Author Topic: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies  (Read 5587 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #20 on: September 04, 2012, 11:37:55 AM »
Maybe reduce it to 1 starting goalie, ...


the 1 active goalie option appears to be a leading candidate for rule revision in 2013-14.

gocubsgo7, can you clarify / give an example of what you mean when you say a
Quote
... and then a 50% reduction in salary on your backup goalie?

...not sure i follow. thx!
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #21 on: September 04, 2012, 12:02:48 PM »
My formal proposal.

Effective immediately - 1 active goalie on the roster. 
Reason- We are a league that pride ourselves on mimicking the NHL, what NHL team has two goalies in net at the same time.  NHL teams have to choose every night who they play is it Quick or Bernier.

disagree with any effective immediately rules. even though the goalie situation is not favorable - the league can be played as is short-term. the goalie situation was the result of the rules in place BUT also the lack of quality team owners (ones who cared not to trade away their starting goalie for a bag o'pucks, then ditch their team after a few months).

on that note, as you know snugerud... FNHL recruiting is more selective this season and i hope it will continue to be moving forward to ensure knowledgeable owners and ones with sufficient time to play fantasy hky commit to the league.


Quote
Starting in 2013-2014 - Before free agency all teams have a one time option of dropping a goalie with no cap hit.  This gives teams that have grossly salary inflated goalies on their roster a chance to drop them without receiving a penalty, this counteracts the drop in goalie value.  Those teams would have a chance to re-sign them in FA at a lower cost and more in line with the future goalie values.

i'd love to hear more ppl comment on this goalie amnesty option. it's got legs!  :toast:
also, we have time to flesh this idea out to determine if we move fwd, the exact mechanics of how to implement from start to finish. remember, we cannot devalue goalies overnight otherwise the time and effort invested by those who have cared to do so isn't swept aside and forgotten. we need to try to find a good balance of change vs stability... easier said then done.  :toth:



Quote
Alternate option: Teams all have the opportunity to extend their goaltenders with the new contract set to take effect immediately regardless of the number of years left on the contract.  It's basically a goalie reset without really removing anyone from teams rosters.  I am not as big on this option since it gives teams that bid ridiculous contracts on goalie to have their cake and eat it too. By making them drop them and bid on a open market seems to be the more fair root to everyone since the high priced goalies were acquired on the open market in the first place. 

personally not a fan of this either. but still good to get new ideas flowing.  :toast:


Quote
Also starting in 2013 season a 10% reduction in goalie stats , with successive 10% reductions in the following 3 years.
Reason: This will bring the leagues top goalie points in line with the leagues top skaters points.  No one can tell me that Fleury is more important than Crosby or Malkin to his team, to mimic the NHL we need to bring goalie points to a more realistic value.

agreed.

i personally believe a revision to goalie scoring needs to happen to get them more in line with overall league scoring system. you can play with 4 starting goalies and 0 Centers + 0 LW and still make the post-season because points are so heavily weighted on goalie stats scoring.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #22 on: September 05, 2012, 12:25:24 PM »
If you want to limit starting goalies to one, its understandable, because that is league like.  2 goalies was implemented so teams could start the two goalies they had without having to find out the starter from the real nhl team every single night.  It didn't work.

But to cap the amount that can be spent on goalies is foolish.  If you want to create a maleficence in the market, that is exactly what you will do.

 If two teams bid at the same dollar cap, who wins?  Am I to believe that some arbitrator can possibly be unbiased and make an honest decision?  Outrageous!  Am I instead to think that the winner will be determined by some calculations of standings or points or etc?  How insane!  It changes the league completely.  Instead of teams trying to win they will be trying to position themselves for players.  Yuck.

Please leave caps of contracts, and all these multiple-calculation objectives out.  It makes this league less fun and more work. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #23 on: September 05, 2012, 12:32:59 PM »
As I said about re-drafting before, how gross.

