Author Topic: Dodgers are Available  (Read 8198 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #30 on: May 03, 2013, 08:52:19 PM »
I think this comes down to joeshmoe and BHows.  People always lose in these application processes, and Rick lost unfairly the last time the Dodgers were open which is why a formal process was put into place.  I think we owe this to Rick because of what happened.  Ironic that the same team is open for him.  There is another strong opening for joeshmoe with the Nationals, and he would be the best candidate for that internal transfer.  This would leave the Padres, a franchise which needs TLC and patience, to one of the aspiring outsiders.  Those who have served their time, or been screwed, get the ability to take solid franchises such as :LAD: and :WAS:.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #31 on: May 03, 2013, 08:59:51 PM »
I think this comes down to joeshmoe and BHows.  People always lose in these application processes, and Rick lost unfairly the last time the Dodgers were open which is why a formal process was put into place.  I think we owe this to Rick because of what happened.  Ironic that the same team is open for him.  There is another strong opening for joeshmoe with the Nationals, and he would be the best candidate for that internal transfer.  This would leave the Padres, a franchise which needs TLC and patience, to one of the aspiring outsiders.  Those who have served their time, or been screwed, get the ability to take solid franchises such as :LAD: and :WAS:.

I don't want any team...I waited for the teams I would like to run.  I was wronged way before Rick when I was skipped for the Yankees.  If we're correcting wrongs it's my team before Ricks.  If we're going by sticking it out, I didn't drop the league because I didn't get the team I wanted (NYY) I stayed, isn't that to be rewarded?  I didn't quit and expect a cushioned spot when I decided I was ready.  And if both franchises are both so solid rick should have no issue representing WAS. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #32 on: May 03, 2013, 09:04:11 PM »
I think this comes down to joeshmoe and BHows.  People always lose in these application processes, and Rick lost unfairly the last time the Dodgers were open which is why a formal process was put into place.  I think we owe this to Rick because of what happened.  Ironic that the same team is open for him.  There is another strong opening for joeshmoe with the Nationals, and he would be the best candidate for that internal transfer.  This would leave the Padres, a franchise which needs TLC and patience, to one of the aspiring outsiders.  Those who have served their time, or been screwed, get the ability to take solid franchises such as :LAD: and :WAS:.

I think being allowed back into a league that he quit, jumping over the rest of the waiting list, and getting any team left open is a good start.  And again, no Washington will not fix me being wronged and robbed.  And this is the second time, NYY now LAD.  And, nobody has said one word about how this isn't even open to Rick until its passed through internal transfers.  Any word about this at all?  Can we count on this league upholding its rules or is there disregard for this completely?  Which rules count and when let me know in advanced.  This way I wont waste three years waiting for a transfer to believe the rules would be followed only to find out favorites would be played.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline rcankosy

  • All-Star
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 2465
  • Bonus inPoints: 0
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • :Blank:
    • View Profile
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #33 on: May 03, 2013, 09:54:28 PM »
I am carefully weighing all the factors here, but I believe that a commissioner's "executive order" falls short of an official rule, especially when considering that it was not passed by the Rules Committee at the time.

funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Colby

  • MLFB Founder
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 28820
  • Bonus inPoints: 27
    • :PIT-NFL:
    • :Blank:
    • :PIT-NHL:
    • :PennState:
    • :UnitedStates:
    • View Profile
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #34 on: May 03, 2013, 09:58:12 PM »
I'll respect any decision that Roy makes.  It is a subjective matter and I gave my opinion.  Note that I didn't even mention the qualified applicants including the likes of Eric and MTK.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Learn about :Commish: inPoints and the Invitationals.

Corey

  • Guest
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #35 on: May 03, 2013, 10:01:11 PM »
3 times is correct, and not hogwash. Give me a day since I am at a fundraiser and I will provide the dates of your inactivity for over 30 days on all 3 occasions. You also have behavioral warnings for rude conduct on many occasions toward members of this site. This conduct was done on the boards and via pm. So once again Jeff and Rick have proved a track record of good behavior.

