1
Dynasty NHL / Re: Extension cost discussion
« Last post by ldsjayhawk on Today at 12:17:11 PM »Wow! This discussion has really morphed. I'll add my $.02 in to the discussion:
$25K per point extension:
Personally, I like the ease of this calculation and I believe that it is pretty close to an accurate calculation. I support keeping this.
Reduced contract length:
I have no objection to this. I always like to see a healthy FA market.
Cash trading cap
I support a limit that prevents this too:
Disparity
I don't like tanking. I support requiring teams field an active roster.
Trading
I do have to say that increasing the options in FA, does decrease the amount of trading, however, that could be offset by having more NHL players on rosters. I believe more parity would increase the trade market as more teams would be competitive and in the running.
I believe increasing
$25K per point extension:
Personally, I like the ease of this calculation and I believe that it is pretty close to an accurate calculation. I support keeping this.
Reduced contract length:
I have no objection to this. I always like to see a healthy FA market.
Cash trading cap
I support a limit that prevents this too:
Quote
but I like the idea of forcing these rebuild trades around the league instead of just one or two front runners hosing down the entire roster.
Disparity
I don't like tanking. I support requiring teams field an active roster.
Quote
I would pair this proposal with an initiative that all teams field an active roster of 90% regular NHL players.
Trading
I do have to say that increasing the options in FA, does decrease the amount of trading, however, that could be offset by having more NHL players on rosters. I believe more parity would increase the trade market as more teams would be competitive and in the running.
I believe increasing