It rips apart what teams have done and is force by the administration.  People should be able to maybe enter into the re-draft system or not.  Because I am not going to take my chances I get a Tukka Rask back.  Who would get to go first and who last?  That cannot be decided fairly. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #24 on: September 05, 2012, 12:59:13 PM »
Also note, bringing it down to one starter really puts the screws to contracts like Ben Bishop, Craig Anderson, etc.  That is why these rule changes really need to be done now and stay that way, for a while.  This league has been a stream of rule changes. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #25 on: September 07, 2012, 11:16:28 AM »
If you want to limit starting goalies to one, its understandable, because that is league like.  2 goalies was implemented so teams could start the two goalies they had without having to find out the starter from the real nhl team every single night.  It didn't work.

I see this as an advanced league and having to find out who the starting goalie is not that big of deal.  http://www.leftwinglock.com/starting-goalies/  if you have a starting goalie, most nights your going to role with them, backups are a little more work.

Quote

    Also starting in 2013 season a 10% reduction in goalie stats , with successive 10% reductions in the following 3 years.
    Reason: This will bring the leagues top goalie points in line with the leagues top skaters points.  No one can tell me that Fleury is more important than Crosby or Malkin to his team, to mimic the NHL we need to bring goalie points to a more realistic value.


agreed.

i personally believe a revision to goalie scoring needs to happen to get them more in line with overall league scoring system. you can play with 4 starting goalies and 0 Centers + 0 LW and still make the post-season because points are so heavily weighted on goalie stats scoring.

Here is an alternate idea. Since we are already devaluing goalies by the 1 starter why not instead of continuing to devalue goalies and further hurting the teams that have them ,  we increase the value of skater (D's and F's) to close some of the gap on the goalies.  Instead of hurting the teams with goalies , it would help the teams with none to be more competitive.  It would also bring the value up on D to bring them more inline with their contracts which is already being discussed as well so you are killing 2 birds with 1 stone. 

I am proposing a initial 25% increase to all skater stats and the addition of a blocked shots stat counted at the same value as hits.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2012, 11:19:55 AM by snugerud »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #26 on: September 07, 2012, 12:27:59 PM »
Also note, bringing it down to one starter really puts the screws to contracts like Ben Bishop, Craig Anderson, etc.  That is why these rule changes really need to be done now and stay that way, for a while.  This league has been a stream of rule changes. 

i know you hate to see others touch your original vision of the league... but let me say i'm here this yr to clarify rules that are unclear, seriously lacking or harmful the the league's ability to survive.

examples of needed rule changes... see COMMISSIONER'S CORNER but here's a taste:

1. Goalie setup + scoring: didn't factor in hoarding, mis-management
2. Cap league with no penalty for below or over cap after 2 full seasons
3. Unclear contract terms that cause confusion for 3 ex-commissioners (hf6k, gilly, sizzrat) + 1 roving commish (drew) ... includes 1yr contracts, variable contracts, extensions on 1yr deals, etc.

* leaving these issues unaddressed hurts/has hurt the league.
* addressing them is like teething, it's a beach but you're better for it afterwards.

and no, not everything can be handled like a band-aid... we have to respect those who've put in 2 full seasons as well as juggle needs of new active owners.

see it as "glass half-full" chris... not the other way. :thumbsup:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline PigsRule

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 7161
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #27 on: September 07, 2012, 12:44:24 PM »
I see this as an advanced league and having to find out who the starting goalie is not that big of deal.  http://www.leftwinglock.com/starting-goalies/  if you have a starting goalie, most nights your going to role with them, backups are a little more work.

haha, good stuff. i use http://www.dailyfaceoff.com/starting-goalies/
much more relevant in smaller leagues that start 2 goalies with daily line-ups like my CHL 42 team tiered league.



Here is an alternate idea. Since we are already devaluing goalies by the 1 starter why not instead of continuing to devalue goalies and further hurting the teams that have them ,  we increase the value of skater (D's and F's) to close some of the gap on the goalies.  Instead of hurting the teams with goalies , it would help the teams with none to be more competitive.  It would also bring the value up on D to bring them more inline with their contracts which is already being discussed as well so you are killing 2 birds with 1 stone. 