Jeff took a bad team and made them winners.  You took a bad team and havent improved. So jeff would be more qualified.

Once again either way I support Rick to be the next gm. No doubt about it.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Corey

  • Guest
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #36 on: May 03, 2013, 10:02:50 PM »
Oh and dont waste 3 years waiting for a transfer. Use the 3 years to make a winning team.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #37 on: May 03, 2013, 10:10:13 PM »
3 times is correct, and not hogwash. Give me a day since I am at a fundraiser and I will provide the dates of your inactivity for over 30 days on all 3 occasions. You also have behavioral warnings for rude conduct on many occasions toward members of this site. This conduct was done on the boards and via pm. So once again Jeff and Rick have proved a track record of good behavior.

Jeff took a bad team and made them winners.  You took a bad team and havent improved. So jeff would be more qualified.

Once again either way I support Rick to be the next gm. No doubt about it.

1) Take your day

2)  Red sox have 2x the payroll...apples and oranges.

3)  Behavior is irrelevant here.  Rick quit a league because he lost out on a team.  Not stellar behavior.  It's rose colored glasses for everything you say Corey because we haven't gotten along over many occasions.  I don't think rehashing it on here is appropriate. 
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #38 on: May 03, 2013, 10:11:37 PM »
Oh and dont waste 3 years waiting for a transfer. Use the 3 years to make a winning team.

childish...protected with all his comments because of his position on the site...and he's not playing favorites...
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

joeshmoe

  • Guest
Re: Dodgers are Available
« Reply #39 on: May 03, 2013, 10:13:35 PM »
I am carefully weighing all the factors here, but I believe that a commissioner's "executive order" falls short of an official rule, especially when considering that it was not passed by the Rules Committee at the time.

What did make it a rule was the consistent use of it as a meter for transfers since.
funny
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Forum Search


