New rule idea for 2016

[chrisetc21]

I see, my mistake then.

[fperric]

The issue is not whether or not a team is rebuilding.  The issue is also not "simple math."   The question is fielding a team with no one in a lineup while having major league available players on your bench, which completely undermines the "simple math" argument.  This combined with only a 23 or 24 game regular season basically decides division races by June or July.  Make no mistake, I am not advocating for anyone to not be able to "run their teams as they see fit."  Simply looking for legitimate competition for the teams vying for playoff spots.  i.e The integrity of the league.

thanks,
  frank-brewers

[indiansnation]

I agree. I guess the issue is to me weather a owner is trying to rebuild a team or are they tanking I guess is the issue we need to look at. Iundesstand if u want to rebuild that's fine go for. But how long does it take to rebuild a team? I'll use me as example say I'm rebuilding my giants. I'll give my team 1 to 3 yes to rebuild it. But after say third year I'm still not puting a team together then something should've done.  I think that's what I'm concerned with. Again I'll use me as example. I'm rebuilding and I have example 200m dollor payroll and I'm only spending say 26m of it and their are u 70 fa out there this is the problem I fuss what I'm saying. If its a 40  man roster and u only have 24. Or 25 spots being field then I dont think that's right year after to MRI fell owner is tanking it and not trying to build a team