Author Topic: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12  (Read 1884 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« on: September 04, 2012, 12:55:26 PM »
Here's a list of teams that were around ...but not really... in 2011-12:

in order of least involved
1. :NJD: New Jersey Devils
This team used up 2 owners, went thru 3-4 mths without an owner in-season, yet owned RNH + Marty. Under the previous owners, the team almost lost MiLR RNH to free agency due to inactivity... yet another case to bar non-hockey ppl or ones with limited hockey knowledge from such a deep league. A new owner is in place for the 2012-13 season.

2. :CLS: Columbus Blue Jackets
Blue Jackets had 1 owner but they appeared to be absent most of the time or busy with other leagues (college hoops + football). This team has found a new active owner for the 2012-13 season.

3. :CHI-NHL: Chicago Blackhawks
Hawks burned thru 2 owners each of whom kind of managed half a season but were not involved in trades nor the FA market. a case of non-hockey ppl owning a team. They did manage to trade away the likes of Hossa, P.Kane + Lecavalier in return for Korpikoski, Grabner, J.Campbell, N.Thompson, Little, B.Boyle before abandoning the team.

4. :STL-NHL: St.Louis Blues
This team went almost 3 months without an owner to start the season after the previous one abandoned the league for his preferred sport, basketball. Jonathan took over before the mid-point of the season but sat tight with a somewhat depleted roster appearing to wait for the 2012 Free Agent period to begin. Hovering at 42m in team salary for almost all of 2011-12, and even to this day, not sure which way the team's headed but i know the owner's a shrewd dealer and the team would be competitive if they chose to be active.

5. :VAN: Vancouver Canucks
Corey's a super active profsl admin + mgr, commish of 12 leagues, chat room guy, but losing MiLR player Cody Hodgson and not resigning pending FA's means they are destined to finish at the bottom of the pack again despite having some great players on their roster and a bunch of goalies.


Other teams in the Top 10...
6. :COL-NHL: - mostly invisible after the season started after signing a ton of prospects to their MLR during the off-season. CapnCally appears to be turning things around in COL.
7. :ANA: - prior to RSnakeR, they had been left unattended for a couple of month by NickF. cloud91 is leading the way and has been busy during the off-season.
8. :MON-NHL: - prior to Tarheels55, this team was relatively inactive due to a high team salary and a decent roster. BeanTown is now on board and looking to turn things around and rebuild this team.
9. :DET-NHL: - had/has somewhat active managers who didn't/don't work the system to benefit their team.
10. :CAR-NHL: - lost 2 MiLR players that had surpassed the 40-games played limit.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 04:05:16 PM by Corey »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21703
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2012, 01:44:56 PM »
 
Quote
but sat tight

So.... I guess Trading Evander Kane was pretty boring eh?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2012, 01:53:12 PM »

So.... I guess Trading Evander Kane was pretty boring eh?

who'd you get for Evander (btw - NYR then let him slip into free agency)...

i wouldn't say boring. i'd say disappointing to see a team with a close to 30m in cap space not make many moves. it's not personal... i prefer teams that make it more challenging for me to play against them. BTW, do i have ur fantrax id right and is that log-in timestamp correct?
« Last Edit: September 04, 2012, 01:56:18 PM by PigsRule »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #3 on: September 04, 2012, 02:10:52 PM »
in the defense of Jonathan, a glut of money in FNHL doesnt really do you any good during our FA unless you are willing to over spend for any average to star players.   I still have lots of money but similar to Brian Burke I refuse to pay the crazy amounts to players.