Quick Profile

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Chat Room

Refresh History
  • Daddy: If it doesn't include the UDFAs its not completed.
    Yesterday at 02:18:07 PM
  • Daddy: Of course it does include them so we good :)
    Yesterday at 02:36:30 PM
  • Daddy: NFL LIVE Draft 8/1/24 8PM EST you dont want to have your dog eat your computer that day Gents!
    Yesterday at 02:37:42 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any trade talks
    Yesterday at 03:29:00 PM
  • Daddy: Baseball FRENZY never stops
    Yesterday at 04:28:04 PM
  • Daddy: Weve processed more baseball transactions in one month than i ever remember in any league but NFL LIVE. This is in all my years.
    Yesterday at 04:28:45 PM
  • Daddy: And.. thats the goal. If everyone is active and everyone is competitive that has always been the goal.
    Yesterday at 04:29:55 PM
  • Braves155: I'm around for talks
    Yesterday at 11:01:43 PM
  • dbreer23: bigfry pm
    Yesterday at 11:33:46 PM
  • DaveW: braves155 PM
    Today at 08:55:17 AM
  • Braves155: Responded Dave
    Today at 09:18:16 AM
  • Braves155: I'm around for any trade talks. MLB/NFL
    Today at 10:26:07 AM
  • Braves155: PM MtCrushmore
    Today at 10:36:45 AM
  • Braves155: PM Alpha5
    Today at 11:15:16 AM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 pm
    Today at 11:36:03 AM
  • indiansnation: Indians in mlb live looking to make a trade or 2
    Today at 11:47:48 AM
  • indiansnation: Willing to listen to offers on turang 2bb
    Today at 11:48:33 AM
  • Braves155: INdinsnation...I'm looking for another deal or 2 s well in MLB LIVE
    Today at 12:29:05 PM
  • Daddy: Yall gonna be in trouble when the new NCAA football (EA Sports) drops next month on the PS5. That is the GOAT franchise.
    Today at 12:50:37 PM
  • Braves155: Also - NFL LIVE...LFG! Looking to make a move or 2 as well guys!
    Today at 12:51:37 PM
  • indiansnation: Davew pm
    Today at 01:28:18 PM
  • indiansnation: Braves155 send u trade offer u never got back to me
    Today at 01:29:02 PM
  • IndianaBuc: Braves155 PM
    Today at 01:44:32 PM
  • Braves155: Replied IndianaBuc. Indiansnation...will look thru my PMs
    Today at 02:23:52 PM
  • DaveW: back to you Brian
    Today at 02:28:48 PM
  • Braves155: Back Brian
    Today at 02:30:33 PM
  • Daddy: If i have 10 top level AA prospects each in the top 10 of the franchise vs one middle of the road pitcher like Cal Quantrill (or pick a guy) which one of those two packages are more valuable?
    Today at 02:39:26 PM
  • Daddy: If you think its the AA guys send me a pm.
    Today at 02:40:07 PM
  • Daddy: Also... Ive got a nice private island full of beautiful women to sell you. Pay me upfront and i will send you its coordinates. We call it the Virgin Daddy Islands. $5k reserves it for your future.
    Today at 02:41:59 PM
  • dbreer23: Take two to tango, though. Most owners with adequate or surplus SP aren't interested in prospects as they're trying to win now.
    Today at 02:42:54 PM
  • Daddy: Agreed. But most does not equal all.
    Today at 02:45:09 PM
  • Braves155: My issue in LIVE currently is having Strider/Alcantara/Giolito all on the long shelf, so I am more retooling than rebuilding
    Today at 02:46:48 PM
  • Daddy: Also agreed. Top quality pitching probably means not much depth. A few injuries can challenge you. Pitching other than top end pitching has been devalued in fantasy. Everyone wants the stud.
    Today at 02:49:24 PM
  • Braves155: But I myself could use some time on a nudie island with some hot women
    Today at 02:49:45 PM
  • Daddy: I here to tell you that ALL major league pitching is good pitching. A great hitter beats a terrible pitcher just 3 out of 10 times. Which means the worst pitchers > the greatest hitters.
    Today at 02:50:33 PM
  • STLBlues91: Ill be around the rest of the day for any talks
    Today at 03:25:59 PM
  • Brent: Greg Maddux had the best outlook.  He viewed himself as tye dealer/house and you had to beat him.  Just like in the casino, the house nearly always wins.
    Today at 04:33:51 PM
  • Brent: He had that view b/c of his father who was a blackjack dealer in Vegas.
    Today at 04:35:28 PM
  • Daddy: Yes @Brent!! That is it exactly. Pitching is the house & it always wins in the end.
    Today at 05:15:18 PM
  • Daddy: There shouldn't be many innings available in FA in dynasty fantasy leagues IMO. Thats guaranteed money! To hell with High A ball.
    Today at 05:21:23 PM
  • Daddy: Until someone starts a minor league baseball fantasy game or option. Maybe we can petition fantrax? I just dont think they will care for that.
    Today at 05:23:07 PM
  • Daddy: Neither should we (so much). Every league i see is MLB.
    Today at 05:24:17 PM
  • Daddy: Stcesorp meht kcuf
    Today at 05:26:02 PM
  • Daddy: Stcepsorp*
    Today at 05:26:33 PM
  • Braves155: The problem with the minors is not the system as a whole, it is some Farm Systems are more 'elite' at being able to produce talent than others. If you look across MLB teams you can pretty easily tell the great systems from the weaker systems and talent development
    Today at 05:57:14 PM
  • Braves155: With regard to pitching in the Minors...there is  method to the madness. It is all about what you make of it tho. I agree that it can seem certain type arms in the minors are a dime a dozen
    Today at 06:02:39 PM
  • Daddy: Mr Braves you are my guy. There isnt anything wrong with minor league studs or flops. I get it in REAL baseball.
    Today at 06:20:28 PM
  • Daddy: This is fantasy baseball. We dont generate revenue selling prospects and merchandising. Our top farms dont get a write up in Sports Illustrated.
    Today at 06:22:29 PM
  • Daddy: Load up on MLB guys, then near MLB guys, and only then is the quality of your prospects matter. Ya dig ;)
    Today at 06:24:36 PM
  • Brent: I over value minors to a fault, but I am softening on that stance.
    Today at 06:45:54 PM