Author Topic: Rule Change Discussions  (Read 3008 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #20 on: August 25, 2016, 02:57:53 AM »
Just out of curiosity, is the league experiencing major problems from this "tanking" situation? Like real life, are teams not being competitive purposely so they can compete later?

In real life a team still has to be fielded.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #21 on: August 25, 2016, 07:14:31 PM »
One more thing I wanted to discuss is the DL.  Right now we can only place people on the DL that are on the MLB 60 day DL.  I think this is flawed.  MLB teams only place people on the 60 day when they need to clear 40 man roster space, it really doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the severity of the injury.  Right now, if a player is out for the season in our league he cannot be put on the DL unless the corresponding MLB org puts him on the 60 day DL.  I think we should change this.  If a player is out for the year in our league he should be allowed to placed on the 60 day DL.  The only caveat I would add is that once you add someone who is declared out for the season to the 60 Day DL he cannot be reinstated for that season. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #22 on: August 25, 2016, 11:58:53 PM »
I tried to tighten up some of the signing rules so they're easier to read.  Please look them over.

Free Agency Rules
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=131562.0

International Free Agency Rules
http://www.profsl.com/smf/index.php?topic=159576.0
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline ldsjayhawk

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 9937
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :CLS:
    • :Kansas:
    • :SKC:
    • :KC:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #23 on: August 26, 2016, 12:57:52 AM »
Every league that has a DL requires the player to be out on the DL by the MLB team.  Why are we trying to change basic rules?  Who is going to make the determination that the player is out for the season?  or do we then lose the 60 day DL for those who are going to be out less than the rest of the season? 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
FGM :win: :SEA: 2017 + 2x AL West Div
BUSH AL :Bronze: :KC: 2021 + 4x AL Central Div
AFB AL :Bronze: :KC: 2012 + 1x Div
AFB NL :Bronze: :COL: 2018 + 2x Div

Offline Maydab23

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2111
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :LAL:
    • :Blank:
    • :UCLA:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #24 on: August 26, 2016, 01:44:59 AM »
As someone who has had I think 7 or 8 different players go on and/or off the 60day DL at some point this season I don't like the idea of a player on 60day DL must be on it all year. A lot of those players on the 60day DL come back mid year from TJS from previous year and now you are telling me I either need to hold a roster spot for those 7 or 8 guys all year or commit to not playing them even as they spend half a year playing in real life.

That said I see the problem Chris is pointing out and agree it is a legitimate problem. Case in point, Jordan Walden took up a roster spot on my team for about 15 months while being injured before the real life Cards decided to Move him from 15 to 60day DL.

So, while I agree there is a problem I don't agree with the proposed solution.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2016, 04:45:43 PM »
Well we could tell someone is out for the year when the team says the player is out for the year.  This happens all the time.  Players who have surgeries or break bones are sometimes left on the 15 day DL but are listed out for the year. 

The 60 day DL is a function of 40 man roster spots in MLB, it's not a function simply of the length of time someone is going to be injured. 

I'm simply proposing, in addition to the 60 man DL, that players who have been declared out for the year can be placed on the DL in our league but would not be allowed to return to active status that year.  This won't affect 60 day DL players at all, it's merely an add on for players out for the season.  You wouldn't have to place him on the DL and lose him for the year, it would just be an option.  It makes no sense that a player out for the year can't be placed on our DL because his real life MLB team just has him on the 15 day DL. 

Either way, it's not a big deal.  Just something I felt was a hole in our rules. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #26 on: August 28, 2016, 01:41:15 AM »
Average MLB team payrolls for the last few years.  We probably don't need the +5% provision.  As it stands, using the averages the cap would go up $17m. 

2016 - $142m
2015 - $135m
2014 - $121m
2013 - $111m
« Last Edit: August 28, 2016, 01:42:56 AM by chrisetc21 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #27 on: August 28, 2016, 01:20:13 PM »
Average MLB team payrolls for the last few years.  We probably don't need the +5% provision.  As it stands, using the averages the cap would go up $17m. 

2016 - $142m
2015 - $135m
2014 - $121m
2013 - $111m

Where did you pull those numbers?  Baseball Prospectus has these numbers
2016 - $130m
2015 - $125m
2014 - $115m
2013 - $106m

maybe you have year end numbers and these are opening day numbers
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

chrisetc21

  • Guest
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #28 on: August 28, 2016, 03:42:18 PM »
Where did you pull those numbers?  Baseball Prospectus has these numbers
2016 - $130m
2015 - $125m
2014 - $115m
2013 - $106m

maybe you have year end numbers and these are opening day numbers

They're year end from spotrac. 

http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Jss0062

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 2533
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :SA:
    • :Blank:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: Rule Change Discussions
« Reply #29 on: August 28, 2016, 10:32:52 PM »
They're year end from spotrac. 

