBeef

  • Rookie
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2017
  • Posts: 387
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #37 on: November 11, 2020, 03:10:13 PM »
PPG seemingly on vacay!

Seems PPG is take a breather before the entry draft. :afro::winner::toast:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline dazfoster

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 1841
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :VAN:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #38 on: November 11, 2020, 04:39:27 PM »
Antman you did deal Baertschi for McAvoy to me when charlie was in his NCAA year but you also did a deal with me for Matthews for Forsberg, Stecher and Bennett, which has turned quite favorably to Colorado advantage.

I'm fine with the expanaion draft rules.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Online Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21702
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: FNHL Seattle Expansion Rules
« Reply #39 on: November 22, 2020, 10:10:53 PM »
Feels like a separate unique perspective entirely. I’d just call it a Burkeeee

I think we both value prospects so I could see how that might be viewed as wreckless management.


Yeah, BB does well. Like all of us hit a few miss a few. Aho was a monster hit for him, that was traded like you get players like that in every 2nd round LOL.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: If it doesn't include the UDFAs its not completed.
    Yesterday at 02:18:07 PM
  • Daddy: Of course it does include them so we good :)
    Yesterday at 02:36:30 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft 8/1/24 8PM EST you dont want to have your dog eat your computer that day Gents!
    Yesterday at 02:37:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    Yesterday at 03:29:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball FRENZY never stops
    Yesterday at 04:28:04 PM
  • Daddy: Weve processed more baseball transactions in one month than i ever remember in any league but NFL LIVE. This is in all my years.
    Yesterday at 04:28:45 PM
  • Daddy: And.. thats the goal. If everyone is active and everyone is competitive that has always been the goal.
    Yesterday at 04:29:55 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks
    Yesterday at 11:01:43 PM
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    Yesterday at 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Today at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Today at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Today at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Today at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Today at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Today at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Today at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Today at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Today at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Today at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Today at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Today at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Today at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Today at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Today at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Today at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Today at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Today at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Today at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Today at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Today at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Today at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Today at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Today at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Today at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Today at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Today at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Today at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Today at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Today at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Today at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Today at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Today at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Today at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Today at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Today at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Today at 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    Today at 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    Today at 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    Today at 06:45:54 PM