Had I known , what I know now , I wouldnt have let some of the players I let go to FA , go to FA.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline Jonathan

  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 21703
  • Bonus inPoints: 103
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :CAR-NHL:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2012, 03:19:26 PM »
who'd you get for Evander (btw - NYR then let him slip into free agency)...

i wouldn't say boring. i'd say disappointing to see a team with a close to 30m in cap space not make many moves. it's not personal... i prefer teams that make it more challenging for me to play against them. BTW, do i have ur fantrax id right and is that log-in timestamp correct?
Do you really think I just let guys like Backes and Pietrangelo walk? That was a result of a dead owner, for multiple years as far as I can see. That is the only way you get FA money here, be dead for a long time. You can't make trades with no assets. I wasnt moving landy or schwartz or coyle and never will. I got something for Kane, but I honestly thought he was not that great, or worth the money. I got some future RW and Turris back. Rangers had intended on keeping him, hence why they gave up guys, guess he forgot. I got a bunch of offers for bad contracts and me giving up prospects, but there is no need for a team that has no chance to win now.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline cheesesteak

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 1760
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2012, 04:34:37 PM »
What's the purpose of calling out 1/3 of the league and pointing out their weaknesses when most of these owners aren't even here any more?
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

BeanTown

  • Guest
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2012, 05:01:58 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
  • Founder
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2012, 05:59:33 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere

I agree.  This is one of the few leagues like this at ProFSL.  However, pointing out these franchises' issues with activity can lead to a focus on redemption.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Corey

  • Guest
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2012, 07:27:40 PM »
Seriously seems like every topic starts off to show up other teams then everyone (choice few) banter back and forth in this league, never seen anything like it.

Many people blame high turnover on rules, buttttttt........

Anyway just my 2 pennies, I'm in a lot I leagues and this is the only one that has this type of atmosphere

Totally agree. Because I chose not sign FA because there was noone there to over spend means Im a bad owner.

And with topic, the topic about trade offers, we wonder why there is high turnover.

Look no further than this thread.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jackdaniels

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 2384
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • just hand me the bottle!
    • :NE:
    • :Blank:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :BostonCollege:
    • :NYRB:
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 Least Involved Teams in 2011-12
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2012, 11:53:13 PM »
I thought it was an interesting post to read. Is it a coincidence most of those teams finished at the bottom of the league.

The Jersey team I took over this Summer will be making a push for the postseason if there's an NHL season. Glad we're already ranked number one on someone's list. :rofl:

One thing's for sure, Corey being the commissioner of 12 leagues is insane.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
:win: 2016-17 FRANCHISE NHL Champion :BOS-NHL:
:win: 2013-14 FRANCHISE NHL Champion :BOS-NHL:

