Proposal to open voting to the membership

[joeshmoe]

With an orderly process.  Proposals during the offseason only, to take effect at a time in the future, established if not otherwise stated in the new proposal.

Utilizing a quorum of the Gms, allowing for proposals, seconds, discussion and a vote. All done at specific times. So a proposal comes, needs a second in a week, discussion for two weeks, a vote, implemented a year out. Thats an example.

Enough of a small majority changing this league due to appointment, not even by vote of the group. The GMs of this league, in part, have no control over your league.

[papps]

There has been a RC since this league started. Now a rule passed that you don't like and you want to change the whole process?

[joeshmoe]

There has been a RC since this league started. Now a rule passed that you don't like and you want to change the whole process?

Not true, i am fundamentally against the way the rules are created. I always have been. I think it discludes 60 percent of the invested group. I dont like the rule, but i also dont like the way the rc functions. Its why i had previously brought up a post about setting rules for the rc but nobody replied, except you.

The process is just way to open.