3911
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: Fantrax NL rosters
« on: January 31, 2012, 10:45:35 PM »
btw, if you guys would like help entering rosters, I'd be willing to pitch in.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 3911
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: Fantrax NL rosters« on: January 31, 2012, 10:45:35 PM »
btw, if you guys would like help entering rosters, I'd be willing to pitch in.
3912
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: Fantrax NL rosters« on: January 31, 2012, 07:07:58 PM »
I haven't been either. Could it just be that those of us with AL teams haven't been set up yet?
3913
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: Marlins/Rockies trade« on: January 30, 2012, 06:11:57 PM »3914
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: Rockies/Marlins trade« on: January 30, 2012, 06:10:27 PM »3915
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Re: New Rockies GM« on: January 29, 2012, 01:49:52 AM »
Welcome!
3916
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: History & Statistics / Re: 2011 Amateur Draft (8/21/11)« on: January 28, 2012, 12:43:08 AM »
The Royals select
10 306 Murray, Matthew RHP 13/06/2011 Georgia Southern 3917
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Archives / Trade Blocks« on: January 26, 2012, 09:54:16 AM »
I am wondering if it would be possible to create one of these green posts at the top for trade blocks. It is helpful to have them all in one place. Just a thought.
3918
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: History & Statistics / Re: 2011 Amateur Draft (8/21/11)« on: January 26, 2012, 03:52:04 AM »
The Royals select:
18 554 O'Brien, Christopher C 21/06/2011 Wichita State 3919
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: History & Statistics / Re: 2011 Amateur Draft (8/21/11)« on: January 24, 2012, 12:33:10 PM »
The Royals select:
13 400 Hinson, John SS 14/06/2011 Clemson 3920
Armchair Fantasy Baseball: Completed Transactions / Re: Mets/Twins Trade« on: January 23, 2012, 05:51:07 PM »
At first, I was not going to vote for this trade, however after further consideration, I believe it is close enough that it does not qualify for a veto under Kenny's stipulations. Purke has considerable risk with injuries and if Plouffe could hit with alittle bit higher average he might justify the at bats the Mets are looking for.
I am not necessarily a fan of the trade, but I don't believe it meets the criteria, therefore, I approve. |
|