 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: Think MLB LIVE hoop style only not quite as deep scoring in basketball.
    Yesterday at 11:51:08 PM
  • Daddy: We are trying something thats never been done to our knowledge.
    Yesterday at 11:53:06 PM
  • Brent: I like it.
    Yesterday at 11:54:07 PM
  • Daddy: No other basketball league in the world has a Vegas NBA team. Till tonight.
    Yesterday at 11:54:13 PM
  • Daddy: I thought you might. :)
    Yesterday at 11:54:45 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah got to figure a solid name out for it
    Yesterday at 11:55:35 PM
  • Daddy: Had a few good suggestions. Just dont be corny.. this represents all of us.
    Yesterday at 11:57:03 PM
  • Daddy: We are the first to give Vegas a suggestion. Lets let it be a good one. Make them take notice.
    Yesterday at 11:57:48 PM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah will research it a bit
    Yesterday at 11:57:58 PM
  • Daddy: One of the NHL signup sheets has 68k views? Thats ridiculous. Where all these people at? We should have 20k leagues.
    Today at 12:00:38 AM
  • Rhino7: I used to use Las Vegas Vipers as a team name
    Today at 12:04:13 AM
  • Daddy: NHL & NCAA have 100k views on the bullpen. Nobody ever looked at that thing. There should be a few more new accounts no? I mean what they looking for. Its a sign up sheet.
    Today at 12:04:17 AM
  • Daddy: Vipers works for me if it does you. Kinda goes with the logo i gave them.
    Today at 12:05:04 AM
  • STLBlues91: Yeah writing down the names sent out and adding a few I find/think of like Las Vegas Legacy and then will narrow them down
    Today at 12:06:47 AM
  • RyanJames5: Can I take the Sonics?
    Today at 12:07:14 AM
  • Brent: Vipers is cool.
    Today at 12:08:08 AM
  • Daddy: Yes sir
    Today at 12:08:19 AM
  • Daddy: I will tentatively put the Vipers until we launch fantrax
    Today at 12:08:59 AM
  • RyanJames5: Very fun idea to expand.
    Today at 12:09:36 AM
  • Daddy: Indeed sir, indeed. What College RJ?
    Today at 12:10:11 AM
  • RyanJames5: Gonzaga
    Today at 12:13:00 AM
  • Daddy: Roger that Zags
    Today at 12:14:13 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: im excited for this a properly run nba dynasty from scratch
    Today at 12:15:51 AM
  • RyanJames5: Thank you sir
    Today at 12:15:59 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: this is my first LIVE that i sstarted from beginning and didnt take over
    Today at 12:16:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: NHL and NBA excited to start those from scratch
    Today at 12:16:59 AM
  • Daddy: All the leagues are well run, we just have different ideas.
    Today at 12:17:35 AM
  • Daddy: There is nothing like virgin teams that nobody else has been into. You get to inherit todays rosters. Then take them into the future.
    Today at 12:18:36 AM
  • Daddy: Usually taking over a team is inheriting someones mess which is why it was open. In startup leagues that isnt an issue.
    Today at 12:19:25 AM
  • Daddy: I forgot to text Brian. :doh:
    Today at 12:21:02 AM
  • Daddy: NBA LIVE Pre-Reserve sign up sheet [link] updated!
    Today at 02:31:32 AM
  • Daddy: I grew up watching The Rainman & The Glove. Welcome back to the NBA Seattle Supersonics. Ive missed ya.
    Today at 12:37:30 PM
  • OUDAN: Frick em, They are much better off in OKC
    Today at 12:54:01 PM
  • Daddy: Thats cold :rofl:
    Today at 01:03:25 PM
  • Daddy: I should have known you jumped off the Lakers and on to the home state squad. We havent talked basketball much here like the old days.
    Today at 01:08:21 PM
  • Daddy: When Philly drafted Embiid that year we had LOR (Lord of the Rings) and we talked much hoops.
    Today at 01:10:18 PM
  • OUDAN: I refused before because of KD but this squad you cant help but love the way they play
    Today at 01:17:16 PM
  • OUDAN: Also I swear I enjoy fantasy basketball more than any other.
    Today at 01:20:09 PM
  • Daddy: Well you are Oklahoma Dan. Makes sense for you to love OKC & OU. Fricking Boomer Sooner!!!
    Today at 01:35:12 PM
  • OUDAN: Truth
    Today at 02:00:20 PM
  • Daddy: You are also top 5 in my All Time Greatest Fantasy GM ranking. We go back 14 years. If there is a Mount Rushmore for dynasty GMs. You Qualify.
    Today at 02:05:44 PM
  • Daddy: Thats also Truth. Ive seen them all.
    Today at 02:06:08 PM
  • OUDAN: Appreciate that man, Crazy how long some of us have been around here.
    Today at 02:15:49 PM
  • OUDAN: Crazy how long some of us have been on here
    Today at 02:15:58 PM
  • Daddy: I was hooked right away. Day 1 Scouting Department Baseball Milwaukee Brewers. Its like i was bit by a Vampire.
    Today at 02:26:34 PM
  • OUDAN: I miss when I cared enough about baseball to put the time in lol
    Today at 02:29:23 PM
  • Daddy: Fourteen years of learning. Ive seen leagues and sites fail and shutdown. Ive watched all the sites. All the leagues. People love to play for a buck.
    Today at 02:33:42 PM
  • OUDAN: I for sure prefer money leagues but yeah a lot have failed
    Today at 02:36:12 PM
  • Daddy: Nobody offered what i wanted. Just parts of it. Nobody did it completely right. They copied flawed concepts and theyve failed. 95% of all dynasty leagues fail.
    Today at 02:36:15 PM
  • Rhino7: OUDAN if you want OKC let me know, I’ll take a diff team. I’d like to compete against you more
    Today at 03:12:12 PM