http://www.spotrac.com/mlb/payroll/

Would it not be better to use baseball pro since that's where our ARB numbers come from?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • BayAreaBallers: Money alpha
    April 24, 2024, 11:37:29 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: He and like Higgins wants to get paid and have a better secure contract
    April 24, 2024, 11:37:49 PM
  • Braves155: I'm sure the Falcons will botch another Draft.
    Yesterday at 08:07:49 AM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Agreed
    Yesterday at 09:59:57 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: ITS DRAFT DAYYYY
    Yesterday at 12:00:23 PM
  • Rob: Welcome to New England, Drake Maye
    Yesterday at 01:45:48 PM
  • Rob: Hopefully you're not what I think you are
    Yesterday at 01:46:33 PM
  • Rob: Which is, Zach Wilson.
    Yesterday at 01:46:38 PM
  • janesvilleaces: Daddy pm
    Yesterday at 01:54:14 PM
  • Renegade: So what’s happening
    Yesterday at 03:54:16 PM
  • Renegade: My 1st time playing college football fantasy
    Yesterday at 03:56:40 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @Rob ive seen that take a few times. “Drake Maye=Zach Wilson”. Thats not how i see it. The Physical tools and demeanor alone are very different between the two. I like maye alot
    Yesterday at 03:58:58 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Are you a patriots fan @rob ?
    Yesterday at 03:59:21 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Jwalkejr88 pm
    Yesterday at 04:01:47 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 replied back
    Yesterday at 04:18:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Good evening all which league we talking trade.
    Yesterday at 04:47:08 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: im nfl
    Yesterday at 04:47:43 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Understood BAB
    Yesterday at 05:00:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Always NFL Brian
    Yesterday at 05:00:36 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yepp
    Yesterday at 05:06:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Can't wait to see the madness
    Yesterday at 05:10:27 PM
  • Daddy: God im sooooooo busy today. Im trying to get errands and profsl done before the draft :doh:
    Yesterday at 06:05:24 PM
  • Daddy: There is no way but im gonna keep at it.
    Yesterday at 06:06:27 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: as long as u r here for draft
    Yesterday at 06:08:49 PM
  • janesvilleaces: Go pack go
    Yesterday at 07:26:45 PM
  • Daddy: I thought i had converted you to a Ram fan by now @janes (insert eye emoji)
    Yesterday at 07:35:47 PM
  • Braves155: Sup guys
    Yesterday at 07:35:57 PM
  • Daddy: NFL DRAFT second only to the NFL LIVE Draft in entertainment!
    Yesterday at 08:52:12 PM
  • Daddy: 8/1/24 8PM Change your NFL LIVE teams future with these guys right here!
    Yesterday at 08:52:53 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: Plan on it.
    Yesterday at 09:25:23 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Interesting developments so far. If you need a QB in NFL Live. Plenty of them have 1st round pedigree
    Yesterday at 10:53:26 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft Room [link] current picks, 2024 preview & history.
    Yesterday at 11:06:17 PM
  • Braves155: Daddy, what are your thoughts on the NFL Draft thus far?
    Yesterday at 11:34:39 PM
  • Braves155: Or anyone, what ya think?
    Yesterday at 11:35:07 PM
  • dbreer23: Vegeta100 PM
    Yesterday at 11:40:43 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Alot of surprised tonight as expected. Offensive heavy. 6 QBs in the 1st. 7 WRs. Fun night
    Today at 12:52:03 AM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Alot of NFL Live implications. Cant wait to see it unfold. On to night 2
    Today at 12:52:28 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: i wish we took cooper Frick
    Today at 01:05:02 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: we coulda waited on pearsall
    Today at 01:05:12 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: as much as i do like him a bit cuz he was dceent at ASU and solid at UF
    Today at 01:05:26 AM
  • Daddy: Who is cooper Frick? What position he play
    Today at 02:57:55 AM
  • Brent: BAB, yeah, Cooper is a beast.
    Today at 07:21:11 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: Daddy I was just expressing my displeasure that we passed on cooper dejean. I strongly felt cb was a bigger need or ol than wr
    Today at 10:28:14 AM
  • Daddy: I get it
    Today at 10:39:43 AM
  • Daddy: I dont understand everything i saw last night. The biggest winner to me was Gardner Minshew
    Today at 10:40:41 AM
  • Daddy: Raiders, Atlanta both should have traded back if they were gonna do what they did. IMO
    Today at 10:41:23 AM
  • Daddy: Atlanta could have fleeced Minny and let them draft JJ #6 then still get Penix before Denver/LV
    Today at 10:42:24 AM
  • Daddy: Its like Brian is running the Raiders.
    Today at 10:43:02 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: ya know what speaking of gardener I did trade for him this off-season
    Today at 10:46:49 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: I honestly wouldn't have minded pearsall but I saw him as a Rd 2 target not Rd 1. Great to see another former alumni join the niners.
    Today at 10:48:21 AM