0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Being fairly new still, I don't even know who makes up the current trade committee. I don't know the reasoning behind why we would need to make the changes. I DO think, in a league this size, there should be a group of people in charge. 7 seems like a good number. I for sure will not vote on a 1 "commissioner rule all" but I would mind a little more clarity as to why the current 7 could/should be replaced.
Like ldsjayhawk said, we used to have a guy who?s constant biased vetos sorta was the reason we had to create a TC. I?m actually ok with commish having approval power but in that case there should be some sort of mechanism that if someone within the league objects then the trade is then put up to vote with a requiring approval %and min number of votes to pass. Or maybe then a TC is called upon and PMs are sent out for all to vote on that specific questionable trade. In any event, I think it?s more about getting everybody on the same page as far as how we want it to be done
I like this idea about a hybrid. Maybe something like trades are approved by the commissioners office but ANYONE can object within 24 or 48 hours, at which point it goes to a 5 person trade committee that must vote yes or no, and it takes 3 yes votes to pass.