I am proposing a initial 25% increase to all skater stats and the addition of a blocked shots stat counted at the same value as hits.

if i'm not mistaken, that's the other side of the same coin. same idea just change the skaters instead of the goalies. it's good food for thought for sure.

i personlly love using blocked shots, makes the defensive defensemen + 2-way fwds/plumbers more relevant in scoring.

of course from an administrative perspective the considerations are:
a) changing a set of scoring values (looks like it's gotta be done either way)
b) scoring impacts contract values too, now we're touching 3 positions vs 1 ... and contracts are already a can o' worms.
c) by touching skaters, we might now cause another negative impacts downstream that haven't been anticipated (butterfly effect).

on the positive side, it means less revisions to goalies as ppl may not want too many changes to goalie setup + scoring.


great to get new ideas to tackle this matter. thx snug!
let's see more input on this idea from snug!
:toast:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Florida Panthers ... link to team page

2023-24 FRANCHISE NHL PAYOUT TO CHAMPION ... :money: $530.00USD :money:
ONLY THE BEST OWNERS WANTED


Offline snugerud

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 4392
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
  • I am the ghost of fantasy hockey past
    • :NE:
    • :TOR-NBA:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #28 on: September 07, 2012, 01:25:20 PM »
just a side, you can alter values of scoring in Fantrax and run tests to see how they turn out which will help reduce some of this butterfly effect.

It is same coin different side but with a big difference. Not everyone in the league has a starting goalie so by reducing the goalie stats you are only affecting those with a starting goalie and in a negative way.

By up ticking the skaters this will affect everyone's team typically in a positive way, some more than others but in probably a less dramatic sense. 

I am just kicking around ideas out loud.  Anybody can feel free to jump in
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Bro-Lo El Cunado

Offline PsychoticPondGoons

  • League Moderator
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 10292
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :BAL-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :NYY:
    • View Profile
Re: PROPOSED: 5 Rule Revision for Goalies
« Reply #29 on: September 07, 2012, 04:37:25 PM »
Bro weren't you the original commissioner. When was this league weekly line-ups. So what is it weekly or daily line-ups.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
PPG's Theme Song EC Lucky X - Welcome Spring2020
PPG's Chill Vibes Thrift Shop - Macklemore & Ryan Lewis
Live to brawl. - J.Yablonski
"I don't like to hurt people. Sometimes I just can't help it." - George Steinbrenner :NYY:


23-24 FNHL Champion TBD will win the  $530.00 PAYOUT!


Best Fantasy Hockey League (25$ returning team fee 2024-25):
FNHL TEAMS FOR SALE!
:Commish: *** :CAR-NHL: HURRICANES :CAR-NHL: *** :Commish:


 


* FNHL Chat

Sorry, this shoutbox does not exist.

