I have no problem with a manager running a 2nd team. In fact Ripper should be applauded for a pro- active approach.
I agree - proactive it good in such as large league.
however we currently have no guidelines in place for a league owner to assume management of another team.
also, as owners have commented in the past one person's vision might not be another's.
Well this league needs a lot of work and it starts with the GM's in this league. There are a few active ones but some serious dead weight kicking around. There are way to many orphaned teams as well. This needs to change ASAP.
If any GM has an issue with me trying to help a 2nd team speak up.
Let's get these teams filled or contract.
Ripper
per note above, if we went with allowing owners to help manage a 2nd team other than their primary ... we'd have to vote to allow that ... since that what ppl expect.
at the same time we need a set of guidelines (ie. a traded player from a secondary team cannot find it's way to the owner's primary team without appearing on the roster of X number of teams prior / perhaps can never be traded to the owner's primary team, etc.).
let's hear it... if you guys want to allow an owner to manage a 2nd team, voice you opinion PRO / CON, and why!