Rangers & Blues

[Jwalk100]

I am currently debating this issue of the Rangers. The current issue of a non-accepted trade is a bit off putting to many members as well as the inability of GMs to be able to contact Bryce which GMs have been removed before for. Also New York has failed to complete the activity check which began on June 23rd. Rangers also failed to make their picks in the draft and give me any notice or why not which again is off putting.

If he is going to be away or is spotty service, that is something that needs to be address to me so that I don't remove a GM for inactivity.

As for the trade, I think this is great for both sides, Rangers get a few more young players while St. Louis gets a solid young center with potential. If Rangers were to be removed I would consider pushing the trade through anyway.

There is no specific requirement in the rules for a trade to be accepted but in general if falls under Section 9-A where a post must be made within 4 days or else it is considered void.

Technically right now Right_Bojangled is in violation of Code of Conduct sections 3 & 6 so I will debate the issue a bit more before a final decision is made.

 

[SlackJack]

Before New York dropped out I had informed Drew behind the scenes that I was willing to amend the offer to substitute Sebastion Collberg in lieu of the 4th.
So the offer before the league now looks like this:

Mark Scheifele, $1.4m (2015-16)

FOR

Adam Lowry, $0.5m (2016-17)
Patrick Maroon, $0.9m (2015-16)
Matej Stransky, N/C (0 games)
Sebastian Collberg, N/C (0 games)

[Drew]

Before New York dropped out I had informed Drew behind the scenes that I was willing to amend the offer to substitute Sebastion Collberg in lieu of the 4th.
So the offer before the league now looks like this:

Mark Scheifele, $1.4m (2015-16)

FOR

Adam Lowry, $0.5m (2016-17)
Patrick Maroon, $0.9m (2015-16)
Matej Stransky, N/C (0 games)
Sebastian Collberg, N/C (0 games)

TC please vote on this trade. Whether it should pass as a currently league owned team I believe this is a good return for Mark. Also give your vote based on whether it should go through with no owner.

[favo_zomg]

I believe that this is a more then fair return for the Rangers, but I also believe that the new owner should have the option to keep this deal on the table or not. I say we keep the deal open and wait for a new owner to approve the deal.

[izaman3]

I believe that this is a more then fair return for the Rangers, but I also believe that the new owner should have the option to keep this deal on the table or not. I say we keep the deal open and wait for a new owner to approve the deal.

I agree with favo. I think it is a good deal for NY, but I'm unsure about making deals with league owned teams, especially since Backyard is a league that recruits new owners very easily

[Tony]

I don't like the idea of passing this deal until there is a new GM. Sorry Slackjack.

[norrya66]

I don't like the idea of passing this deal until there is a new GM. Sorry Slackjack.

I agree with everyone else.  I guess I see a lot more value in Mark then some, but regardless, I think the new owner should have say on the deal.

[Drew]

Sounds good guys. We will wait for the new owner.