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • BayAreaBallers: been focused on LIVE
    May 09, 2024, 06:07:40 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the night for trade talks in any league
    May 09, 2024, 07:19:35 PM
  • Brent: CCD is very active on the Discord Channel.
    May 09, 2024, 07:55:50 PM
  • Braves155: Evening gents
    May 09, 2024, 07:57:35 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: evening
    May 09, 2024, 08:03:53 PM
  • Braves155: Will be on for a portion of the evening
    May 09, 2024, 08:10:39 PM
  • Braves155: Been starting to get into these older games that originally ran off DOSBOX for those who know what I'm talking about. The idea is you build your team with a salary of XXX and then every 2-3 seasons you have decisions to make. Field a 26 man roster, control your own pitching rotation, pen, lineup & bench like the true MLB. Draft every season where there's a lot of turnover. Interesting for sure.
    May 09, 2024, 08:15:28 PM
  • Braves155: PM Jwalk (Jets)
    May 09, 2024, 08:30:58 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: idsjayhawk replied
    May 09, 2024, 08:34:31 PM
  • Braves155: PM Professor Dan
    May 09, 2024, 09:19:27 PM
  • Daddy: Let that Man go on vacation. :rofl:
    May 09, 2024, 09:27:13 PM
  • Daddy: He had earned this getaway. His computer has earned it.
    May 09, 2024, 09:28:07 PM
  • Braves155: NEVER!!
    May 09, 2024, 09:28:29 PM
  • Braves155: You mean 'getaway' from 100 prospect posts/week from our Brian?
    May 09, 2024, 09:29:17 PM
  • Braves155: Any LIVE deal talks? Hmu
    May 09, 2024, 09:38:00 PM
  • Daddy: He ain't the only one brotha :)
    May 09, 2024, 09:40:48 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: dbreer deserves at least a hanfulof beers and margs
    May 09, 2024, 09:45:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: we put him through the ringer w the activity
    May 09, 2024, 09:45:54 PM
  • Rhino7: CCD has had a lot of trades lately
    May 09, 2024, 09:54:49 PM
  • Daddy: That's awesome!
    May 09, 2024, 10:06:13 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I've returned to fgm
    Yesterday at 01:44:16 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: Took over the team available
    Yesterday at 01:44:26 AM
  • Daddy: Congratulations @BAB. FGM is well managed.
    Yesterday at 02:28:01 AM
  • BayAreaBallers: Yes I'm aware I had too much going on when I left after 2022 season. I'm back now for my second stint
    Yesterday at 02:50:11 AM
  • ldsjayhawk: Excited to have you
    Yesterday at 01:00:06 PM
  • indiansnation: Poor washington
    Yesterday at 03:04:48 PM
  • indiansnation: NFL Report: Commanders' rookie QB Jayden Daniels may soon be banned from the NFL Jayden Daniels, the 2nd overall pick in the 2024 Draft, has made a huge mistake that could get him banned from the NFL even before making his debut with the Washington Commanders.  NFL News: Commanders' president unveils team's plans for name change NFL News: Magic Johnson makes his first big decision as co-owner of the Commanders Updated on May 10, 2024 10:51AM EDT  Jayden Daniels was selected by the Washington Commanders in the 2024 NFL Draft ? Julio Aguilar/Getty ImagesJayden Daniels was selected by the Washington Commanders in the 2024 NFL Draft By Fernando Franco Puga  The Washington Commanders have received some very bad news. Jayden Daniels, who they picked with the 2nd overall pick in the 2024 Draft, may soon be banned from the NFL after violating a very important rule.   In the 2024 NFL Draft, several teams were in need of a top quarterback to bolster their offenses. With the 2nd overall pick, the Commanders decided to select Jayden Daniels, one of the best prospects at the position.  Daniels had a remarkable path through LSU, even breaking some of Joe Burrow’s records. However, the quarterback’s career is now in jeopardy after he admitted to breaking the league’s rules regarding gambling.   Jayden Daniels openly admits to violating the NFL’s gambling policy Worrying news has arrived in Washington today. Jayden Daniels, their 1st-round pick this year, has openly admitted to violating the NFL’s gambling policy, and his rookie season is in jeopardy.  NFL Draft: Jayden Daniels admits whether he'd like to play for the Washington Commanders SEE ALSO  NFL Draft: Jayden Daniels admits whether he'd like to play for the Washington Commanders  During a recent appearance on the “All Facts, No Brakes” podcast, Daniels revealed that he has a bet with Malik Nabers, the New York Giants‘ 6th overall pick, on who’s going to be this year’s NFL Offensive rookie.   “Man, he wasn’t supposed to tell nobody,” Daniels said about Nabers revealing the bet. “We got a little something going on. I mean, he put it out there, so it’s like I can’t say he cap.”  Keyshawn Johnson, host of the podcast, asked Daniels about the bet. The quarterback admitted that the wager for $10,000 is real, but he was clearly uncomfortable with the question.    