Author Topic: Proposed trade rule changes.  (Read 514 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fitzy1962

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4355
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Proposed trade rule changes.
« on: October 06, 2015, 03:31:15 AM »
Hello All,

I think it's about time this league lives up to it's billing of emulating Major League Baseball.

Year after year, other team's trades get veto'd and $hit on, while the self-appointed trade police pass each other's trades with flying colors...not a coincidence at all.

They all vote to allow their own trades and $hit all over everyone else's deals. Let's not even go into the most farcical trade ever allowed in any league, in which entire teams, minor league rosters, international monies, millions of cap-dollars and entire rosters and all draft-picks of every team in the trade, were exchanged, Somehow, it was allowed to happen.

And those same people $hit all over eeeeeeevery little detail of everyone else's trades, which have been posted by anyone else, ever since then. What an insult that it's allowed to happen year after year.

Ever since "YahooLando" left, the league has turned into an aristocracy. The rich get richer and everyone else is only here to fill in the league roster. Very few people want to wait years to develop a team they way they want to and without trades, all there is is the draft and free agency, which is limited to a few quality players before the season and not much else once the season begins.

No coincidence that most of the new team managers added each year after veteran owners leave, are rookies on the website. Better that they don't understand what should and should not be allowed.

It's a joke. "Yahoo" designed an awesome format, but since he's left, it's been run downhill ever since, by a small group of people who decide all the trades to their own satisfaction and not those trying to improve their teams in their own way.

Year after year, it gets worse and worse, outright and blatant manipulation, changing the scoring and the rules and dumping on other's trades, to fit personal agendas.

There are plenty of good and honest people who still play in this league, and a bunch of others who have come and gone. But there is a certain "click" in this league, who stick together and approve all their own trades and veto everyone else's, backed up by their own factual opinion.

In a league this big, there shouldn't be a small group who have so much influence on other people's teams. And every year it get's worse. Maybe no one else has the balls to say it, but I do. 

Let people manage their own teams as they wish. There are very few trades which, if allowed, would alter the "integrity of the league" or upset the balance of it.

Any veto must provide a detailed, factually based basis for that veto.  Reasons for a veto would include but are not limited to factors such as statistical comparison, contract status, age, injury history, talent level, organizational makeup, past trade history, and/or collusion.

There are too many allowable objections to trades. All of those items listed are open to personal interpretation. Major League teams make trades all the time which are not, on the surface, "equal" in all of those categories listed above. 

Billy Beane has had a very successful career out of making such trades and by using his own personal evaluation methods based on his own thinking, outside of the box, with what the rest of the league would do.

Trades cannot truly be evaluated until years later and everyone has their own opinion, but it is only an opinion. I understand that voting on a posted trade is necessary, but being so hyper critical is not.

What should "organizational make-up" have to do with anything regarding a trade?How is anyone supposed to change their organizational make-up. if all trades must be composed of players with "equal statistics, age, and contract status"? How are the teams with less volume of talent supposed to improve their teams otherwise?

By drafting rookies and waiting years for them to develop? Not many people want to wait years to have even a chance of competing to win in a fantasy sports league. Especially considering that so many teams in this league are in such bad shape  talent-wise and with a limited budget, and are then vacated, partially because they know  most of their trades will be disallowed, after they have been dissected by the league "experts".   

"Any new owner that has a trade vetoed within the first 30 days of ownership will be required to post players on the trade block for a period of 48 hours before any trade can be posted."?

And what is the value in this rule, other than to allow the habitual "veto'ers" to pick  over another team's trade pieces in advance, so they can then prepare an argument for why the next trade should be disallowed?

Sounds more like a self-fulfilling prophecy than anything legitimate for league purposes.

These trade rules only benefit the "haves" and only serve as a detriment to the "have not's".


 



 

