51
Buckets of Dimes / Re: Questions/Suggestions
« on: October 28, 2020, 09:45:30 PM »
Looks great thanks so much. The only other thing would be linking the team name to tabs. I think he cross court dynasty sheet does this
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 51
Buckets of Dimes / Re: Questions/Suggestions« on: October 28, 2020, 09:45:30 PM »
Looks great thanks so much. The only other thing would be linking the team name to tabs. I think he cross court dynasty sheet does this
52
Buckets of Dimes: Archives / Re: Poll - RFA and Franchise Tag« on: October 28, 2020, 01:01:46 PM »
oh sorry, i thought the rule change was to introduce the ability to franchise tag after y9-12. if that is already the case and we are only adding flexibility to the value of the RFA contract (y5-8) then i dont think it's a needed rule change. i'll change my vote
53
Buckets of Dimes: Archives / Re: Poll - RFA and Franchise Tag« on: October 27, 2020, 05:42:54 PM »
In general, i feel the RFA and franchise tagging mechanics are very heavy influences on player salaries compared to market valuations
54
Buckets of Dimes: Archives / Re: Poll - RFA and Franchise Tag« on: October 27, 2020, 05:37:43 PM »
In the interest of transparency, I voted for this rule because I have Doncic and I want to lock him up for as long as possible. Perhaps many people who have voted for this might be in the same boat as me.
If i'm trying to think like an objective commissioner, I agree with the well thought out points from WizKid and I think that you'd probably want to star players to have more movement than 2 teams per career as it makes for a more interesting league. This is my first time playing in a salary cap league but in other non-salary cap leagues dynasty I've played in, a lot of the top players change teams multiple times in a season. I think Harden was traded 2-3 times last year in one of my leagues which is a lot of fun. If we want realism then we should probably vector around star players playing for 3+ franchises per career but there should also be some mechanism to keep players for the duration of their career. So if Doncic is my favourite player ever and I want to keep him on my team for life, I should be able to. IMO RFA is not a strong enough disincentive as I'd think most teams in the top half of the league would be willing to give up their low ranked draft picks and plan their cap to sign Doncic in his absolute prime years. As an alternative to franchise tagging for years 9-12, could we be allowed to exceed the cap to resign our own players (or just one of them) if we want contracts to be subject to market valuation? Or maybe if a player has been under one team's control for 8 years, you could franchise tag and you are able to exceed the cap just for that player, but that player's salary has a X% premium over the current franchise tag amounts. I dont really have a good solution but just throwing some ideas out to allow for control for one player's career (with negative cap ramifications) 55
Buckets of Dimes / Re: Questions/Suggestions« on: October 26, 2020, 11:02:44 AM »
minor suggestion:
is it possible to have a summary tab on the spreadsheet that lists team name, manager name, manager profsl link, salary cap available for the next few years? not sure how much trouble this is or if this was previously brought up 56
Buckets of Dimes: Archives / Re: New Kings Owner« on: October 22, 2020, 09:59:34 PM »
Thanks Vik
Looking forward to playing with everyone 57
Buckets of Dimes: Completed Transactions / Re: Kings roster moves« on: October 22, 2020, 09:56:05 PM »
.
58
Buckets of Dimes: Completed Transactions / Re: Kings roster moves« on: October 22, 2020, 09:47:56 PM »
I also drop:
Shelvin Mack Antonio Blakeney Christiano Felicio Thanks 59
Buckets of Dimes: Completed Transactions / Kings roster moves« on: October 22, 2020, 09:38:11 PM »
I use my new manager drop to waive Larry nance jr
60
Buckets of Dimes: Archives / Re: Open Teams« on: October 22, 2020, 06:18:09 PM »
i'd like to take the kings please, thanks!
|
|