No, you're right. I screwed up.
No worries, I was more concerned for future bids.
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe he has to sign with a team before he is able to be signed
It's highly irregular and dumb to allow teams to bid on players they've bought out.
Just playing within the rules fellas. Personally, I voted against allowing present owners being allowed to buyout. I haven't seen anything thus far restricting owners bidding on players they had bought out.
Does the free agency process stay the same once the season starts? Still have to post bid or does it become a free for all of sorts based on waiver wire order?
Thanks,
Frank-brewers
I think it's clear that the Twins have every intention of making a mockery of the competitiveness of his team. I think that's a serious problem really.
Maturity not your strong suit I see.
How about a rule that requires you to call up players that have a certain number of major league at-bats or innings pitched? This would help keep the stockpiling of talent in the minor leagues to a minimum.
I like the idea, but that opens up the question of how to handle veterans that are signed to minor league deals and when veterans on bad contracts take up a 40-man spot that an owner rightfully would not want there. The rule would have to be hammered out obviously.
I'd much rather play with people that like to have fun than arrogant pricks like you. Do we need to implement some rules to prevent people from holding guys in the minors? Maybe. It seems like a personal preference thing to me. Calling me out specifically for the way I run my team (and my methods are completely within the rules) shows your inability to make sound judgment in dealing with people/problems. There's a reason 95+% of the people here dislike you. Run your team and I'll run mine. If you think there should should be certain rules in place, you suggest them. You don't post on the public threads that someone is making a mockery of their team. I believe I'm giving myself the best chance to string together multiple championships with this strategy. It's odd that I had signed a couple retired guys several days ago, but you didn't call me out on it until I started bumping some of your guys in FA.
Are y'all really arguing about who is doing a better job of tanking? Both of your teams are bad on purpose. It's currently within the rules, and a good strategy in real life, though I wonder about in a fantasy league. These attacks need to end now.
im with chris on this one. where is the spirit of the rule? we can't expect these guys to draft a 5,000 page document to avoid every little angle or loophole. just my opinion.
anyway, I have a question re FA contracts: i thought "PC+$50k" contracts were only for prospects. maybe i am mistaken here, but want to be sure any new bids i put in are correct, since i see some vets being opened up with "PC+$50k". thanks.
also, are we still on a "6 leading bid" max?
thanks,
frank-mil