61
Cross-Court Dynasty: Completed Transactions / PG Aaron Holiday RFA
« on: July 20, 2022, 05:54:43 PM »
RFA rights to
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 61
Cross-Court Dynasty: Completed Transactions / PG Aaron Holiday RFA« on: July 20, 2022, 05:54:43 PM »
RFA rights to
62
Cross-Court Dynasty: Completed Transactions / PG Landry Shamet RFA« on: July 20, 2022, 05:54:17 PM »
RFA rights to
63
Cross-Court Dynasty: Completed Transactions / SF Caleb Martin RFA« on: July 20, 2022, 05:53:15 PM »
RFA rights to
64
Cross-Court Dynasty: Completed Transactions / SF Cody Martin RFA« on: July 20, 2022, 05:52:38 PM »
RFA Rights to
65
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives / Possible new rule- 1 year extensions« on: July 15, 2022, 05:57:26 PM »
We already have a rule in place where if you sign someone in FA to a 1 year deal, they are ineligible for an extension and will back to FA the following year. This post is to gauge reception to also making this rule included extensions. Meaning if you extend someone for 1 year, they automatically go to FA the following season. This would only impact future extensions, not ones already made.
This is mainly to make it more realistic as players usually only accept 1 year deals as a provide it deal to hit the open market the next year for a bigger payday. And it would possibly make FA more exciting each year if better players hit FA. Please post your thoughts. 66
Cross-Court Dynasty: Completed Transactions / OKC Release« on: June 29, 2022, 05:52:55 PM »
OKC use free drop on F Gordon Hayward $16.4m (2025)
67
Cross-Court Dynasty: Draft Room / 2022 NBA Draft Eligible Draftees« on: June 24, 2022, 05:25:58 PM »2 2 51 Tyrese Martin SG United States Golden State Warriors (from Toronto via Philadelphia,[X] traded to Atlanta) UConn (Sr.) 2 54 Yannick Nzosa C DR Congo Washington Wizards (from Dallas)[Z] Unicaja (Spain) 2 55 Gui Santos SF Brazil Golden State Warriors Minas (Brazil) 2 56 Luke Travers SG Australia Cleveland Cavaliers (from Miami via Indiana)[AA][L] Perth Wildcats (Australia) 2 58 Hugo Besson PG France Indiana Pacers (from Phoenix,[AC] traded to Milwaukee)[r] New Zealand Breakers (Australia) 68
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives / Future Cap- PLEASE VOTE« on: May 31, 2022, 05:52:22 PM »
Should we continue to allow teams to go over the cap in future years? Current rule is we allow teams to go over cap in future years and then as soon as the off-season starts where you are over cap, every move made must clear more cap than it brings in.
1. Yes, keep it allowed. And to clear up any future confusion, the rule is that once the off-season where you are over the cap starts, you must make sure you are back under the cap by the start of the regular season. 2. No, do not allowed anyone to ever be over future cap. Any trades/signings that would put you over cap will be invalid. If it's voted to remove the ability to go over future cap, this would go into affect at the start of next off-season to not impact anyone already over future caps 69
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives / Open Teams Going Into Off-Season« on: May 24, 2022, 05:45:25 PM »
Currently 4 openings:
We also have 2 teams being run as a 2nd team 70
Cross-Court Dynasty: Archives / League Wide Vote- Cash Exchanged On Player's Contract« on: April 28, 2022, 01:41:29 PM »
Ok we are starting this vote over with new options as it seems we have hit a stalemate with the original vote. I want to get this vote figured out before teams start going crazy in offseason moves. No discussions on other options, these are the final options on where we go with cash exchanges.
So post your vote below. Option 1- Leave as is Option 2- Eliminate cash exchanged on contracts entirely Option 3- A team can have no more than a net $25m in cash paid from another team on their roster. Meaning if you have are paying say $10m in cash on player's trade away from your roster, you can not have more than $35m coming in from other teams. Option 4- Same as option 3 except $10m net instead of $25m Option 5- Change to a max % allowed of 25% of a player's contract. Meaning if the player is on a 2 years contract on deal at $30m per season, the max total that can be paid on player is $15m (25% of the player's $60m contract value). If after we get near end of vote and 2 options are close in votes, we will remove the lower 3 options and just re-vote at the 2 higher selected optins. On options 2 and 5, previous trades would not be impacted. If someone already has money exchanged, it would be grandfathered Vote Tally Billy- 2 OUDAN- 5 STLBlues91- 5 IndianaBuc- 2 Vik- 5 cloud91- 5 jojowalkwalk- 1 uli17bg- 2 DynastyDeacon- 2 Brent- 2 gem9n9- 2 Daddy- 2 jimw- 2 interpaga- 5 seebnova- 4 Milton- 5 rotodojo- 2 RyanJames5- 5 DMarch47- 5 Teton- 5 Braves155- 5 ajm5551- 5 BadHabit- 2 tdtdtd Anthony- 5 |
|