Jayden Daniels Jayden Daniels with LSU “Going against him is gonna be fun,” Nabers said, via the New York Daily News. “We got a bet going for Rookie of the Year. Whoever loses gotta pay, I think it’s $10,000 cash.”  Nabers and Daniels were teammates at LSU. They are set to meet in at least two games in the upcoming season. However, this gamble could get them both banned from the NFL, as they are clearly violating the league’s gambling policy.  What does the NFL gambling policy says about betting? This situation will pose a huge challenge for the Commanders and the Giants. The league strictly prohibits players from engaging in any form of gambling related to the NFL, as it undermines the integrity of the game.  SEE ALSO  2024 NFL Draft picks by team: How many picks does each team have?  The policy explicitly prohibits ‘private wagers between teammates, family and friends, or others.’ This situation could land the two rookies in trouble, potentially resulting in a ban for the former LSU players.  SURVEY Should Jayden Daniels and Malik Nabers be banned over their bet?  Yes No ALREADY VOTED 1162 PEOPLE  Fernando Franco Puga Fernando Franco is an accomplished writer and sports journalist specializing in soccer, NFL, MLB, and MMA. Since joining Bolavip US in 2022, he has significantly broadened his sports journalism repertoire, offering deep insights and coverage. Fernando's writing career began in 2013, and over the years, he has made notable contributions to leading sports media outlets, including Sopitas.com, Diario AS USA, and Goal. His articles are well-regarded for their depth and analytical approach. Fernando earned his degree in Communication from the prestigious Autonomous National University of Mexico (UNAM), equipping him with a robust foundation in media studies.  JAYDEN DANIELS NEW YORK GIANTS NFL DRAFT WASHINGTON COMMANDERS Check our latest news in Google News  FOLLOW US WHATSAPP ALSO READ SOCCER Report: Mexican star player is out of 2024 Copa America SOCCER MLS: Inter Miami coach explains if Angel Di Maria will play with Lionel Messi NFL Tom Brady reached out to Gisele Bundchen after his controversial roast NBA NBA News: Patrick Beverley gets big suspension EDITIONS:|ARGENTINA|BRASIL|CHILE|COLOMBIA|GLOBAL|M?XICO|US ENGLISH ABOUT US|STAFF|CONTACTO|Escribe en Bolavip|RedGol|Futbolcentroamerica Terms & ConditionsPrivacy policiesEditorial PolicyAd Choices A product from Futbol Sites. All rights reserved.
    Yesterday at 03:04:57 PM
  • Daddy: Brian. Please have the nearest person kick you in the nuts. Send me your medical bill. I will pay that.
    Yesterday at 04:26:11 PM
  • Mt_Crushmore: I'll pitch in to cover. Smh
    Yesterday at 04:40:11 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Wtf brian
    Yesterday at 04:44:57 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, that was a wall of WTF.
    Yesterday at 05:16:07 PM
  • indiansnation: Iknow what im doing  wilson didnt do crap for me. Was not going to resogn him
    Yesterday at 05:53:04 PM
  • indiansnation: Ill sign smith or love in free agency.
    Yesterday at 05:56:01 PM
  • indiansnation: Hell i can get both if i want
    Yesterday at 05:56:20 PM
  • indiansnation: I will have 141m in cap space.
    Yesterday at 05:58:10 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: I think thwy are talking about the chat post about jayden daniels brian. Not your trade
    Yesterday at 06:00:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *they
    Yesterday at 06:00:57 PM
  • Daddy: The World is a better place with you in it Brian. For sure. You are one of a kind sir. You know how i feel about ya.
    Yesterday at 06:09:45 PM
  • Daddy: If your post takes up the entire chat box, do not press send. We good. Post the link instead. ;)
    Yesterday at 06:11:08 PM
  • Daddy: You trading Russ after pooping on him for two years is no shocking development. You trading anyone other than the Wife shocks no one sir.
    Yesterday at 06:14:07 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: LOL!!
    Yesterday at 06:18:07 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: Fricking hell JW that was savage
    Yesterday at 06:18:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: On mother days weekend too
    Yesterday at 06:18:54 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: FGM owners SD will look to make moves here very shortly as soon as I get time to get a better understanding of the team
    Yesterday at 06:19:59 PM
  • STLBlues91: im around the rest of the day for any talks
    Yesterday at 06:52:33 PM
  • Daddy: How does a Man go on vacation for a week yet manage to trade for Russ?  Im not so sure someone didn't miss med call this morning.
    Yesterday at 07:09:56 PM
  • indiansnation: Jim w pm
    Yesterday at 10:21:14 PM
  • indiansnation: Jimw pm again
    Yesterday at 10:41:28 PM
  • indiansnation: Thanks for quick response brent
    Yesterday at 11:57:14 PM
  • Brent: Replied
    Today at 12:09:28 AM