« Last Edit: October 06, 2015, 12:46:34 PM by Fitzy1962 »
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Brent: Nope, 32-team contract league.
    Yesterday at 12:49:09 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: I don't have Holiday.  Just used him as an example since he was the #1 prospect
    Yesterday at 12:56:05 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: @Alpha I do make trades.  I am just not giving up the entire farm to land a guy I can get out of the FA pool
    Yesterday at 12:59:21 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: Trading should be a win-win situation for both teams.
    Yesterday at 01:00:32 PM
  • dbreer23: Agreed. I think the Devers deal in FGM is a good example of that. Devers gives SD some now (and future) pop, giving up substantial pieces to get him (Mayo, Keith, and one other).
    Yesterday at 01:03:48 PM
  • Brent: I had Holliday in FGM before I stepped away.
    Yesterday at 01:24:07 PM
  • Brent: I am glad I cut back on leagues, I was spread too thin.
    Yesterday at 01:24:25 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: @idsjayhawk i understand that. To be clear, i wasnt judging anyone. I just know in NFL Live, you cant just draft 1-7 rds every year and sign a few FAs and be the champion. It wont happen
    Yesterday at 01:52:08 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Trading isnt easy. But neither is winning
    Yesterday at 01:52:22 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: If you made a list of the most aggressive gms to have stepped foot in nfl live, you will notice the champions will be among them
    Yesterday at 01:53:06 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You arent gonna win every trade and you HAVE to have a plan. Ive made some horrible trades. I have every year
    Yesterday at 01:53:50 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Carolina has kyren williams right now cause i traded him for a 2nd and a 4th. Id rather have kyren today lol
    Yesterday at 01:54:28 PM
  • Brent: Agreed.  I have Amon Ra St. Brown and Aiyuk because I traded JJ.  I couldn't have acquired a player like ASB where I was picking in the 1st so I down tiered at WR to make a trio of Chase, ASB and Aiyuk instead of JJ, Chase and fill in the blank.
    Yesterday at 02:09:02 PM
  • ldsjayhawk: That is probably even more true in baseball since your drafts don't payoff for 5 years or so.  And I will admit my conservatism may be the reason I only have one championship here at ProFSL
    Yesterday at 02:10:04 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: jwalkerjr88 is right
    Yesterday at 02:25:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: on that u havat trade a bit here and there
    Yesterday at 02:25:57 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: although my last draft class and fa class kinda lead me to a run so it can happen
    Yesterday at 02:27:21 PM
  • Brent: Yeah, it does help to have a big draft class and available cap.
    Yesterday at 02:36:56 PM
  • Brent: I'm contemplating doing a complete tear down in NFL Live and rebuild.  Honestly, I probably should have postered for it to be this season.  I still might, but I would legit need to go into the draft with 3-4 top 10 picks/+ many others.
    Yesterday at 02:38:21 PM
  • Brent: postured
    Yesterday at 02:38:35 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Yea nailing drafts and some key FAs helps too. But if you remember BAB you traded alvin kamara for the rams 1-7 draft picks. So the extra picks helped you nail the 2023 draft the way you did
    Yesterday at 03:13:02 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: Its the combination of all three that is required is what im saying
    Yesterday at 03:13:31 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: And brent a tear down with you assets would look interesting. Personally i just think you need break one big asset down into 3 good ones and move carr and go from there. But you have an A1 nfl mind so im sure you will nail whatever it is you decide
    Yesterday at 03:14:39 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: *your
    Yesterday at 03:14:50 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: very good pt yes i did gain lot of capital which propelled me to make more moves from that trade
    Yesterday at 03:34:25 PM
  • Brent: Thank you.  Yes, I agree.  I do need to break one asset down to 3.  I did that with JJ, went from S tier to 2 A tiers.  Now I need to potentially go from an A tier to 3 Bs or something like that.  I've had some inquiries on Carr, but nothing worth moving him.
    Yesterday at 03:48:17 PM
  • Alpha5: Guarantee I know who he traded Kamara to for 1-7 without even looking
    Yesterday at 05:22:42 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: alpha it was a good trade at the time
    Yesterday at 05:29:49 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: my team was in the Crapter at that pt
    Yesterday at 05:29:58 PM
  • Brent: Who did you draft with the 1st acquired in that trade?
    Yesterday at 05:36:34 PM
  • Daddy: Whoever it was, he got six more choices on top of that. The "win win" scenario.
    Yesterday at 05:53:04 PM
  • Daddy: At that time i had no RB1. So i traded an entire draft class to get one.
    Yesterday at 05:54:10 PM
  • Daddy: SF doubled up his pick haul and went to work, using them in trades & draft return.
    Yesterday at 05:54:46 PM
  • Daddy: Then beat me in the NFC Title game.
    Yesterday at 05:55:32 PM
  • Daddy: RB is a hard position to nail down. If someone wants to trade me 1-7 for Kamara. Step right up.
    Yesterday at 06:02:30 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I gotta see what I did
    Yesterday at 06:05:04 PM
  • Daddy: You got better
    Yesterday at 06:13:59 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i did so many moves trades and draft that i honestly dunno
    Yesterday at 06:18:48 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: This is the way
    Yesterday at 06:21:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: I could teach how I did what I did
    Yesterday at 07:33:36 PM
  • STLBlues91: ill be around for a few hours today. Wont be around tomorrow until late
    Yesterday at 07:37:07 PM
  • TheGOAT: Thank God that there are 3 really good qb options in the draft. Can't imagine a world with Bo Nix as my frachise qb
    Yesterday at 08:12:51 PM
  • TheGOAT: Not that hes bad
    Yesterday at 08:13:06 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: think rn my qb room is minshew dobbs wentz
    Yesterday at 08:22:37 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: We look forward to your return to the playoffs @Thegoat
    Yesterday at 08:22:51 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: You and your brother camw in guns blazing a few years back. The NFC is not the gauntlet the AFC is. Once you make the title game, all bets are off
    Yesterday at 08:23:33 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: nfc is still tough
    Yesterday at 08:25:23 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: i had a tough road
    Yesterday at 08:25:37 PM
  • BayAreaBallers: to get to teh ship lot of good teams i knocked out
    Yesterday at 08:25:50 PM
  • Brent: Carr is OTB for those who don't want a rookie.
    Today at 08:17:12 AM