Author Topic: 5 Year Contracts  (Read 1294 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline seanrmgallagher

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1693
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :PHI-NFL:
    • :PHI-NBA:
    • :PHI-NHL:
    • :Pennsylvania:
    • View Profile
Re: 5 Year Contracts
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2014, 02:25:41 PM »
30 seems too limiting (Pujols was 31 and got a ten year deal), but there should be a limit. I like the idea of lowering the limit as age gets older. I think 33 for 5, 34 for 4, etc. It may also be too complicated, but maybe there should also be an exception. If an older player signs a longer deal in real life than would be allowed, I think that length should be allowed. (i.e. 36 year old Beltran signing a 3 year deal).

That being said, I think there needs to be a limit. Someone going for a championship should not be able to sign Jeter to a 5 year contract just to have him for one year. Mariano Rivera should not be signed to a 2 year deal when he has announced his retirement at the end of the season (which happened last year, and then the owner left before this season).
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Lindner

  • Guest
Re: 5 Year Contracts
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2014, 04:53:01 PM »
I think the biggest thing we are concerned about here is new owners getting screwed over by the previous owner of their team.  I wouldn't argue that restricting Free Agency is the best way to address this issue though.  Sometimes GMs make calculated sacrifices to win a championship.  I don't think it would be a travesty to sign someone you know is only going to play for one more year to a two year contract if you think it's going to put you over the edge.  That's a calculated sacrifice, just like trading future draft picks.  If the GM is going to stick around and live with their decision, I have no issue with letting them make "unwise" signings if they think it's best for their team.

I think the best way prevent new owners from inheriting terrible contracts is to put in place a buyout system for new owners.  If you're a new owner, you can cut any contract with any one of these characteristics for free:

33+ years old with 4+ years left on his contract
34+ years old with 3+ years left on his contract
38+ years old with 2+ years left on his contract
All retired players
All players playing in other leagues
$25M/year or more (at any contract length)


You guys can decide what the best specifications would be regarding years and contract lengths.  I think this would be the best way to deal with this potential issue without restricting the creative options of our current GMs.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline firemanx

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 1109
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIA-NBA:
    • :FLO:
    • :MiamiFL:
    • View Profile
Re: 5 Year Contracts
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2014, 01:08:19 PM »
I think it's position  dependent if your offering a 39 year old catcher or pitcher a 5 yr deal its risky, but a 1b is less risky it's a very gray area to put limits I think we should let the market dictate
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

fperric

  • Guest
Re: 5 Year Contracts
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2014, 02:45:33 PM »
im fine either way, but maybe a simple solution would b to make all contracts honored through thier duration.  i.e. if jeter had gotten a 3yr deal from someone and retired after one year, owner still has to pay for all three years on their cap instead of the contract ending at his retirement.  just a thought, but like i said, i understand both sides and would b fine either way.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline firemanx

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 1109
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :MIA-NBA:
    • :FLO:
    • :MiamiFL:
    • View Profile
Re: 5 Year Contracts
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2014, 03:14:07 PM »
I can definitely understand the reason behind age limits on 5 year contracts & I think we should institute an age limit on 5 year contracts isn't that why we only allow 5 year bids I mean of course everyone likes to sign players as cheap as possible,but if we end up with 1 team full of retired players will ruin the competitiveness of the league I vote yes on the age tag(stipulation  IMO Good idea commish :winner: :judge:
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

mrmetsman

  • Guest
Re: 5 Year Contracts
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2014, 05:32:13 PM »
I agree on Lindner on this one.
Some kind of buyout system could work.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Fitzy1962

  • MVP
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4355
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :DAL:
    • :BOS-NBA:
    • :BOS-NHL:
    • :Texas:
    • View Profile
Re: 5 Year Contracts
« Reply #16 on: March 07, 2014, 06:13:09 PM »
I feel all retired players should be released and their contracts voided. Why should we have to continue paying if the MLB teams don't do this? Ryan Dempster isn't getting paid this year by the Red Sox, for example.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

ThePetis

  • Guest
Re: 5 Year Contracts
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2014, 06:54:55 PM »
I feel all retired players should be released and their contracts voided. Why should we have to continue paying if the MLB teams don't do this? Ryan Dempster isn't getting paid this year by the Red Sox, for example.

An example of why that idea doesn't work across the board.... Hiroki Kuroda or Tim Hudson.  These guys have two years left, max.  Kuroda was signed to a 4-year deal in free agency, I believe.  Knowing he'll retire shortly, but spreading his contract across 4-5 years?  That would be gaming the system.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Braves155: Replied
    Yesterday at 01:07:51 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Yesterday at 02:11:57 PM
  • Jwalkerjr88: 2024 NFL Live Draft Player Pool [link]
    Yesterday at 02:12:31 PM
  • Daddy: If it doesn't include the UDFAs its not completed.
    Yesterday at 02:18:07 PM
  • Daddy: Of course it does include them so we good :)
    Yesterday at 02:36:30 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft 8/1/24 8PM EST you dont want to have your dog eat your computer that day Gents!
    Yesterday at 02:37:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    Yesterday at 03:29:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball FRENZY never stops
    Yesterday at 04:28:04 PM
  • Daddy: Weve processed more baseball transactions in one month than i ever remember in any league but NFL LIVE. This is in all my years.
    Yesterday at 04:28:45 PM
  • Daddy: And.. thats the goal. If everyone is active and everyone is competitive that has always been the goal.
    Yesterday at 04:29:55 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks
    Yesterday at 11:01:43 PM
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    Yesterday at 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Today at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Today at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Today at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Today at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Today at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Today at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Today at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Today at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Today at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Today at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Today at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Today at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Today at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Today at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Today at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Today at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Today at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Today at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Today at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Today at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Today at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Today at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Today at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Today at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Today at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Today at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Today at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Today at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Today at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Today at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Today at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Today at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Today at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Today at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Today at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Today at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Today at 06:20:28 PM